Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2015, Article ID 319204, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/319204
Research Article

Reference Ranges of Amniotic Fluid Index in Late Third Trimester of Pregnancy: What Should the Optimal Interval between Two Ultrasound Examinations Be?

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576 104, India

Received 31 July 2014; Revised 18 November 2014; Accepted 20 November 2014

Academic Editor: Sinuhe Hahn

Copyright © 2015 Shripad Hebbar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Yeo, M. G. Ross, and A. M. Vintzileos, “Antepartum and intra-partum surveillance of the fetus and the amniotic fluid,” in Clinical Obstetrics: The Fetus & Mother, pp. 586–606, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Liston, D. Sawchuck, and D. Young, “Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 29, supplement 4, no. 9, pp. S3–S56, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. A. Baschat, R. M. Viscardi, B. Hussey-Gardner, N. Hashmi, and C. Harman, “Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. G. Heller, B. Misselwitz, and S. Schmidt, “Early neonatal mortality, asphyxia related deaths, and timing of low risk births in Hesse, Germany, 1990–8: observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7256, pp. 274–275, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. A. Manning, “Antepartum fetal testing: a critical appraisal,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 348–352, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. P. Nash, “Amniotic fluid index,” Neonatal Network, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. E. A. Dubil, “Amniotic fluid as a vital sign for fetal wellbeing,” AJUM, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 62–70, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. F. Nabhan and Y. A. Abdelmoula, “Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 3, Article ID CD006593, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. J. P. Phelan, M. O. Ahn, C. V. Smith, S. E. Rutherford, and E. Anderson, “Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 601–604, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. H. Beall, J. P. H. M. van den Wijngaard, M. J. C. van Gemert, and M. G. Ross, “Amniotic fluid water dynamics,” Placenta, vol. 28, no. 8-9, pp. 816–823, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. J. P. Phelan, C. V. Smith, P. Broussard, and M. Small, “Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36–42 weeks' gestation,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 540–542, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Iqbal and A. Noreen, “Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancies at term,” Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 270–271, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. G. Voxman, S. Tran, and D. A. Wing, “Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome,” Journal of Perinatology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 282–285, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. G. Lalor, B. Fawole, Z. Alfirevic, and D. Devane, “Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD000038, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. C. Signore, R. K. Freeman, and C. Y. Spong, “Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development wrkshop,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 687–701, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. S. S. Khadilkar, S. S. Desai, S. M. Tayade, and C. N. Purandare, “Amniotic fluid index in normal pregnancy: an assessment of gestation specific reference values among Indian women,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 136–141, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
  18. R. A. Brace and E. J. Wolf, “Normal amniotic fluid volume changes throughout pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 382–388, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. R. Moore and J. E. Cayle, “The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1168–1173, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. F. Magann, A. T. Sandlin, and S. T. Ounpraseuth, “Amniotic fluid and the clinical relevance of the sonographically estimated amniotic fluid volume: oligohydramnios,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1573–1585, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. M. Lee, S. K. Park, S. S. Shim, J. K. Jun, J. S. Park, and H. C. Syn, “Measurement of fetal urine production by three-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. N. D. Hinh and J. L. Ladinsky, “Amniotic fluid index measurements in normal pregnancy after 28 gestational weeks,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 132–136, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. M. R. MacHado, J. G. Cecatti, F. Krupa, and A. Faundes, “Curve of amniotic fluid index measurements in low-risk pregnancy,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. S. Birang, “Ultrasonographic assessment of normal amniotic fluid index in a group of Iranian women,” Iranian Journal of Radiology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Singh, T. Tayal, R. Gupta, A. P. Sharma, D. Khurana, and A. Kaul, “Amniotic fluid index in healthy pregnancy in an Indian population,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 176–177, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow, Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
  27. J. T. E. Richardson, “Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research,” Educational Research Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus