Journal of Sensors

Journal of Sensors / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 805303 |

Dimitrios G. Bekas, Alkiviadis S. Paipetis, "Study of the Effect of Damage on the Electrical Impedance of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Epoxy Nanocomposites", Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015, Article ID 805303, 7 pages, 2015.

Study of the Effect of Damage on the Electrical Impedance of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Epoxy Nanocomposites

Academic Editor: Marco Grassi
Received06 Nov 2014
Revised06 Apr 2015
Accepted07 Apr 2015
Published27 Apr 2015


Within the scope of this work is the study of the effect of damage on the electrical hysteretic behaviour of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. For that purpose CNT reinforced epoxy nanocomposites were subjected to different levels of damage and their response to an AC voltage excitation was monitored. The correlation between frequency dependent impedance properties and level of damage was extensively studied. The AC frequency response of the interrogated specimens from 10 Hz up to 0.5 MHz revealed a strong correlation between the level of damage and the hysteresis of the studied materials.

1. Introduction

Coupled property interaction in engineering structures may administer multiple functionalities. In order to exploit coupled field interaction for application such as structural health monitoring (SHM), an in depth understanding of the principles that relate structural integrity to internal properties is indispensable. Typical example is the electromechanical coupling which relates electrical properties to the mechanical response and/or the durability of the structure in the case of composites reinforced with a conductive phase such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs).

Due to their unique structure and excellent electrical and mechanical properties, CNTs have attracted wide attention as multifunctional nanofillers for polymer based nanocomposites [16]. On the other hand, epoxy resins are well established as the matrix of advanced composites for several engineering applications, as they offer satisfactory specific stiffness and strength as well as durability. During the past decade, epoxy resin-based CNT composites were extensively studied by many researchers for their electrical properties [711]. These composites could potentially, among others, be used for conductive coatings, electrostatic dissipation, electrostatic painting, and electromagnetic interference shielding applications.

As aforementioned, electrical properties act as a potential indicator for the evaluation of composite’s structural integrity. Numerous researchers attempt a direct correlation between the inherent structural integrity and the variation of electrical properties. Whilst reversible changes in the electrical properties relate solely to strain, irreversible electrical resistance change relates to internal damage of the composite material [1217]. In a typical study, the structural integrity of a hybrid Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) with MWCTs in the matrix material was evaluated concurrently with the self-sensing abilities of the composite [18]. The underlying principle of self-sensing relates to a percolated electrical network within the insulating matrix which works as an inherent sensor in the composite structure. As a result, any changes in this electrical network of nanocomposites and CFRPs, when subjected to load, provide a direct measure for strain (reversible) and damage accumulation (irreversible).

More recently, the CNT dispersion in typical epoxy matrices process has been successfully related to the impedance of the system and has been modelled using an equivalent electrical circuit [19, 20]. However, little research effort has been devoted to the study of the impedance properties of nanoreinforcement composites and its relation to loading history and/or internal damage. Impedance spectroscopy (IS) may be employed as a method for damage characterization and could provide useful information about the internal integrity of the material. It may be argued that damage (e.g., manifested as microcracks or hydrolysis in the case of an epoxy subjected to mechanical or environmental loading, resp.) may cumulatively increase the hysteretic behaviour of the material, as it increases its capacitance. IS is a dynamic technique where a monochromatic signal, involving the single frequency , is applied through a material volume and measuring the resulting phase delay and amplitude of the resulting current. Using this method, researches achieved a correlation between IS measurements and the internal integrity of several composite materials [21, 22]. Fazzino et al. [23] have successfully characterised progressive damage initiation and progression in thin woven glass/epoxy composites using IS. They reported a noteworthy sensitivity, especially during the first 25% of fatigue life fraction. Kang et al. [17] developed an electric model for a SWNT/PMMA sensor, by correlating the electrical impedance properties to the nanocomposite processing including the functionalization, dispersion, and annealing of the nanotubes. In another work, Pohl et al. [24] employed the IS as a tool for structural health monitoring of smart CFRP structures. They managed to detect damage (delamination) due to low-velocity impact by monitoring changes in the magnitude of the impedance over a wide frequency range. Peairs and coworkers [25] showed that impedance-based techniques are capable of the in situ structural health monitoring of the space shuttle ground structure. They focused on the optimization of the sensor frequency range in order to ensure maximum sensitivity for correlation with the integrity of the interrogated structure.

