|
S.No | Techniques | Specimen | Sensitivity (%) | Advantages | Dis-advantages | Cost (INR) |
|
1 | Autofluorescence spectroscopy [13] | Oral tissue | 91.1 | It is a noninvasive technique and patient-friendly | Nonspecific | 500–1000 |
2 | Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy [14] | Oral tissue | 94 | Low cost, it gives quantitative results with good sensitivity & specificity | The result surrounds the overlapping of bands | 500–2000 |
3 | Elastic scattering spectroscopy biopsy [15] | Oral tissue | 82 | No secondary procedures | Time-consuming | |
4 | Histopathological examination [16] | Oral tissue | NA | The study of large portions of tissues minimal or risk | Chances of human error broader in scope Cell kinds are difficult to identify. | 800–6400 |
5 | Immunohistochemistry [17] | Oral tissue | NA | Used widely | Chances of human error | 1500–3500 |
6 | Incisional biopsy [18] | Oral tissue | NA | a little piece of tissue is used. Performed in suspected instances of cancer and precancer. | Increased risk of metastasis of malignant lesions. | 1000–2000 |
7 | Laser capture microdissection [19] | Oral tissue | NA | Cell separation is precise and fast | Expensive sample contamination. High level of expertise required | 6000 |
8 | Mass spectroscopy [20] | Oral tissue | NA | Molecular profiling of tissues | Expensive instrumentation | |
9 | Optical coherence tomography [21] | Oral mucosa | 91 | Noninvasive easy-to-use | Hyperkeratosis has a negative impact on image quality. | 1000–2500 |
10 | Raman spectroscopy [22] | Oral tissue | 90 | Minimal sample preparation nondestructive noninvasive | Bands overlap, making it difficult to distinguish specific components. | 1500 |
11 | Vital staining techniques [23] | Oral tissue | 91 | Noninvasive | A significant number of false positive instances are evaluated. | 500 |
|