Evolutionary Multilabel Feature Selection Using Promising Feature Subset Generation

Table 3

Comparison results in terms of hamming loss.

Method	Birds	Enron	Llog	Mediamill	Medical
Proposed	0.061 ± 0.008	0.060 ± 0.003	0.016 ± 0.001	0.034 ± 0.000	0.020 ± 0.001
GA	0.072 ± 0.015	0.100 ± 0.033	0.075 ± 0.073	0.048 ± 0.022	0.023 ± 0.001
NSGA	0.064 ± 0.008	0.104 ± 0.026	0.072 ± 0.071	0.054 ± 0.032	0.022 ± 0.001
MPSOFS	0.135 ± 0.018	0.198 ± 0.007	0.292 ± 0.008	0.174 ± 0.005	0.023 ± 0.001
Method	TMC2007	Business	Education	Entertainment	Health
Proposed	0.088 ± 0.002	0.029 ± 0.001	0.042 ± 0.001	0.055 ± 0.001	0.039 ± 0.001
GA	0.088 ± 0.004	0.035 ± 0.005	0.046 ± 0.003	0.070 ± 0.007	0.051 ± 0.004
NSGA	0.086 ± 0.004	0.037 ± 0.010	0.048 ± 0.004	0.068 ± 0.004	0.054 ± 0.005
MPSOFS	0.117 ± 0.002	0.079 ± 0.003	0.061 ± 0.002	0.105 ± 0.003	0.067 ± 0.002
Method	Reference	Science	Social	Society	Avg. rank
Proposed	0.034 ± 0.006	0.035 ± 0.003	0.025 ± 0.003	0.054 ± 0.002	1.07
GA	0.055 ± 0.013	0.051 ± 0.012	0.042 ± 0.007	0.062 ± 0.005	2.71
NSGA	0.047 ± 0.008	0.045 ± 0.008	0.040 ± 0.010	0.060 ± 0.002	2.29
MPSOFS	0.086 ± 0.005	0.110 ± 0.005	0.070 ± 0.002	0.144 ± 0.007	3.93