About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Parasitology Research
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 926706, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/926706
Review Article

A Sequential Model of Host Cell Killing and Phagocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica

1Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Room 320 Stafford Hall, 95 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
2Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Room 320 Stafford Hall, 95 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

Received 24 November 2010; Accepted 19 December 2010

Academic Editor: D. S. Lindsay

Copyright © 2011 Adam Sateriale and Christopher D. Huston. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica is responsible for invasive intestinal and extraintestinal amebiasis. The virulence of Entamoeba histolytica is strongly correlated with the parasite's capacity to effectively kill and phagocytose host cells. The process by which host cells are killed and phagocytosed follows a sequential model of adherence, cell killing, initiation of phagocytosis, and engulfment. This paper presents recent advances in the cytolytic and phagocytic processes of Entamoeba histolytica in context of the sequential model.

1. Introduction

Entamoeba histolytica is an enteric parasite that colonizes the human intestinal lumen and has the capacity to invade the epithelium. Although 90% of amebic infections are asymptomatic and self-limiting, there are an estimated 50 million cases of invasive infection annually [1, 2]. According to the WHO, Entamoeba histolytica is ranked third as a cause of death among parasites with 100,000 estimated deaths annually [1]. The morbidity and mortality of this parasite is primarily seen in developing countries. Ingestion of contaminated food or water containing infectious cysts leads to excystation in the intestine. Each cyst produces eight motile trophozoites, which colonize the host’s colon. In those cases where the infection is not self limiting, amebic dysentery and liver abscess formation can occur [2].

The process of invasion and hepatic abscess formation has no apparent advantage for Entamoeba histolytica [3]. The logical question would then be why did this organism evolve to be a pathogen and not a commensal like its noninvasive cousin, Entamoeba dispar? One theory of Entamoeba histolytica’s origin of virulence is coincidental evolution. Host cells may have recognition patterns similar to those of enteric bacteria that the parasite has evolved to identify. Entamoeba histolytica has been shown to preferentially phagocytose cells coated with collectins, C-type lectins involved in recognition of ligands that are common to both bacteria and apoptotic cells [4]. An effective hijacking of the host’s own innate immune system to increase phagocytosis may have led to an invasive phenotype. In further support of this theory, Ghosh and Samuelson [3] have shown that several signaling proteins required for Entamoeba histolytica’s virulence are also utilized to kill and phagocytose bacteria. Another seemingly plausible explanation is that Entamoeba histolytica’s invasive phenotype arose in response to host defense mechanisms [5]. Directed apoptosis and subsequent phagocytosis may serve to limit host inflammatory mechanisms by suppressing necrosis and subsequent Th1-type immunity [6]. Cysteine proteases that are known to degrade host extracellular matrix also protect Entamoeba histolytica from complement, secretory IgA, and serum IgG [79].

While the evolutionary basis behind virulence is uncertain, the mechanism behind virulence is slowly becoming clearer. Invasion by Entamoeba histolytica is strongly correlated with the parasite’s capacity to kill and phagocytose host cells [1013]. The function of this review is to highlight some of the recent advances in understanding the mechanism of cell killing and phagocytosis, and to place these findings in the context of previous knowledge. For the purpose of this review, cell killing and phagocytosis have been organized in a sequential model involving (i) adherence to the host cell surface, (ii) contact-dependent cell killing, (iii) initiation of phagocytosis, and (iv) engulfment (see Figure 1).

fig1
Figure 1: Sequential model of cell killing and phagocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica. Adherence, cell killing, and initiation of phagocytosis leading to engulfment of host cells are depicted from left to right. Abbreviations: cysteine protease adhesin (CPADH), transmembrane kinase (TMK), serine-threonine-isoleucine rich protein (STIRP), reactive oxygen species (ROS), serine-rich Entamoeba histolytica protein (SREHP), cysteine protease 5 (CP5), and phosphatidylserine (PS).

2. Adherence

The D-galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine- (GalNAc-) specific lectin is the major amebic surface adhesin responsible for adherence to intestinal mucus and host cells [14]. The GalNAc lectin is composed of a light subunit (Lgl), heavy subunit (Hgl), and a noncovalently bound intermediate subunit (Igl) [15, 16]. The light and heavy subunits are linked via a disulfide bond and exist predominantly at the parasite cell membrane as a 260 kDa heterodimer [15]. The heavy subunit contains a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) that recognizes D-galactose and N-acetyl-D-galactosamine [17]. MUC-2, the predominant mucin in the host intestine, is bound by the GalNAc lectin with high affinity (  M), allowing for Entamoeba histolytica to colonize mucosal surfaces [18, 19]. The CRD also recognizes host cell surface protein glycoconjugates and inhibition of adherence to host cells has been shown using monoclonal antibodies that bind the CRD specifically [20, 21]. Host cell adherence can also be strongly inhibited using μM concentrations of either galactose or N-acetyl-D-galactosamine [14, 22, 23]. Inhibition of adherence through the GalNAc lectin invariably leads to a subsequent decrease in host cell cytotoxicity [23]. Tetracycline-regulated expression of a truncated intracellular domain of the GalNAc lectin heavy subunit has been shown to significantly decrease adherence to host cells in vitro [24]. These data suggest that the lectin participates in outside-to-inside signaling, which is likely through the β2 integrin homologous intracellular domain of the GalNAc heavy subunit. These functions in adhesion and signaling place the GalNAc lectin firmly at the nexus of virulence, though there are other Entamoeba histolytica proteins that have been implicated in adherence.

The EhCPADH complex is a 124 kDa heterodimer formed by a cysteine protease (EhCP112) and an adhesin (EhADH112). Targeted monoclonal antibodies to the C-terminus adhesion epitope of ADH112 results in greater than 50% reduced adherence to host cells, and ensuing decreases in cytotoxicity and phagocytosis [25]. ADH112 has three putative transmembrane domains, a putative Bro1 domain, and an intracellular domain with potential phosphorylation sites [26]. It will be interesting to see whether targeted mutations to the intracellular region or a truncated version of this protein produce a parasite with diminished adherence. The ADH112 intracellular domain is highly divergent from that of the GalNAc lectin heavy subunit [26]. Adhesion signaling mechanisms of these complexes are, therefore, likely to be distinct.

