Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Sensors
Volume 2017, Article ID 8790198, 26 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8790198
Research Article

SmartOntoSensor: Ontology for Semantic Interpretation of Smartphone Sensors Data for Context-Aware Applications

Department of Computer Science, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan

Correspondence should be addressed to Shah Khusro; kp.ude.hsepu@orsuhk

Received 11 April 2016; Revised 10 August 2016; Accepted 11 January 2017; Published 20 February 2017

Academic Editor: Andrea Cusano

Copyright © 2017 Shaukat Ali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Ali, S. Khusro, A. Rauf, and S. Mahfooz, “Sensors and mobile phones: evolution and state-of-the-art,” Pakistan Journal of Science, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 385–399, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. Y. Wang, J. Lin, M. Annavaram et al., “A framework of energy efficient mobile sensing for automatic user state recognition,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '09), pp. 179–192, Kraków, Poland, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Subercaze, P. Maret, N. M. Dang, and K. Sasaki, “Context-aware applications using personal sensors,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Body Area Networks (ICST '07), pp. 1–5, Florence, Italy, 2007.
  4. P. Korpipää and J. Mäntyjärvi, “An ontology for mobile device sensor-based context awareness,” in Proceedings of the 4th International and Interdisciplinary Conference (CONTEXT '03), pp. 451–458, Stanford, Calif, USA, June 2003. View at Scopus
  5. D. J. Russomanno, C. R. Kothari, and O. A. Thomas, “Building a sensor ontology: a practical approach leveraging ISO and OGC models,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI '05), pp. 637–643, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, June 2005. View at Scopus
  6. C. A. Henson, J. K. Pschorr, A. P. Sheth, and K. Thirunarayan, “SemSOS: semantic sensor observation service,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS '09), Baltimore, md, USA, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Neuhaus and M. Compton, “The semantic sensor network ontology: a generic language to describe sensor assets,” in Proceedings of the AGILE 2009 Pre-Conference Workshop Challenges in Geospatial Data Harmonisation, Hannover, Germany, 2009.
  8. M. Compton, P. Barnaghi, L. Bermudez et al., “The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group,” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 17, pp. 25–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology,” 2001, http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.pdf.
  10. D. J. Russomanno, C. Kothari, and O. Thomas, “Sensor ontologies: from shallow to deep models,” in Proceedings of the 37th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SST '05), pp. 107–112, Tuskegee, Ala, USA, March 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Avancha, C. Patel, and A. Joshi, “Ontology-driven adaptive sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems (MobiQuitous '04), pp. 194–202, Boston, Mass, USA, August 2004.
  12. M. Calder, R. A. Morris, and F. Peri, “Machine reasoning about anomalous sensor data,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Eid, R. Liscano, and A. El Saddik, “A universal ontology for sensor networks data,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIMSA '07), pp. 59–62, IEEE, Ostuni, Italy, June 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Gomez, A. Preece, M. P. Johnson et al., “An ontology-centric approach to sensor-mission assignment,” in Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns, A. Gangemi and J. Euzenat, Eds., vol. 5268 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 347–363, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J.-H. Kim, H. Kwon, D.-H. Kim, H.-Y. Kwak, and S.-J. Lee, “Building a service-oriented ontology for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (IEEE/ACIS ICIS '08), pp. 649–654, Portland, Ore, USA, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Botts and A. Robin, “OpenGIS® Sensor Model Language (SensorML) Implementation Specification,” 2007 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=21273.
  17. A. Pease, I. Niles, and J. Li, “The suggested upper merged ontology: a large ontology for the semantic web and its applications,” in Proceedings of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, Edmonton, Canada, 2002.
  18. M. Compton, C. Henson, L. Lefort, H. Neuhaus, and A. Sheth, “A survey of the semantic specification of sensors,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC '09), 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  19. A. Underbrink, K. Witt, J. Stanley, and D. Mandl, “Autonomous mission operations for sensor webs,” in Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2008, San Francisco, Calif, USA, December 2008.
  20. L. Bermudez, E. Delory, T. O'Reilly, and J. Del Rio Fernandez, “Ocean observing systems demystified,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Biloxi—Marine Technology for Our Future: Global and Local Challenges (OCEANS '09), pp. 1–7, Biloxi, Miss, USA, October 2009. View at Scopus
