Alamandine: Potential Protective Effects in SARS-CoV-2 Patients

Soltani Hekmat, Ava; Javanmardi, Kazem

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6824259

Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6824259 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6824259

Alamandine: Potential Protective Effects in SARS-CoV-2 Patients

Ava Soltani Hekmat¹and Kazem Javanmardi¹

Academic Editor: Vijaya Anand

Received07 Jul 2021

Revised13 Sept 2021

Accepted21 Oct 2021

Published08 Nov 2021

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can occur due to contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 has no confined treatment and, consequently, has high hospitalization and mortality rates. Moreover, people who contract COVID-19 present systemic inflammatory spillover. It is now known that COVID-19 pathogenesis is linked to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). COVID-19 invades host cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor—as such, an individual’s susceptibility to COVID-19 increases alongside the upregulation of this receptor. COVID-19 has also been associated with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, which leads to acute respiratory distress, cardiomyopathy, and shock. These outcomes are thought to result from imbalances in angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang-(1-7)/alamandine activity. ACE2, Ang-(1-7), and alamandine have potent anti-inflammatory properties, and some SARS-CoV-2 patients exhibit high levels of ACE2 and Ang-(1-7). This phenomenon could indicate a failing physiological response to prevent or reduce the severity of inflammation-mediated pulmonary injuries. Alamandine, which is another protective component of the RAS, has several health benefits owing to its antithrombogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic characteristics. Alamandine alleviates pulmonary fibrosis via the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor D (MrgD). Thus, a better understanding of this pathway could uncover novel pharmacological strategies for altering proinflammatory environments within the body. Following such strategies could inhibit fibrosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and, consequently, prevent COVID-19.

1. Introduction

COVID-19 is an extremely contagious disease triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first case of COVID-19 occurred in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared it as a pandemic [1].

Coronaviruses comprise a single-stranded RNA enveloped in a capsid that is encapsulated in a spike (S) glycoprotein containing membrane. This S glycoprotein enables the virus to bind to host receptors, enter host cells, and initiate membrane fusion [2]. According to the literatures, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 is a specific functional receptor for SARS-CoV2 [3]. A type II transmembrane serine protease is the main host protease by which S glycoproteins are activated [4]. The viral entry of this protease can be inhibited by camostat mesylate [5].

According to Zhou et al., SARS-CoV-2 can infiltrate ACE2-expressing cells, whereas it cannot enter cells that do not have ACE2. Moreover, it cannot enter cells with conventional COVID-19 entry receptors such as aminopeptidase N and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) [6]. Such findings signify ACE2’s status as the primary cell receptor for SARS-CoV-2 [7].

Regarding SARS-CoV-2 infections, in particular, ACE2 receptors (or their transmembrane domain) are internalized with the virus. S glycoproteins do not occlude the ACE2 receptor’s catalytically active site [8]. Moreover, binding takes place regardless of ACE2’s peptidase activity. Also, binding and membrane fusion appear to be promoted by a disintegrin and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17), and TNF-converting enzyme, among other transmembrane proteinases and some proteins, including vimentin and clathrin [8].

Given the current absence of a specific treatment for COVID-19 which has high morbidity and mortality rates, it is vital to discover a novel drug for COVID-19 treatment.

The clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients and the fact that ACE2 is a SARS-CoV-2 receptor suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes an imbalance in the RAS [7]. In this review, we discuss the following: (i) different treatment options for COVID-19 patients and some clinical strategies for rebalancing the RAS. These treatments utilize ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, and they involve the activation of the RAS’s protective arm with MasR agonist (Ang-(1-7)), (ii) ACE2-based treatments, and (iii) the protective effect of alamandine on COVID-19 patients, because of its anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antioxidative properties.

The information provided in this study was derived from English language publications found in the PubMed and Scopus databases, as well as the Google Scholar search engine. The search terms were alamandine, RAS, ACE2, Ang-(1-7), COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and cytokine storm; we also searched for combinations of these terms.

2. Treatments for COVID-19

Although only one medication to treat COVID-19 has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), many medications are being tested [9]. Below, we describe various available treatments for COVID-19 [9].

2.1. Antiviral and Antimalarial Drugs

Remdesivir is the only drug approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19 [9]. Remdesivir binds to the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and inhibits viral replication by preventing RNA transcription from being completed. In in vitro, it exhibits anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity [9]. However, the results of remdesivir randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been inconsistent. Current RCTs of remdesivir focused on hospitalized patients have revealed that remdesivir had no significant therapeutic effects for COVID-19 patients. However, several individual studies have shown promising outcomes among individuals at the early stages of the disease [9, 10].

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are used to treat malaria, as well as several autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine prevent viral infection by increasing the pH (from approximately 4.0 to 6.0) of cellular endosomes (which is required for virus-cell fusion) and interfering with SARS-CoV cellular receptor glycosylation [11]. RCTs and meta-analyses indicate that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine do not protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, decrease mortality, reduce the duration of hospital stay, or improve clinical outcomes [9].

2.2. Corticosteroid

Patients with severe COVID-19 may have a systemic inflammatory response, leading to lung injury and multisystem organ failure [9]. However, the potent anti-inflammatory properties of corticosteroids may prevent or mitigate these undesirable effects. Corticosteroids may decrease the excessive inflammation in patients with severe cases of COVID-19, but they may also induce immunosuppression and exacerbate the infection. Furthermore, long-term and high-dose corticosteroid use may cause side effects, including avascular necrosis and hyperglycemia. Corticosteroids are often prescribed for severe patients who frequently suffer from acute respiratory distress syndrome and/or sepsis [9, 12].

2.3. Interleukin-6 Inhibitors

IL-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine produced by monocytes, fibroblasts, and lymphocytes, and SARS-CoV infection induces bronchial epithelial cells to generate IL-6 in a dose-dependent manner. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody [9] that has been proposed to help protect against COVID-19. Initial studies on the use of tocilizumab as a COVID-19 treatment yielded conflicting results. The two largest randomized controlled tocilizumab trials (REMAP-CAP and RECOVERY) indicated that tocilizumab reduced the mortality rate among hospitalized patients, especially those needing oxygen due to an inflammatory response [9, 13]. Although IL-6 receptor antagonists appeared to help COVID-19 patients who need substantial amounts of oxygen, they are not yet suitable for general use in adults who have mild cases of the disease or require prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation [13].

2.4. Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are a type of immunological molecule that can recognize and bind to specific antigens. Because large quantities of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies can be generated rapidly, they are considered a possible candidate for treating new infectious diseases. Specifically, they have been employed effectively to treat the Ebola virus disease [10]. Monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 mainly target the S glycoprotein, thus inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 recognition and binding to the human ACE2 receptor. The result of this mechanism is viral cell entry [10].

The FDA has granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to many neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab with etesevimab, casirivimab with imdevimab, and sotrovimab [13]. Many neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapies seem to reduce viral load and prevent mortality in people at high risk of disease progression [7, 10, 13].

Considering rapid SARS-CoV-2 mutations, monotherapy with neutralizing antibodies may result in further mutational escape. Because SARS-CoV-2 variants are continuously developing, it is crucial to monitor the variant types and their susceptibilities to different antibody therapies [7].

3. The Renin-Angiotensin System

The RAS is an essential hormonal system for regulating blood pressure [14]. The RAS is a complex system of various peptides that carry out diverse biological actions mediated by specific receptor subtypes [15]. Angiotensin (Ang) II is a potent bioactive molecule generated from Ang I by an ACE. The classic RAS includes the ACE-Ang II-Ang II type 1 receptor (AT₁R) axis. This axis ensures vasoconstriction and water intake, sodium retention, fibrosis, inflammation, and increased oxidative stress. The ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-alamandine pathway is the main component of the other (nonclassical) type of RAS. This RAS combats many of the actions performed by the Ang II-AT₁R axis [15, 16].

Various cardiovascular diseases develop via the classic RAS [17]. In this system, collagen is synthesized, and fibroblast is proliferated in the heart via Ang II. Cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis are common effects of this process, and they often lead to adverse ventricular remodeling [18]. Ang II is also commonly responsible for inflammatory processes and alterations in the electrophysiological properties of the heart [19].

AT1 receptor stimulation leads to vasoconstriction and, in turn, increased catecholamine release and aldosterone production [17]. These outcomes subsequently trigger fibrosis, inflammation, and decreases in collagenase activity and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression [20]. NADPH oxidase downregulation, decreased smooth muscle cell expression, and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are vital components of AT1 receptors’ proinflammatory processes. The activity of various proinflammatory transcription nuclear factors (e.g., nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB)) is also increased [21]. Additionally, ATI receptors cause the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) [19].

RAS blockers (ACE-inhibitors and II receptor blockers (ARBs)) are a potential component of treatment for COVID-19 patients. Research shows that these patients have high ACE2 levels, which correlate with high viral loads; therefore, ACE2 is likely linked to COVID-19 pathogenesis. Early evidence suggested that RAS blockers increase the severity of health outcomes due to increased ACE2 mRNA expression, which, in turn, promotes the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 [22]. However, no studies have confirmed this relationship. Moreover, no evidence supports the notion that ACE2 activity is linked to mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 [23].

Moreover, empirical studies have not confirmed the connections between ARB and ACE-inhibitor use and COVID-19 diagnosis, hospital admission due to COVID-19, and COVID-19 severity [19, 24].

Furthermore, research indicates that the use of RAS blockers and non-RAS blockers results in similar mortality rates among COVID-19 patients [25, 26]. Opinions and guidelines are inconsistent regarding whether medications that upregulate ACE2 levels should be continued, primarily because of the current lack of evidence on this matter [27].

4. The Protective Arm of RAS

Unlike the classic RAS, the nonclassic RAS protects the heart by reducing inflammation, fibrosis, and cardiac electrical remodeling. It also plays a role in vasodilation, hypertrophy, and thrombosis mitigation. Of note, alamandine and Ang-(1-7) belong to this protective arm of RAS [28]. This RAS axis has antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties. Specifically, the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/mitochondrial assembly receptor (MasR) and alamandine/MrgD axes might help protect the body against COVID-19 [29] (Figure 1).

5. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2

ACE2 directly converts Ang II into Ang-(1-7). Among diabetes patients, serum and urinary ACE2 activity increases, as do hypertension and the risk of heart failure [15]. Whereas the circulating levels of ACE are generally high, ACE2 levels tend to be low. This pattern might indicate reduced shedding or perhaps a restricted vascular expression of peptidase [15]. Thus, ACE2 is a vital component of the RAS, owing to its capacity to metabolize Ang II. It also promotes the production of Ang-(1-7), thus activating the Ang-(1-7)-AT₂/MasR axis.

Over time, the administration of soluble ACE2 can lower the risk of cardiac and renal injury, fibrosis, and inflammation in mice with type 1 and type 2 diabetes [15]. Furthermore, adipose tissue proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) and iNOS were found to increase in ACE2 knockout mice [8].

When ACE2 activity is reduced or absent, Ang I tends to be converted into Ang II. At the same time, Ang II is not effectively converted into Ang-(1-7) or alamandine. Because of this, the levels of proinflammatory Ang II are increased, while the levels of anti-inflammatory Ang-(1-7) and alamandine are reduced [19].

Conceptually, using ACE2 to alter the balance of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) over time is a challenging process. Ang II levels can be lowered via exogenous ACE2, and this process is likely to generate Ang II due to the inactivation of renin’s negative feedback mechanisms [15]. Therefore, it seems unlikely that high levels of ACE2 can reduce Ang II and increase Ang-(1-7) in the long term, except perhaps if an ACE inhibitor is also involved [15].

Almost every organ in the human body, including the lungs, heart, kidney, nasopharynx, smooth muscle cells, and testes, expresses different ACE2 receptor levels [30]. ACE2 is primarily expressed on type II alveolar epithelial cells within the respiratory system [8]. However, low levels of this receptor are also expressed in the oral and nasal mucosa and nasopharynx surfaces’ epithelial cells. Such findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 mainly targets the lungs [31].

Moreover, proximal tubule cells, bladder urothelial cells, and myocardial cells express high levels of ACE2. ACE2 receptors are also abundant in the enterocytes of the small intestine, especially in the ileum [32]. After infecting the lungs, SARS-CoV-2 can spread through the bloodstream to other organs with elevated ACE2 expression levels. For example, enteric symptoms were exhibited by as many as 67% of patients who developed diarrhea while infected with SARS, and a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients showed similar symptoms [31].

The soluble human recombinant ACE2 is useful for treating lung injuries caused by viral infections [32]. Thus, ACE2 could be used to treat COVID-19. This argument is based on the fact that the entry receptor of ACE2 mediates SARS-CoV-2 infections and that it impacts cardiac and lung damage [33] .ACE2 blockers can also prevent viruses from entering cells. Therefore, treatments involving ACE2 blockers could reduce ACE2’s protective and anti-inflammatory activity, leading to a higher risk of lung damage.

As such, it could be desirable to block viral entry via protease inhibitors that target TMPRSS2 protease upon SARS-CoV-2 cell entry [31]. This alternative would eliminate the risk associated with endogenous ACE2 activity. Also, recombinant human ACE2 could improve the function of downregulated ACE2; subsequently, Ang-(1-7) and alamandine could return the functioning of the RAS to normal by diminishing the effects of high Ang II levels [19]. However, clinical trials using ACE2-based treatments are needed to ensure that such treatments present no adverse effects and that they increase the likelihood of positive outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

6. Angiotensin 1-7

Ang-(1-7) can bind to MasR and AT₂R and subsequently counter the harmful effects imposed by the Ang II/AT₁R axis. Ang-(1-7) has also been shown to have antiarrhythmic, antithrombotic, antihypertensive, and vasodilatory properties that protect the cardiopulmonary system. Furthermore, studies on animals indicate that low Ang-(1-7) levels are associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), while the upregulation of Ang-(1-7) appears to reduce the prevalence of reactive oxygen species and pulmonary fibrosis. By doing so, Ang-(1-7) prevents tissue damage. Beyond this, research has shown that the Ang-(1-7)/MasR axis exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by blocking the NF-κB pathway and diminishing the prevalence of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6) [33].

There are various Ang-(1-7) agonists, including cyclic Ang-(1-7), hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD)/Ang-(1-7), AVE-0991, CGEN-856, and CGEN-857 [33] that exhibit vasodilation and improved cardiac remodeling by binding to MasR. This binding activity allows these agonists to exert the same effects as Ang-(1-7) with high in vivo stability. However, there are still several Ang-(1-7) agonists that have been empirically investigated in humans—thus, there is not enough data regarding the safety of using some of these agonists for treating diseases.

The FDA has approved a pharmaceutical Ang-(1-7) formulation called TXA127 as an orphan drug used to treat various ailments, including pulmonary arterial hypertension and Duchenne muscular dystrophy [33]. Ang-(1-7) can increase the mRNA expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 (ERK)1/ERK2 [34]. Various MasR agonists have been studied to determine their capacity to treat cardiovascular diseases. One such agonist is the nonpeptide compound AVE 0991. This agonist, in combination with aliskiren (a renin inhibitor), was studied in rats with experimental hypertension; the results revealed decreased blood pressure [35]. Moreover, Ang-(1-7) has been reported to have a cardioprotective effect in murine models of heart failure, highlighted by reduced ejection fractions [15].

Preclinical evidence indicates the introduction of Ang-(1-7) improves oxygenation while reducing inflammation and fibrosis [15].

Ang-(1-7) might protect against COVID-19. Specifically, increases in the circulating levels of ACE2 [36] and Ang-(1-7) [37] among COVID-19 patients could be a protective mechanism. This notion is supported by Wang et al., who showed that a high Ang-(1-7)/Ang II ratio predicts favorable outcomes in patients with heart failure [38].

Several unpublished clinical trials are currently being conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of treating COVID-19 patients with Ang-(1-7) [19]. Table 1 shows the characteristics of these ongoing studies.

7. Alamandine

Alamandine is a recently discovered aspect of the RAS that protects the cardiovascular system and kidneys [46]. It can develop either due to ACE2 activity on octapeptide Ang A or when the N-terminal amino acid of Ang-(1-7), Asp, is decarboxylated into Ala [47]. By binding to MrgD, alamandine boosts the cardiovascular system by, for example, counterbalancing Ang II-associated endothelial dysfunction [48].

MrgD promotes adenylyl cyclase activity, which increases cAMP levels and, in turn, protein kinase A activation and the phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding proteins. Additionally, alamandine stimulates eNOS and the subsequent generation of NO, thereby inducing vasodilation and imposing antihypertension effects [49]. The former effect reverses vascular endothelial dysfunction and decreases the preload of the heart by aiding the venous return to the heart [50].

As shown in Figure 2, various molecular pathways contribute to cytokine storms in COVID-19, resulting in multiple organ failures. The disruption of the epithelial barrier in the lungs starts a series of reactions and, eventually, cytokine storm-related damage [51]. The activation of the NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome and the nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) complex has been linked to cytokine storms [51]. The breakdown of the epithelial barrier causes bacterial infection of the lungs (or other organs) [51], and all of these activities in some way lead to oxidative stress, which is critical in the pathogenesis of viral infections [52].

Figure 2

Proposed mechanisms by which alamandine inhibits the SARS-CoV-2-related cytokine storm and accompanying damage. The binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor may increase ROS production by epithelial cells. ROS, in turn, may cause cell death and increase the synthesis of NF-κB and NLRP3, both of which increase cytokine levels. This phenomenon leads to immunological infiltration, which may cause illnesses such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and, in severe instances, death. Alamandine may mitigate these effects by increasing the levels of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, GPx) and decreasing the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6), proinflammatory transcription factor (NF-κB), the profibrotic mediator (TGF-β), and the apoptotic factor (caspase 3). ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme-2; MrgD: Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor D; ROS: reactive oxygen species; NLRP3: NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa beta; IL: interleukin; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma.

Interferon gamma (IFN), transforming growth factor- (TGF-), IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-8, and TNF- are among the numerous chemicals that are increased within virally mediated cytokine storms. The development of cytokine storms is one of the leading causes of mortality in people infected with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and influenza [53]. Alamandine may inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection through several possible mechanisms (Figure 2).

When given to isoproterenol-treated rats orally at a dose of 132 μg/kg, alamandine-HPβCD (2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin) had antihypertensive and antifibrotic effects. Meanwhile, when given peripherally, alamandine alleviated hypertension and the LV dysfunction associated with hypertension. Alamandine treatment (50 μg/kg/day, S.C. for 42 days) blocked the PKA pathway, thereby protecting spontaneously hypertensive rats against cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocytes hypertrophy induced by Ang II [54].

Alamandine also possesses antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties. For example, alamandine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) increases the expression of antioxidants in the ventricles of rats that have suffered ischemia-reperfusion injuries [55]. The administration of alamandine heightened the expressions of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in ventricles affected by ischemia and reperfusion [56]. Furthermore, the expression of caspase-9, Bax, and caspase-3 in ischemia and reperfusion ventricles was also decreased by alamandine. However, when PD123319 or MrgD receptor antagonists were administered in combination with alamandine, these benefits were weakened [55].

Alamandine-HPβCD (30 μg/kg/day, by gavage for 14 days) also lowers the effects of some proinflammatory factors (e.g., TNF-α and IL-1α) brought on by aortic constriction in mice [56]. An animal model of sepsis triggered by polysaccharides in the plasma and tissues of mice indicated increased levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and TNF-α. At the same time, administering alamandine (1.0 μM/kg, i.v.) led to lower levels of inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis in cardiac tissues [57]. It has been shown that through the MrgD receptor, alamandine reduces macrophage inflammatory responses and orients them toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype over time [58].