Many of the proteins recently implicated in adherence have arisen from genomic and transcriptomic analyses of Entamoeba histolytica and nonvirulent Entamoeba. Sequencing of the Entamoeba histolytica genome has led to many new discoveries, truly advancing the field of Entamoeba research in a manner not seen since Diamond et al. first axenically cultured the parasite [2729]. One such discovery is STIRP (serine-threonine-isoleucine rich protein), a protein family exclusively expressed in virulent strains of Entamoeba, in vitro. shRNA-mediated silencing of the STIRP family led to a 35% decrease in adhesion to host cells and a subsequent reduction in cytotoxicity [30]. ROM1 is a serine protease functionally related to the rhomboid proteases first identified in Drosophila melanogaster [31, 32]. Rhomboid proteases are seven-pass transmembrane proteases with the ability to cleave transmembrane proteins at their transmembrane domain [33]. The ROM1 gene appears to be the only rhomboid protease expressed by both Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. shRNA-mediated silencing of ROM1 reduced adhesion to healthy Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, but not to apoptotic CHO cells, the mechanism of which is still to be determined. It is hypothesized that the ROM1 protease could be involved in cleavage and activation of amebic transmembrane proteins involved in adherence and phagocytosis. ROM1 silenced ameba were shown to have an ordinary amount of GalNAc lectin at their cell surface, but other amebic adhesins may be modulated by ROM1 [31]. There is experimental evidence of at least one additional Entamoeba histolytica surface lectin activity involved in phagocytosis [34].

Another recently described potential adhesin is TMKB1-9, a member of a large family of transmembrane kinases (the relevance of which is more thoroughly discussed later) [35]. The expression of TMKB1-9 was shown, quite conclusively, to correlate with decreased adherence to and destruction of CHO cell monolayers. Intriguingly, the expression of TMKB1-9 also correlated to serum content in the culture medium, suggesting a possible mechanism for sensing environmental conditions [36]. As this exciting new research unfolds, we shall hopefully better understand what serum component(s) is regulating TMKB1-9 expression, and how TMKB1-9 modulates cell adherence.

Trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica express GPI-anchored lipoglycoconjugates on their cell surface, referred to as lipopeptidophosphoglycans or EhLPPG [37, 38]. These molecules have been implicated in host-parasite interactions based on the finding that nonvirulent and virulent strains of Entamoeba histolytica express different amounts and structures of EhLPPG [3942]. Recent research has shown that EhLPPG are the primary NKT cell ligands, helping to explain why CD1d−/− mice show significantly larger liver abscesses [43, 44]. Marinets et al. [45] found that passive immunization with antibody to LPPG conferred protection from invasive amebiasis in the severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mouse model of hepatic abscess. This effect was also seen using a SCID intestinal xenograph model of invasion [46]. LPPG antibody also caused agglutination of ameba in vitro, which may have been a confounding factor in an earlier report showing an LPPG antibody-mediated decrease in adherence [47]. LPPG may be vitally important in immune recognition, but the role it plays in host cell-parasite adherence remains uncertain. Finally, the lysine and glutamic acid-rich protein, KERP1, remains an attractive potential adhesion, as it has been shown to bind epithelial cells and is absent in the Entamoeba dispar genome [48]. Its role in adhesion has yet to be formally tested, but KERP1 has recently been evidenced to play a role in liver abscess formation [49].

3. Cell Killing

The GalNAc lectin is a striking example of a crossover function between adherence and cell killing. Antibodies targeting the heavy subunit (Hgl) on a separate domain from the CRD decrease cell killing by approximately 50% [50]. It should be noted that exclusion of any adherence protein from the subsequent processes of cell killing and initiation of phagocytosis does not rule out their involvement, only a lack of evidence to suggest significant involvement in the latter two. It is quite possible that many of the proteins involved in the recognition of healthy host cells are also involved in the cytolysis and/or recognition of apoptotic cells, much like the GalNAc lectin.

The Entamoeba histolytica genome encodes three amoebapore proteins that can be secreted upon contact, and the purified proteins cause target host cell membrane permeability at μM concentrations [51, 52]. When inserted into host cell membrane, amoebapore proteins oligomerize through peptide-peptide interactions to produce ion channels [53]. Antisense silencing of amoebapore A expression significantly impairs Entamoeba histolytica’s ability to kill baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, assayed by trypan blue exclusion [54]. The G3 strain of Entamoeba histolytica has an almost complete transcriptional silencing of the amoebapore A protein [55]. The G3 strain was also shown to be deficient in cell monolayer destruction and incapable of forming liver abscess in the hamster model of hepatic abscess [55]. Conversely, the G3 strain produced abscesses, though of smaller size, in the SCID mouse model [56]. The authors speculate this difference may have been due to the increased susceptibility of the SCID mice, variable timing of liver assessment, or variation in the role that amoebapore plays in different animal models.

While target host cells and bacteria are susceptible to amoebapore, Entamoeba histolytica is surprisingly resistant at μM concentrations. Experiments using liposomes with Entamoeba histolytica cell membrane composition demonstrated that the phospholipid composition of the parasite plasma membrane, along with its high cholesterol content, prevents binding of fluorescently labeled amoebapore [57]. The plasma membrane of Entamoeba histolytica is also resistant to another protein implicated in host cell killing, phospholipase [58]. Pharmacological inhibitors of eukaryotic phospholipase A significantly reduced CHO cell killing, as measured by trypan blue exclusion criteria [58]. The predominant phospholipid found on the Entamoeba cell membrane is ceramide aminoethylphosphonate (CAEP), which is a phospholipase resistant species of phospholipid [59, 60]. While phosphonolipids have been found in small amounts in various mammals, such large amounts of CAEP have only been seen in marine bacteria, gastropods, and bivalve mollusks [61]. CAEP was also detected in the plasma membrane of Entamoeba histolytica’s reptilian relative, Entamoeba invadens [62]. It is possible that CAEP confers resistance to Entamoeba histolytica’s resident phospholipases.

