Evolutionary Multilabel Feature Selection Using Promising Feature Subset Generation

Table 4

Comparison results in terms of ranking loss.

Method	Birds	Enron	Llog	Mediamill	Medical
Proposed	0.115 ± 0.017	0.100 ± 0.008	0.155 ± 0.023	0.060 ± 0.001	0.115 ± 0.026
GA	0.129 ± 0.015	0.133 ± 0.024	0.164 ± 0.023	0.066 ± 0.007	0.145 ± 0.026
NSGA	0.125 ± 0.017	0.149 ± 0.031	0.163 ± 0.023	0.067 ± 0.011	0.139 ± 0.026
MPSOFS	0.132 ± 0.017	0.194 ± 0.011	0.180 ± 0.021	0.159 ± 0.004	0.140 ± 0.024
Method	TMC2007	Business	Education	Entertainment	Health
Proposed	0.073 ± 0.001	0.062 ± 0.027	0.089 ± 0.003	0.111 ± 0.002	0.085 ± 0.028
GA	0.075 ± 0.002	0.070 ± 0.029	0.100 ± 0.004	0.140 ± 0.007	0.098 ± 0.027
NSGA	0.076 ± 0.002	0.067 ± 0.027	0.100 ± 0.003	0.137 ± 0.009	0.097 ± 0.028
MPSOFS	0.078 ± 0.002	0.096 ± 0.027	0.101 ± 0.003	0.153 ± 0.005	0.098 ± 0.028
Method	Reference	Science	Social	Society	Avg. rank
Proposed	0.111 ± 0.023	0.118 ± 0.003	0.075 ± 0.010	0.135 ± 0.003	1.00
GA	0.130 ± 0.021	0.154 ± 0.007	0.088 ± 0.012	0.151 ± 0.008	2.86
NSGA	0.128 ± 0.025	0.150 ± 0.006	0.085 ± 0.011	0.153 ± 0.011	2.29
MPSOFS	0.140 ± 0.023	0.157 ± 0.004	0.097 ± 0.012	0.212 ± 0.005	3.86