Research Article

Evolutionary Multilabel Feature Selection Using Promising Feature Subset Generation

Table 2

Comparison results in terms of multilabel accuracy.

MethodBirdsEnronLlogMediamillMedical
Proposed0.527 ± 0.0440.383 ± 0.0120.249 ± 0.0140.362 ± 0.0040.427 ± 0.030
GA0.491 ± 0.0550.284 ± 0.0220.209 ± 0.0180.336 ± 0.0310.303 ± 0.058
NSGA0.480 ± 0.0400.282 ± 0.0220.208 ± 0.0140.347 ± 0.0130.297 ± 0.018
MPSOFS0.453 ± 0.0310.206 ± 0.0120.042 ± 0.0020.163 ± 0.0070.286 ± 0.033

MethodTMC2007BusinessEducationEntertainmentHealth
Proposed0.441 ± 0.0040.672 ± 0.0110.318 ± 0.0090.396 ± 0.0040.537 ± 0.011
GA0.435 ± 0.0100.657 ± 0.0210.316 ± 0.0100.361 ± 0.0110.499 ± 0.011
NSGA0.434 ± 0.0050.662 ± 0.0130.318 ± 0.0100.362 ± 0.0100.495 ± 0.009
MPSOFS0.420 ± 0.0050.634 ± 0.0080.283 ± 0.0050.365 ± 0.0100.496 ± 0.013

MethodReferenceScienceSocialSocietyAvg. rank
Proposed0.436 ± 0.0090.288 ± 0.0100.546 ± 0.0080.371 ± 0.0081.00
GA0.422 ± 0.0120.231 ± 0.0090.517 ± 0.0120.258 ± 0.0112.79
NSGA0.429 ± 0.0090.237 ± 0.0100.526 ± 0.0090.267 ± 0.0102.64
MPSOFS0.414 ± 0.0170.234 ± 0.0130.527 ± 0.0120.239 ± 0.0073.57