Journal of Sensors

Journal of Sensors / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7942963 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7942963

Navigation System Heading and Position Accuracy Improvement through GPS and INS Data Fusion

Academic Editor: Hana Vaisocherova
Received05 Jul 2015
Revised13 Nov 2015
Accepted03 Dec 2015
Published06 Jan 2016

Abstract

Commercial navigation systems currently in use have reduced position and heading error but are usually quite expensive. It is proposed that extended Kalman filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) be used in the integration of a global positioning system (GPS) with an inertial navigation system (INS). GPS and INS individually exhibit large errors but they do complement each other by maximizing the advantage of each in calculating the heading angle and position through EKF and UKF. The proposed method was tested using low cost GPS, a cheap electronic compass (EC), and an inertial management unit (IMU) which provided accurate heading and position information, verifying the efficacy of the proposed algorithm.

1. Introduction

Computation of accurate heading and position data is a key task in a navigation system. Numerous products are available in the market which can perform above computations. However, they are expensive. Hence, there is a lot of research work devoted towards developing a precise navigation system which is reasonably priced.

Global positioning system (GPS) is used in a variety of fields such as scientific and engineering, due to its superior capability of providing accurate navigation information. However, there are issues in the system such as the following: when the GPS does not receive the satellite signal leading to issue in generation of valid data. The heading information from only one GPS is not highly accurate. An inertial navigation system (INS) provides more accurate heading information than the GPS, but its position data is less reliable than that of the GPS. It can be seen that the GPS and INS do complement each other leading to various research works on integrated INS/GPS navigation systems for the past two decades. The above given problems are resolved in this work by fusing data from GPS, INS, and electronic compass (EC).

Several types of complementary filters utilizing low-pass and high-pass filters were proposed due to the frequency filtering properties of a linear system [1, 2]. A ship heading control obtained using disturbance compensating model predictive control (DC-MPC) algorithm in wave fields was previously suggested [3]. Some works also combined Kalman filter (KF) and fuzzy inference in improving the accuracy of a navigation system [46]. The sensor selection was done through fuzzy logic while KF was utilized for sensor fusion. KF and its variations have been widely used for sensor fusion such as in determining an accurate azimuth of a pedestrian system by fusing EC and INS gyroscope information through decentralized Kalman filter [7] while another work fused EC, INS, and multiple GPS using extended Kalman filter-covariance intersection (EKF-CI) to determine heading information [8]. A dual-rate Kalman filter (DRKF) was designed to integrate GPS pseudoranges and time-differenced GPS carrier phases (possessing low noise and millimeter measurement precision) with INS measurements [9]. Estimation in nonlinear systems is extremely important since most systems are inherently nonlinear in nature. The successful practical nonlinear system implementation of a GPS/MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) based-IMU (inertial measurement unit) with heading update in an extended Kalman filter (EKF) framework has been previously demonstrated [10]. Another work utilized adaptive two-stage KF since EKF cannot effectively track time-varying or unknown parameters [11]. A major drawback of EKF is that it does not effectively estimate if the system is highly nonlinear since it uses first-order Taylor series expansion for linearizing the nonlinear system. The mean and covariance estimates acquired using the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) on the other hand are accurate at least up to the second order [12]. Several works have confirmed the higher estimation accuracy of UKF against the EKF [1316] but their key limitation is that both cannot undertake the problem of nonlinear systems with non-Gaussian noise. An unscented particle filter algorithm, which is a particle filter using EKF to generate the proposal distribution, was proposed to solve this issue [17]. One study compared complementary filter and KF depending on the system model simplicity [16, 18]; another showed that EKF exhibited good performance in estimating attitude/orientation using low cost sensor in environments where GPS signals are denied [19].

Locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplot were previously utilized in deriving a more accurate heading angle using GPS data but it was limited for postprocessing only [2023]. These works were expanded by further integrating EC with INS gyroscopic data for more accurate heading while the position information was determined by integrating GPS with ISN accelerometer data through EKF and UKF. It was observed that sensor fusion through KF improved accuracy similar to results of previous works [2226].

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. EKF and UKF are explained in detail in Section 2 through the navigation system model utilized in this work. The simulation and experimental tests are presented in Section 3 followed by the concluding remarks in Section 4.

2. Background and Algorithm

2.1. Extended Kalman Filter (EKF)

KF is an efficient recursive filter that estimates the state of a linear or nonlinear dynamic system from a series of noisy measurements while EKF is a representative algorithm of KF expanded and applied to nonlinear system. The study of EKF necessitates the understanding of a nonlinear system model first. Consider the following general nonlinear system equation: where (1) and (2) are the state and measurement models of the nonlinear system while random variables and are the process and measurement noise, respectively. Both noises are assumed to be zero-mean white noise with normal probability distribution, such thatThe process noise and measurement noise covariance matrices might change with each time step or measurement but they are assumed to be constant for this study.

The EKF can now be applied to the system upon obtaining the system model. The schematic flow chart of the EKF in Figure 1(a) shows that the algorithm consists of two main operations, namely, the prediction and update processes [23].(1)Prediction process (Step (I)) is responsible for projecting forward the current state and error covariance estimates to obtain a priori estimates for the next step.(2)Correction or update process (Steps (II)–(IV)) which is the main point of the EKF is responsible for the feedback, to incorporate the new measurement into the a priori estimate to obtain an improved a posteriori estimate.Jacobian is utilized to linearize the nonlinear model in EKF. The and matrices in Figure 1(a) can be derived using the following equations:

2.2. Unscented Kalman Filter

EKF is not efficient enough when the system is highly nonlinear with the following main drawbacks: (a) linearization may lead to highly unstable system and (b) the derivation of Jacobian matrices is not important in most applications and most often leads to implementation difficulties.

UKF utilizes unscented transformation to perform state estimation of nonlinear systems without linearizing the system and measurement models. A set of carefully and deterministically chosen weighted samples that parameterize the mean and covariance of the belief is used in the transformation. Suppose is a random variable with dimension through a nonlinear function and has covariance and mean . A set of points, called sigma points, are chosen such that their mean and covariance are and , respectively. These points are applied in the nonlinear function to get and . The -dimensional random variable is approximated by weighted sigma points. The sigma points and weights for are defined as follows:where is a row vector from the matrix and is an arbitrary constant:

The method instantiates each sigma point through the function resulting in a set of transformed sigma points, mean, and covariance as

The state and measurement with their covariance can be predicted upon understanding unscented transformation. The remaining steps of the UKF shown in Figure 1(b) are similar to that of KF.

The system function is applied to each sample resulting in a group of transformed points. The propagated mean and covariance are the mean and covariance of this group of points. The Jacobians of the system and measurement model do not have to be calculated since there is no linearization involved in the propagation of the mean and covariance which makes UKF practically attractive.

2.3. Navigation System Model

The kinematics of a vehicle is given by the following state equation [24]:where , , and are the linear velocities and is the angular velocity along -axis (yaw), while and represent cosine and sine functions. The measurement model can be defined as follows, based on the need to identify the position and heading angle :Jacobian matrices and are derived using (4) in order to linearize the system:Matrix does not change since measurement model (6) is linear. Process noise covariance and measurement noise covariance are chosen based on experimental data:

3. Simulation Setup and Result

The GPS, EC, and INS (with gyroscope and accelerometer) mounted on an experimental board as shown in Figure 2(a) were utilized for data gathering. The CMPS03 EC has a heading accuracy of 3 to 4 degrees and costs $44. The uBlox GPS receiver with model UIGGUB01-V02R01 has a position accuracy of 10 m and data rate of 10 Hz, utilizes NMEA 0183 protocol, and costs $40. The MySEN-M INS has a data rate of 100 Hz and heading accuracy of 4 degrees. A Furuno SC50 satellite compass system was utilized as the reference system. It has a heading accuracy of 0.5 degrees, position accuracy of 2 to 3 m, and setting time of 3 min and costs $4,995.

The experiment board and reference system are placed on top of the car as shown in Figure 2(b). A car was utilized instead of a ship due to the difficulty of performing the test out on the ocean. A roadway on a newly reclaimed area in Gunsan city of South Korea was chosen for the location of the experiment, due to the availability of open-sky area with minimal traffic. The actual experimental location as seen through Google Earth is shown in Figure 2(c).

GPS and accelerometer data from INS were set as the measurement state and the state to estimate the position, respectively. The resulting position information when using both EKF and UKF is shown in Figure 3 with several parts zoomed in order to clearly distinguish the performance of each. The raw gyroscope and EC data shown in Figure 4 are fused to obtain accurate heading information for navigation. Heading information based on the GPS COG, EKF, UKF, and reference systems is shown in Figure 5 with EKF giving values closest to that of the reference system. COG is “Course Over Ground” heading information from the GPS device while HDT is “True Heading” of the GPS device obtained by processing RF cycle in the GPS carrier frequency:The root mean square errors (RMSE) calculated using (13) are shown in Table 1 to give a better perspective in the differences of the position and heading result. The EKF took 132.4128 secs while UKF took 137.0245 secs to fully simulate the process.


EKFUKFGPS COG

Heading (RMSEheading)0.326 deg.0.2196 deg.8.1218 deg.
Position (RMSEposition)1.12 m1.12 m1.33 m

4. Conclusion

Commercial navigation systems produce accurate information with reduced errors but are usually expensive. This work proposes a system that can estimate accurate heading and position information comparable to more expensive ones at a fraction of the cost. Low cost sensors such as global positioning system (GPS) and electronic compass (EC) are fused with inertial navigation system (INS)/inertial measurement unit (IMU) through extended Kalman filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) to achieve the desired results. It was shown that individual heading information from several cheaper devices with big errors can produce a much more accurate fused heading value.

Position estimation results for both EKF and UKF show the same slight increase in accuracy, but heading estimation results showed that UKF output was closer to the reference than that of EKF. It was seen that EKF is better than UKF when taking into consideration the time it took to perform the process. It can be eventually concluded that accurate heading and position information can be obtained from the fusion of several low cost sensors, verifying the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Research Base Construction Fund Support Program” funded by Chonbuk National University in 2015, the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, and National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (no. 2013R1A2A2A01068127 and no. 2013R1A1A2A10009458).

References

  1. V. Kubelka and M. Reinstein, “Complementary filtering approach to orientation estimation using inertial sensors only,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '12), pp. 599–605, IEEE, Saint Paul, Minn, USA, May 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. S. Yoo, S. K. Hong, H. M. Yoon, and S. Park, “Gain-scheduled complementary filter design for a MEMS based attitude and heading reference system,” Sensors, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3816–3830, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. Li and J. Sun, “Disturbance compensating model predictive control with application to ship heading control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 257–265, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. Kobayashi, D. Masumoto, and F. Kojima, “Sensor selection based on fuzzy inference for sensor fusion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 305–310, IEEE, July 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. X. Li, X. Song, and C. Chan, “Reliable vehicle sideslip angle fusion estimation using low-cost sensors,” Measurement, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 241–258, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Caron, E. Duflos, D. Pomorski, and P. Vanheeghe, “GPS/IMU data fusion using multisensor Kalman filtering: introduction of contextual aspects,” Information Fusion, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Q. Ladetto, J. van Seeters, S. Sokolowski, Z. Sagan, and B. Merminod, “Digital magnetic compass and gyroscope for dismounted soldier position & navigation,” in Proceedings of the Military Capabilities Enabled by Advances in Navigation Sensors, Sensors & Electronics Technology Panel, NATO-RTO Meetings, Istanbul, Turkey, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. F. P. Vista, D. J. Lee, and K. T. Chong, “Design of an EKF-CI based sensor fusion for robust heading estimation of marine vehicle,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 403–407, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Han and J. Wang, “Integrated GPS/INS navigation system with dual-rate Kalman Filter,” GPS Solutions, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 389–404, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Vydhyanathan, H. Luinge, M. U. de Haag, and M. Braasch, “Integrating GPS/MEMS-based-IMU with single GPS baseline for improved heading performance,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10, IEEE, Big Sky, Mont, USA, March 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. H. Kim, J. G. Lee, and C. G. Park, “Adaptive two-stage extended Kalman filter for a fault-tolerant INS-GPS loosely coupled system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 125–137, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. J. Julier, J. K. Uhlmann, and H. F. Durrant-Whyte, “A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1628–1632, IEEE, Seattle, Wash, USA, June 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Van Der Merwe and E. A. Wan, “Sigma-point Kalman filters for integrated navigation,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Navigation (ION '04), pp. 641–654, June 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. Zhang, J. Gu, E. E. Milios, and P. Huynh, “Navigation with IMU/GPS/digital compass with unscented Kalman filter,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA '05), pp. 1497–1502, IEEE, Niagara Falls, Canada, August 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. L. Crassidis, K.-L. Lai, and R. R. Harman, “Real-time attitude-independent three-axis magnetometer calibration,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 115–120, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Kandepu, B. Foss, and L. Imsland, “Applying the unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 18, no. 7-8, pp. 753–768, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Van Der Merwe, A. Doucet, N. De Freitas, and E. Wan, “The unscented particle filter,” in NIPS, pp. 584–590, MIT Press, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. W. T. Higgins Jr., “A comparison of complementary and Kalman filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–325, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. H. Afzal, V. Renaudin, and G. Lachapelle, “Use of earth's magnetic field for mitigating gyroscope errors regardless of magnetic perturbation,” Sensors, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 11390–11414, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Gankhuyag and K. T. Chong, “Accurate heading estimation of a vehicle using GPS only,” in Proceedings of the Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems Conference (ICROS '13), Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  21. G. Gankhuyag, D. J. Lee, and K. T. Chong, “A simulation of low cost GPS/INS integration using extended Kalman filter,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Information and Control Symposium, Daejeon, South Korea, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  22. T. I. Fossen, Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  23. P. Kim and L. Huh, Kalman Filter for Beginners: with MATLAB Examples, CreateSpace, 2011.
  24. T. Perez and T. I. Fossen, “Kinematic models for manoeuvring and seakeeping of marine vessels,” Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Liu, “Navigation and control of mobile robot using sensor fusion,” in Robot Vision, InTech, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Gankhuyag, W. C. Young, and K. T. Chong, “Loosely-coupled Kalman filter integration of GPS and INS for marine vehicle,” in Proceedings of the Information and Control Symposium, pp. 187–184, Incheon, South Korea, 2013. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Ji Hyoung Ryu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

4910 Views | 1817 Downloads | 20 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.