Research Article
Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening
Table 5
Differences in the detectability of patients in the PE risk group using other algorithms compared to algorithm 1 (History+MAP+UtA-PI+PlGF).
| | Method of screening | Comparison of detection by two methods | value |
| | Preeclampsia cut-off 1 : 70 | | | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF+PAPP-A | 44vs44 | 1.00 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PAPP-A | 44vs41 | 0.25 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI | 44vs38 | 0.04 | | Preeclampsia cut-off 1 : 100 | | | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF+PAPP-A | 58vs56 | 0.48 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PAPP-A | 58vs42 | 0.0002 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI | 58vs41 | 0.0001 | | Preeclampsia cut-off 1 : 150 | | | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF+PAPP-A | 86vs83 | 0.25 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI+PAPP-A | 86vs62 | <0.0001 | | History+MAP+UtPI+PlGF vs History+MAP+UtPI | 86vs60 | <0.0001 |
|
|