Alamandine (50 μg/kg/day, S.C. for 42 days) also alleviated the negative proinflammatory effects of doxorubicin (DOX) (e.g., increased TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β, and NF-κB levels) [59, 60]. Moreover, a study in rats indicated that alamandine can drastically control DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity by altering rats’ antioxidant status, apoptosis, and inflammatory cytokines [59]. Furthermore, Liu et al. recently showed that alamandine (2 μg/kg/day, S.C. for 21 days) can inhibit bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis by reducing oxidative stress and activating autophagy through the MrgD receptor [61].

Other research shows that alamandine (50 μg/kg/day, S.C. for 42 days) protects against pulmonary fibrosis and enhances the functioning of the respiratory system in vivo [62]. Alamandine’s anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and pulmonary protective characteristics appear to make it a promising component of SARS-CoV-2 treatments. However, further research is needed to confirm this claim and assess the risk-benefit ratio.

8. Conclusion

Alamandine and Ang-(1-7) are essential parts of the RAS protective arm, which possesses anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antifibrotic properties. In particular, the alamandine/MrgD receptor axis seems vital to protecting the body against specific diseases, including SARS-CoV-2. Although several efforts have been made to clarify the benefits of alamandine administration using animal models, such methods have not been clinically tested. Considering the crisis surrounding SARS-CoV-2 infections and related deaths, alamandine may be crucial to treating COVID-19 patients.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

A.S.H. and K.J. conceived the idea, designed the concept, and wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Figure 2 has been created with https://BioRender.com. Adapted from “Proposed Therapeutic Treatments for COVID-19 Targeting Viral Entry Mechanism”, by https://BioRender.com (2021). Retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates.