The main purpose of this study is to enhance the resolving ability of the electrical based methodologies via the employment of AC configurations. These involve the study of the effect of damage on the hysteretic electrical behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy nanocomposites by measuring phase delays at several frequencies varying from 10 Hz up to 0.5 MHz of AC voltage for different levels of cyclic thermal shock damage.

The behaviour of the composite after cyclic thermal shock exposure is of primary importance in high performance structures, such as those encountered in the aerospace industry where advanced composites continuously gain higher market share. Typically, an aircraft structure is subjected to a thermal shock cycle for every landing and take-off procedure. Under these conditions, the aircraft is subjected to temperature extremes ranging from approximately −30°C to 30°C in a period of 15 min [26]. On the other hand, new aircrafts such as the Dreamliner possess a fully composite fuselage [27]. In a typical composite system, thermal shock is expected to create internal defects in the structure mainly due to the differential thermal expansion coefficient between the reinforcement and the matrix, additional to any degradation independently caused to the constituent phases [28]. In a recent study, it was suggested that thermal shock induced damage in CNT reinforced epoxies is manifested as deterioration of the interface due to thermal stress concentration around the CNTs [29]. In order to detect and quantify thermal shock induced damage, IS was employed using a typical frequency spectrum analysis setup in order to assess the AC frequency dependence of damage and attempt the simulation of its evolution with a simple equivalent electrical circuit.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The matrix material consisted of a two-part epoxy resin, that is, Araldite LY 564 and Aradur 2954 by Huntsman Advanced Materials, Switzerland. The mix ratio was 100 : 35 by weight. As reinforcement, Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) supplied by ARKEMA, France, were used. They were synthesized by Catalyzed Chemical Vapor Deposition (CCVD); the tube diameter ranged from 10 to 15 nm and the tube length was more than 500 nm.

2.2. Processing of the Nanocomposites: Sonication

Efficient dispersion quality of the CNTs in the epoxy matrix was achieved via sonication using an ultrasonic mixer (UP400S, Hielscher). CNTs and Araldite LY 564 resin were carefully weighed and mixed together in a beaker. An ice bath was also used so as to avoid overheating of the polymer resin and introduction of defects on the CNTs surface (Figure 1). CNTs were dispersed in the matrix using sonication for 4 h at 100% of the full amplitude of the probe, that is, 400 W.

At the end of the sonication process, the hardener was added to the modified resin and the mixture was mechanically stirred for approximately 10 min. Prior to casting, the mixture was degassed for another 10 min in a vacuum oven at 25°C for another 10 min. Finally, the mixture was cast to silicon rubber moulds and cured at 60°C for 2 h. The square plates of approximately 150 × 150 × 4 mm3 were removed from the mould and postcured at 120°C for 4 h.

Prismatic specimens of 60 × 100 × 4 mm3 were cut from the plates using a water lubricated table diamond saw (Figure 2). Finally, the specimens were lightly sanded in order to (i) remove defects from the manufacturing process and (ii) prepare the side surface for the application of the measuring electrodes.

2.3. Testing Procedure
2.3.1. Cyclic Thermal Shock

All specimens were subjected to several cycles of cyclic thermal shock in order to simulate temperature changes which occur to aircraft structures. The interrogated specimens were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of undamaged specimens and was employed as reference. The second and third groups of specimens were subjected to a series of 30 and 70 thermal shock cycles, respectively. Each cycle consisted of the following two steps, executed in sequence: (a) residence for 2 h at a bath containing a mixture of water and ethylene glycol at −30°C and (b) residence for 2 h at a bath containing plain water as heating medium +30°C. Transport between the two baths was performed manually in less than 5 s. During the thermal shock cycles, all specimens were sealed in PE bags so as to prevent diffusion of the heating/cooling medium in the polymer matrix.

2.3.2. Impedance Spectroscopy (IS)

For the purposes of electrical measurements, electrodes were attached at the side surfaces (left and right surface, as seen in Figure 2(b)) of the prismatic specimens using silver conductive paste so as to minimise contact resistance and achieve good electrical coupling.

Impedance spectroscopy was performed using a dielectric spectrometer-frequency spectrum analyser (DETA-SCOPE L1 provided by Advise Ltd.) (Figure 3).

The spectrometer applied a sinusoidal electric excitation waveform of varying frequency and the induced current waveform was recorded. The excitation frequency ranged from 10 Hz to 0.5 MHz.

3. Results and Discussion

Within the scope of this work is to relate the internal degradation (microcracks) of the material with changes in the impedance spectra using IS.

When the material is subjected to an alternating electric field, the electric dipoles in the material are trying to orient to the direction of the field. As excitation frequency increases, inertia effects prevent the dipoles from following these changes and hysteretic effects are induced manifesting a phase delay between excitation and response signals. As a result, we expect a typical dielectric system to exhibit increasing phase delay with increasing frequency.

Thermal shock, on the other hand, induces cracks in the material due to the mismatch in the thermal expansion coefficient between the epoxy matrix and the graphitic nanoreinforcement; these cracks, which are of the order of the reinforcement, accumulate with increasing number of cycles and affect the impedance of the studied material in a dual fashion: (i) the real part of the impedance or the resistance is increasing as microcracks act as discontinuities in the conductive network created by the dispersed conductive nanophase in the composite and (ii) the imaginary part of the total impedance of the system is altered as microcracks which develop may be regarded as nanocapacitors which cumulatively contribute to the change of the imaginary part of the impedance or the reactance of the system.

Overall, impedance spectroscopy is expected to increase the dimensionality of the electrical methodology by introducing both the real and the imaginary part of the resistance, providing thus more information on the accumulating damage. This is critical for the accurate solution of the inverse problem, where the formulation of governing equations based on observation and/or experiment about any physical problem or system is required.

The sinusoidal electric potential that was applied to the material can be expressed bywhere the is the external potential at time , is the amplitude of the waveform, and ω is the radial frequency. The outbound signal is governed by where is the current at time , is the amplitude of the outbound signal, and is the phase delay. The total impedance of the system can be calculated using Ohm’s law: where is the total impedance of the system. Using Euler’s relationship, the impedance is represented as a complex number with a real and an imaginary part: withwhere and are the real and the imaginary parts of the complex impedance, respectively.

The Bode plots, that is, magnitude of impedance or phase delay versus frequency, can be seen in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.

As can be seen in Figure 4, the magnitude of the impedance at low frequency increases with increasing number of thermal shock cycles. In all cases, the magnitude of the impedance is constant until approximately 250 Hz, which denotes the transition from Ohmic (linear) to non-Ohmic (nonlinear). This behaviour is consistent with DC resistance measurements, where the resistance is monotonically increasing as the microcracks which are created due to thermal shock destroy the conductive CNT network in the nanocomposite [18].

As should be pointed out at this stage, the magnitude of the impedance is highly affected by the presence of internal damage, exhibiting an increase of half an order of magnitude or doubling its initial value, at only 30 cycles of thermal shock, indicating that the impedance magnitude is a highly sensitive damage index.

The Bode plot of the phase delay (Figure 5) indicates an almost identical behaviour in all three cases. All systems exhibit a capacitive pattern where current leads the voltage. There is an initial part where phase oscillates around zero, indicative of an initial DC behaviour, followed by a decrease before reaching a first plateau. This plateau may be regarded as indicative of a dominant time constant at low frequencies, that is, up to approximately 0.5 MHz.

Along with the impedance measure, results show changes in both real and imaginary parts of the impedance with damage. The Nyquist plot, that is, the real versus the imaginary part of the impedance as calculated from (5), can be seen in Figure 6. The experimental Nyquist plot is different from that of a typical RC circuit in parallel, which is a semicircle and possesses a single time constant, but is indicative of a strong capacitance element which is scaled according to the level of damage, as was also suggested by Figure 5. As was also noticed in Figure 5, scanning at frequencies higher than 1 MHz is required for more time constants that may be involved in the behaviour of the material.

More analytically, the frequency dependent part of the impedance or its imaginary part relates to capacitance and inductance properties of the interrogated element when seen as a typical electrical circuit and is expressed by the total reactance of the system: where is the total reactance, is the inductive reactance, is the capacitive reactance, is the radial frequency, is the inductance, and is the capacitance. The negative values of the imaginary part of the impedance, or that current leads the voltage, that have been obtained for all cases indicate the presence of capacitance that can be expressed by

This behavior can be attributed to the decrease in the dielectric constant of the specimen due to microcracks. In detail, capacitance is expressed by where is the permittivity of free space and has a value of 8.85×10−12 C2/Nm2, is the relative permittivity of the material, is the area, and is the thickness. The introduction of defects (microcracks) lowers the conductivity of the system; therefore the relative permittivity of the material is changing. The total capacitance of the nanocomposite is then represented by where is the concentration of the air (voids) inside the material and is the relative permittivity of the air.

Also the relative permittivity of the air has lower values than the relative permittivity of composite . Thus, capacitance of the system is decreasing. On the other hand according to (7) the imaginary part of the impedance is increasing upon damage.

This can be easily distinguished in Figure 6 where the Nyquist plot of imaginary part versus the real part of the impedance is depicted. As it can be seen there is dramatic increase at approximately one order of magnitude in the imaginary part (-ImZ) of the impedance for the specimen that was subjected to 70 cycles of thermal shock compared with the undamaged one.

Assuming a simple and a typical RC circuit in parallel to simulate the behaviour of the system, we may simulate the induced damage as a function of the capacitance.

In Figure 7 we may see the equivalent resistance and capacitance of the system as a function of the thermal shock cycles. The interpolation was performed using the LEVMW Complex Nonlinear Least Squares software (Copyright: James Ross Macdonald). As can be seen, the resistance of the material is monotonically increasing whereas the capacitance of the system is decreasing significantly with increasing number of cycles.

Overall, it can be seen that IS is potentially a powerful tool for assessing damage induced in nanoreinforced composite materials. Of particular interest are (i) the extreme sensitivity of the system, (ii) the increase in the dimensionality of the problem (i.e., damage may be correlated with both the measure and the phase of the impedance), and (iii) the ability to model primary damage phenomena using simple equivalent circuits.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the electrical AC response of specimens that were subjected to increasing cycles of thermal shock was monitored. Phase and magnitude of the impedance of the specimen were recorded using a frequency scan from 10 Hz up to 0.5 MHz.

Impedance spectroscopy provided useful information about the internal state of the material.

Results indicate a direct correlation between the degradation of the material and the measure of the impedance, which proved extremely sensitive to the changes invoked in the material microstructure due to thermal shock.

All specimens exhibited an initial DC behaviour until approximately 250 Hz, as well as a capacitance behaviour with a dominant capacitance element at approximately 1 KHz, which scaled with increasing damage.

As was shown, the electrical behaviour of the system may be adequately modelled by simulating it as a simple RC circuit in parallel. Under this assumption, the resistance of the equivalent circuit is monotonically increasing due to the disruption of the conductive CNT network in the material. At the same time, the total capacitance of the material is decreasing as the developed cracks at the nanoscale cumulatively affect the macroscopic capacitance of the material.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the “THALES-GSRT ID I.D: 593 Mis: 379412” and “ACP3-GA-20l3-6054l2-HIPOCRATES” research programs for financial support.


  1. E. T. Thostenson, Z. F. Ren, and T.-W. Chou, “Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 1899–1912, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. O. Breuer and U. Sundararaj, “Big returns from small fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites,” Polymer Composites, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 630–645, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Moniruzzaman and K. I. Winey, “Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes,” Macromolecules, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 5194–5205, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. S. P. Shaffer and A. H. Windle, “Fabrication and characterization of carbon nanotube/poly(vinyl alcohol) composites,” Advanced Materials, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 937–941, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Z. Spitalsky, D. Tasis, K. Papagelis, and C. Galiotis, “Carbon nanotube-polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 357–401, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Allaoui, S. Bai, H. M. Cheng, and J. B. Bai, “Mechanical and electrical properties of a MWNT/epoxy composite,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 1993–1998, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, B. Fiedler et al., “Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites,” Polymer, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2036–2045, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Sandler, M. S. P. Shaffer, T. Prasse, W. Bauhofer, K. Schulte, and A. H. Windle, “Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix and the resulting electrical properties,” Polymer, vol. 40, no. 21, pp. 5967–5971, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Huang, N. Li, Y. Ma et al., “The influence of single-walled carbon nanotube structure on the electromagnetic interference shielding efficiency of its epoxy composites,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1614–1621, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Zheng and S.-C. Wong, “Electrical conductivity and dielectric properties of PMMA/expanded graphite composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 225–235, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. K. W. Sandler, J. E. Kirk, I. A. Kinloch, M. S. P. Shaffer, and A. H. Windle, “Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites,” Polymer, vol. 44, no. 19, pp. 5893–5899, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Shindo, Y. Kuronuma, T. Takeda, F. Narita, and S.-Y. Fu, “Electrical resistance change and crack behavior in carbon nanotube/polymer composites under tensile loading,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Fiedler, F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, W. Bauhofer, and K. Schulte, “Can carbon nanotubes be used to sense damage in composites?” Annales de Chimie: Science des Materiaux, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 81–94, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Nofar, S. V. Hoa, and M. D. Pugh, “Failure detection and monitoring in polymer matrix composites subjected to static and dynamic loads using carbon nanotube networks,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1599–1606, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. T. Thostenson and T.-W. Chou, “Carbon nanotube networks: sensing of distributed strain and damage for life prediction and self healing,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 2837–2841, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Park, H. Kim, and J. P. Youngblood, “Strain-dependent electrical resistance of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polymer composite films,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 5, Article ID 055705, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. Kang, M. J. Schulz, J. H. Kim, V. Shanov, and D. Shi, “A carbon nanotube strain sensor for structural health monitoring,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 737–748, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. A. Grammatikos and A. S. Paipetis, “On the electrical properties of multi scale reinforced composites for damage accumulation monitoring,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2687–2696, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Gkikas, C. Saganas, S. A. Grammatikos, G. M. Maistros, N.-M. Barkoula, and A. S. Paipetis, “Dispersion monitoring of carbon nanotube modified epoxy systems,” in Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, vol. 8345 of Proceedings of SPIE, March 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Gkikas, Ch. Saganas, S. A. Grammatikos, D. G. Aggelis, and A. S. Paipetis, “Simultaneous acoustic and dielectric real time curing monitoring of epoxy systems,” in Smart Sensor Phenomena, Technology, Networks, and Systems Integration, vol. 8346 of Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, Calif, USA, March 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. D. Davis and B. J. Harkless, “Use of an electrochemical probe for predictive assessment of bonded repair,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 323–329, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. Fazzino and K. Reifsnider, “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy detection of damage in out of plane fatigued fiber reinforced composite materials,” Applied Composite Materials, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 127–138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. D. Fazzino, K. L. Reifsnider, and P. Majumdar, “Impedance spectroscopy for progressive damage analysis in woven composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 69, no. 11-12, pp. 2008–2014, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Pohl, S. Herold, G. Mook, and F. Michel, “Damage detection in smart CFRP composites using impedance spectroscopy,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 834–842, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. M. Peairs, B. Grisso, D. J. Inman, K. R. Page, R. Atham, and R. N. Margasahayam, “Proof-of-concept application of impedance-based health monitoring on space shuttle ground structures,” Tech. Rep. NASA/KSC-PH-6401, NASA, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. Elefsiniotis, D. Samson, T. Becker, and U. Schmid, “Investigation of the performance of thermoelectric energy harvesters under real flight conditions,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 2301–2305, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. A. Caminero, M. Lopez-Pedrosa, C. Pinna, and C. Soutis, “Damage monitoring and analysis of composite laminates with an open hole and adhesively bonded repairs using digital image correlation,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 76–91, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. C. Ray, “Study of the influence of thermal shock on interfacial damage in thermosetting matrix aramid fiber composites,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 201–202, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Gkikas, D. D. Douka, N. M. Barkoula, and A. S. Paipetis, “Nano-enhanced composite materials under thermal shock and environmental degradation: a durability study,” Composites B: Engineering, vol. 70, pp. 206–214, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Dimitrios G. Bekas and Alkiviadis S. Paipetis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.