Following contact with Entamoeba histolytica host cells undergo the morphological and phenotypic changes of apoptosis, including nuclear chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and membrane blebbing [63]. These cells stain positive by terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and by annexin V, indicating DNA degradation and phosphatidylserine increases on the outer leaflet of the host cell plasma membrane [64]. Although one study has shown necrotic features of Entamoeba histolytica-induced cell death, predominant amount of the literature supports an apoptotic result [6571]. The mechanism by which this host-cell apoptosis is initiated in a variety of different cell types is still unclear, but there are some common factors. Target cells show a sustained increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration, protein tyrosine dephosphorylation, and caspase 3 activation following contact with Entamoeba histolytica [66, 72, 73]. Recent work has shown that pretreatment of Jurkat lymphocytes with the calpain inhibitor calpeptin leads to a decrease in protein tyrosine dephosphorylation. It is hypothesized that the increase in host cell intracellular Ca2+ concentration activates calpain, which cleaves and activates host SHP-1 and SHP-2. SHP-1 and SHP-2 then act as protein tyrosine phosphatases. Although calpeptin pretreatment leads to a decrease in protein tyrosine dephosphorylation, it is insufficient to halt ensuing apoptosis [74]. Caspase 8 deficiency and caspase 9 inhibition have likewise been shown to be ineffective in abrogating apoptosis in target Jurkat lymphocytes. Conversely, the caspase 3 inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO was found to block Jurkat cell apoptosis, measured by DNA fragmentation and 51Cr release [66]. In a C57BL/6 mouse model of hepatic abscess, Entamoeba histolytica-induced apoptosis was also found to be Fas/Fas ligand independent [64]. These findings support a Fas/Fas ligand and caspase 8/9 independent activation of caspase 3.

Recent research using a CBA mouse model of colitis has shown that intraperitoneal injection with the pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD reduced the mouse parasite burden and, further, that caspase 3 knockout C57BL/6 mice showed an even lower parasite burden [6]. The fact that caspase 3 knockout mice were not fully protected from Entamoeba invasion suggests a possible second mechanism of cell death. Sim et al. [70] have shown in neutrophils that intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) are induced upon contact from Entamoeba histolytica. This induction also coincides with an increasing ERK1/2 activation. Incubation with a MEK1 inhibitor decreased ERK1/2 activation and neutrophil apoptosis. Recent work from this group indicates that apoptosis in neutrophils is also inhibited by host cell preincubation with monoclonal antibodies to CD18 [75]. CD18 is a β2 integrin that mediates neutrophil adhesion and is known to promote activation of NADPH oxidase [76]. Treatment with an NADPH oxidase inhibitor also partially decreased neutrophil apoptosis, as measured by annexin-V staining of phosphatidylserine [70]. Previous studies have shown GalNAc lectin deposition on target host cell membranes following parasite contact [77]. It is interesting to speculate that, if integrated into the host cell membrane, the β2 integrin domain of the GalNAc lectin heavy subunit may be capable of stimulating NADPH oxidase. Whether the ROS-dependent pathway and the caspase 3-dependent pathway are part of the same mechanism of apoptosis or separate, the end result is membrane blebbing and increased phosphatidylserine exposure on the outer leaflet of the host plasma membrane [13, 67].

4. Initiation of Phagocytosis

Experiments have shown, conclusively, that Entamoeba histolytica more readily phagocytoses host cells that have already undergone apoptosis [13, 67]. Apoptotic Jurkat lymphocytes and Ca2+ ionophore-treated erythrocytes are both phagocytosed at a higher rate than their viable counterparts. Jurkat lymphocytes made artificially apoptotic by insertion of phosphatidylserine into the outer leaflet are also phagocytosed by Entamoeba histolytica at a higher rate [67]. When healthy Jurkat lymphocytes were incubated with Entamoeba histolytica in vitro, caspase 3 activity was detected by immunofluorescence using an antiactive caspase 3 antibody in virtually all intact cells ingested [67]. Thus, apoptosis appears to be a requirement for phagocytosis to occur, though it remains possible that viable cells are just engulfed less efficiently.

Galactose inhibition of the GalNAc lectin leads to a 22% reduction in amebic adherence to Ca2+ ionophore-treated erythrocytes, in contrast to healthy erythrocytes which show approximately 81% reduction in adherence [13]. Similarly, D-galactose inhibits adherence to apoptotic Jurkat lymphocytes inefficiently [67]. These results clearly implicate other Entamoeba histolytica receptors in adhesion to apoptotic host cells and initiation of phagocytosis.

Ideal candidates for apoptotic receptors are members of the Entamoeba histolytica transmembrane kinase family of proteins. Entamoeba histolytica has over 90 transmembrane kinases (TMKs), categorized into subfamilies (A, B1-3, C, D1-2, E, F) based on signature motifs in their kinase domains [35]. Single-cell microarray analysis of Entamoeba histolytica has shown that multiple TMKs are expressed by individual parasites in vitro [78]. A small subset of these proteins has been characterized, thus far, with surprising results. Certain members of the TMK family have been implicated in proliferation, possibly due to signaling involving the extracellular milieu [36, 78, 79]. TMKB1-9 levels have been shown to correlate with serum levels in culture media; in fact, many of the TMKs have expression patterns that fluctuate over time [35, 36]. Other TMKs have exhibited a role in the uptake of host cells, specifically in the recognition of apoptotic host cells [78, 80]. Expression of a carboxy-truncated version of TMK39, possessing only extracellular and transmembrane domains, decreased uptake of apoptotic Jurkat lymphocytes by approximately 50% [78]. Similarly, expression of a truncated version of TMKB3-96 (PATMK) decreased uptake of Ca2+ ionophore-treated erythrocytes [80]. This decrease was also shown using shRNA-mediated knockdown and using polyclonal antiserum specific for PATMK, which localized to the phagocytic cup during erythrophagocytosis.

