Journal of Parasitology Research

Journal of Parasitology Research / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 236838 |

Deepak Kumar, Rakesh Chawla, P. Dhamodaram, N. Balakrishnan, "Larvicidal Activity of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) against the Larvae of Bancroftian Filariasis Vector Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus", Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 236838, 5 pages, 2014.

Larvicidal Activity of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) against the Larvae of Bancroftian Filariasis Vector Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus

Academic Editor: Wej Choochote
Received20 Sep 2013
Revised11 Dec 2013
Accepted12 Dec 2013
Published13 Feb 2014


Background & Objectives. The plan of this work was to study the larvicidal activity of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus. These larvae are the most significant vectors. They transmit the parasites and pathogens which cause a deadly disease like filariasis, dengue, yellow fever, malaria, Japanese encephalitis, chikungunya, and so forth, which are considered harmful towards the population in tropic and subtropical regions. Methods. The preliminary laboratory trail was undertaken to determine the efficacy of petroleum ether and N-butanol extract of dried whole plant of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) belonging to the family Caesalpiniaceae at various concentrations against the late third instar larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus by following the WHO guidelines. Results. The results suggest that 100% mortality effect of petroleum ether and N-butanol extract of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) was observed at 200 and 300 ppm (parts per million). The results obviously showed use of plants in insect control as an alternative method for minimizing the noxious effect of some pesticide compounds on the environment. Thus the extract of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) is claimed as more selective and biodegradable agent. Conclusion. This study justified that plant Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) has a realistic mortality result for larvae of filarial vector. This is safe to individual and communities against mosquitoes. It is a natural weapon for mosquito control.

1. Introduction

Mosquito is the most indisputable medicinal significant arthropod vector of diseases. The vector-borne diseases caused by mosquito are one of the major health problems in most of the countries. It is affecting the socioeconomical status of many nations and it is an important pest against human causing allergy too. That includes a local skin reaction [1]. They transmit parasites and pathogens which continue to have disadvantageous impact on human beings [2]. The diseases like filariasis, dengue, yellow fever, malaria, Japanese encephalitis, and chikungunya are some of the deadly diseases spread by mosquitoes. Culex quinquefasciatus is an important vector of bancroftian filariasis in tropical and subtropical regions. According to WHO (1984), about 90 million people worldwide were once infected with Wuchereria bancrofti, the lymphatic dwelling parasite, and ten time more people are at the risk of being infected. In India alone is 25 million people harbor microfilaria and 19 million people suffer from filarial diseases [3]. Mosquito is frequently found due to poor drainage system especially during rainy seasons, fish pond, and irrigation ditches and rice fields. This provides a better breeding place for mosquitoes [4]. There is provocative interest in research for larvicidal compound from natural sources. Even though chemical vector program has been carried on for long time, these mosquito vectors remain because of repeated use of synthetic products, house hold spray, and insecticides for mosquito control. As a result, the mosquito develops their resistance [5].

Hence, there is a need for developing biologically active natural chemical constituents which act as a larvicidal and promising to reduce the risk to humans and harmful accumulated residues [2, 6]. This has necessitated the need for research and development of environmentally safe, biodegradable, and low cost indigenous method for vector control, which can be used with minimum care by individuals and communities in specific situation [7]. The plant Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) is described in Ayurveda and siddha as a potent drug. It is traditionally used for the health disorders like cough, stomachic, constipation, leprosy, and filariasis [810]. The extract of whole plant hass proven pharmacologically significant on boils, spasm, hysteria, and whooping cough [11] and also as antioxidant [12], purgative, diuretic, febrifugal, expectorant, stomachic [13], antidiabetic [14], and cytotoxic [15]. The seeds are bitter, sweet, acrid, diuretic, expectorant, purgative, stomachic, febrifuge, and useful in leprosy, ulcer, cough, bronchitis, hiccough, constipation, dyspepsia, and fever. The leaves are bitter, acrid, sweet, thermogenic, depurative, expectorant, and aphrodisiac and are useful in the vitiated condition of vata and kapha leprosy. The roots are bitter, acrid, thermogenic, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, digestive, stomachic, and tonic used against ring worm, colic flatulence, dyspepsia, epilepsy, and convulsion [16]. Besides the claim of larvicidal property of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.), there is no scientific evidence to prove this claim. Hence, the present study has been attempted to make a survey of whole plant extract of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) in a view that the whole plant extract may have most of its biological and biocontrol value when compared to its individual parts, in the context of integrated vector control management. The results of the present study would be useful in promoting research aimed at the development of new agents for mosquito control based on bioactive from of indigenous plant source.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of a Plant Material

The plant was collected during flowering stage in the month of July-August from Nilgris. Then, their identification was established with the aid of an experienced botanist Dr. S. Rajan and compared with herbarium sheets of the authentic sample. Many of defensive components are biodegradable with nonresidual effect on the biological environment; hence, an attempt has been made in present investigation to identify plant with potential to control vector mosquitoes.

2.2. Preparation of Extraction

The dried whole plant of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) was powdered and extracted by Soxhlet with petroleum ether and N-butanol. The extracts were concentrated under the rotary vacuum at evaporator until the complete solvents evaporated at (>45°C) to getsemi solid mass of crude extracts [17]. And then use freeze dried (−80°C) to obtain solid residue [18]. These extracts were used for determining the larvicidal activity against mosquito larvae of bancroftian filariasis vector mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus [19, 20].

2.3. Larvicidal Bioassay

Larvicidal activity was evaluated in accordance with WHO standard with slight modification being done for study [21]. The larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus were obtained and reared from the neonatal mosquito in the National Institute of Communicable Disease, Southern India branch field station. This located at Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu. They were maintained at the temperature of 28 ± 2°C and 80 ± 10% RH (relative humidity) under the 12-hour light and dark photoperiod cycle. The larvae were fed dog biscuit and a brewer’s yeast powder mixture 3 : 1 ratio is used in the laboratory. After five days, adult male mosquitos were fed a 10% of sucrose solution. The emerging female mosquitoes obtain blood meal from white albino rat for 2-3 h for eggs production [22]. A stock solution was prepared and stored in a refrigerator at 15°C. The 25 healthy late third instar larvae were collected and to composed into two different extracts of Petroleum ether and N-butanol in 500 mL beaker (sterilized glass and plastic beaker) each of which was conducted in triplicate. 25 larvae were collected with a pasture pipette, placed on a filter paper for removal of excess of water and placed in 250 mL dechlorinated tap water containing various concentrations of crude extracts. Three controls in triplicate were set up, with distilled water (250 mL). The beakers were covered with muslin cloth to avoid entry of any foreign material. After exposure the larvae in the extract were observed and outright recorded. In between the experiment, no food was ceded to larvae. At the end of 24 h, the observed mortality (crude mortality) was recorded. There is no sign of any movement even after mild touch with a glass rod [18] and dead larvae are to be counted as described in the WHO technique report series. From this crude mortality, percentage of crude mortality was obtained. Subsequently, control mortality, if any, was recorded and percentage of crude mortality was obtained. The percentage of crude mortality was corrected by Abbot’s formula. The corrected probit mortality and expected mortality were also obtained.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The average larval mortality data were subjected to probit analysis for calculating LC50 and LC90 (lethal concentration) values and their 95% confidence limits were estimated by fitting a probit regression model to the observed relationship between percentage of mortality of larvae and logarithmic concentration of the substance. Separate probit models were fitted for each extract [23]. All of the analysis was carried out using the SPSS (Statistical Package Social Science) software version 13.0.

3. Results

The petroleum ether and N-butanol extracts of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) were screened for larvicidal bioassay using water as a vehicle, respectively. The procedure followed for determining larvicidal is the same as described by WHO. The experiments were conducted by using 25 of late third instar larvae for each test solution, keeping a minimum of three replicates and sufficient controls. A total number of 75 larvae were exposed for each concentration for each extract. Five different concentrations of test solution ranging from 40 to 200 ppm were kept for petroleum ether extract and six concentrations of test solution ranging from 50 to 300 ppm were kept for N-butanol extract. The observed and expected mortalities of larvae based on probit regression analysis for different concentrations of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) are shown in Table 1. The estimated LC50 and LC90 values (95% confidence intervals) for Cassia occidentalis (Linn.), Petroleum ether and ethyl N-butanol extracts were 98.4 (89.1–107.2) and 173.8 (160.6–191.5) and 161.6 (152.8–170.5) and 230.0 (217.8–245.5), respectively. The median potency of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) is about 1.6 time less efficacious with petroleum ether and is significantly higher compared to its usage with N-butanol extract. The extracts of these plant have a few important chemical constituents like carbohydrates, glycoside, and tannins [24]. This component has potential larvicidal activity due to individual or synergistic effects on larvae. This needs a further deep investigation to identify the effective constituents for controlling mosquitoes. The results were considered to be statistically significant as given in Table 1.

Conc. ( g/mL)Number of larvaeMortality (%)Expected mortalityLC50   (95% CI)LC90  (95% CI) Probit (mortality)  =   

Cassia occidentalis with petroleum ether
4075152020−1.0012.016.098.4  (89.1–107.2)173.8 (160.6–191.5)
D.F. = 3 

Cassia occidentalis with N-butanol
5075344−  (152.8–170.5)230.0  (217.8–245.5)
D.F. = 4 

D.F.: degrees of freedom.

4. Discussion

Globally, there is a prompt awareness going on and always desired to use natural, ecofriendly compounds for larvicidal activity [25]. Mosquito risk has become more acute in recent time and the death of millions of people every year due to mosquito-borne diseases has resulted in the loss of socioeconomic wealth in many countries. The control of mosquito by chemical substance is not safe at present because of insecticide resistance by vectors and environmental imbalance. Application of chemical or synthetic insecticides leads to deleterious effects in the long term, hence it does not provide absolute results. That is why alternative mosquito control method is needed [26]. The extract which is obtained from plant parts like leaves, root, flower, bark, seed, and fruits in their crude extracts has been used as conventional larvicide [25]. The secondary compounds of plants are vast repository of compounds with a wide range of biological activities. Tennyson [17] studied the larvicidal activity of twenty-five plant extracts against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus. Likewise, Pavela [27] studied the larvicidal activity of thirty-one Euro-Asiatic methanolic extracts against the larvae Culex quinquefasciatus. The leaf extract of Mesua ferra [28], fruit extract of Croton caudatus, flower extract of Tiliacora acuminate [29], leaf extract of Typhonium trilobatum [30] and flower extract of Tagetes erecta [31] were found to cause larval mortality to Culex quinquefasciatus. In this study, the petroleum ether and N-butanol extracts of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) whole plant exhibited a dose dependent activity which is similar to other studies which have also reported dose-dependency of plant against mosquito larvae [3234]. The mechanism of action exhibited by Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) whole plant may therefore possibly be due to its toxic effects on the larvae. This is supported by a previous study which reported that an ethanol extract of P. Pinnata exhibited toxic effects in the Swiss albino mice [35]. Other studies also showed clearly that the chloroform and methanolic extracts of Tagetes minuta L. have a pronounced larvicidal effect on mosquito Anopheles stephensi which is due to the presence of the phytochemicals such as flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, and saponins. Thus, the above statement may potentiate that the shown larvicidal activity of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) whole plant may also be due to presence of flavonoids, phenols, glycosides, and tannins.

Hence, from the present study, the authors concluded that the petroleum ether and N-butanol extracts of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) whole plant extract have larvicidal activities.

5. Conclusion

On the basis of the above results, we can conclude that Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) has a paramount larvicidal importance. The synthetic chemical can be obtained easily at a very low cost. But the use of the plants for larvae control offers a safer alternative too. Moreover, these results could be useful in the search for newer compounds. These extracts are inexpensive, easy to handle, and safer products for the control of mosquito larvae.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors are thankful to the J.S.S. College of Pharmacy, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, and the National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Coonoor, Southern India branch field station located at Mettupalayam (District Coimbatore of Tamil Nadu State), for providing all necessary facilities which were required for completing this research work.


  1. M. Govindarajan, A. Jebanesan, and D. Reetha, “Larvicidal effect of extracellular secondary metabolites of different fungi against the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say,” Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. Maheswaran, S. Kingsley, and S. Ingacimuthu, “Larvicidal and repellent activity of Clerodendron phlomides against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae),” in Proceedings of Recent Trends in Insect Pest Management, pp. 240–243, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. Maheswaran, S. Sathish, and S. Ingacimuthu, “Larvicidal activity of Leucas aspera (Willd) against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Adedes aegypti L.,” International Journal of Integrative Biology, vol. 2, pp. 214–217, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  4. N. Komalamisra, Y. Trongtokit, Y. Rongsriyam, and C. Apiwathnasorn, “Screening for larvicidal activity in some Thai plants against four mosquito vector species,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1412–1422, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. N. G. Das, D. Goswami, and B. Rabha, “Preliminary evaluation of mosquito larvicidal efficacy of plant extracts,” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 145–148, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. K. Prabakar and A. Jebanesan, “Larvicidal efficacy of some Cucurbitacious plant leaf extracts against Culex quinquefasciatus (Say),” Bioresource Technology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 113–114, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Kumar, P. Dhamodaran, P. Nilani, and N. Balakrishna, “Larvicidal activity of Tephrosia purpuria against of against Culex quinquefasciatus,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 2, pp. 219–221, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. N. Yoganarasimhan, Medicinal Plants of India: Tamil Nadu, vol. 2, 2000.
  9. M. P. Singh and H. Panda, Medicinal Herbs with Their Formulations, vol. 1, Daya Publishing House, Delhi, Indian, 2005.
  10. K. R. Retnam and P. Martin, Ethnomedicinal Plants, Agrobis Jodhpur, Delhi, India, 2006.
  11. V. Bobbarala, P. K. Katikala, K. C. Naidu, and S. Penumajji, “Antifungal activity of selected plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungi Aspergillus niger F2723,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 87–90, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. P. Vadnere, A. V. Patil, S. K. Jain, and S. S. Wagh, “Investigation on in-vitro antioxidant activity of whole plant of Cassia occidentalis Linn. (Caesalpiniaceae),” International Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1985–1991, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. Vijayabhaskar, K. Chaitanyaprasad, K. Srisailam, N. M. Arunadevi, S. Swathi, and P. Subhashini, “Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the extract of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) animal model,” International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 759–762, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. Verma, A. Khatri, B. Kaushik, U. K. Patil, and R. S. Pawar, “Antidiabetic activity of Cassia occidentalis (Linn.) in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 224–228, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Bhagat and A. K. Saxena, “Evaluation of Cassia occidentalis for in vitro cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines and antibacterial activity,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 234–237, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. P. Khare, Indian Medicinal Plants: An Illustrated Dictionary, Springer, New Delhi, India, 2007.
  17. S. Tennyson, K. J. Ravindran, and S. Arivoli, “Screening of twenty five plant extracts for larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae),” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 2, supplement, pp. S1130–S1134, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Y. S. Ali, S. Ravikumar, and J. M. Beula, “Mosquito larvicidal activity of seaweeds extracts against Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 196–201, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India—Part I, vol. 1, Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, India, 1st edition, 2001.
  20. WHO, Geneva, Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials, A.I.T.B.S. Publishers & Distributors, Delhi, India, 2000.
  21. WHO, Mineographed Document, WHO, 1985.
  22. A. Alouani, N. Rehimi, and N. Soltani, “Larvicidal activity of a neem tree extract (Azadirachtin) against mosquito larvae in the republic of Algeria,” Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  23. D. J. Finnely, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1971.
  24. R. B. Bhagat and D. K. Kulkarni, “Evaluation of larvicidal and antifeedant potential of three Jatropha species against Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and two predators (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae),” Annals of Biological Research, vol. 3, pp. 2911–2916, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. Vinayagam and N. Senthil kumar, “Umamaheswari Larvicidal activity of medicinal plant extract against malaria vector Anopheles stephensi,” Research Journal of Parasitology, vol. 3, pp. 50–58, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. Pavela, “Larvicidal activities of some Euro-Asiatic plants against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae),” Journal of Biopesticides, vol. 1, pp. 81–85, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Singha, U. Adhikari, and G. Chandra, “Smoke repellency and mosquito larvicidal potentiality of Mesua ferra L. leaf extract against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 1, supplement, pp. S119–S123, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Singha, S. Banerjee, and G. Chandra, “Synergistic effect of Croton caudatus (fruits) and Tiliacora acuminata (flowers) extracts against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 2, supplement, pp. S159–S164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. M. Haldar, P. Ghosh, and G. Chandra, “Evaluation of target specific larvicidal activity of the leaf extract of Typhonium trilobatum against Culex quinquefasciatus Say,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 2, supplement, pp. S199–S203, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Nikkon, M. R. Habib, Z. A. Saud, and M. R. Karim, “Tagetes erecta Linn. and its mosquitocidal potency against Culex quinquefasciatus,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 186–188, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Choochote, B. Tuetun, D. Kanjanapothi et al., “Potential of crude seed extract of celery, Apium graveolens L., against the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae),” Journal of Vector Ecology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 340–346, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. K. Singh, R. C. Dhiman, and P. K. Mittal, “Mosquito larvicidal properties of Momordica charantia Linn (Family: Cucurbitaceae),” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 88–91, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. Kaushik and P. Saini, “Larvicidal activity of leaf extract of Millingtonia hortensis (Family: Bignoniaceae) against Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti,” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 66–69, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  34. I. M. Maje, J. A. Anuka, I. M. Hussaini et al., “Evaluation of the anti-malarial activity of the ethanolic leaves extract of Paullinia pinnata (Linn.) (sapindaceae),” Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 67–72, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Hadjiakhoondi, H. Vatandoost, M. Khanavi, M. R. Abaee, and M. Karamia, “Biochemical investigation of different extracts and larvicidal activity of Tagetes minuta L. on Anopheles stephensi larvae,” Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 81–84, 2005. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Deepak Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.