References

C. R. Triggle, D. Bansal, H. Ding et al., “A comprehensive review of viral characteristics, transmission, pathophysiology, immune response, and management of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 as a basis for controlling the pandemic,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mariano, R. J. Farthing, S. L. M. Lale-Farjat, and J. R. C. Bergeron, “Structural characterization of SARS-CoV-2: where we are, and where we need to be,” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, vol. 7, p. 344, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chakraborty, “Evolutionary and structural analysis elucidates mutations on SARS-CoV2 spike protein with altered human ACE2 binding affinity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 538, pp. 97–103, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Dessie and T. Malik, “Role of serine proteases and host cell receptors involved in proteolytic activation, entry of SARS-CoV-2 and its current therapeutic options,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 14, pp. 1883–1892, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hoffmann, H. Kleine-Weber, S. Schroeder et al., “SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor,” Cell, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 271–280.e8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Muralidar, G. Gopal, and S. Visaga Ambi, “Targeting the viral-entry facilitators of SARS-CoV-2 as a therapeutic strategy in COVID-19,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 5260–5276, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhou, X.-L. Yang, X.-G. Wang et al., “A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin,” Nature, vol. 579, no. 7798, pp. 270–273, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ni, X. Yang, D. Yang et al., “Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in COVID-19,” Critical Care, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 422, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shang, D. C. Lye, and B. Cao, “Contemporary narrative review of treatment options for COVID-19,” Respirology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 745–767, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Nile, A. Nile, S. Jalde, and G. Kai, “Recent advances in potential drug therapies combating COVID-19 and related coronaviruses-a perspective,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 154, article 112333, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wang, R. Cao, L. Zhang et al., “Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro,” Cell Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 269–271, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Putter and J. Seghatchian, “An update on COVID-19 infection control measures, plasma-based therapeutics, corticosteroid pharmacotherapy and vaccine research,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 59, no. 5, article 102934, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Matthay and A. F. Luetkemeyer, “IL-6 receptor antagonist therapy for patients hospitalized for COVID-19, and how?” JAMA, vol. 326, no. 6, pp. 483–485, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Patel, A. Rauf, H. Khan, and T. Abu-Izneid, “Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS): the ubiquitous system for homeostasis and pathologies,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 94, pp. 317–325, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Chappell, “The angiotensin-(1-7) axis: formation and metabolism pathways,” in Angiotensin-(1-7), pp. 1–26, Springer International Publishing, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Chappell, “Biochemical evaluation of the renin-angiotensin system: the good, bad, and absolute?” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 310, no. 2, pp. H137–H152, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Unger, “The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 89, no. 2A, pp. 3A–9A; discussion 10A, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Rossi, A. Mascolo, and V. Mollace, “The pathophysiological role of natriuretic peptide-RAAS cross talk in heart failure,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 226, pp. 121–125, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mascolo, C. Scavone, C. Rafaniello et al., “The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the heart and lung: focus on COVID-19,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, article 667254, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mascolo, K. Urbanek, A. de Angelis et al., “Angiotensin II and angiotensin 1-7: which is their role in atrial fibrillation?” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 367–380, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Okamoto and N. Ichikawa, “The pivotal role of the angiotensin-II-NF-κB axis in the development of COVID-19 pathophysiology,” Hypertension Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 126–128, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vaduganathan, O. Vardeny, T. Michel, J. J. V. McMurray, M. A. Pfeffer, and S. D. Solomon, “Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with COVID-19,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 17, pp. 1653–1659, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Kuster, O. Pfister, T. Burkard et al., “SARS-CoV2: should inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system be withdrawn in patients with COVID-19?” European Heart Journal, vol. 41, no. 19, pp. 1801–1803, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Reynolds, S. Adhikari, C. Pulgarin et al., “Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 25, pp. 2441–2448, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-Y. Jung, J. C. Choi, S.-H. You, and W.-Y. Kim, “Association of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)- related outcomes in Korea: a nationwide population-based cohort study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 71, no. 16, pp. 2121–2128, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gao, Y. Cai, K. Zhang et al., “Association of hypertension and antihypertensive treatment with COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective observational study,” European Heart Journal, vol. 41, no. 22, pp. 2058–2066, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shete, “Urgent need for evaluating agonists of angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas receptor axis for treating patients with COVID-19,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 96, pp. 348–351, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Verano-Braga, A. L. V. Martins, D. Motta-Santos, M. J. Campagnole-Santos, and R. A. S. Santos, “ACE2 in the renin-angiotensin system,” Clinical Science, vol. 134, no. 23, pp. 3063–3078, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Villela, D. G. Passos-Silva, and R. A. S. Santos, “Alamandine: a new member of the angiotensin family,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 130–134, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Muslim, N. Nasrin, F. O. Alotaibi et al., “Treatment options available for COVID-19 and an analysis on possible role of combination of rhACE2, angiotensin (1-7) and angiotensin (1-9) as effective therapeutic measure,” SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1761–1766, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hamming, W. Timens, M. L. C. Bulthuis, A. T. Lely, G. J. Navis, and H. van Goor, “Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 631–637, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Abd El-Aziz, A. Al-Sabi, and J. D. Stockand, “Human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) shows promise for treating severe COVID19,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Issa, A. H. Eid, B. Berry et al., “Combination of angiotensin (1-7) agonists and convalescent plasma as a new strategy to overcome angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) inhibition for the treatment of COVID-19,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Liu, G. Y. Oudit, F. Fang, J. Zhou, and J. W. Scholey, “Angiotensin-(1-7)-induced activation of ERK1/2 is cAMP/protein kinase A-dependent in glomerular mesangial cells,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 302, no. 6, pp. F784–F790, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Singh, K. Singh, and P. L. Sharma, “Effect of combination of renin inhibitor and Mas-receptor agonist in DOCA-salt-induced hypertension in rats,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 373, no. 1–2, pp. 189–194, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. van Lier, M. Kox, K. Santos, H. van der Hoeven, J. Pillay, and P. Pickkers, “Increased blood angiotensin converting enzyme 2 activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients,” ERJ Open Research, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Valle Martins, F. A. da Silva, L. Bolais-Ramos et al., “Increased circulating levels of angiotensin-(1-7) in severely ill COVID-19 patients,” ERJ Open Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wang, R. Basu, M. Poglitsch, J. A. Bakal, and G. Y. Oudit, “Elevated angiotensin 1-7/angiotensin II ratio predicts favorable outcomes in patients with heart failure,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 95–106, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04401423, TXA127 for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04401423.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04605887, Angiotensin 1-7 as a Therapy in the Treatment of COVID-19, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04605887.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04778059, Safety and Efficacy of USB002 for Respiratory Distress Due to COVID-19, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04778059.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04375124, Treatment of Angiotensin Peptide (1-7) for COVID-19, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04375124.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04633772, Use of Angiotensin-(1-7) in COVID-19, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04633772.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04332666, Angiotensin-(1,7) Treatment in COVID-19: the ATCO Trial, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04332666.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT04570501, Angiotensin (1-7) for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients, National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda (MD), 2020, October 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04570501.
R. Q. Lautner, D. C. Villela, R. A. Fraga-Silva et al., “Discovery and characterization of alamandine: a novel component of the renin-angiotensin system,” Circulation Research, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 1104–1111, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Soltani Hekmat, K. Javanmardi, A. Kouhpayeh, E. Baharamali, and M. Farjam, “Differences in cardiovascular responses to alamandine in two-kidney, one clip hypertensive and normotensive rats,” Circulation Research, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 405–412, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Soltani Hekmat, N. Zare, A. Moravej, M. H. Meshkibaf, and K. Javanmardi, “Effect of prolonged infusion of alamandine on cardiovascular parameters and cardiac ACE2 expression in a rat model of renovascular hypertension,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 960–967, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. C. G. de Jesus, S. Scalzo, F. Alves et al., “Alamandine acts via MrgD to induce AMPK/NO activation against ANG II hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 314, no. 6, pp. C702–C711, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Qaradakhi, V. Apostolopoulos, and A. Zulli, “Angiotensin (1-7) and alamandine: similarities and differences,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 111, pp. 820–826, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bhaskar, A. Sinha, M. Banach et al., “Cytokine storm in COVID-19-immunopathological mechanisms, clinical considerations, and therapeutic approaches: the REPROGRAM consortium position paper,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, p. 1648, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. V. Chernyak, E. N. Popova, A. S. Prikhodko, O. A. Grebenchikov, L. A. Zinovkina, and R. A. Zinovkin, “COVID-19 and oxidative stress,” Biochemistry, vol. 85, no. 12-13, pp. 1543–1553, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tang, Z. Yin, Y. Hu, and H. Mei, “Controlling cytokine storm is vital in COVID-19,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Qaradakhi, M. T. Matsoukas, A. Hayes et al., “Alamandine reverses hyperhomocysteinemia-induced vascular dysfunction via PKA-dependent mechanisms,” Cardiovascular Therapeutics, vol. 35, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Park, H. T. A. Phuong, L. Yu, and S. H. Kim, “Alamandine protects the heart against reperfusion injury via the MrgD receptor,” Circulation Journal, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 2584–2593, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. P. de Souza-Neto, M. . M. . Silva, M. . C. Santuchi et al., “Alamandine attenuates arterial remodelling induced by transverse aortic constriction in mice,” Clinical Science, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 629–643, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Li, X. R. Chen, F. Xu et al., “Alamandine attenuates sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction via inhibiting MAPKs signaling pathways,” Life Sciences, vol. 206, pp. 106–116, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. de Carvalho Santuchi, M. F. Dutra, J. P. Vago et al., “Angiotensin-(1-7) and alamandine promote anti-inflammatory response in macrophages in vitro and in vivo,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2019, Article ID 2401081, 14 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Soltani Hekmat, A. Chenari, H. Alipanah, and K. Javanmardi, “Protective effect of alamandine on doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats,” BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 31, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Soltani Hekmat, Z. Navabi, H. Alipanah, and K. Javanmardi, “Alamandine Significantly Reduces Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Rats,” Human & Experimental Toxicology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1781–1795, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Liu, B. Zheng, Y. Zhang, W. Huang, Q. Hong, and Y. Meng, “Alamandine via MrgD receptor attenuates pulmonary fibrosis via NOX4 and autophagy pathway,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 885–893, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Fernandes, H. B. Dias, W. A. de Souza Jaques, T. Becker, and K. Rigatto, “Assessment of alamandine in pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory mechanics in rodents,” Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, vol. 2021, pp. 1–8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ava Soltani Hekmat and Kazem Javanmardi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

881

Downloads

856

Citations