Exactly what these TMKs are recognizing on apoptotic cells is unknown. Phosphatidylserine exposure is a hallmark of host cell apoptosis, making it a strong candidate ligand [81, 82]. Annexin V masking of phosphatidylserine on apoptotic erythrocytes leads to a decrease in phagocytosis [13]. Annexin V treatment along with galactose inhibition of the GalNAc lectin also leads to an astonishing >95% reduction in erythrophagocytosis. If phosphatidylserine were the only driving force behind apoptotic cell recognition, then annexin V treatment of other apoptotic cell types should also decrease phagocytosis. Interestingly, this effect is not seen. Annexin V treatment of Jurkat lymphocytes does not affect the rate of phagocytosis in vitro (C. Huston, unpublished data). These findings lead us to believe that, while phosphatidylserine may be a strong signal for initiation of phagocytosis, other ligands present on nucleated apoptotic host cells must be also capable of stimulating Entamoeba histolytica phagocytosis.

Research on macrophage uptake of apoptotic cells has shown that recognition of phosphatidylserine alone involves multiple receptors [83, 84]. As previous studies have noted, the extracellular domain of TMKs contain many epidermal growth factor- (EGF-) like repeats characteristic of scavenger receptors conserved in eukaryotes [78, 85]. A Boolean exploration of BLAST searches involving the extracellular domains of the representative scavenger receptors CED-1 (C. elegans), eater (D. melanogaster), and STAB2 (H. sapiens) returns 55 members of the Entamoeba histolytica TMK family (Figure 2). This number is remarkable considering that many of the transmembrane kinase genes encode truncated forms, lacking substantial extracellular domains [35, 79]. Proteomic analysis of the Entamoeba histolytica phagosome using carboxylated paramagnetic beads as bait identified 22 TMKs over various time points (Table 1) [80]. It is an attractive hypothesis that TMKs are acting as scavenger receptors, yet more research is needed to characterize TMK ligands and the downstream signaling induced. Buss et al. [78] observed heterodimerization of wild type and truncated TMKs in transfected parasites. It will be interesting to see whether TMK homodimerization alone is sufficient to initiate phagocytosis, and whether TMKs are able to dimerize with other family members.

tab1
Table 1: Members of the Entamoeba histolytica transmembrane kinase family found in phagosome preparations at various time points [80, 86].
926706.fig.002
Figure 2: Venn diagram summarizing results of Entamoeba histolytica BLAST searches using the extracellular domains of CED-1 (C. elegans), eater (D. melanogaster), and STAB2 (H. sapiens). Fifty-five members of the E. histolytica transmembrane kinase gene family share significant homology to these representative scavenger receptors.

Another large family of genes in Entamoeba histolytica is the cysteine proteases, of which there are 50 known members [87]. EhCP1, EhCP2, and EhCP5 appear to make up nearly 90% of the cysteine protease transcripts in cultured parasites [88, 89]. At different time points of infection, the expression of cysteine proteases can shift greatly, leading to the increase of EhCP4 and others [90]. In cultured parasites, antisense knockdown of EhCP5 resulted in a 90% decrease in cysteine protease activity compared to wild type [91]. Strangely, this strain of Entamoeba histolytica had a decrease in phagocytosis, while having no apparent defect in hemolytic activity or monolayer destruction. This is in stark contrast to the known roles of cysteine proteases that include degradation of extracellular matrix, mucin, complement proteins, immunoglobulins, and cytokines [79, 92]. EhCP5-attenuated parasites were also unable to penetrate the colonic lamina propria in an ex vivo human colonic model of invasion [93]. Targeted inhibitors to EhCP1 and EhCP4 have also been shown to be protective in the SCID mouse-human intestinal xenograph model and in the SCID mouse hepatic abscess model, respectively [94, 95]. The connection between cysteine proteases and phagocytosis has not been determined, but their importance for host invasion has been proven ex vivo and in vivo. The availability of pharmacologic inhibitors for cysteine proteases makes them attractive targets for drug design, and the inhibitors are potential tools to dissect the roles of individual cysteine proteases in phagocytosis.

The serine rich Entamoeba histolytica protein (SREHP) was first identified based on its strong immunogenic properties, and characterized as a potential parasite chemoattractant [96]. These results are perplexing considering that the SREHP does not appear to be secreted, but does show localization to the plasma membrane of Entamoeba histolytica. An in vitro screen of 43 monoclonal antibodies raised against Entamoeba histolytica membrane preparations identified a single antibody that inhibited phagocytosis, which was found to be specific for SREHP [97]. This antibody blocked uptake of apoptotic Jurkat lymphocytes by over 90%, and the reduction was shown to be GalNAc lectin-independent via saturating amounts of galactose. Adherence and induction of apoptosis were also reduced to a much lesser degree. The SREHP has a putative transmembrane domain but no appreciable cytoplasmic domain, implicating a possible coreceptor that is still to be identified.

The host collectins C1q, SP-A, and MBL have all been shown to be ligands that stimulate Entamoeba histolytica phagocytosis [4]. Structurally, the collectin family all have a collagenous N-terminal tail and a globular C-terminal head generally involved in opsonization [98]. Collectins are found throughout the host mucosal lining, including those of the intestine [99101]. Collectin-mediated opsonization of bacteria and apoptotic host cells is stimulatory for Entamoeba histolytica as well as macrophages [4, 102] (A. Sateriale, unpublished data). Pretreatment with C1q increased amebic uptake of apoptotic Jurkat lymphocytes in vitro, but not of viable Jurkats, even though C1q was detectable on the surface of both. The localization of C1q to apoptotic Jurkat membrane blebs in these experiments indicates possible concentration dependence. C1q and MBL were also found to be chemoattractants for Entamoeba histolytica, via a transwell migration assay [4]. As the host collectins have been shown to be structurally similar, a single receptor may show cross-reactivity. However, a putative Entamoeba histolytica collectin receptor has yet to be identified.

5. Engulfment

The process of host-cell engulfment following initiation of phagocytosis has been shown to be actin and myosin dependent [103]. Rhodamine-labeled phalloidin localizes to the phagocytic cup during target cell ingestion, and cytochalasin D blocking of actin polymerization has been shown to inhibit phagocytosis [104106]. An Entamoeba histolytica strain with a threefold overexpression of myosin 1B exhibited marked deficiency in erythrophagocytosis [107]. Recent research has also posited that Entamoeba lipid rafts are involved in the organization of host-cell adhesion and endocytosis [108]. In a cholesterol-rich organism such as Entamoeba histolytica, it is not difficult to imagine the large role lipid rafts could play in organizing pathogenic events [59]. Entamoeba histolytica signaling proteins that have been shown to regulate host-cell engulfment include p21 activated kinase (PAK), protein kinase C (PKC), RacA, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) [3, 109, 110]. Recent proteomic research involving purified phagosomes has given supporting evidence to these observations and offers a more complete picture of the various proteins involved in amebic endocytosis [80, 111113]. Okada and Nozaki [114] and Marion and Guillén [85] offer very concise and comprehensive reviews of the endocytosis mechanism.

6. Future Directions

Some of the original mysteries surrounding Entamoeba histolytica pathogenicity still plague researchers today. The Zulu word for Entamoeba histolytica-derived liver abscess is isigwebedhla, which translates to disease of the strong young men [115]. The cause behind the gender bias still remains unknown. This is not particularly surprising, considering that the mechanism by which Entamoeba histolytica causes host cell apoptosis is largely uncertain. Models for assaying parasite invasion such as the SCID mouse-human xenograph model and the recent ex vivo human intestinal model may allow for a better understanding of host-parasite interactions [93, 116]. While animal models are invaluable, discrepancies between species and even between strains highlight the variability of the host-parasite interface. Models better representing the parasite’s natural human host may allow for a better understanding of the invasive phenotype. Many of the proteins described in this sequential model of invasion also happen to be the most immunogenic [117]. The characterization of novel proteins involved in adherence, cell killing, and phagocytosis still holds the promise of identifying future vaccine candidates.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their fellow laboratory members for their thoughtful comments on this paper. C. D. Huston is supported by NIAID R01 AI072021-03.

References

  1. “WHO/PAHO/UNESCO report. A consultation with experts on amoebiasis. Mexico City, Mexico 28-29 January, 1997,” Epidemiological Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 13–14, 1997.
  2. R. Haque, C. D. Huston, M. Hughes, E. Houpt, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Amebiasis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 16, pp. 1565–1573, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. K. Ghosh and J. Samuelson, “Involvement of p21(racA), phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and vacuolar ATPase in phagocytosis of bacteria and erythrocytes by Entamoeba histolytica: suggestive evidence for coincidental evolution of amebic invasiveness,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 4243–4249, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. E. Teixeira, B. T. Heron, and C. D. Huston, “C1q- and collectin-dependent phagocytosis of apoptotic host cells by the intestinal protozoan Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 198, no. 7, pp. 1062–1070, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Campos-Rodríguezp and A. Jarillo-Luna, “The pathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica is related to the capacity of evading innate immunity,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. M. Becker, K. N. Cho, X. Guo et al., “Epithelial cell apoptosis facilitates Entamoeba histolytica infection in the gut,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 1316–1322, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. L. Reed, J. A. Ember, D. S. Herdman, R. G. DiScipio, T. E. Hugli, and I. Gigli, “The extracellular neutral cysteine proteinase of Entamoeba histolytica degrades anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 266–274, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. L. Kelsall and J. I. Ravdin, “Degradation of human IgA by Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 1319–1322, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Q. Tran, D. S. Herdman, B. E. Torian, and S. L. Reed, “The neutral cysteine proteinase of Entamoeba histolytica degrades IgG and prevents its binding,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 508–511, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Martinez-Palomo, A. Gonzalez-Robles, and B. Chavez, “Structural bases of the cytolytic mechanisms of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Protozoology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 166–175, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Orozco, G. Guarneros, A. martinez Palomo, and T. Sanchez, “Entamoeba histolytica. Phagocytosis as a virulence factor,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1511–1521, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. Rodriguez and E. Orozco, “Isolation and characterization of phagocytosis- and virulence-deficient mutants of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. R. Boettner, C. D. Huston, J. A. Sullivan, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar utilize externalized phosphatidylserine for recognition and phagocytosis of erythrocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 3422–3430, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. I. Ravdin and R. L. Guerrant, “Role of adherence in cytopathogenic mechanisms of Entamoeba histolytica. Study with mammalian tissue culture cells and human erythrocytes,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1305–1313, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. A. Petri Jr., M. D. Chapman, T. Snodgrass, B. J. Mann, J. Broman, and J. I. Ravdin, “Subunit structure of the galactose and N-acetyl-D-galactosamine-inhibitable adherence lectin in Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 5, pp. 3007–3012, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. J. Cheng, M. A. Hughes, C. D. Huston et al., “Intermediate subunit of the Gal/GalNAc lectin of Entamoeba histolytica is a member of a gene family containing multiple CXXC sequence motifs,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5892–5898, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Dodson, P. W. Lenkowski, A. C. Eubanks et al., “Infection and immunity mediated by the carbohydrate recognition domain of the Entamoeba histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 460–466, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Chadee, M. L. Johnson, E. Orozco, W. A. Petri, and J. I. Ravdin, “Binding and internalization of rat colonic mucins by the galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine adherence lectin of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 398–406, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Chadee, W. A. Petri, D. J. Innes, and J. I. Ravdin, “Rat and human colonic mucins bind to and inhibit adherence lectin of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1245–1254, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. J. Mann, C. Y. Chung, J. M. Dodson, L. S. Ashley, L. L. Braga, and T. L. Snodgrass, “Neutralizing monoclonal antibody epitopes of the Entamoeba histolytica galactose adhesin map to the cysteine-rich extracellular domain of the 170- kilodalton subunit,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1772–1778, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. A. Petri Jr., R. Haque, and B. J. Mann, “The bittersweet interface of parasite and host: lectin-carbohydrate interactions during human invasion by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 56, pp. 39–64, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Kobiler and D. Mirelman, “Adhesion of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites to monolayers of human cells,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 539–546, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. I. Ravdin, C. F. Murphy, R. A. Salata, R. L. Guerrant, and E. L. Hewlett, “N-acetyl-d-galactosamine-inhibitable adherence lectin of Entamoeba histolytica. I. Partial purification and relation to amoebic virulence in vitro,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 804–815, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. R. Vines, G. Ramakrishnan, J. B. Rogers, L. A. Lockhart, B. J. Mann, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Regulation of adherence and virulence by the Entamoeba histolytica lectin cytoplasmic domain, which contains a β2 integrin motif,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2069–2079, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. García-Rivera, M. A. Rodríguez, R. Ocádiz et al., “Entamoeba histolytica: a novel cysteine protease and an adhesin form the 112 kDa surface protein,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 556–568, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Bañuelos, G. García-Rivera, I. López-Reyes, and E. Orozco, “Functional characterization of EhADH112: an Entamoeba histolytica Bro1 domain-containing protein,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 292–297, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. S. Diamond, “Axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica,” Science, vol. 134, no. 3475, pp. 336–337, 1961. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Loftus, I. Anderson, R. Davies et al., “The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Nature, vol. 433, no. 7028, pp. 865–868, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. A. Baxt and U. Singh, “New insights into Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 489–494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. C. MacFarlane and U. Singh, “Identification of an Entamoeba histolytica serine-, threonine-, and isoleucine-rich protein with roles in adhesion and cytotoxicity,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2139–2146, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. A. Baxt, E. Rastew, R. Bracha, D. Mirelman, and U. Singh, “Downregulation of an Entamoeba histolytica rhomboid protease reveals roles in regulating parasite adhesion and phagocytosis,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1283–1293, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. E. Bier, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan, “rhomboid, a gene required for dorsoventral axis establishment and peripheral nervous system development in Drosophila melanogaster,” Genes and Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 190–203, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Urban and M. Freeman, “Substrate specificity of rhomboid intramembrane proteases is governed by helix-breaking residues in the substrate transmembrane domain,” Molecular Cell, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1425–1434, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. T. Heron, A. Sateriale, J. E. Teixeira, and C. D. Huston, “Evidence for a novel Entamoeba histolytica lectin activity that recognises carbohydrates present on ovalbumin,” International Journal for Parasitology. