Review Article

Cavity-Enhanced Spectroscopy in Condensed Phases: Recent Literature and Remaining Challenges

Table 1

Review of literature CES methods.

AbsorberMethodλ (nm)Sample volumeMin. det. optical loss (cm−1)Ref.

Allura red dye, Congo redLCW CRDS532<1 μL0.00034[31]
Malachite greenLJ CRDS628150 mL0.016[47]
BenzeneNICUV-CES450–650NA0.00002[48]
Alexa Fluor dyeNICUV-CES400–7002.7 mL0.000009[22]
Brilliant blue dyeNICUV-CRDS630NA0.00005[20]
Rhodamine 6GNICUV-CRDS500–600~3 mL0.000065[49]
QuinalizarinBRCUV-CRDS47010 μL0.00062[50]
BenzeneBRCUV-CRDS580–660NA0.0000002[51]
Crystal violetLF-CRDS53212 μL0.00031[52]
BacteriochlorophyllLF-CRDS783few mL0.000016[53]
Cu2+, indigo carmineLF-CRDS620–67010 μL0.000001[54]
Methylene blueLF-CRDS65560 mL0.00000033[55]
Sudan black, methylene blueLF-CRDS450–700100 mL0.0000003[21]
TartrazineFG-CRDS405100 nL0.02[56]
TartrazineFG-CRDS4056 nL0.11[57]
RhodamineFG-CRDS53219 nL0.11[34]
Permanganate ionFG-CRDS532130 nL0.0024[58]
Ferrozine complexLCW562300 μL0.000013[59]
Bromothymol blueLCW6131 μL0.02[60]

LCW: liquid core waveguide; LJ: liquid jet; CRDS: cavity ring-down spectroscopy; CES: cavity-enhanced spectroscopy; NICUV: normal incidence cuvette; BRCUV: Brewster angle cuvette; LF: liquid-filled cell in which fluid directly contacts fluid; FG: fiber gap; NA: not available.