Research Article
Denoising Method Based on Sparse Representation for WFT Signal
Table 2
Comparison of SNR and CC by using the three different denoising methods.
|
SNR before denoising | Frequency | SNR after denoising (dB) | CC after denoising | Hard threshold | Soft threshold | The proposed method | Hard threshold | Soft threshold | The proposed method |
| 10 dB | 50 | 11.8975 | 12.5750 | 13.3241 | 0.9901 | 0.9908 | 0.9912 | 55 | 12.1520 | 12.8504 | 13.4851 | 0.9798 | 0.9813 | 0.9845 | 60 | 11.7591 | 12.4382 | 13.5607 | 0.9732 | 0.9735 | 0.9756 | 65 | 11.6483 | 12.0538 | 13.2084 | 0.9789 | 0.9800 | 0.9812 | 70 | 11.5608 | 12.4672 | 13.6375 | 0.9816 | 0.9833 | 0.9863 |
| 5 dB | 50 | 8.0593 | 8.8428 | 9.0593 | 0.9843 | 0.9854 | 0.9893 | 55 | 8.3879 | 8.8534 | 9.7245 | 0.9620 | 0.9632 | 0.9689 | 60 | 8.3189 | 9.0547 | 9.8915 | 0.9609 | 0.9637 | 0.9664 | 65 | 8.0125 | 8.8504 | 9.7581 | 0.9636 | 0.9658 | 0.9692 | 70 | 7.5483 | 8.1592 | 9.2461 | 0.9709 | 0.9724 | 0.9759 |
| 0 dB | 50 | 6.1360 | 6.8254 | 7.5268 | 0.9738 | 0.9755 | 0.9780 | 55 | 5.8967 | 6.5249 | 7.0423 | 0.9586 | 0.9614 | 0.9631 | 60 | 5.1586 | 5.4860 | 6.7808 | 0.9694 | 0.9721 | 0.9743 | 65 | 6.1404 | 6.5328 | 7.0524 | 0.9638 | 0.9645 | 0.9672 | 70 | 5.1453 | 5.8918 | 6.9245 | 0.9652 | 0.9674 | 0.9695 |
| −5 dB | 50 | 3.5524 | 3.9805 | 4.5246 | 0.9631 | 0.9647 | 0.9663 | 55 | 2.8593 | 3.4395 | 4.1250 | 0.9646 | 0.9651 | 0.9684 | 60 | 2.7695 | 3.0256 | 3.8925 | 0.9659 | 0.9683 | 0.9705 | 65 | 3.1369 | 3.5284 | 4.2386 | 0.9571 | 0.9588 | 0.9594 | 70 | 3.1245 | 3.8925 | 4.8425 | 0.9609 | 0.9613 | 0.9635 |
| −10 dB | 50 | 1.2534 | 1.8562 | 2.5851 | 0.9476 | 0.9489 | 0.9498 | 55 | 1.5962 | 2.1256 | 2.8408 | 0.9549 | 0.9553 | 0.9563 | 60 | 1.2564 | 1.7592 | 2.3614 | 0.9423 | 0.9428 | 0.9446 | 65 | 0.9547 | 1.5410 | 2.0596 | 0.9362 | 0.9365 | 0.9372 | 70 | 1.5814 | 1.9854 | 2.5468 | 0.9438 | 0.9443 | 0.9456 |
|
|