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. L. Beck, D. R. Boettner, B. Dragulev, K. Ready, T. Nozaki, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Identification and gene expression analysis of a large family of transmembrane kinases related to the Gal/GalNAc lectin in Entamoeba histolytica,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 722–732, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Shrimal, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Bhattacharya, “Serum-dependent selective expression of EhTMKB1-9, a member of Entamoeba histolytica B1 family of transmembrane kinases,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e1000929, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Moody, S. Becker, Y. Nuchamowitz, M. J. McConville, and D. Mirelman, “The lipophosphoglycan-like molecules of virulent and avirulent E. histolytica as well as of E. dispar differ in both composition and abundance,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 28, pp. 98–102, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Moody-Haupt, J. H. Patterson, D. Mirelman, and M. J. McConville, “The major surface antigens of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites are GPI-anchored proteophosphoglycans,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 297, no. 2, pp. 409–420, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Bhattacharya, R. Prasad, and D. L. Sacks, “Identification and partial characterization of a lipophosphoglycan from a pathogenic strain of Entamoeba histolytica,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 161–168, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. Srivastava, M. T. Anand, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Bhattacharya, “Lipophosphoglycan is present in distinctly different form in different Entamoeba histolytica strains and absent in Entamoeba moshkovskii and Entamoeba invadens,” Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 617–622, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Moody, S. Becker, Y. Nuchamowitz, and D. Mirelman, “Virulent and avirulent Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar differ in their cell surface phosphorylated glycolipids,” Parasitology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 95–104, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Moody, S. Becker, Y. Nuchamowitz, and D. Mirelman, “Identification of significant variation in the composition of lipophosphoglycan-like molecules of E. histolytica and E. dispar,” Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 9S–12S, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Lotter, T. Jacobs, I. Gaworski, and E. Tannich, “Sexual dimorphism in the control of amebic liver abscess in a mouse model of disease,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Lotter, N. González-Roldán, B. Lindner et al., “Natural killer T cells activated by a lipopeptidophosphoglycan from Entamoeba histolytica are critically important to control amebic liver abscess,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e1000434, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Marinets, T. Zhang, N. Guillén et al., “Protection against invasive amebiasis by a single monoclonal antibody directed against a lipophosphoglycan antigen localized on the surface of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 186, no. 9, pp. 1557–1565, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Z. Zhang, M. Duchêne, and S. L. Stanley Jr., “A monoclonal antibody to the amebic lipophosphoglycan-proteophosphoglycan antigens can prevent disease in human intestinal xenografts infected with Entamoeba histolytica,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 5873–5876, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. L. Stanley Jr., H. Huizenga, and E. Li, “Isolation and partial characterization of a surface glycoconjugate of Entamoeba histolytica,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Seigneur, J. Mounier, M. C. Prevost, and N. Guillén, “A lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein, KERP1, from Entamoeba histolytica binds to human enterocytes,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 569–579, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Santi-Rocca, C. Weber, G. Guigon, O. Sismeiro, J. Y. Coppée, and N. Guillén, “The lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein KERP1 plays a role in Entamoeba histolytica liver abscess pathogenesis,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 202–217, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. D. Saffer and W. A. Petri Jr., “Role of the galactose lectin of Entamoeba histolytica in adherence-dependent killing of mammalian cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 4681–4683, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Leippe, S. Ebel, O. L. Schoenberger, R. D. Horstmann, and H. J. Muller-Eberhard, “Pore-forming peptide of pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 17, pp. 7659–7663, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Leippe, J. Andrä, R. Nickel, E. Tannich, and H. J. Müller-Eberhard, “Amoebapores, a family of membranolytic peptides from cytoplasmic granules of Entamoeba histolytica: isolation, primary structure, and pore formation in bacterial cytoplasmic membranes,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 895–904, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Leippe, “Ancient weapons: NK-lysin, is a mammalian homolog to pore-forming peptides of a protozoan parasite,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 17–18, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. Bracha, Y. Nuchamowitz, M. Leippe, and D. Mirelman, “Antisense inhibition of amoebapore expression in Entamoeba histolytica causes a decrease in amoebic virulence,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 463–472, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. Bracha, Y. Nuchamowitz, and D. Mirelman, “Transcriptional silencing of an amoebapore gene in Entamoeba histolytica: molecular analysis and effect on pathogenicity,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 295–305, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, D. Alexander, R. Bracha, D. Mirelman, and S. L. Stanley Jr., “Expression of amoebapores is required for full expression of Entamoeba histolytica virulence in amebic liver abscess but is not necessary for the induction of inflammation or tissue damage in amebic colitis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 678–683, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Andrä, O. Berninghausen, and M. Leippe, “Membrane lipid composition protects Entamoeba histolytica from self-destruction by its pore-forming toxins,” FEBS Letters, vol. 564, no. 1-2, pp. 109–115, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. I. Ravdin, C. F. Murphy, R. L. Guerrant, and S. A. Long-Krug, “Effect of antagonists of calcium and phospholipase A on the cytopathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 542–549, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. B. Aley, W. A. Scott, and Z. A. Cohn, “Plasma membrane of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 391–404, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. Simon and G. Rouser, “Species variations in phospholipid class distribution of organs: II. Heart and skeletal muscle,” Lipids, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 607–614, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. K. S. Mukhamedova and A. I. Glushenkova, “Natural phosphonolipids,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 329–341, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Cerbón and J. Flores, “Phospholipid composition and turnover of pathogenic amebas,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 487–492, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. B. D. Ragland, L. S. Ashley, D. L. Vaux, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Entamoeba histolytica: target cells killed by trophozoites undergo DNA fragmentation which is not blocked by Bcl-2,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 460–467, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. K. B. Seydel and S. L. Stanley Jr., “Entamoeba histolytica induces host cell death in amebic liver abscess by a non-fas-dependent, non-tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent pathway of apoptosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2980–2983, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. O. Berninghausen and M. Leippe, “Necrosis versus apoptosis as the mechanism of target cell death induced by Entamoeba histolytica,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 3615–3621, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. D. Huston, E. R. Houpt, B. J. Mann, C. S. Hahn, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Caspase 3-dependent killing of host cells by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 617–625, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. D. Huston, D. R. Boettner, V. Miller-Sims, and W. A. Petri Jr., “Apoptotic killing and phagocytosis of host cells by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 964–972, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. Yan and S. L. Stanley Jr., “Blockade of caspases inhibits amebic liver abscess formation in a mouse model of disease,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 7911–7914, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. K. B. Seydel and S. L. Stanley Jr., “Entamoeba histolytica induces host cell death in amebic liver abscess by a non-fas-dependent, non-tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent pathway of apoptosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2980–2983, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. Sim, T. S. Yong, S. J. Park et al., “NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of ERK1/2 is required for apoptosis of human neutrophils induced by Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 7, pp. 4279–4288, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. K. A. Kim, Y. A. Lee, and M. H. Shin, “Calpain-dependent calpastatin cleavage regulates caspase-3 activation during apoptosis of Jurkat T cells induced by Entamoeba histolytica,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1209–1219, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. I. Ravdin, N. Sperelakis, and R. L. Guerrant, “Effect of ion channel inhibitors on the cytopathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 335–340, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. E. Teixeira and B. J. Mann, “Entamoeba histolytica-induced dephosphorylation in host cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1816–1823, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. K. A. Kim, Y. A. Lee, and M. H. Shin, “Calpain-dependent cleavage of SHP-1 and SHP-2 is involved in the dephosphorylation of Jurkat T cells induced by Entamoeba histolytica,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 176–183, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. Sim, S. J. Park, T. S. Yong, K. I. Im, and M. H. Shin, “Involvement of β-integrin in ROS-mediated neutrophil apoptosis induced by Entamoeba histolytica,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1368–1375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. N. Mayadas and X. Cullere, “Neutrophil β integrins: moderators of life or death decisions,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 388–395, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. Pacheco, M. Shibayama, R. Campos et al., “In vitro and in vivo interaction of Entamoeba histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin with various target cells: an immunocytochemical analysis,” Parasitology International, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. N. Buss, S. Hamano, A. Vidrich et al., “Members of the Entamoeba histolytica transmembrane kinase family play non-redundant roles in growth and phagocytosis,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 833–843, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Mehra, J. Fredrick, W. A. Petri Jr., S. Bhattacharya, and A. Bhattacharya, “Expression and function of a family of transmembrane kinases from the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 5341–5351, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. D. R. Boettner, C. D. Huston, A. S. Linford et al., “Entamoeba histolytica phagocytosis of human erythrocytes involves PATMK, a member of the transmembrane kinase family,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 122–133, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. S. J. Martin, C. P. M. Reutelingsperger, A. J. McGahon et al., “Early redistribution of plasma membrane phosphatidylserine is a general feature of apoptosis regardless of the initiating stimulus: inhibition by overexpression of Bcl-2 and Abl,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1545–1556, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. V. A. Fadok, D. R. Voelker, P. A. Campbell, J. J. Cohen, D. L. Bratton, and P. M. Henson, “Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 148, no. 7, pp. 2207–2216, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. D. L. Bratton and P. Henson, “Apoptotic cell recognition: will the real phosphatidylserine receptor(s) please stand up?” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. R76–R79, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. K. S. Ravichandran, “Find-me and eat-me signals in apoptotic cell clearance: progress and conundrums,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 9, pp. 1807–1817, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. S. Marion and N. Guillén, “Genomic and proteomic approaches highlight phagocytosis of living and apoptotic human cells by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. C. Aurrecoechea, J. Brestelli, B. P. Brunk et al., “EuPathDB: a portal to eukaryotic pathogen databases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, database issue, pp. D415–D419, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. G. Clark, U. C. M. Alsmark, M. Tazreiter et al., “Structure and content of the Entamoeba histolytica genome,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 65, pp. 51–190, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. I. Bruchhaus, T. Jacobs, M. Leippe, and E. Tannich, “Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: differences in numbers and expression of cysteine proteinase genes,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. I. Bruchhaus, B. J. Loftus, N. Hall, and E. Tannich, “The intestinal protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica contains 20 cysteine protease genes, of which only a small subset is expressed during in vitro cultivation,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 501–509, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. C. A. Gilchrist, E. Houpt, N. Trapaidze et al., “Impact of intestinal colonization and invasion on the Entamoeba histolytica transcriptome,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. Ankri, T. Stolarsky, and D. Mirelman, “Antisense inhibition of expression of cysteine proteinases does not affect Entamoeba histolytica cytopathic or haemolytic activity but inhibits phagocytosis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 777–785, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. X. Que, S. H. Kim, M. Sajid et al., “A surface amebic cysteine proteinase inactivates interleukin-18,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1274–1280, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. D. Bansal, P. Ave, S. Kerneis et al., “An ex-vivo human intestinal model to study Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 3, no. 11, article e551, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. G. Meléndez-López, S. Herdman, K. Hirata et al., “Use of recombinant Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteinase 1 to identify a potent inhibitor of amebic invasion in a human colonic model,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1130–1136, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. C. He, G. P. Nora, E. L. Schneider et al., “A novel Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteinase, EhCP4, is key for invasive amebiasis and a therapeutic target,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 24, pp. 18516–18527, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. S. L. Stanley Jr., A. Becker, C. Kunz-Jenkins, L. Foster, and E. Li, “Cloning and expression of a membrane antigen of Entamoeba histolytica possessing multiple tandem repeats,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 13, pp. 4976–4980, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. E. Teixeira and C. D. Huston, “Participation of the serine-rich Entamoeba histolytica protein in amebic phagocytosis of apoptotic host cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 959–966, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. J. K. van de Wetering, L. M. G. van Golde, and J. J. Batenburg, “Collectins: players of the innate immune system,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 271, no. 7, pp. 1229–1249, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. S. Rubio, T. Lacaze-Masmonteil, B. Chailley-Heu, A. Kahn, J. R. Bourbon, and R. Ducroc, “Pulmonary surfactant protein A (SP-A) is expressed by epithelial cells of small and large intestine,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 20, pp. 12162–12169, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Akiyama, A. Hoffman, C. Brown et al., “Tissue distribution of surfactant proteins A and D in the mouse,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 993–996, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. K. Uemura, M. Saka, T. Nakagawa et al., “L-MBP is expressed in epithelial cells of mouse small intestine,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 12, pp. 6945–6950, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. C. A. Ogden, A. DeCathelineau, P. R. Hoffmann et al., “C1q and mannose binding lectin engagement of cell surface calreticulin and CD91 initiates macropinocytosis and uptake of apoptotic cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 6, pp. 781–795, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. I. Meza, P. Talamás-Rohana, and M. A. Vargas, “The cytoskeleton of Entamoeba histolytica: structure, function, and regulation by signaling pathways,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 234–243, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. G. B. Bailey, D. B. Day, and J. W. Gasque, “Rapid polymerization of Entamoeba histolytica actin induced by interaction with target cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 546–558, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. R. L. Guerrant, J. Brush, and J. I. Ravdin, “Interaction between Entamoeba histolytica and human polymorphonuclear neutrophils,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. G. B. Bailey, D. B. Day, C. Nokkaew, and C. C. Harper, “Stimulation by target cell membrane lipid of actin polymerization and phagocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1848–1853, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. H. Voigt, J. C. Olivo, P. Sansonetti, and N. Guillén, “Myosin IB from Entamoeba histolytica is involved in phagocytosis of human erythrocytes,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 1191–1201, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. K. Mittal, B. H. Welter, and L. A. Temesvari, “Entamoeba histolytica: lipid rafts are involved in adhesion of trophozoites to host extracellular matrix components,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. E. Labruyère, C. Zimmer, V. Galy, J. C. Olivo-Marin, and N. Guillén, “EhPAK, a member of the p21-activated kinase family, is involved in the control of Entamoeba histolytica migration and phagocytosis,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. E. D. J. O. Batista and W. De Souza, “Involvement of protein kinases on the process of erythrophagocytis by Entamoeba histolytica,” Cell Biology International, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 243–248, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. M. Okada, C. D. Huston, B. J. Mann, W. A. Petri Jr., K. Kita, and T. Nozaki, “Proteomic analysis of phagocytosis in the enteric protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 827–831, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. S. Marion, C. Laurent, and N. Guillén, “Signalization and cytoskeleton activity through myosin IB during the early steps of phagocytosis in Entamoeba histolytica: a proteomic approach,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1504–1518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. M. Okada, C. D. Huston, M. Oue et al., “Kinetics and strain variation of phagosome proteins of Entamoeba histolytica by proteomic analysis,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 171–183, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. M. Okada and T. Nozaki, “New insights into molecular mechanisms of phagocytosis in Entamoeba histolytica by proteomic analysis,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 244–252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. S. L. Stanley Jr., “Amoebiasis,” Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9362, pp. 1025–1034, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. K. B. Seydel, E. Li, P. E. Swanson, and S. L. Stanley Jr., “Human intestinal epithelial cells produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to infection in a SCID mouse-human intestinal xenograft model of amebiasis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1631–1639, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. L. Mortimer and K. Chadee, “The immunopathogenesis of Entamoeba histolytica,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 366–380, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus