Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Parasitology Research
Volume 2011, Article ID 690863, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/690863
Research Article

Reproductive Organ of Blow Fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Ultrastructural of Testis

1Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
2College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand
3Department of Tropical Pathology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
4Department of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162 8640, Japan
5Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, TX 77845-2543, USA

Received 12 May 2011; Accepted 31 May 2011

Academic Editor: Wej Choochote

Copyright © 2011 Kabkaew L. Sukontason et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This work presents the ultrastructure of testis of the medically important blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) using light microscopy and electron microscopy. Reproductive organ of males was dissected to determine the testis in the pupal stage, 3-day-old flies and 7-day-old flies and observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). SEM displayed a smooth surface which is occasionally penetrated by tracheoles. TEM of the testis in the pupal stage presents the thick testis wall covering underdeveloped cells containing a variable size of an electron-dense globule. For the 3-day-old males, the testicular wall is formed by an external layer, a peritoneal sheath, a muscular layer, a basement membrane, and a follicular epithelium. Follicular epithelium presented developing spermatozoa. Regarding the 7-day-old males, development of spermatozoa is apparent, displaying nucleus, centriolar adjunct, axoneme, and mitochondrial derivatives, with the 9 + 9 + 2 microtubule pattern of axoneme.

1. Introduction

Chrysomya megacephala (F.) is the medically important blow fly species in many parts of the world including Thailand. Larvae of this species have been reported in association with human corpses in several case situations [1]. Not only have their specimens been used to estimate the postmortem interval (PMI) in cases [2], but also to detect organophosphate poisoning in a putrefying body through larval analysis [3]. In Thailand, C. megacephala has been the primary species of fly found at death scenes involving exposed, burned, hanging, or floating corpses, in which the types of environment were quite varied, including forested, urban, and suburban areas [1].

The biology, particularly, the reproductive morphology of blow fly has been documented as the basic research in some species. Examples of this are provided by investigation under light microscopy in Chrysomya pinguis, Chrysomya defixa [4], Calliphora pubescens, Calliphora testaceifacies [5], and Onesia accepta [6]; while scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study has been employed for researches in Lucilia cuprina [7], Cochliomyia hominivorax, and Cochliomyia macellaria [8]; most of such works have involved the taxonomic identification. Regarding applied research, the research involving bacterium, Rickettsiella in the ovary of the Oriental cockroach, Blatta orientalis [9], insect virus Hz-2V in the reproductive organs of the female corn earworm moth, Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera), and infection of the endobacterium was exemplary [10]. Concerning such published information, it is the objective of this study to investigate the reproductive system of C. megacephala, focusing on the testis, using light microscopy (LM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This information will establish baseline data on the reproductive system of this species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fly Strains

The adult male C. megacephala used in this study was obtained from a laboratory colony located at the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai (at 17–21°N, 98-99°E), Thailand. Laboratory colonies were maintained at a natural temperature of 24–28°C with a light/dark photoperiod of 12 : 12 h. Larvae were fed a fresh pork liver diet. Adults were reared on two kinds of food: (1) a mixture of 10% (w/v) sugar solution and multivitamin syrup solution and (2) fresh pork liver (used as both a food source and oviposition site).

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The ultrastructure of testis was studied using SEM. Twenty, 3–5-day-old male flies, were sacrificed by placing them in a freezer set at 4°C for 15 minutes. The dead flies were dissected in normal saline under a dissecting microscope to obtain this organ. They were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB) at pH 7.4 at 4°C for 24 hours. After primary fixation, samples were rinsed with PB two times at 15 min intervals. The rinsed samples were then placed in 1% osmium tetroxide as a post-fixative at room temperature for 2-3 hours. Subsequently, they were rinsed twice with PB and dehydrated gradually at 30 minute intervals with increasing concentrations of ethanol 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and twice with 100% ethanol, to replace water with ethanol. Following water displacement, the specimens were soaked in acetone twice for 30 minutes. Critical point drying (CPD) was performed. Specimens were then attached to aluminum stubs with double-stick tape and coated with gold (Au) in a sputter-coating apparatus before being viewed with a JEOL JSM-5910LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL: Japan).

2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Testis dissected from the pupal stage (~4-5 day-old pupa), 3-day-old males and 7-day-old males, were processed for the TEM investigation. The procedures for dissection and fixation of organs for the TEM study were the same as previously described for the SEM study. After postfixation, the testis was cut into separate units using a razorblade. Subsequently, they were dehydrated and placed in acetone for 2 hours before being transferred to a solution of resin : acetone in a ratio of of 1 : 3 for 24 hours, 1 : 1 for 24 hours and 3 : 1 for 24 hours. Each specimen was then soaked in a solution of resin only for 3 hours twice. Specimens were then embedded in Spurr’s resin by placing them into a plastic block and incubating at 70°C for 24 hours. A thick section (0.5 μm) of each organ was cut with a glass knife on an Ultramicrotome (Becthai, USA). Ultrathin sections (90 nm) were prepared from these reembedded blocks, with serial sections collected from copper slot grids. Sections were poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before examination by a Hitachi H700 transmission electron microscope (Japan) operated at 100 kV.

