Review Article

Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Investigating Soil Mineralogy: A Review

Table 2

A review of VNIR spectroscopy for the prediction of soil attributes using feature-based and chemometric methods in previous studies.

Soil mineralogic attributeaSoil typebLocationSamplecncal/nvaldMethodeR2fRMSEgSource

ClayTAlfisols and entisolsRomaniaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried210/90SVR0.2784.4[90]
ClayTNot mentionedFranceLab/sieved (2)-air-dried99/49PLSR0.7633.6[59]
ClayTDiverseRomaniaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried210/90SVR0.4685.3[91]
ClayTVertisols and alfisolsIndiaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried175/58PLSR0.802.2[92]
ClayTDiverseDenmarkLab/sieved (2)-air-dried480CVPLSR0.9417[84]
ClayTEntisol and inceptisolsItalyLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried175/60PLSR0.800.17[93]
ClayTDiverseAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried1104CVDWT-ANN0.8864.2[45]
ClayTDiverseAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried1104CVPLSR0.8377.7[45]
ClayTEntisolTurkeyLab/sieved (2)-air-dried502CVPLSR0.8438.20[89]
ClayTEntisolTurkeyLab/sieved (2)-air-dried502CVMARS0.8635.10[89]
ClayTDiverseFranceLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried52CVPLSR0.8531.2[22]
ClayTDiverseFranceLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried52CVCR0.7344[22]
ClayTDiverseFranceField/fresh52CVPLSR0.6449.6[22]
ClayTDiverseFranceField/fresh52CVCR0.5882[22]
ClayTDiverseUSALab/sieved (2)-air-dried72CVPLSR0.9241[85]
ClayTDiverseUSAField/fresh72CVPLSR0.8361[85]
ClayKDiverseAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried102CVPLSR0.95111.5[94]
ClayKNot mentionedChinaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried20CVCR-MLR0.8010.41[88]
ClayKDiverse topsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried4606CVModel trees0.520.8[95]
ClayKDiverse subsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried2492CVModel trees0.461.1[95]
ClayKMineral-organic mixesAustraliaLab/sieved (0.2)-oven-dried8CVPLSR0.940.36[2]
ClayIDiverseAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried90CVPLSR0.96102.1[94]
ClayINot mentionedChinaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried20CVCR-MLR0.7928.14[88]
ClayIDiverse topsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried4606CVModel trees0.411.2[95]
ClayIDiverse subsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried2492CVModel trees0.401.5[95]
ClayIMineral-organic mixesAustraliaLab/sieved (0.2)-oven-dried8CVPLSR0.960.34[2]
ClaySDiverseAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried98CVPLSR0.94118.7[94]
ClaySNot mentionedChinaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried20CVCR-MLR0.8421.35[88]
ClaySDiverseFranceLab/sieved (2)-air-dried63CVCR0.83158[20]
ClaySDiverse topsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried4606CVModel trees0.610.8[95]
ClaySDiverse subsoilAustraliaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried2492CVModel trees0.441.2[95]
ClaySMineral-organic mixesAustraliaLab/sieved (0.2)-oven-dried8CVPLSR0.920.34[2]
ClaySNot mentionedUSALab/sieved (2)-air-dried178CVPLSR0.831[96]
Clay2:1Argiudoll, hapludolls, and eutrudoxBrazilLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried29CVCR0.80[47]
FeTNot mentionedFranceLab/sieved (2)-air-dried99/49PLSR0.8424h[59]
FeTVertisols and alfisolsIndiaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried175/58PLSR0.780.15h[92]
FeTDiverseMoraviaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried97CVMLR0.3712.76h[97]
FeTCambisols and luvisolsSouth AfricaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried123/40CR-MLR0.219.3[98]
FeTCambisols and luvisolsSouth AfricaField/fresh94/31CR-MLR0.2316.3[98]
FeTCambisols and luvisolsSouth AfricaLab/sieved (2)-air-dried123/40PLSR0.439.8[98]
FeTCambisols and luvisolsSouth AfricaField/fresh94/31PLSR0.438.0[98]
FeHTypic hapludox and typic eutrudoxBrazilLab/sieved (2)-air-dried206CVPLSR0.7710.7[99]
FeGFe-oxide mixesUSALab/sieved (2)-oven-dried6CVCR0.9525.3[86]
CEntisols, inceptisols, and aridisolsIranLab/sieved (2)-air-dried30/10PLSR0.7152.4[67]
CNot mentionedFranceLab/sieved (2)-air-dried99/49PLSR0.8942.1[59]
CDiverse topsoilIranLab/sieved (2)-air-dried251CVPLSR0.58117[100]
CDiverse topsoilIranLab/sieved (2)-air-dried251CVCR0.35149[100]
CEntisolTurkeyLab/sieved (2)-air-dried502CVPLSR0.656.80[89]
CEntisolTurkeyLab/sieved (2)-air-dried502CVMARS0.716.20[89]
CDiverseFranceLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried52CVPLSR0.9438.34[22]
CDiverseFranceLab/sieved (2)-oven-dried52CVCR0.9252[22]
CDiverseFranceField/fresh52CVPLSR0.7776.67[22]
CDiverseFranceField/fresh52CVCR0.47132[22]

aSoil attributes: clayT, total clay content; clay2:1,2:1 clay mineral content; ClayK, kaolinite content; ClayI, illite content; ClayS, smectite content; FeT, total iron content; FeH, hematite content; FeG, goethite content; C, carbonate content. bsoil type: soil type is not given in the study (not mentioned); the soil samples in the study include more than three soil types (diverse). csample treatment: oven-dried, sieved (<2 mm), and measured under laboratory conditions (lab/sieved (2)-oven-dried); oven-dried, sieved (<0.2 mm), and measured under laboratory conditions (lab/sieved (0.2)-oven-dried); air-dried, sieved (<2 mm), and measured under laboratory conditions (lab/sieved (2)-air-dried); fresh (wet and unprocessed) and measured under field conditions (field/fresh). dncal/nval shows the number of samples used in the spectral calibration and validation, respectively. CV indicates that the validation was conducted independently using a statistical cross-validation technique. epartial least squares regression (PLSR); multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); support vector regression (SVR); the discrete wavelet transform-artificial neural networks (DWT-ANN); continuum removal (CR); feature-based multiple linear regression (CR-MLR). fcoefficient of determination. groot mean-square error (g·kg−1). —, RMSE is not given in the study. hmg·kg−1.