Research Article
Seasonal Source Apportionment of Heavy Metals and Physicochemical Parameters: A Case Study of Sapanca Lake Watershed
Table 3
Source apportionment for physicochemical parameters and heavy metals in winter.
| Winter | Others | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | Calculated | Measured | C/M |
| TOC | | | | 0.92 | 1.89 | | | 2.81 | 2.53 | 1.11 | T | | 0.56 | | | 5.81 | | 1.42 | 7.80 | 7.92 | 0.98 | EC | | | 190.97 | | 3.76 | 2.25 | 1.87 | 198.85 | 282.87 | 0.70 | TDS | | | 197.02 | | | 15.69 | | 212.70 | 267.16 | 0.80 | SAL | | | 0.20 | | | 0.13 | | 0.33 | 0.20 | 1.66 | pH | 3.15 | | | 0.14 | 3.37 | 1.67 | 1.46 | 9.80 | 8.19 | 1.20 | SS | | | | | 4.19 | 1.53 | 26.84 | 32.56 | 41.93 | 0.78 | Al | | | | 21259.67 | 191.05 | | | 21450.71 | 120944.92 | 0.18 | As | | | | | 2.38 | 0.84 | | 3.21 | 2.63 | 1.22 | Ba | | | 6.22 | 2.72 | 2.28 | | | 11.23 | 15.92 | 0.70 | Cd | | 1.95 | | | | | 0.12 | 2.07 | 2.35 | 0.88 | Co | | 1.31 | | 0.06 | | | 0.10 | 1.47 | 1.46 | 1.00 | Cr | | 1.87 | 0.22 | 0.75 | | 0.92 | 0.24 | 4.01 | 3.01 | 1.33 | Cu | | 2.07 | | | 0.54 | | | 2.61 | 3.35 | 0.78 | Fe | | | 5748.46 | 43793.91 | 1116.08 | | | 50658.45 | 211793.47 | 0.24 | Ni | | 0.04 | | 2.68 | | 0.46 | 0.36 | 3.54 | 2.51 | 1.41 | Pb | | 3.44 | | | 0.43 | | 0.04 | 3.90 | 4.04 | 0.97 | Zn | | | 1.77 | | | 3.41 | 0.30 | 5.48 | 6.70 | 0.82 |
|
|
S1: industrial source; S2: lithogenic source; S3: traffic and lithogenic sources; S4: domestic and industrial sources; S5: agricultural source; S6: seasonal pollution source.
|