Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Sensors
Volume 2010, Article ID 967245, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/967245
Research Article

Complete Triaxis Magnetometer Calibration in the Magnetic Domain

Position Location and Navigation (PLAN) Group, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4

Received 6 September 2010; Revised 13 October 2010; Accepted 26 October 2010

Academic Editor: Pavel Ripka

Copyright © 2010 Valérie Renaudin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. A. Kaufman, R. L. K. Kleinberg, and R. O. Hansen, Principles of the Magnetic Methods in Geophysics, vol. 12 of Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  2. M. H. Afzal, V. Renaudin, and G. Lachapelle, “Assessment of indoor magnetic field anomalies using multiple magnetometers,” in ION GNSS, Portland, Ore, USA, 2010.
  3. N. Bowditch, The American Practical Navigator, National Imagery and Mapping Agency, Bethesda, Md, USA, 9th edition, 1995.
  4. M. J. Caruso, “Applications of magnetoresistive sensors in navigation systems,” SAE Transaction, vol. 106, pp. 1092–1098, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Gebre-Egziabher, G. H. Elkaim, J. D. Powell, and B. W. Parkinson, “Calibration of strapdown magnetometers in magnetic field domain,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. F. Vasconcelols, G. Elkaim, C. Silvester, P. Oliviera, and B. Cardeira, “A Geometric Approach to Strapdown Magnetometer Calibration in Sensor Frame,” in IFAC Workshop on Nvaigation, Guidance and Control of Underwater Vehicles, Killaloe, Ireland, April 2008.
  7. V. Petrucha, P. Kaspar, P. Ripka, and J. M. G. Merayo, “Automated system for the calibration of magnetometers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 7, Article ID 07E704, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Honeywell, “AN212 Handling of Sensor Bridge Offset,” Application Notes, 2010, http://www.honeywell.com/.
  9. Honeywell, “AN215 Cross Axis Effect for AMR Magnetic Sensors,” Application Notes, 2010, http://www.honeywell.com/.
  10. CGRF, “Natural Resources Canada,” Application Notes, 2010, http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geomag/field/cgrf_e.php.
  11. I. Markovsky, A. Kukush, and S. Van Huffel, “Consistent least squares fitting of ellipsoids,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 177–194, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Q. Li and J. G. Griffiths, “Least squares ellipsoid specific fitting,” in Proceedings of Geometric Modeling and Processing, pp. 335–340, Beijing, China, April 2004. View at Scopus
  13. A. Fitzgibbon, M. Pilu, and R. B. Fisher, “Direct least square fitting of ellipses,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 476–480, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Cheng and J. W. Van Ness, Statistical Regression with Measurement Error, Kendall's Library of Statistics, 6, Wiley, London, UK, 1999.
  15. V. Renaudin, M. H. Afzal, and G. Lachapelle, “Assessment of indoor magnetic field anomalies using multiple magnetometers,” in Proceedings of ION GNSS, pp. 335–340, Oregon, USA, April 2010.