Defogging Technology Based on Dual-Channel Sensor Information Fusion of Near-Infrared and Visible Light

Table 3

Average evaluation metric values of all methods on 8 image pairs.

				SSIM	QUI	CE	AG	EN	EI	MI	SD	PSNR
He et al. [8]	1.4732	0.0446	1.6338	1.6316	0.9188	1.6479	6.4491	6.9959	44.6196	1.5417	42.8358	57.2518
Tarel and Hautière [9]	1.9589	0.0000	3.4843	1.7318	0.8976	2.0167	8.2279	7.5873	58.9731	1.6047	50.3948	56.5191
Ancuti C.O. and Ancuti C. [14]	1.5277	0.4413	3.3632	1.8601	0.8189	1.9802	9.4472	7.4199	84.4507	1.3055	61.3855	57.3773
Zhou et al. [20]	1.4265	0.0395	3.7925	1.6001	0.7275	1.9378	9.3067	8.1847	72.4889	1.4054	61.0167	59.1760
Schaul et al. [21]	1.1888	0.0000	2.6428	1.6929	0.6926	1.9397	7.7943	6.5957	74.8722	2.1156	58.4320	57.5806
Son and Zhang [22]	1.0602	0.0585	3.6798	1.7517	0.7027	1.9862	7.7717	7.1681	76.2423	2.4377	40.2686	59.6547
Li and Wu [23]	1.1085	0.0000	3.6014	1.7203	0.7595	2.1939	9.2300	7.8570	100.9518	2.3862	67.3378	58.9492
Li et al. [26]	1.2620	0.1401	3.4825	1.6755	0.7135	1.9755	6.7187	7.5157	57.4804	1.7159	72.2351	59.3997
Liu et al. [27]	1.3505	0.1136	3.3020	1.7447	0.7870	1.5075	8.2411	7.7173	78.1802	2.1345	55.9789	59.1252
Li et al. [28]	1.6731	0.0577	4.2859	1.7264	0.8229	2.0047	5.9415	6.9831	50.2864	2.1242	41.7718	59.6178
Our	1.8175	0.0000	4.5035	1.7026	0.7740	1.7080	9.6249	7.8970	94.5903	1.9963	68.9191	59.5652
Our+CSC	2.1447	0.0000	4.6751	1.7936	0.7869	1.7522	9.6450	7.9728	95.5726	2.4346	70.4060	59.8374