  21. C. Schlenoff, T. Hong, C. Liu, R. Eastman, and S. Foufou, “A literature review of sensor ontologies for manufacturing applications,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE '13), pp. 96–101, October 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Shi, G. Li, X. Zhou, and X. Zhang, “Sensor ontology building in semantic sensor web,” in Internet of Things, Y. Wang and X. Zhang, Eds., vol. 312, pp. 277–284, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, and M. Fernández-López, “The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering,” in Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi, Eds., pp. 9–34, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Ali, S. Khusro, and H. Chang, “POEM: practical ontology engineering model for semantic web ontologies,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. V. Presutti and A. Gangemi, “Content ontology design patterns as practical building blocks for web ontologies,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 128–141, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  26. X. Wang, X. Zhang, and M. Li, “A survey on semantic sensor web: sensor ontology, mapping and query,” International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 325–342, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  27. E. Simperl, “Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: a feasibility study,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 905–925, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Preuveneers, J. V. den Bergh, D. Wagelaar et al., “Towards an extensible context ontology for ambient intelligence,” in Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 148–159, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2004.
  29. J. Brank, M. Grobelnik, and D. Mladenic, “A survey of ontology evaluation techniques,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Multi-Conference Information Society, pp. 166–169, 2005.
  30. T. J. Lampoltshammer and T. Heistracher, “Ontology evaluation with Protégé using OWLET,” Infocommunications Journal, vol. 6, pp. 12–17, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  31. H. Hlomani and D. Stacey, “Approaches, methods, metrics, measures, and subjectivity in ontology evaluation: a survey,” 2014, http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj657.pdf.
  32. A. Gomez-perez, Ontology Evaluation, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1st edition, 2004.
  33. S. Tartir and I. B. Arpinar, “Ontology evaluation and ranking using OntoQA,” in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC '07), pp. 185–192, Irvine, Calif, USA, September 2007.
  34. S. Tartir, I. B. Arpinar, and A. Sheth, “Ontological evaluation and validation,” in Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, R. Poli, M. Healy, and A. Kameas, Eds., pp. 115–130, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  35. Y. Shi, G. Li, X. Zhou, and X. Zhang, “Sensor ontology building in semantic sensor web,” in Internet of Things, Y. Wang and X. Zhang, Eds., vol. 312, pp. 277–284, Springer, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Burton-Jones, V. C. Storey, V. Sugumaran, and P. Ahluwalia, “A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 84–102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Horridge, H. Knublauch, A. Rector, R. Stevens, and C. Wroe, “A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using The Protégé-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools,” 2004, http://mowl-power.cs.man.ac.uk/protegeowltutorial/resources/ProtegeOWLTutorialP4_v1_3.pdf.
  38. E. Blomqvist, V. Presutti, E. Data, and A. Gangemi, “Experimenting with eXtreme design,” in Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management by the Masses EKAW, vol. 10, pp. 120–134, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
  39. S. Khusro, S. Ali, A. Rauf et al., “Unleashing sensor data on linked open data—the story so far,” Life Science Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1766–1786, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Gurrin, Z. Qiu, M. Hughes et al., “The smartphone as a platform for wearable cameras in health research,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 308–313, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. E. Petroulakis, I. G. Askoxylakis, and T. Tryfonas, “Life-logging in smart environments: challenges and security threats,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '12), pp. 5680–5684, Ottawa, Canada, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. P. Wetterwald, “Android@Home,” in Proceedings of the Google I/O Developer Conference, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2011.
  43. D. Choujaa and N. Dulay, “Activity recognition using mobile phones: achievements, challenges and recommendations,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on How to Do Good Research in Activity Recognition: Experimental Methodology, Performance Evaluation and Reproducibility in Conjunction with UBICOMP, 2010.
  44. N. Ravi, N. Dandekar, P. Mysore, and M. L. Littman, “Activity recognition from accelerometer data,” in Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 1541–1546, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 2005.
  45. A. Khan, S. Khusro, A. Rauf, and S. Mahfooz, “Rebirth of augmented reality—enhancing reality via smartphones,” Bahria University Journal of Information & Communication Technologies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 110–121, 2015. View at Google Scholar