Research Article

Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening

Table 4

Differences between first trimester screening parameters according to the algorithm used with a cut-off point for a PE risk >1 : 150 (n: number of patients; CRL: crown rump length; GA: gestational age(weeks); IQR: interquartile range).

Cut-off >1 : 150
Type of algorithm(1) History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF(2) History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF+PAPP-A(3) History+MAP+UtPI+PAPP-A(4) History+MAP+UtPI value

Screen positive rate (%)86/801 (10.7)87/801 (10.9)80/801 (10)84/801 (10.5)
Age median (IQR)33 (28-36)33 (28-36)32 (27.5-36)33 (28-36)0.9
Weight median (IQR)71 (62.5-85)70 (62-85)69.1 (60.5-84)70.5 (62.25-85.5)0.96
Height median (IQR)164 (160-168)164 (160-168)165 (160-170)165 (160-170)0.86
Parity median (IQR)1 (0-2)1 (0-1)1 (0-1.5)1 (0-1)0.96
CRL(GA) median (IQR)12.71 (12.29-13)12.71 (12.29-13)12.71 (12.29-13)12.71 (12.29-13)0.96
MoM UtPI median (IQR)1.35 (1.13-1.55)1.34 (1.13-.55)1.35 (1.13-1.56)1.34 (1.12-1.52)0.97
MoM PAPP-A median (IQR)0.96 (0.68-1.35)0.98 (0.68-1.35)0.96 (0.68-1.28)0.94 (0.67-1.26)0.89
MoM PlGF median (IQR)0.93 (0.72-1.27)0.94 (0.73-1.27)0.93 (0.72-1.2)0.92 (0.71-1.2)0.92
MoM MAP median (IQR)1.16 (1.08-1.25)1.16 (1.09-1.25)1.17 (1.11-1.25)1.17 (1.11-1.25)0.89