Review Article

Gestational Weight Gain among Healthy Pregnant Women from Asia in Comparison with Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines-2009: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Study characteristics of included .

ReferenceStudy designnAge (years)Mean GWG (kg)Quality Rating

[15]Prospective 
RCT
102Control group: 
24.28 (NR) 
Intervention group: 
24.31(NR)
Control group-12.29 
Intervention group:12.45
Fair

[16]Retrospective 
Cohort
2,72827.4 (NR)UW- 9.3, 
NW- 9.1, OW- 9.0 
OB- 8.5
4

[17]Retrospective 
Cohort
97,15731.8 (NR)UW-10.27, 
NW- 10.11, OW- 7.98 
OB- 5.5
4

[18]Retrospective 
Cross-sectional
75NR (25-Unemployed - 14.2 
Employed women- 14.3
3

[19]Retrospective 
Cohort
48,867NR (NR)UW- 15.47, 
NW- 14.51, OW- 12.95 
OB- 12.69
7

[20]Retrospective 
Cohort
33,97327.6 (NR)UW- 16.5,  
NW- 17.7, OW- 18.1 
OB- 17.3
7

[21]Prospective 
Cohort
12325.09 (N9.76

[14]Retrospective 
Cohort
4,73528.2 (19-38.5

[22]Prospective 
Cohort
200NR (NR) NR4

[23]Retrospective 
Cohort
436NR (NNR3

[24]Retrospective 
Cohort
510NR (18-44)15.8

[25]Retrospective 
Cohort
85,765NR (NR)UW- 19, 
NW- 17.2, OW- 14.4 
OB- 13.5
4

[26]Retrospective 
RCT
1,43625.8 (NR)1good

GWG: gestational weight gain, NR: not reported, NW; normal weight, OB; obese, OW: overweight, RCT: randomised control trial, UW: underweight.
All values are mean; ranges in parenthesis (unless otherwise indicated).
the participants were healthy Asian women with a singleton pregnancy.
was reported stratified by exposure or outcome.
study, vast majority of the subjects (90.7%) were between 19 and 35 years.
study, mean GWG was reported but it was not stratified by different levels of body mass index (BMI).
study, mean GWG was reported stratified by employment status of participants.