Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Robotics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8901820, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8901820
Research Article

A Novel Method of Dexterity Analysis for a 5-DOF Manipulator

1State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nangang, Harbin 150001, China
2School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Xiaolingwei 200, Nanjing 210094, China
3Wuhu HIT Robot Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Electronic Industrial Park, Block E, JiuJiang District, Wuhu 241007, China

Received 4 October 2015; Revised 14 December 2015; Accepted 28 December 2015

Academic Editor: Yuan F. Zheng

Copyright © 2016 Wanjin Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Lau, J. Eden, D. Oetomo, and S. K. Halgamuge, “Musculoskeletal static workspace analysis of the human shoulder as a cable-driven robot,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 978–984, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Seriani, M. Seriani, and P. Gallina, “Workspace optimization for a planar cable-suspended direct-driven robot,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 34, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Yoshikawa, “Manipulability of robotic mechanisms,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3–9, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Mansouri and M. Ouali, “A new homogeneous manipulability measure of robot manipulators, based on power concept,” Mechatronics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 927–944, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Mansouri and M. Ouali, “The power manipulability—a new homogeneous performance index of robot manipulators,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 434–449, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Mansouri and M. Ouali, “Quaternion representation of the power manipulability,” Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 309–336, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Vahrenkamp and T. Asfour, “Representing the robot's workspace through constrained manipulability analysis,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Cervantes-Sánchez, J. M. Rico-Martínez, and V. H. Pérez-Muñoz, “Two natural dexterity indices for parallel manipulators: angularity and axiality,” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID 041007, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. M. Gosselin, “Dexterity indices for planar and spatial robotic manipulators,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 650–655, IEEE, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, May 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. G. Roberts, “The dexterity and singularities of an underactuated robot,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 159–169, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. K. Tchón and K. Zadarnowska, “Kinematic dexterity of mobile manipulators: an endogenous configuration space approach,” Robotica, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 521–530, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Bai, M. R. Hansen, and T. O. Andersen, “Modelling of a special class of spherical parallel manipulators with Euler parameters,” Robotica, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Liu, T. Huang, and D. G. Chetwynd, “A method to formulate a dimensionally homogeneous jacobian of parallel manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 150–156, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Xu and X. Ding, “Gait analysis of a radial symmetrical hexapod robot based on parallel mechanisms,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 867–879, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. B. Du, J. Zhao, and C. Song, “Dexterity analysis for omni-directional wheeled mobile manipulator based on double quaternion,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 585–593, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Gosselin and J. Angeles, “A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 220–226, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. C. Park and R. W. Brockett, “Kinematic dexterity of robotic mechanisms,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Gao and D. Zhang, “Performance analysis, mapping, and multiobjective optimization of a hybrid robotic machine tool,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 423–433, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. J. Guo, R. F. Li, C. Q. Cao, and Y. F. Gao, “Kinematics analysis of a novel 5-DOF hybrid manipulator,” International Journal of Automation Technology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 765–774, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Denavit, “A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices,” Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 22, pp. 215–221, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  21. B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Hoffman, Analysis in Euclidean Space, Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, USA, 2013.
  23. A. Kumar and K. J. Waldron, “The workspaces of a mechanical manipulator,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 665–672, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus