Sensor Technologies and Methods for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Yijun Chen, Qun Zhang, Ying Luo, Tat Soon Yeo, "Micromotion Feature Extraction of Space Target Based on TrackBeforeDetect", Journal of Sensors, vol. 2017, Article ID 8723042, 14 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8723042
Micromotion Feature Extraction of Space Target Based on TrackBeforeDetect
Abstract
The micromotion feature of space target provides an effective approach for target recognition. The existing micromotion feature extraction is implemented after target detection and tracking; thus the radar resources need to be allocated for target detection, tracking, and feature extraction, successively. If the feature extraction can be implemented by utilizing the target detecting and tracking pulses, the radar efficiency can be improved. In this paper, by establishing a feedback loop between micromotion feature extraction and trackbeforedetect (TBD) of target, a novel feature extraction method for space target is proposed. The TBD technology is utilized to obtain the rangeslowtime curves of target scatterers. Then, micromotion feature parameters are estimated from the acquired curve information. In return, the state transition set of TBD is updated adaptively according to these extracted feature parameters. As a result, the micromotion feature parameters of space target can be extracted concurrently with implementing the target detecting and tracking. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
1. Introduction
The monitoring and recognition of space targets have become more and more important since these space targets such as fragments of satellites, rocket bodies, and other space debris are hazardous to aerospace activities with the increasing outer space explorations [1]. Generally, a space target has complex micromotion such as spinning, precession, and rolling, in addition to the body translation [2]. These micromotions will induce the microDoppler (mD) effect, which can be regarded as a unique signature, providing additional information for classification, recognition, and identification of the target [3]. Therefore, since the concept of microDoppler was introduced to the radar signal processing field [4, 5], the micromotion feature extraction of space target has drawn extensive attention of scholars [6–16].
Based on the fixed scatterer model [7], the micromotion feature of space target was usually analyzed with the timefrequency distribution technique, and the micromotion feature of target was extracted with parameter transformation method [7]. However, the timefrequency methods have some limitations due to the fact that the change of microDoppler frequency with time is highly nonlinear [8]. A feature extraction method based on empiricalmode decomposition (EMD) was proposed to estimate the oscillation frequency of the truck’s surface in [9]. To get the higher potential payoffs from the exploitation of mD effect in wideband radar system, the micromotion feature extraction for wideband radar based on complex image orthogonal matching pursuit decomposition is proposed in [10].
However, many space targets are of conical and conecylinder shapes, these rotationally symmetric targets cannot be described exactly with the fixed scatterer model. Their scattering centers of the edge of the conic bottom slide with the radar line of sight (LOS) that means the scattering centers local at the two intersections of the conic bottom edge and the radar wave incident plane [11]. Based on the slide scatterer model, the mathematical expression of microDoppler is derived, which is validated by the darkroom data in [12, 13]. However, these works did not provide effective micromotion feature extraction methods for the slide scatterer model. Unfortunately, most of the existing micromotion feature extraction methods for the fixed scatterer model will not function properly because the microDoppler curve of a slide scatterer is much different from that of a fixed scatterer. Although some methods based on the complex generalized Radon transform and extended Hough transform are proposed for micromotion feature extraction based on the slide scatterer model [14, 15], the computation load of these methods is heavy, and the methods need high pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to avoid the frequency domain aliasing phenomenon. In this case, a lot of radar resources needs to be allocated for micromotion feature extraction.
In fact, the existing micromotion feature extraction methods of space target are implemented after target detection and tracking. It is necessary to allocate the limited radar resources for target detecting, tracking, and feature extraction, successively. In the case of multitarget monitoring, the allocation contradiction of radar resources will be serious. To overcome this problem, we intend to seek a novel approach which can implement target detecting and tracking simultaneously when extracting the micromotion features of a space target, which can be available for both the fixed scatterer model and the slide scatterer model.
In recent years, the trackbeforedetect (TBD) technology has shown good performance in weak target detecting and tracking. Unlike traditional techniques that declare the presence of a target at each scan, the TBD technology processes more consecutive scans jointly, and then it declares the presence of a target and its track [16–18]. Through the interscan accumulation, the TBD technology can improve the probability of target detection. The idea of establishing a feedback loop between feature extraction and TBD of target has been provided in our previous preliminary work [19]. In this paper, a micromotion feature extraction method of space target based on TBD technology is further proposed. In the method, the tracks of target scatterers can be obtained during the TBD of target, and the tracks are the rangeslowtime curves of target scatterers indeed. We call the rangeslowtime curve as “range trajectory” in this paper. On this basis, we attempt to add the micromotion feature extraction into the process of target detecting and tracking by establishing a feedback loop, namely, that the micromotion feature parameters are extracted via fitting the obtained range trajectory according to the mathematical expression of mD effect, and in turn the extracted micromotion feature parameters are utilized to update the parameters of TBD adaptively. As a result, the micromotion feature extraction, detecting, and tracking of space target can be implemented simultaneously with the information feedback, which can provide realtime and effective information for target recognition. By changing the mathematical expressions of different kinds of mD effects for range trajectory fitting, the fixed scatterer model, the slide scatterer model, and any kinds of micromotion forms can be processed with the proposed method.
This paper is organized as follows. Taking the conical target contains a fixed scatterer and two slide scatterers as an example, the micromotion feature of the target precession is analyzed in Section 2. Combining with the TBD technology, the micromotion feature extraction method is presented in detail in Section 3. Simulations are presented in Section 4 and some conclusions are made in the last section.
2. Micromotion Feature of Conical Target with Precession
When the space target is flying outside the atmosphere, it needs to spin around its own axis of symmetry to maintain stability. Meanwhile, it needs to cone around a spatial directional axis due to the lateral force caused by projectile separation and bait release. These two types of rotation formed the precession of target. For a conical target, it usually consists of three dominant scatterers (i.e., one tipcone scatterer and two conebase scatterers), where the tipcone scatterer can be treated as a fixed tipcone scatterer, and the conebase scatterers are slide conebase scatterers. The geometry of conical target with precession is shown in Figure 1, where is the target center, and the target is rotating around axis with precession angle and precession frequency rad/s. The distance between the radar and the target center is denoted as . The radar LOS is denoted as , axis is in the plane determined by and axis, and axis is established according to the righthand rule. The LOS can be represented as , where is the angle between LOS and axis. The target consists of three scatterers denoted as , , and , respectively. The radius of the base circle is , the distance between the target centroid and scatterer is denoted as , and the vertical distance between the target centroid and the bottom circle is represented as . According to the rigid body dynamics, the velocity of target should be along axis and the velocity is given as .
Assume that the angle between axis and the projection of vector on the plane is at time , then the angle between LOS and is denoted as , and it can be calculated by
The projection of , , and in the lineofsight direction at time can be represented as , , and , respectively; that is,
Reference [1] points out that, in the wideband radar system, the micromotion feature of target can be described by rangeslowtime image, where the peak of range profile appears to be a rangeslowtime curve (range trajectory) which is determined by the scatterer range . And the range trajectory reflects the micromotion feature of target scatterer. Therefore, from (2)(4), the micromotion feature of conetip scatterer is sinusoid, while that of the conebase scatterers and is quasisinusoid, which deviates from the standard sinusoid.
During the target observation, the shielded effect should be considered. Assume that the cone half angle of target is . Obviously, is changing with time , and . The observable scatterers are different when locates in different interval range of . Therefore, we divide into four observation areas as follows: Area 1: , the observable scatterers are , , and . Area 2: , the observable scatterers are and . Area 3: , the observable scatterers are , , and . Area 4: , the observable scatterers are and .
The impact of the shielded effect on the proposed micromotion feature extraction method will be discussed in Section 3.
Next, a simple simulation is given to validate the correctness of theoretical analysis. The pulse duration is μs, carrier frequency is GHz, signal bandwidth is GHz, pulse repetition frequencies is Hz, and the coherent processing time is s. The radius of the base circle is m, the distance between the target center and conetip scatterer is m, and the vertical distance between the target center and the bottom circle is m.
To observe the micromotion feature of target more intuitively, we assume that m and m/s. The precession angle is , precession frequency is rad/s, the angle between LOS and axis is , and the initial angle is rad. We can obtain the rangeslowtime image as shown in Figure 2.
From Figure 2, we can see that the range profile peak of scatterer changes with slowtime following the sinusoidal form, while those of the sliding scatterers and are quasisinusoids (deviating from the standard sinusoid form), which confirms the theoretical analysis.
3. Micromotion Feature Extraction Based on TBD
Due to the requirement of additional observation pulses after target detection and tracking, the existing micromotion feature extraction methods usually occupy much radar resources. Also, the realtime performance and radar efficiency are not satisfied. So we intend to combine the micromotion feature extraction with target detecting and tracking in the way of information feedback and then implement the micromotion feature extraction, detecting and tracking of space target simultaneously. It will save the radar resources and improve the radar efficiency and realtime performance of micromotion feature extraction.
In this section, we establish a feedback loop between micromotion feature extraction and TBD of target. Firstly, based on TBD technology, the target scatterer range trajectory information is backtracked along with the energy accumulation process, and then the micromotion feature parameters of target can be fitted with these obtained trajectory information. In return, the extracted micromotion feature parameters are used to update the state transition set of TBD adaptively, and the results of micromotion feature extraction are considered into the declaration of the target presence. As a result, micromotion feature extraction, target detecting, and tracking can be completed simultaneously.
3.1. Range Trajectory Backtracking and Micromotion Feature Extraction
For simpleness, the range trajectory backtracking for single scatterer based on TBD is described firstly. The monitoring area is divided into grids according to the range and azimuthal angle, and each grid is denoted as a state , , , which represents the position , where and are the stepped increasement of the range and azimuthal angle, and is the center of the monitoring area. Assume the radar transmits wideband signal . At each scan, the beams towards all the azimuthal angles ( angles) are formed by the radar. The beam width is denoted as , each state will be hit by successive beams, whereObviously, the sequence number of these beams should be .
At the th scan, the echo signal of the state of the th beam can be represented aswhere represents the beampattern of the th beam and represents the obtained transmit gain at the th azimuthal angle with the th beam and is the backscattered amplitude of the state at the th scan.
After performing range compression, the highresolution range profile (HRRP) can be obtained as
Thus, at the th scan, the measured value of each state can be defined as
At the th scan, the cumulative energy of state is denoted as , and it can be calculated aswhere is the state transition set. contains all the possible state which can transit to state . Set an appropriate detection threshold for the cumulative energy function after scans accumulation, and the state sequence whose cumulative energy is larger than the threshold can be backtracked according towhere is the backtracking function, which is used to record the state corresponding to the maximum cumulative energy at each scan. Assume that the recorded state of the th scan is , the estimated scatterer range trajectory can be denoted as , , and the angle trajectory is , .
For the conetip scatterer , the estimated range trajectoryshould be equal to (2), where is the time interval between the two adjacent scans. Without loss of generality, it holds . Similarly, for the conebase scatterers and , the estimated range trajectories should be equal to (3) and (4), respectively.
However, the TBD method described above can obtain only one scatterer range trajectory, which cannot meet the requirement of getting range trajectories of each scatterers. Although some TBD methods for multitarget detecting and tracking have been proposed [20, 21], they require that the state of different targets can not be the same. However, in this paper, the different scatterers are usually at the same azimuthal angle and may be of the same range at some scans (i.e., the range trajectories may be intersected). That means the different scatterers may have the same state, which leads to the existing method which can not be used. To resolve this problem, we improve the TBD method as follows.
Assume the target consists of observable scatterers. At the th scan, for each azimuthal angle , select any states to form an expanded state , where the states can be the same; that is, can be equal to when . The measured value of the expanded state is defined as
On the basis, the cumulative energy shown as (9) is conducted in terms of the expanded state, where the state correlation is necessary. For example, there are 6 kinds of states correlation approaches when , shown as Figure 3.
Among these 6 kinds of states correlation approaches, only one is consistent with the actual scatterers trajectories. In [22], we have proposed a state correlation approach which can be used for states correlation.
After scans, the cumulative energy should be compared with a detection threshold :where is a constant which will affect the target detecting performance, in this paper we call as “detection threshold coefficient.” The state sequences whose cumulative energy is larger than the threshold can be backtracked according to (10).