3. Results

The internal reproductive organs in male C. megacephala comprised of pairs of testes, vas deferens and accessory glands, one seminal vesicle, one ejaculatory duct, and one sperm pump (Figures 1 and 2(a)). The testes were oval shaped, orange-brown in color, with the terminal end connecting to the vas deferens. The vas deferens was a thin, transparent, and long simple tube that opened into the seminal vesicle which is slightly enlarged and globular. The seminal vesicle is connected with the long, thin ejaculatory duct, of which terminal end was inserted into the sperm pump, connecting to the external genitalia.

690863.fig.001
Figure 1: Whole internal reproductive tract in male C. megacephala showing paired testes (tes), paired vas deferens (vd), seminal vesicle (sv), paired accessory gland (acg), medial ejaculatory duct (ed), and sperm pump (sp).
fig2
Figure 2: SEM image of internal reproductive tract in male C. megacephala. (a) Whole tract showing testes (tes), vas deferens (vd), seminal vesicle (sv), accessory gland (acg), ejaculatory duct (ed), and sperm pump (sp). (b) Testis showing the smooth surface and is occasionally penetrated by tracheoles (tr).

Determination using light microscope revealed that the testes of C. megacephala are located in the posterior region of the abdomen and have an overall oval shape. The color of the testes of flies just after emergence is a pale orange. The color changes to become a reddish orange in 1-day-old flies. The color of the testes changes continuously from reddish orange (Figure  1(a)) to brown.

SEM micrographs of testes show a smooth surface that is occasionally penetrated by tracheoles (Figure 2(b)). Regarding TEM, micrographs of testes of pupal stage revealed the testicular wall covering underdeveloped cells containing a variable size and density of electron-dense globules (Figure 3). No apparent organelle was observed. For the 3-day-old males, the testicular wall is actually formed by an external layer, a peritoneal sheath, a muscular layer, and a basement membrane (Figure 4(a)). Rounded grains containing pigment, with varying density levels, are spread in the cytoplasm (Figure 4(a)). Observation at the follicular epithelium presented developing spermatozoa (Figure 4(b)). The first stage is the beginning of the first division of maturation, the primary spermatocyte. They are pear shaped with large nuclei. The ratio of nucleus and cytoplasm is 1 : 1, with chromatin that is dispersed inside the nucleus (Figure 4(c)). In the second division of maturation, the secondary spermatocyte is characterized by the presence of elongated clusters of chromatin in the globular-shaped cells. The primary and secondary spermatocytes can be differentiated in TEM micrographs (Figure 4(c)), where the third division of maturation is recognized by the appearance of spermatozoa with nuclei and flagellum (Figure 4(d)). Regarding the 7-day-old males, muscular layer is obvious in the testicular wall (Figure 5(a)). Development of spermatozoa inside testis is still observed (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). Figure 5(d) showed the composition of spermatozoa—nucleus, centriolar adjunct, axoneme, and mitochondrial derivatives.

690863.fig.003
Figure 3: TEM micrograph of the testis of pupa C. megacephala showing thick testis wall covering underdeveloped germ cells with variable size and density of electron-dense globules (arrows).
fig4
Figure 4: TEM micrographs of the testis of a 3-day-old C. megacephala. (a) Transverse section showing the strata forming the testicular wall formed by an external layer (el), a peritoneal sheath (ps), a muscular layer (m), and a basement membrane (bm). Rounded grains containing pigment, with varying density levels, are spread in the cytoplasm (arrows). (b) Germ cells showing group of pear-shaped cells. (c) Primary spermatocyte (spc 1) with packed electron-dense chromatin and secondary spermatocyte (spc 2) which is characterized by four groups of separated nuclei. (d) Spermatozoa with nuclei (n) and flagellum (arrow).
fig5
Figure 5: TEM micrographs of the testis of a 7-day-old C. megacephala. (a) Testicular wall displayed an external layer (el), a peritoneal sheath (ps), a muscular layer (m) with nucleus (n). Rounded grains containing pigment, with varying density levels, are spread in the cytoplasm (arrows). (b) Development of sperimatozoa inside the germ cells (asterisks). (c) Enlargement of (b) presenting group of spermatozoa. (d) Spermatozoa showing nucleus (n), centriolar adjunct (ca), axoneme (ax), and mitochondrial derivatives (m).

4. Discussion

The internal male genital organs of C. megacephala consist of the various parts commonly found in insects. The testes are located in the posterior abdomen and contain all spermatozoa stages from primary spermatocytes to spermazoa. In almost all other Diptera, the testes are enveloped by two tissue layers consisting of the outer epithelium (or tunica externa) and the inner epithelium (or tunica interna). In species where color has been observed in the testes, pigment granules are deposited in the outer epithelium contributing to the apparent visible color [11]. As in other Diptera, the TEM micrographs of the testicular wall of C. megacephala show that the outer epithelium is full of the rounded grains containing the pigment, which give the organ its characteristic color. This characteristic has also been observed in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens [12].

