Research Article
Evolutionary Multilabel Feature Selection Using Promising Feature Subset Generation
Table 2
Comparison results in terms of multilabel accuracy.
| Method | Birds | Enron | Llog | Mediamill | Medical | Proposed | 0.527 ± 0.044 | 0.383 ± 0.012 | 0.249 ± 0.014 | 0.362 ± 0.004 | 0.427 ± 0.030 | GA | 0.491 ± 0.055 | 0.284 ± 0.022 | 0.209 ± 0.018 | 0.336 ± 0.031 | 0.303 ± 0.058 | NSGA | 0.480 ± 0.040 | 0.282 ± 0.022 | 0.208 ± 0.014 | 0.347 ± 0.013 | 0.297 ± 0.018 | MPSOFS | 0.453 ± 0.031 | 0.206 ± 0.012 | 0.042 ± 0.002 | 0.163 ± 0.007 | 0.286 ± 0.033 |
| Method | TMC2007 | Business | Education | Entertainment | Health | Proposed | 0.441 ± 0.004 | 0.672 ± 0.011 | 0.318 ± 0.009 | 0.396 ± 0.004 | 0.537 ± 0.011 | GA | 0.435 ± 0.010 | 0.657 ± 0.021 | 0.316 ± 0.010 | 0.361 ± 0.011 | 0.499 ± 0.011 | NSGA | 0.434 ± 0.005 | 0.662 ± 0.013 | 0.318 ± 0.010 | 0.362 ± 0.010 | 0.495 ± 0.009 | MPSOFS | 0.420 ± 0.005 | 0.634 ± 0.008 | 0.283 ± 0.005 | 0.365 ± 0.010 | 0.496 ± 0.013 |
| Method | Reference | Science | Social | Society | Avg. rank | Proposed | 0.436 ± 0.009 | 0.288 ± 0.010 | 0.546 ± 0.008 | 0.371 ± 0.008 | 1.00 | GA | 0.422 ± 0.012 | 0.231 ± 0.009 | 0.517 ± 0.012 | 0.258 ± 0.011 | 2.79 | NSGA | 0.429 ± 0.009 | 0.237 ± 0.010 | 0.526 ± 0.009 | 0.267 ± 0.010 | 2.64 | MPSOFS | 0.414 ± 0.017 | 0.234 ± 0.013 | 0.527 ± 0.012 | 0.239 ± 0.007 | 3.57 |
|
|