Research Article
Optical Fiber Force Myography Sensor for Identification of Hand Postures
Table 3
Comparison of several techniques for assessing the hand postures.
| Ref. | Type | Sensors | Postures | Performance |
| This | FMG | 3 OFS | 9 postures, including finger and wrist flexion | 99.7% accuracy | [36] | sEMG | 2 electrodes | Up to 16 hang postures, including finger and wrist flexion | 85% accuracy | [37] | sEMG | 5 electrodes 1 accelerometer | 18 postures including dynamic gestures and circular movements | 97.6% accuracy | [18] | sEMG | 10 electrodes | 5 finger flexion and thumb abduction | 10–20% nRMSE | [18] | FMG | 6 FSR | 5 finger flexion and thumb abduction | 10–20% nRMSE | [19] | FMG | 8 FSR | 6 gestures including grasp, elbow flexion, and wrist rotation | 92.33% accuracy | [12] | FMG | 32 FSR | 17 combinations of finger flexion | >99% accuracy | [25] | FMG | 4 OFS | 11 postures for identification of finger flexion | 89.9% accuracy |
|
|