It should be pointed out that the states correlation leads to the dependence of the energy accumulation of each scatterer. A specific expression of the detection threshold coefficient is difficult to be derived with a given false alarm probability. Just as [20], the detection threshold coefficient can be chosen from MonteCarlo experiments.
Assume that the number of the cumulative energy which is larger than the threshold is . Thus, state sequences will be obtained, and each state sequence contains range trajectories and angle trajectories . Due to the fact that intersections number of any two range trajectories will be small, a condition for selecting the reasonable state sequence from the state sequences is defined aswhere represents the intersections number of and and is a constant used to control the ratio of intersections number to scans number . The state sequences which satisfy the condition shown as (14) are selected, and the corresponding range trajectories and angle trajectories are obtained from the target scatterers.
For each possible value of , the TBD procedure proposed above can be conducted to obtain the range trajectories of scatterers. The shielded effect has been discussed in Section 2: when falls with in Area 1 or Area 3, three scatterers are observable (corresponding to ); when falls within Area 2 or Area 4, two scatterers are observable (corresponding to ). Therefore, the possible values of are and . Thus, the TBD procedure of and should be conducted.
In the case of , if there is state sequence which satisfies (14) which can be selected out, three range trajectories (i.e., , , and ) can be obtained. Firstly, we assume that is the range trajectory of the conetip scatterer and and are the range trajectories of the conebase scatterers and , respectively. , , and can be represented aswhere represents the error induced from the noise and TBD procedure. We can estimate the micromotion feature parameter vector by fitting , , and according to the curve form of standard sinusoid shown as (2) and quasisinusoid shown as (3)(4) with the least squares method:
Equation (16) can be solved with the Levenberg–Marquardt method [23], which is sensitive to the initial values. Therefore, how to set the appropriate initial values is proposed as follows. The EMD method [24] can be used to separate into a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMF) which is descended by frequency. Thus, we can obtainwhere is the error from and EMD method. According to (3) and (4), we can get
Similarly, separating with the EMD method, we can obtain
The initial values , , , , , , , , and for (19) can be obtained according the equation set:where is the inverse function of . In (20), the equations’ number is one less than unknown parameters number. Thus, we defined the search interval and the search stepped increasement of as and , respectively. For each initial values , , and , a group of initial values of , , , , , , , and can be obtained according to (20). Based on the initial values, the corresponding micromotion feature parameter vector , , can be obtained by solving (16) with the Levenberg–Marquardt method. The fitting error with the th group initial values is calculated as
All is compared with each other, and the estimated micromotion feature parameter vector is defined as
The fitting error is denoted as
It should be pointed that and are obtained under the assumption that is the range trajectory of the conetip scatterer . Therefore, we rewrite them as and .
Next, we assume and are the range trajectory of the conetip scatterer, respectively. The micromotion feature parameter vectors and can be obtained, and the corresponding fitting errors are denoted as and . The micromotion feature parameter vector corresponding to the minimum fitting error is selected out as the final micromotion feature parameter vector
The fitting error is denoted as
Similarly, in the case of , the micromotion feature parameter vector can be obtained. What should be pointed out is that if the two range trajectories are corresponding to the conebase scatterers and , respectively, the parameter can not be obtained.
3.2. Adaptive Update of State Transition Set
Just as mentioned in (18), the state transition set contains all the possible state which can transit to state , and the construction of state transition set will significantly affect the efficiency and performance of TBD and micromotion feature extraction. In this paper, the state transition set is updated adaptively, by forecasting the state of scatterers in next scan according to the extracted micromotion feature parameters.
Assume that, in the th scan, the cumulative energy is larger than the threshold; the extracted micromotion feature parameter vector can be obtained with the method proposed in Section 3.1, which is represented as
The corresponding fitting error is denoted as .
The state transition set can be determined in light of the extracted micromotion feature parameters. The state will belong to the state transition set (i.e., ) when it satisfieswhere represents the consistency of the micromotion feature parameter vectors between th scan and th scan, and is an adaptive adjustment function which is used to control the size of searching range gate during TBD according to . In this paper, is defined aswhere represents the mean value of a vector. Obviously, the smaller is, the higher consistency is.
Obviously, if is relatively small, it shows that the consistency of the extracted micromotion feature parameter vectors is high, we can consider that the precision of the micromotion feature extraction is well, and the forecast of state information in the next scan is accurate. In this case, the searching range gate can be decreased to reduce the computation load. On the contrary, if is relatively large, the forecasted precision is low and the searching range gate should be increased appropriately. Therefore, should be an increasing function, which is defined aswhere is a constant coefficient, is the minimum of searching range gate, which is set to be 5 in this paper, and the maximum value of is limited to 20.
3.3. Adaptive Starting and Ending of Precession Feature Extraction
In TBD algorithms, the detection threshold affects the target detecting performance directly. However, how to set an appropriate detection threshold is difficult, especially in the multiscatterers environment.
As the micromotion feature extraction has been included into the process of target detecting and tracking by establishing a feedback loop, the pertinent issue now is how to declare the presence of a target and when to start and end the micromotion feature extraction algorithm.
In the proposed method, the energy accumulation value and the result of micromotion feature extraction are both taken into full consideration to address the problem above, which is different from the traditional signal processing method. Just as we know, in traditional method, only when the energy accumulation value is larger than the threshold, it declares the presence of a target, and then the extraction of its micromotion feature will be implemented by transmitting additional observation pulses. In comparison, in the proposed method, by adding the micromotion feature extraction into the process of target detecting and tracking, on condition that the precision of micromotion feature extraction is high enough, it can declare the presence of a target and the micromotion feature is extracted successfully at the same time, although the energy accumulation value dose not achieve the required level.
Assume the minimum and maximum total number of scans that are jointly processed in TBD are and , respectively. Firstly, set two detection threshold coefficients: the lower detection threshold coefficient and the higher detection threshold coefficient . In the th () scan if the cumulative energy is larger than , we declare the presence of a target and the micromotion feature parameters can be obtained with the proposed method described in Section 3.1. On the other hand, if the cumulative energy is larger than and smaller than , backtracking the target scatterers trajectories according to (10) and (14). On this basis, the extracted micromotion feature parameter vector at th scan can be obtained. Go on to cumulate energy for the data of th scan, and extract the micromotion feature parameters at th scan. The consistency of the extracted micromotion feature parameter vectors can be calculated according to (29). If and fitting error are both relatively small (satisfies and ), we can declare the presence of a target and get the micromotion feature parameters. The energy accumulation is no longer needed. Otherwise, update the state transition set according to (27), and the energy accumulation of the data of th scan is needed. Repeat the steps described above until it satisfies and or , or it reached the th scan. In conclusion, the flowchart of micromotion feature extraction of space target based on TBD is shown in Figure 4.
There are three points should be noticed for the proposed method.
(1) The values of and are chosen from MonteCarlo experiments with the given false alarm probability and in the case the presence of a target is declared when the energy accumulation value is larger than the threshold. The corresponding detection probabilities are denoted as and . However, the result of micromotion feature extraction is taken into consideration to declare the presence of a target in this paper; thus the final false alarm probability and detection probability obtained from the proposed method are hard to be calculated from a specific expression with the variables of , , , and . Numerous experiments have shown that will be a little higher than . Therefore the value of can be chosen according to the desired false alarm probability, which is set as in this paper. The value of will affect the detection probability and computation load, and it is set as in this paper from numerous experiments with the consideration of maximizing the detection probability and minimizing the computation load.
(2) When the value of is larger than the observable scatterers number, the cumulative energy and the trajectories which are corresponding to the target will not be different from that corresponding to the noise. Thus, the target will not be detected. On the contrary, if the value of is smaller than the observable scatterers number, only trajectories can be obtained. Thus, some scatterers trajectories will be lost and the corresponding micromotion feature parameters can not be extracted. Therefore, the value of should be set as the maximum possible value firstly, which can be preset by experience. Then the value of decreases gradually until a target is detected and the micromotion feature is extracted or .
(3) The computational load of the proposed method is proportional to the search range. Therefore, to reduce the computational load, we assume that target detecting and tracking with narrowband radar is conducted firstly, and a lower threshold is used to detect the possible targets; then the obtained coarse position and velocity information of targets are utilized to determine the search range of the proposed method.
4. Simulations
In this section, some simulations are carried out to verify the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.
Assume that the target center is located at km at the beginning of observation (i.e., km) and the velocity of target is 500 m/s. The other simulation parameters are the same with those described in Section 2. The geometry of radar and target is illustrated as shown in Figure 5.
The parameters of the TBD procedure are set as follows: , , , m, , m, , , , , m, , and . First, we consider the problem of the detection threshold coefficient setting. When the energy accumulation value is larger than the threshold, it declares the presence of a target, and then the false alarm probability versus detection threshold coefficient is reported in Figure 6. Therefore, for the given and , the detection threshold coefficients are set as and .
The micromotion feature extraction based on TBD of is conducted with dB which is added to the HRRP of the target. Due to the fact that Fourier transform with () points is taken to obtain the HRRP, the average received SNR of the original echo is obtained by subtracting dB from the reported value. After scans, among all the state sequences whose cumulative energy is larger than and satisfying the condition shown as (14), one state sequence is corresponding to the target, as shown in Figure 7(a), and the other state sequences are induced from noise; one of them is shown as Figure 7(b). For convenience, the ordinate value has reduced by a constant of .
(a)
(b)
In the following text, for the state of , the cumulative energy, range trajectories, angle trajectories, estimated micromotion feature parameter vector, fitting error, consistency of the extracted micromotion feature parameter vector, state transition set of target, and noise in next scan are denoted as , , , , , , , , , , , , , and , respectively.
Using any two values of the range trajectory, the probable slope can be obtained, which can be utilized for the coarse slope compensation of trajectories, as shown in Figure 8.
(a)
(b)
Based on the range trajectories of target and noise, respectively, the estimated micromotion feature parameter vectors and can be obtained according to (13)–(22). At this time, the energy accumulation values and are both smaller than threshold , and the consistencies and can not be obtained due to the inexistence of the extracted micromotion feature parameter vector at the former scan. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to carry out energy accumulation. For and , respectively, update state transition sets and according to (27) by utilizing the obtained precession feature parameter vectors and .
After 24 scans, for , we can obtain the consistency and fitting error , which does not satisfy and . On the contrary, for , the consistency and fitting error , which satisfies and . Therefore, we declare the presence of a target, and the micromotion feature parameter vector can be obtained, as shown in Table 1. And the update process of the consistency, fitting error, and the size of searching range gate are shown in Figure 9.

(a)
(b)
(c)
From Figure 8, we can see that the consistency of the extracted micromotion feature parameter vector is increasing (i.e., is decreasing) with energy accumulation, and can reduce to the value smaller than , while is always higher than . Similarly, the size of searching range gate has the same change trend with the consistency. At the same time, the fitting error increases with energy accumulation, and can stabilize at the value which is smaller than , while will be higher than . Therefore, the state sequence corresponding to the target can be selected out, and the other state sequences induced from noise can be eliminated. Furthermore, the obtained micromotion feature parameter vector shown in Table 1 is closed to the theoretical value, which illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Next, the detection performance and micromotion feature extraction performance of the proposed method are compared with the traditional TBD method and the extended Hough transform method, respectively. With the proposed method, the false alarm probability and the detection probability are and . With the traditional TBD method, fixing the false alarm probability as , the detection probability is . Obviously, the detection performance of the proposed method is better than that of the traditional TBD method. Further, the micromotion feature extraction performance is defined as the estimated error of each micromotion feature parameter. With the extended Hough transform method, the micromotion feature parameter vector is obtained shown in Table 2. Due to the low SNR, the micromotion feature parameter vector can not be extracted effectively with the extended Hough transform method, while the high micromotion feature extraction performance can be obtained with the proposed method, shown as Table 1.

Finally, the detection performance and micromotion feature extraction performance with different SNRs are considered. Fixing the false alarm probability as 0.0052, the detection probability of the proposed method is better than that of the traditional TBD method, shown in Figure 10. Without loss of generality, we think the micromotion feature extraction is successful when the estimated error of each micromotion feature parameter is less than 10%. The success of micromotion feature extraction with different SNRs is shown in Figure 11. We can see that the success of micromotion feature extraction with the proposed method is much higher than that with the extended Hough transform method when SNR is lower than 11 dB. What is more important is that the micromotion feature parameters can be extracted without transmitting additional pulses, which can save the radar resources and provide realtime information for target recognition.