Research Article

Similarity Statistics for Clusterability Analysis with the Application of Cell Formation Problem

Table 6

Grouping efficacy results with the two-stage solution process.

ā€‰Case ICase II
HCHC+GA% ImproveHCHC+GA% Improve

Case A0.78170.781700.75500.75500
Case B0.88590.885900.65420.65420
Case C0.75870.758700.71800.71800
Case D0.75140.751400.82180.82180
Case E0.85900.859000.83020.83020
Case F0.82300.823000.78000.78000
Case G0.85110.851100.68610.68610
Case H0.70590.705900.75000.75000
Case I0.64750.647500.74440.74440
Case J0.76450.764500.76000.76000
Case K0.71060.710600.72410.72410
Case L0.75610.756100.81220.81220
Case M0.67200.672000.77980.77980
Case N0.63270.632700.84840.84840
Case O0.66440.664400.88540.88540

ā€‰Case IIICase IV
HCHC+GA% ImproveHCHC+GA% Improve

Case A0.76270.762700.57760.59593.17%
Case B0.79610.796100.46500.47131.35%
Case C0.81420.814200.58420.58840.72%
Case D0.72900.729000.49380.51293.87%
Case E0.68980.689800.49270.50652.80%
Case F0.70970.709700.46890.524011.75%
Case G0.79900.799000.57110.57470.63%
Case H0.66670.666700.41340.488418.14%
Case I0.64810.648100.40670.42815.26%
Case J0.69950.699500.37850.448318.44%
Case K0.60350.603500.38190.436914.40%
Case L0.60790.60940.25%0.46570.48985.18%
Case M0.57530.57650.21%0.37380.458622.69%
Case N0.58910.59030.20%0.35560.398612.09%
Case O0.66730.667300.41500.44948.29%