Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2012, Article ID 804691, 6 pages
Research Article

Not Significant: What Now?

1Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Schöpfstraße 41, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Received 25 July 2012; Accepted 12 October 2012

Academic Editor: Man Lai Tang

Copyright © 2012 Gerhard Marinell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Cohen, “The earth is round (p<.05),” American Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 997–1003, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Loftus, “On the tyranny of hypothesis testing in the social sciences,” Contemporary Psychology, vol. 36, pp. 102–105, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. A. Fisher, The Design of Experiments, (5th Ed., 1951; 7th Ed., 1960; 8th Ed., 1966), Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK, 1935.
  4. R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK, 1956.
  5. G. Gigerenzer, “Mindless statistics,” Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 587–606, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1994.
  7. D. Boos and I. Stefanski, “P-value precision and reproducibility,” The American Statistician, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 213–221, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Wald, “Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 117–186, 1945. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Neyman and E. Pearson, “On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, vol. 231, pp. 289–337, 1933. View at Google Scholar