Research Article
Similarity Statistics for Clusterability Analysis with the Application of Cell Formation Problem
Table 6
Grouping efficacy results with the two-stage solution process.
| ā | Case I | Case II | HC | HC+GA | % Improve | HC | HC+GA | % Improve |
| Case A | 0.7817 | 0.7817 | 0 | 0.7550 | 0.7550 | 0 | Case B | 0.8859 | 0.8859 | 0 | 0.6542 | 0.6542 | 0 | Case C | 0.7587 | 0.7587 | 0 | 0.7180 | 0.7180 | 0 | Case D | 0.7514 | 0.7514 | 0 | 0.8218 | 0.8218 | 0 | Case E | 0.8590 | 0.8590 | 0 | 0.8302 | 0.8302 | 0 | Case F | 0.8230 | 0.8230 | 0 | 0.7800 | 0.7800 | 0 | Case G | 0.8511 | 0.8511 | 0 | 0.6861 | 0.6861 | 0 | Case H | 0.7059 | 0.7059 | 0 | 0.7500 | 0.7500 | 0 | Case I | 0.6475 | 0.6475 | 0 | 0.7444 | 0.7444 | 0 | Case J | 0.7645 | 0.7645 | 0 | 0.7600 | 0.7600 | 0 | Case K | 0.7106 | 0.7106 | 0 | 0.7241 | 0.7241 | 0 | Case L | 0.7561 | 0.7561 | 0 | 0.8122 | 0.8122 | 0 | Case M | 0.6720 | 0.6720 | 0 | 0.7798 | 0.7798 | 0 | Case N | 0.6327 | 0.6327 | 0 | 0.8484 | 0.8484 | 0 | Case O | 0.6644 | 0.6644 | 0 | 0.8854 | 0.8854 | 0 |
| ā | Case III | Case IV | HC | HC+GA | % Improve | HC | HC+GA | % Improve |
| Case A | 0.7627 | 0.7627 | 0 | 0.5776 | 0.5959 | 3.17% | Case B | 0.7961 | 0.7961 | 0 | 0.4650 | 0.4713 | 1.35% | Case C | 0.8142 | 0.8142 | 0 | 0.5842 | 0.5884 | 0.72% | Case D | 0.7290 | 0.7290 | 0 | 0.4938 | 0.5129 | 3.87% | Case E | 0.6898 | 0.6898 | 0 | 0.4927 | 0.5065 | 2.80% | Case F | 0.7097 | 0.7097 | 0 | 0.4689 | 0.5240 | 11.75% | Case G | 0.7990 | 0.7990 | 0 | 0.5711 | 0.5747 | 0.63% | Case H | 0.6667 | 0.6667 | 0 | 0.4134 | 0.4884 | 18.14% | Case I | 0.6481 | 0.6481 | 0 | 0.4067 | 0.4281 | 5.26% | Case J | 0.6995 | 0.6995 | 0 | 0.3785 | 0.4483 | 18.44% | Case K | 0.6035 | 0.6035 | 0 | 0.3819 | 0.4369 | 14.40% | Case L | 0.6079 | 0.6094 | 0.25% | 0.4657 | 0.4898 | 5.18% | Case M | 0.5753 | 0.5765 | 0.21% | 0.3738 | 0.4586 | 22.69% | Case N | 0.5891 | 0.5903 | 0.20% | 0.3556 | 0.3986 | 12.09% | Case O | 0.6673 | 0.6673 | 0 | 0.4150 | 0.4494 | 8.29% |
|
|