Research Article
A Method Combining CNN and ELM for Feature Extraction and Classification of SAR Image
Table 2
Recognition and contrast results (%) of different algorithms for SAR images.
| Accuracy rate | SRC [2] | DCN [4] | CGLF [5] | PCA [1] | CSPC [3] | CNSVM [25] | CNN- SVM [7] | CNNELM |
| 2S1 | 85.36 | 98.18 | 95.62 | 89.95 | 90.65 | 94.53 | 100.00 | 100.00 | BMP_2 | 84.48 | 98.98 | 98.46 | 94.54 | 92.5 | 95.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | BRDM_2 | 90.11 | 99.27 | 95.26 | 92.54 | 93.34 | 85.04 | 100.00 | 100.00 | BTR_60 | 96.53 | 96.41 | 100.00 | 95.68 | 98.95 | 97.46 | 99.99 | 100.00 | BTR_70 | 98.33 | 99.49 | 99.49 | 85.66 | 99.79 | 91.33 | 97.66 | 100.00 | D_7 | 98.32 | 99.27 | 100.00 | 90.85 | 98.12 | 98.18 | 100.00 | 100.00 | T_62 | 90.54 | 99.64 | 98.17 | 89.99 | 90.52 | 91.21 | 99.50 | 100.00 | T_72 | 94.59 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.79 | 91.38 | 98.18 | 99.50 | 100.00 | ZIL_13_1 | 96.35 | 99.64 | 99.49 | 94.68 | 94.65 | 93.80 | 99.00 | 100.00 | ZUS_23_4 | 92.3 | 99.64 | 99.64 | 93.65 | 94.62 | 98.18 | 100.00 | 100.00 | Average | 92.70 | 99.13 | 98.56 | 92.43 | 94.48 | 94.38 | 99.57 | 100.00 |
|
|