SEM studies of the testes of various insects have shown both similarities and differences of C. megacacephala. The morphological characters of testes in four Plecoptera species consist of a number of separate follicles, each enclosed by its epithelium and open into the vas deferens [13]. In Leuctra fusca, each of the two testes consists of 9 to 10 follicles, almost tubular in shape; Brachyptera risi, the follicles are ovoid; Taeniopteryx stankovichi, the follicles are more roundish than those B. risi; T. kuetreiberi, the two testes are united in the median proximal portion, forming a single arc sac. In this current study, SEM investigations of male C. megacephala revealed a pair of oval-shaped testes with a smooth surface that is occasionally penetrated by tracheoles.

The presence of the primary and secondary spermatocytes observed in the developing spermatozoa of 3 day-old germ cells is similar to that observed in the pupal stage of the thrips, Haplothrips simplex (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) [14]. The tail region of C. megacephala spermatozoa as determined in 7-day-old males appeared likely consisting of two mitochondrial derivatives, an axoneme and an accessory body, of which (9 outer single accessory tubule, 9 doublets and 2 central single) microtubule pattern of axoneme, and this has been recently clarified by Name et al. [15]. This pattern was also found in other blow fly, Calliphora vomitoria [16], flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) [17]; fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilinae) [18], Orfelia species, and Boletina species (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) [16] whereas in mosquito Culex pipiens and Anopheles maculipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) [16] and sand fly, Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) [19] a type designated as . Nevertheless, the type has been reported in other Diptera including the mosquito, Toxorhynchites brevipalpis (Diptera: Culicidae) [20].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (RMU4980007) and the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (PHD/0113/2547). The authors also thank the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University and Chiang Mai University for supporting and defraying the publication cost. This work has been presented as the “poster presentation” in the ICOPA XII, held in Melbourne, Australia, in 15–21 August, 2010.

References

  1. K. Sukontason, P. Narongchai, C. Kanchai et al., “Forensic entomology cases in Thailand: a review of cases from 2000 to 2006,” Parasitology Research, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1417–1423, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. L. Goff, A. I. Omori, and K. Gunatilake, “Estimation of postmortem interval by arthropod succession. three case studies from the Hawaiian Islands,” American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 220–225, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Gunatilake and M. L. Goff, “Detection of organophosphate poisoning in a putrefying body by analyzing arthropod larvae,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 714–716, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Kurahashi, N. Benjaphong, and B. Omar, “Blow flies (Insecta: Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Malaysia and Singapore,” Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, vol. 45, supplement 5, pp. 1–88, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. R. Norris, “Lectotype designation and characterisation of the Australian blowflies Calliphora pubescens Macquart and Calliphora testaceifacies Macquart (Diptera: Calliphoridae),” Australian Journal of Entomology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. R. Norris, “Synonymy, distribution and bionomics of the Australian blowfly Onesia accepta (Malloch) (Diptera: Calliphoridae),” Australian Journal of Entomology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 354–356, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. J. Merritt, “The morphology of the phallosome and accessory gland material transfer during copulation in the blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Insecta, Diptera),” Zoomorphology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 359–366, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. C. R. Leite, “Ultrastructure of the male terminalia of Cochliomyia hominivorax and C. macellaria,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 90, pp. 475–481, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Radek, “Light and electron microscopic study of a Rickettsiella species from the cockroach Blatta orientalis,” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 249–256, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. P. Rallis and J. P. Burand, “Pathology and ultrastructure of the insect virus, Hz-2V, infecting agonadal male corn earworms, Helicoverpa zea,” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Hori, “Comparative anatomy of the internal organs of the Calyptrate muscoid flies I. Male internal sexual organs of the adlt flies,” Science Report Kanazawa University, vol. 7, pp. 23–83, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Valdez, “Ultrastructure of the testis of the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. Fausto, M. Belardinelli, R. Fochetti, J. M. Tierno de Figueroa, and M. Mazzini, “Comparative spermatology in plecoptera (Insecta). II. An ultrastructural investigation on four species of systellognatha,” Arthropod Structure and Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Paccagnini, L. De Marzo, F. Giusti, and R. Dallai, “The aberrant spermatogenesis of the Haplothrips simplex (Buffa) (Thysanoptera): ultrastructural study,” Tissue and Cell, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. P. O. Name, J. R. Pujol-Luz, and S. N. Báo, “Structure and ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae),” Micron, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 853–860, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Dallai, P. L. Bellon, S. Lanzavecchia, and B. A. Afzelius, “The dipteran sperm tail: ultrastructural characteristics and phylogenetic considerations,” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. D. Warner, “The relationship between matrix structure and the microtubule component of the axoneme,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 159–182, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. T. Tokuyasu, “Spoke heads in sperm tail of Drosophila melanogaster,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 334–337, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Ilango, “Structure and function of the spermathecal complex in the phlebotomine sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae): II. Post-copulatory histophysiological changes during the gonotrophic cycle,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 733–747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Jean-Lou and M. Xavier, “Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of the mosquito Toxorhynchites (Diptera, Culicidae),” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 289–291, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus