Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 931416, 37 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/931416
Research Article

Secondary Analysis under Cohort Sampling Designs Using Conditional Likelihood

1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A2
2Indic Society for Education and Development (INSEED), Nashik, Maharashtra 422 011, India
3Department of Vaccines, National Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tampere, 33014 Tampere, Finland
5Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland

Received 28 July 2011; Revised 29 December 2011; Accepted 24 January 2012

Academic Editor: Kari Auranen

Copyright © 2012 Olli Saarela et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. L. Kupper, A. J. McMichael, and R. Spirtas, “A hybrid epidemiologic study design useful in estimating relative risk,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 70, pp. 524–528, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. O. Miettinen, “Design options in epidemiologic research. An update,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. L. Prentice, “A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials,” Biometrika, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  4. D. Oakes, “Survival times: aspects of partial likelihood,” International Statistical Review, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 235–264, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. B. Langholz and L. Goldstein, “Risk set sampling in epidemiologic cohort studies,” Statistical Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–53, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Jiang, A. J. Scott, and C. J. Wild, “Secondary analysis of case-control data,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1323–1339, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Y. Lin and D. Zeng, “Proper analysis of secondary phenotype data in case-control association studies,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. Saarela, S. Kulathinal, E. Arjas, and E. Läärä, “Nested case-control data utilized for multiple outcomes: a likelihood approach and alternatives,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 27, no. 28, pp. 5991–6008, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Salim, C. Hultman, P. Sparén, and M. Reilly, “Combining data from 2 nested case-control studies of overlapping cohorts to improve efficiency,” Biostatistics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Kettunen, K. Silander, O. Saarela et al., “European lactase persistence genotype shows evidence of association with increase in body mass index,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1129–1136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. O. P. Heinonen, J. K. Huttunen, D. Albanes et al., “The alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene lung cancer prevention study: design, methods, participant characteristics, and compliance,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Evans, V. Salomaa, S. Kulathinal et al., “MORGAM (an international pooling of cardiovascular cohorts),” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Kulathinal, J. Karvanen, O. Saarela, and K. Kuulasmaa, “Case-cohort design in practice—experiences from the MORGAM Project,” Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations, vol. 4, article 15, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. J. Lee, L. McMurchy, and A. J. Scott, “Re-using data from case-control studies,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1377–1389, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Reilly, A. Torrång, and A. Klint, “Re-use of case-control data for analysis of new outcome variables,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 4009–4019, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. D. B. Richardson, P. Rzehak, J. Klenk, and S. K. Weiland, “Analyses of case-control data for additional outcomes,” Epidemiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 441–445, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. M. Monsees, R. M. Tamimi, and P. Kraft, “Genome-wide association scans for secondary traits using case-control samples,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 717–728, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Langholz and L. Goldstein, “Conditional logistic analysis of casecontrol studies with complex sampling,” Biostatistics, vol. 2, pp. 63–84, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. O. Saarela and S. Kulathinal, “Conditional likelihood inference in a case-cohort design: an application to haplotype analysis,” International Journal of Biostatistics, vol. 3, no. 1, article 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. J. Karvanen, “Estimation of quantile mixtures via L-moments and trimmed L-moments,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 947–959, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  21. D. B. Rubin, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. D. Kalbfleisch and J. F. Lawless, “Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 149–160, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. O. Samuelsen, “A pseudolikelihood approach to analysis of nested case-control studies,” Biometrika, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 379–394, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  24. D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson, “A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 47, pp. 663–685, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  25. S. O. Samuelsen, H. Ånestad, and A. Skrondal, “Stratified case-cohort analysis of general cohort sampling designs,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 103–119, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. D. R. Cox and D. V. Hinkley, Theoretical Statistics, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1974.
  27. D. R. Cox, “Partial likelihood,” Biometrika, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 269–276, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. E. B. Andersen, “Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 32, pp. 283–301, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  29. J. D. Kalbfleisch and D. A. Sprott, “Application of likelihood methods to models involving large numbers of parameters,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 32, pp. 175–208, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  30. S. R. Seaman and S. Richardson, “Bayesian analysis of case-control studies with categorical covariates,” Biometrika, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1073–1088, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  31. D. R. Cox, Principles of Statistical Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  32. J. Ma, C. I. Amos, and E. W. Daw, “Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 594–604, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Kim and V. De Gruttola, “Strategies for cohort sampling under the Cox proportional hazards model, application to an AIDS clinical trial,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149–172, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  34. C.-E. Särndal, B. Swensson, and J. Wretman, Model Assisted Survey Sampling, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  35. S. Kulathinal and E. Arjas, “Bayesian inference from case-cohort data with multiple end-points,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  36. J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
  37. O. Saarela, S. Kulathinal, and J. Karvanen, “Joint analysis of prevalence and incidence data using conditional likelihood,” Biostatistics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 575–587, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011, http://www.r-project.org/.
  39. M. Galassi, J. Davies, J. Theiler et al., GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual, Network Theory Ltd., Bristol, UK, 3rd edition, 2009, http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/.
  40. B. Langholz, “Use of cohort information in the design and analysis of case-control studies,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 120–136, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  41. N. E. Breslow and J. A. Wellner, “Weighted likelihood for semiparametric models and two-phase stratified samples, with application to Cox regression,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 86–102, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  42. T. Cai and Y. Zheng, “Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers in nested case-control studies,” Biostatistics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. G. Booth, R. W. Butler, and P. Hall, “Bootstrap methods for finite populations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 89, no. 428, pp. 1282–1289, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  44. R. J. Gray, “Weighted analyses for cohort sampling designs,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 24–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. B. Langholz, “Case-control studies = odds ratios: blame the retrospective model,” Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–12, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar