Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2016, Article ID 3658527, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3658527
Clinical Study

The Regional Centralization of Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and Its Impact on Neonatal Acidemia and the Cesarean Birth Rate

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Perinatal Medicine, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan

Received 21 December 2015; Revised 17 March 2016; Accepted 22 May 2016

Academic Editor: E. R. Lumbers

Copyright © 2016 Kaori Michikata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Alfirevic, D. Devane, and G. M. L. Gyte, “Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 5, Article ID CD006066, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. National Institue of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop, “Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 1385–1390, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. A. Macones, G. D. V. Hankins, C. Y. Spong, J. Hauth, and T. Moore, “The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 661–666, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. C. Blackwell, W. A. Grobman, L. Antoniewicz, M. Hutchinson, and C. G. Bannerman, “Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 378.e1–378.e5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. T. Parer and T. Ikeda, “A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 26.e1–26.e6, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. T. Parer, “Standardization of fetal heart rate pattern management: is international consensus possible?” Hypertension Research in Pregnancy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51–58, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. L. Clark, M. P. Nageotte, T. J. Garite et al., “Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Pehrson, J. L. Sorensen, and I. Amer-Wahlin, “Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 926–935, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Young, R. Hamilton, S. Hodgett et al., “Reducing risk by improving standards of intrapartum fetal care,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 226–231, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Katsuragi, T. Ikeda, S. Noda, J. Onishi, T. Ikenoue, and J. T. Parer, “Immediate newborn outcome and mode of delivery: use of standardized fetal heart rate pattern management,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Devane and J. G. Lalor, “A randomised-controlled trial evaluating a fetal monitoring education programme,” Midwifery, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 296–307, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Sameshima, T. Ikenoue, T. Ikeda, M. Kamitomo, and S. Ibara, “Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 118–123, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. W. Kubli, E. H. Hon, A. F. Khazin, and H. Takemura, “Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1190–1206, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. H. Paul, A. K. Suidan, S.-Y. Yeh, B. S. Schifrin, and E. H. Hon, “Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 206–210, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Sameshima and T. Ikenoue, “Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. L. Anderson, M. W. Scerbo, L. A. Belfore, and A. Z. Abuhamad, “Time and number of displays impact critical signal detection in fetal heart rate tracings,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 435–441, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus