Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2017, Article ID 8529816, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8529816
Research Article

Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Labor: A Comparison of Three Methods

1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
3OBMedical, Jonesville, FL, USA
4Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women & Babies, Orlando, FL, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Tammy Y. Euliano; ude.lfu@onailuet

Received 27 July 2016; Revised 8 February 2017; Accepted 12 February 2017; Published 14 March 2017

Academic Editor: Fabio Facchinetti

Copyright © 2017 Tammy Y. Euliano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. M. Harper, A. L. Shanks, M. G. Tuuli, K. A. Roehl, and A. G. Cahill, “The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 38.e1–38.e6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. F. Siddiqi and P. M. Taylor, “Necrotizing fasciitis of the scalp: a complication of fetal monitoring,” American Journal of Diseases of Children, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 226–228, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Spernol, “Severe infantile bleeding from a vasa praevia during application of a fetal electrode following spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes,” Zeitschrift Fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie, vol. 185, no. 6, p. 364, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  4. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, “Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 25, pp. 159–167, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. C. A. M. Bakker, G. J. Colenbrander, A. A. Verstraeten, and H. P. Van Geijn, “The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Reinhard, B. R. Hayes-Gill, S. Schiermeier et al., “Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 286, no. 5, pp. 1103–1107, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Ray, A. Hildreth, and U. I. Esen, “Morbid obesity and intra-partum care,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 301–304, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Y. Euliano, M. T. Nguyen, S. Darmanjian et al., “Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 66.e1–66.e6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Erdogmus, K. E. Hild II, Y. N. Rao, and J. C. Príncipe, “Minimax mutual information approach for independent component analysis,” Neural Computation, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1235–1252, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. T. Stampalija, M. Signaroldi, C. Mastroianni et al., “Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and doppler telemetry,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1517–1520, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Centers for Disease Control, NCHS Obesity Data, National Center for Health Statistics, 2014, http://obesity.procon.org/sourcefiles/NCHSDataOnObesity.pdf.
  12. R. Scott-Pillai, D. Spence, C. R. Cardwell, A. Hunter, and V. A. Holmes, “The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A Retrospective Study in a UK Obstetric Population, 2004–2011,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 932–939, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. F. Magann, D. A. Doherty, S. P. Chauhan, J. M. Klimpel, S. D. Huff, and J. C. Morrison, “Pregnancy, obesity, gestational weight gain, and parity as predictors of peripartum complications,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 284, no. 4, pp. 827–836, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. Kabiru and B. Denise Raynor, “Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 928–932, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Carlhäll, K. Källén, and M. Blomberg, “Maternal body mass index and duration of labor,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. I. Cedergren, “Non-elective caesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labour in relation to maternal body mass index,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 163–166, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. P. Wispelwey and E. Sheiner, “Cesarean delivery in obese women: a comprehensive review,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 547–551, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. K. Edwards, “Chorioamnionitis and labor,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 287–296, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. R. Cohen, S. Ommani, S. Hassan et al., “Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1306–1313, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. M. Graatsma, J. Miller, E. J. H. Mulder, C. Harman, A. A. Baschat, and G. H. A. Visser, “Maternal body mass index does not affect performance of fetal electrocardiography,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 573–577, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. R. Cohen and B. Hayes-Gill, “Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 590–595, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus