Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 320425, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/320425
Research Article

Control of the False Discovery Proportion for Independently Tested Null Hypotheses

1Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, P.O. Box 1137, New York, NY 10029, USA
2Division of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, New York University, 650 First Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA

Received 14 December 2011; Accepted 8 February 2012

Academic Editor: Yongzhao Shao

Copyright © 2012 Yongchao Ge and Xiaochun Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 289–300, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Genovese and L. Wasserman, “Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 499–517, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  3. E. L. Korn, J. F. Troendle, L. M. McShane, and R. Simon, “Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 379–398, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  4. C. Genovese and L. Wasserman, “A stochastic process approach to false discovery control,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1035–1061, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. E. L. Lehmann and J. P. Romano, “Generalizations of the familywise error rate,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1138–1154, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. N. Meinshausen and J. Rice, “Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 373–393, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. J. P. Romano and A. M. Shaikh, “On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion,” in Lehmann Symposium—Optimality, vol. 49 of IMS Lecture Notes—Monograph Series, pp. 33–50, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, Ohio, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. P. Romano and A. M. Shaikh, “Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1850–1873, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. J. van der Laan, S. Dudoit, and K. S. Pollard, “Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives,” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, article 15, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. J. D. Storey, J. E. Taylor, and D. Siegmund, “Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 187–205, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 60–83, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Langaas, B. H. Lindqvist, and E. Ferkingstad, “Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 555–572, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. N. Meinshausen, “False discovery control for multiple tests of association under general dependence,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 227–237, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Göb, “Bounds for median and 50 percentage point of binomial and negative binomial distribution,” Metrika, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Donoho and J. Jin, “Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 962–994, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. D. Jaeschke, “The asymptotic distribution of the supremum of the standardized empirical distribution function on subintervals,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  17. M. Noe and G. Vandewiele, “The calculation of distributions of Kolmogorov-Smirnov type statistics including a table of significance points for a particular case,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 39, pp. 233–241, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  18. J. D. Storey and R. Tibshirani, “Statistical significance for genomewide studies,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 16, pp. 9440–9445, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  19. Y. Ge, S. C. Sealfon, and T. P. Speed, “Multiple testing and its applications to microarrays,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 543–563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar