Journal of Solid State Physics

Journal of Solid State Physics / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 451563 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/451563

Dielectric Properties of Rhombohedral

Academic Editor: Hamdy Doweidar
Received30 Apr 2013
Revised26 Aug 2013
Accepted20 Sep 2013
Published07 Nov 2013

Abstract

Dielectric materials are needed in many electrical and electronic applications. So, basic characterizations need to be done for all dielectrics. (PN) is ferroelectric and piezoelectric only in its orthorhombic phase, with potential high temperature applications. So, its rhombohedral phase, frequently formed as an undesirable impurity in the preparation of orthorhombic PN, has been ignored with respect to possible dielectric characterizations. Here, essentially single phase rhombohedral PN has been prepared, checking structure from XRD Rietveld Analysis, and the real and imaginary parts of permittivity measured in an Impedance Spectrometer (IS) up to ~ and over 20 Hz to 5.5 MHz range, for heating and some cooling runs. Variations, with temperature, of relaxation time constant ( ), AC and DC conductivity, bulk resistance, activation energy and capacitance have been explored from our IS data.

1. Introduction

Commercial piezoelectric (PE) materials for applications in medicine, industry, and research have mostly been barium titanate (BaTiO3), lead zirconate titanate (Pb[ZrxTi1-x]O3, , or PZT), or materials based on one of these. But Curie temperature, the upper limit for piezoelectricity, is at best 130°C [1, 2] for the former and 390°C [2] for a specially modified PZT. Now, certain modern high temperature applications in industry need higher Curie temperature and, hence, newer materials with higher Curie temperature and suitable PE properties. This growing need for high temperature piezoelectric sensors and actuators [1, 2] has revived, in last few decades, a worldwide interest in lead niobate (PbNb2O6, to be shortened here as PN) in orthorhombic structure, which alone is piezoelectric. It was discovered [3] in 1953 but almost ignored for decades after a wave of pioneering work [35] of high quality. PN and PN-based ferroelectric samples involving chemical substitution &/or composite formation [68] are now being investigated by different groups, while present work is on pure PbNb2O6 in rhombohedral form.

PbNb2O6 has different structures as already indicated. The stable forms of PbNb2O6 are [35, 9] rhombohedral (at low temperature) and tetragonal (at high temperature). The latter is transformed, usually by quenching ( ), to PNQ, the metastable orthorhombic PbNb2O6, which alone can be made piezoelectric (fortunately with a high Curie temperature higher than 580°C for 5.5 MHz, e.g., [9]). Slow ( ) cooling (from temperatures like 1270°C) leads [10, 11] to PNS, rhombohedral PbNb2O6, which is not ferroelectric; ruling out piezoelectric properties and piezoelectric applications. So, most R & D efforts have been concentrated on orthorhombic PbNb2O6 [15, 1221]. Even the real part ( ) and imaginary part ( ) of the dielectric constant of the nonferroelectric PbNb2O6 with rhombohedral phase have rarely been reported [16, 22]. No analysis of its dielectric data has yet been made to study paraelectric and other physical properties in detail, although rhombohedral PbNb2O6 is a dielectric material in its own right. So, an analysis of its dielectric data [23] has been carried out in this work, after preparing rhombohedral PbNb2O6 in practically pure state, with X-ray Rietveld confirmation of the structure and impedance spectroscopy (IS) covering 20 Hz to 5.5 MHz at different values the sample temperature ( ) up to 700°C.

2. Materials and Methods

Pellets from starting chemicals of PbO and Nb2O5 with 2% extra by weight of PbO (to compensate for presumed Pb loss during firing) have been calcined first for 3.5 h at 1050°C, then at 1290°C for 1 h, and finally at 1270°C for about 5 h. At the end of last firing, the samples have been slow-cooled at an average rate of 1.5°C per minute, to get the rhombohedral form. The samples have been characterized by XRD with Rietveld analysis [16]. Firing in compact pellet form and grinding plus repelletizing before each firing improved sample quality.

The impedance spectroscopy has been carried out using Solatron “SI 1260 Impedance Gain Phase Analyzer” with a high temperature attachment. Our slow-cooled PNS pellets (diameter ~12 mm and 2.2 to 2.4 mm thick) have not been poled before measurement. Silver paint put on the flat faces of the pellet under study has acted as the electrodes for IS measurements, using 100 mV AC excitation. This measurement of and (the real and imaginary components, resp., of the relative dielectric constant, i.e., permittivity) has been done for different measuring frequencies covering from 20 Hz to 5.5 MHz range at different values the sample temperature ( ) while heating at the rate of 2°C per minute from room temperature to 700°C and also during many of the cooling runs.

3. Results and Discussion

X-ray Rietveld analysis shown in Figure 1 confirmed the rhombohedral PN structure with detected but unidentified impurity phase or phases, at a concentration of the order of 1% only. Impurity content can definitely be concluded to be lower than 5%. Due to factors like the unaccounted contribution of the unidentified impurities, the fit gives residue factors % and %, although it looks fairly good. Since this paper is finding the structure only to confirm the formation of rhombohedral PN and not trying to improve the well-established [22] structure of rhombohedral PN, somewhat poorer quality of fit can be tolerated. Still, this fit does show the correct space group, R3 m (hexagonal), no. 160, with lattice parameters  Å and  Å. From the cell volume defined by these lattice parameters and formula-guided mass associated with the cell, density has been calculated to be about 83.8% of the theoretical density on average. This lower than 100% density can affect the measurement of dielectric properties only to the extent of showing a lower value of dielectric constant.

Figure 2 shows temperature ( ) dependence of the real part of the dielectric constant ( ) during heating from room temperature to 700°C, at various measurement frequencies (5.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 4 MHz, 3 MHz, 2 MHz, 1 MHz, 500 kHz, 50 kHz, 30 kHz, 10 kHz, 5 kHz, and 1 kHz) for the rhombohedral phase. Two insets offer enlarged view in the temperature range from 400°C to 700°C. There appear to be two broad but weak peaks (at 479°C to 509°C) and (at 571°C to 575°C) for different lower frequency (5 kHz to 50 kHz) results and only one broad but weak peak (at 572°C to 577°C) for higher frequencies (500 kHz to 5.5 MHz). Even a third peak appears at the lowest measuring frequency of 1 kHz. This peak (at ~684°C) is rather sharp. This matches, with respect to temperature, the ferroelectric to paraelectric transition [16] of orthorhombic PbNb2O6, confirming its presence as an impurity of much lower value of (height at peak2), compared to the value of [16] of the ferroelectric PbNb2O6, as detailed in Table 1, implying presence in low concentration. While the origin of other peaks or even of the peak is not very clear, their absence (Figure 4) in cooling runs confirms their origin to low concentration unstable phases or defect conditions that get annealed by the 700°C cycling. Further discussion can found in the section on Cooling Data.


Frequency (Hz)
(room temperature)

(room temperature)
(°C) (°C) (°C)

1 k64.30.044253.4 495.8 711.4
5 k64.00.013204.0 281.0
10 k63.90.005186.5 238.8
30 k63.80.003165.6 195.9
50 k63.80.006160.9 182.0
500 k64.10.051131.3
1 M64.90.106117.8
2 M65.1−0.004115.9
3 M68.0−0.004115.2
4 M71.70.002118.7
5 M75.3−0.005124.4
5.5 M77.6−0.026128.5

Figure 3 shows temperature dependence of the imaginary part of the dielectric constant ( ), during heating from room temperature to 700°C for different measuring frequencies in the range 1 kHz to 5.5 MHz for PNS. For 1 kHz graph, increases sharply in the temperature range of 450°C to 650°C and then decreases with the increase of temperature, in our study being up to 700°C. Inset shows to be practically constant with temperature up to 450°C at high frequencies (1 MHz to 5.5 MHz). But for low frequencies (1 kHz to 500 kHz) and temperatures above 300°C, increases significantly with temperature. Cooling data (Figure 4), taken after cycling to 700°C, shows the temperature ( ) dependence of the real part of dielectric constant ( ) as Figure 4(a). Inset Figures 4(b) and 4(c) show the temperature dependence of imaginary parts of dielectric constant ( ) and temperature dependence of the dielectric loss ( ) at various measurement frequencies (5.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 4 MHz, 3 MHz, 2 MHz, 1 MHz, 500 kHz, 50 kHz, 30 kHz, 10 kHz, 5 kHz, and 1 kHz) during cooling (about 2°C/min) from 700°C to 410°C. Here, scale of plotting is grossly different from that for earlier heating data. We observe negative values of and at high frequencies (5.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 4 MHz, 3 MHz, and 2 MHz). The values of , , and of PNS sample are much smaller and less affected by temperature in cooling runs than in heating runs, as has been shown in Table 2, as well. The nonconclusive jitter in data for 1 kHz may be due to the enlarged view of the signal, and hence not significant. It is clear that the 700°C cycling has removed the unstable phases or conditions (Figure 2) and provided a clearer view of the rhombohedral phase. Figure 5 shows frequency dependence of the real part ( ) of dielectric constant and (inset view) of the PNS sample. In these heating runs at different temperatures (Figure 5), both quantities ( and tan ) decrease with the increase of the measuring frequency.


Frequency (Hz)Heating runCooling run

1 k171.32.839483.0120.013.89−0.00316.800.215
5 k112.11.123278.741.8014.410.02415.740.074
10 k97.70.745236.824.7114.17−0.02815.610.043
30 k83.60.394195.510.1114.20−0.00315.070.036
50 k79.60.287181.36.61614.260.00615.040.038
500 k70.50.125131.21.18114.240.04714.320.072
1 M70.10.157117.50.86214.320.10314.360.114
2 M70.00.036115.60.47713.72−0.02913.66−0.025
3 M72.90.021115.30.38314.34−0.10514.35−0.102
4 M76.90.024118.80.34214.36−0.11714.35−0.116
5 M80.80.012124.30.31312.64−0.27612.65−0.270
5.5 M83.4−0.016128.40.29011.68−0.56211.52−0.558

In this section, proper analysis the dielectric data of rhombohedral PbNb2O6 (PNS samples) has been carried out to calculate the values of temperature has dependent relaxation time ( ), bulk resistance ( ), and capacitance ( ) using Nyquist diagram/Cole-Cole plot as well as frequency dependent AC conductivity ( ) and frequency independent DC conductivity ( ) for different temperatures. We also calculate the value of corresponding activation energy ( ) for different temperature ranges.

The plot of (imaginary part of the impedance) versus (real part of the impedance) is called Nyquist diagram [23]. It is based on the well-known Cole-Cole plot of versus . The versus plot for our rhombohedral PNS sample is shown in Figure 6. The data points have been joined by a standard polynomial fit, indicated by open circles in Figure 6. Single semicircular nature of the plots is clearer in the higher temperature plots (for 450°C to 700°C), as the lower temperature plots, like that for 400°C in the insert of Figure 6, show large semicircular arcs. An important observation is that the Nyquist diagram here shows only one semicircular arc [9, 23] in higher temperature region over the studied frequency range 20 Hz to 5.5 MHz. One semicircle implies only one contribution (here from the sample grains) and not from any second source like grain boundaries or electrode effect). A sample with one semicircle Nyquist diagram or Cole-Cole plot is equivalent [9, 23] to a bulk resistance and a capacitance in parallel. These elements give rise to a time constant , the dielectric relaxation time of the basic material. The frequency of the peak of the Nyquist diagram can find the relaxation time as for this peak point [9, 23]. At this point, has its maximum value. So, many authors use the frequency of peak (i.e., maximum) of versus frequency plot to find the relaxation time . Often the centre of the semicircular arc of the Nyquist diagram is not on the -axis, so that the semicircle is seen to be depressed by an angle ( ) below the -axis. This is the case, if there is a distribution of relaxation times. This is determined by the width of the distribution of relaxation time. Dielectric relaxation time ( in μs) is a temperature-dependent parameter and it decreases with temperature, as has been shown in Figure 10.

If the semicircle starts near the origin at and intercepts the -axis again at , gives [9, 23] the bulk resistance. Fitting the impedance spectroscopy ( versus ) data, usually forming an arch, to the equation of a circle, its radius and and hence can be determined. Bulk resistance has thus been calculated from our data in Figure 6 and plotted in Figure 7. It is found that the semicircle of data points for a particular temperature in Figure 6 reduces in size with increase of temperature, implying smaller bulk resistance of the sample at higher temperatures as documented in Figure 7 (left side, indicated by black solid sphere). Using the relation , we calculate the value of capacitance ( in nF) and plot in Figure 7 (right side, indicated by blue solid stars). In Figure 7, it is found that capacitance does not change much with temperature in region 500°C to 700°C except at the temperature ~550°C that gives a sharp peak.

AC conductivity ( ) has been calculated from the dielectric loss ( ) data using the empirical formula: [9, 24], where  F·m−1 is the vacuum permittivity and is the speed of light in vacuum. Figure 8(a) presents this result on AC conductivity (as , in Ω−1·m−1) as a function of 1000/T (in Kelvin inverse, K−1), inset Figure 8(b) shows versus in the temperature range 373 to 973 K (100 to 700°C), and Figure 8(c) shows versus in the temperature range 100 to 450°C. AC activation energy ( in eV) has been calculated using the empirical Arrhenius relation , where is the preexponential factor, is the Boltzmann constant (= 8.617343 × 10−5 eV·K−1), and is the temperature of the sample in Kelvin,and has listed the values of frequency-dependent in different temperature regions in Table 3, and variation of has been shown in Figure 9. Figure 9 shows the activation energy ( ) in frequency range 20 Hz to 50 kHz for different temperature ranges.

(a)

Frequency (Hz)Temperature range
(50 to 380°C)(380 to 420°C)(420 to 520°C)
(meV)    Ω·m (meV)    Ω·m (meV)    Ω·m

1 k766.7119.81910.42223.8
5 k715.164.91795.8401.2
10 k704.162.31727.0144.7
30 k644.229.21597.721.8
50 k101.612.29610.219.61519.47.26
500 k17.9615.37272.50.2391094.20.023
1 M9.0749.02122.40.046872.60.001
2 M75.4525.22503.013.91188.50.145
3 M1196.21.85 M1276.00.642
4 M570.463.31153.80.124

(b)

Frequency (Hz)Temperature range
(540 to 565°C)(565 to 650°C)(675 to 700°C)
(meV)    Ω·m (meV)    Ω·m (meV)    Ω·m

1 k829.6303.6324.00.273−915.459.7
5 k830.6309.4322.90.270−904.268.9
10 k830.6310.5320.90.264−897.674.9
30 k824.3319.3316.10.250−889.383.6
50 k813.0248.3311.60.238−878.396.2
500 k610.319.9224.30.093−795.3308.5
1 M525.47.84171.20.059−741.0736.4
2 M554.212.8161.30.056−839.9233.6
3 M561.817.0145.70.054−885.5156.6
4 M561.020.5131.80.055−890.9176.2
5 M588.035.6123.30.059−916.2152.7

The frequency-independent and temperature-dependent DC conductivity ( ) have been calculated using empirical formula [6, 25] for slow-cooled PN sample (paraelectric PbNb2O6) with rhombohedral structure, as shown in Figure 10. Here, we observe that the DC conductivity of the slow-cooled PN sample increases with temperature up to ~580°C, then remains practically constant up to 600°C, and then increases again giving a wide peak at 650°C. Data points have been joined by a continuous line through a polynomial fit of the equation , where  Ω−1·m−1.°C−1, and  Ω−1·m−1·°C−2. Here, (relative permittivity in vacuum) = 8.854187 × 10−12 F·m−1, and is the real part of dielectric constant for high frequency. Here, is the time constant of the equivalent circuit (also called relaxation time), and this has been calculated using Nyquist diagram [9, 23] as detailed previously. Value of DC activation energy ( ), due to DC conductivity [9], has been calculated using the Arrhenius relation [26], where is the preexponential factor, is the Boltzmann constant that equals 8.617343 × 10−5 eV·K−1, and is the temperature in Kelvin. The values of and have been summarized in Table 4.


Temperature range (°C) (eV)    Ω·m

450–5302.172
530–5700.813
570–6000.124
650–700−0.578

Comparing the AC and DC conductivity data of PNS sample, we observe that (for frequencies from 1 MHz to 1 kHz) and (for frequencies 1 MHz to 5.5 MHz). Intriguing negative resistance can be noticed in Figures 8(b) and 8(c), although its confirmation by more experiments is desired. Negative resistance is, however, known in electronic devices and certain materials [2730], and the granular ceramic PNS sample is a good candidate for such effects at high frequencies. This has indeed been observed here only at highest frequencies used. We plan to do further studies on this controversial issue.

Activation energy, calculated from DC conductivity, decreases with increase of temperature (Table 4). Negative activation energy for highest temperatures in Table 4 is linked to decrease of with increase of temperature for . However, negative values of DC and AC activation energy have been reported earlier [9, 31] without discussion. Presently observed AC activation energy is negative in the temperature range of 675–700°C, similar to positive and negative values of activation energy on two sides of a peak in [31] in their Figure 11 over 1 kHz to 1 MHz range studied there. This simply implies that thermal activation of carriers in a semiconductor, increases the resulting current with temperature up to a certain temperature. If no more carriers are available, further increase of temperature cannot lead to more carriers. But factors like scattering by increasing lattice vibration and recombination lead to decrease of current and hence of conductivity. Already energetic carriers lose energy in such processes. Application of activation equation to such cases gave negative activation energy.

4. Conclusion

Presently prepared PbNb2O6 samples have practically pure rhombohedral phase as revealed by X-ray diffraction. The samples are further characterized by impedance spectroscopy (IS) over 20 Hz to 5.5 MHz and up to 700°C. Cooling data of IS measurement appear to reveal better the real features of this paraelectric material; unexplained features (small broad peak/s in versus graph in Figure 2), appearing in the first heating run in IS measurement on our PNS sample, are conjectured to be related to minor phases at low concentration. 700°C cycling removes unexplained features, and no such unexplained peaks have been observed in the cooling data.

Present analysis of the impedance spectroscopy data on rhombohedral PNS has been very detailed over wide ranges of temperature and frequency, with DC and AC conductivities, capacitance ( ), and resistance ( ) of the equivalent circuit, relaxation time, and related activation energies evaluated and discussed either more extensively than the literature or for the first time. Here, we are the first to present the Nyquist diagram and the plot of versus , for rhombohedral lead meta-niobate. For the AC and DC conductivity of PNS sample we observe for frequencies in 1 MHz to 1 kHz range and for frequencies in 1 MHz to 5.5 MHz range. Rhombohedral PbNb2O6, frequently an undesirable impurity in orthorhombic PbNb2O6, is, however, a dielectric in its own right. The present work is its first detailed study from that viewpoint.

This pelletized sample appears to show negative resistance under certain conditions.

Acknowledgments

The impedance spectroscopy setup at the Department of Ceramic Engineering, NIT, Rourkela 769008, India, has been used with the active encouragement of Professor Swadesh K Pratihar. Authors thank Professor Hamdy Doweidar for helpful comments.

References

  1. R. Kazys, A. Voleisis, and B. Voleisiene, “High temperature ultrasonic transducers: review,” Ultragarsas, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 7–17, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. A. Wolf and S. Trolier-McKinstry, “Temperature dependence of the piezoelectric response in lead zirconate titanate films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1397–1406, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Goodman, “Ferroelectric properties of lead metaniobate,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 368–372, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. H. Francombe and B. Lewis, “Structural, dielectric and optical properties of ferroelectric leadmetaniobate,” Acta Crystallographica, vol. 11, pp. 696–703, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. C. Subbarao and G. Shirane, “Nonstoichiometry and ferroelectric properties of PbNb2O6-type compounds,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1846–1851, 1960. View at: Google Scholar
  6. X. Chen, H. Ma, W. Ding et al., “Microstructure, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties of Pb0.92Ba0.08Nb2O6-0.25 wt% TiO2 ceramics: effect of sintering temperature,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 3364–3372, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G.-L. Men, P. Liu, R.-X. Zhang et al., “Effects of la on dielectric and piezoelectric properties of Pb1-xLa2x/3(Nb0.95Ti0.0625)2O6 ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 1753–1757, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. M. Chen, X. G. Zhao, W. Ding, and P. Liu, “Microstructure and dielectric properties of Pb0.94La0.06Nb2O6 ceramics,” Ceramics International, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 2855–2859, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. R. Sahu and U. De, “Dielectric properties of PbNb2O6 up to 700C from impedance spectroscopy,” Journal of Materials, vol. 2013, Article ID 702946, 15 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. R. Sahu and U. De, “Thermal characterization of piezoelectric and non-piezoelectric Lead Meta-Niobate,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 490, no. 1-2, pp. 75–77, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. U. De, K. R. Sahu, K. R. Chakraborty, and S. K. Pratihar, “Dielectric and thermal investigations on PbNb2O6 in pure piezoelectric phase and pure non-piezoelectric phase,” Integrated Ferroelectrics, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 96–109, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Ray, E. Günther, and H.-J. Ritzhaupt-Kleissl, “Manufacturing and characterization of piezoceramic lead metaniobate PbNb2O6,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 35, no. 24, pp. 6221–6224, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Data sheet Fa. Ferroperm, Ferroperm A/S, Piezoceramic Division, Kvistgard, Denmark, 1995.
  14. Y.-M. Li, L. Cheng, X.-Y. Gu, Y.-P. Zhang, and R.-H. Liao, “Piezoelectric and dielectric properties of PbNb2O6-based piezoelectric ceramics with high Curie temperature,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 197, no. 1–3, pp. 170–173, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. S. Rath, “Unit-cell data of the lead niobate PbNb206,” Acta Crystallographica, vol. 10, pp. 437–437, 1957. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. R. Chakraborty, K. R. Sahu, A. De, and U. De, “Structural characterization of orthorhombic and rhombohedral lead meta-niobate samples,” Integrated Ferroelectrics, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Guerrero, Y. Leyet, M. Venet, J. de Los S. Guerra, and J. A. Eiras, “Dielectric behavior of the PbNb2O6 ferroelectric ceramic in the frequency range of 20 Hz to 2 GHz,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 27, no. 13-15, pp. 4041–4044, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Lee and R. S. Lakes, “Damping properties of lead metaniobate,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. G. Ingle and B. M. Bangre, “Optical, etching, and interferometric studies on ferroelectric PbNb2O6,” Pramana, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 435–440, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. N. Lawless, “Specific heats of lead and cadmium niobates at low temperatures,” Physical Review B, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 3755–3760, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. P. Labbe, M. Frey, B. Raveau, and J. C. Monier, “Structure Cristalline de la Phase Ferroelectrique du Niobate de Plomb PbNb2O6. Deplacements des Atomes Metalliques et Interpretation de la Surstructure,” Acta Crystallographica B, vol. 33, pp. 2201–2212, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. Mahe, “Etude structurale du metaniobate de plomb rhomboedrique II. -Positions des atoms,” Bulletin de La Societe Chimique de France, vol. 6, pp. 1879–1884, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. R. Macdonald and W. B. Johnson, “Impedance spectroscopy: theory, experiment, and applications,” in Fundamentals of Impedance Spectroscopy, E. Barsoukov and J. R. Macdonald, Eds., pp. 1–26, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  24. R. N. P. Choudhary, D. K. Pradhan, G. E. Bonilla, and R. S. Katiyar, “Effect of La-substitution on structural and dielectric properties of Bi(Sc1/2Fe1/2)O3 ceramics,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 437, no. 1-2, pp. 220–224, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Lu, J. P. Bonnet, J. Ravez, and P. Hagenmuller, “Correlation between low frequency dielectric dispersion (LFDD) and impedance relaxation in ferroelectric ceramic Pb2KNb4TaO15,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 57, no. 3-4, pp. 235–244, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Indris, P. Heitjans, M. Ulrich, and A. Bunde, “AC and DC conductivity in nano- and microcrystalline Li2O:B2O3 composites: experimental results and theoretical models,” Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 89–103, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley-India, New Delhi, India, 2nd edition, 2007.
  28. J. Millman and C. C. Halkias, Integrated Electronics: Analog to Digital Circuits and Systems, chapter 3, Tata McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  29. D. Dascălu, “Space-charge waves and high-frequency negative resistance of SCL diodes,” Electronics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 301–329, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. Wang and D. D. L. Chung, “Apparent negative electrical resistance in carbon fiber composites,” Composites Part B, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 579–590, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. N. Singh and P. K. Bajpai, “Dielectric relaxation in pure columbite phase of SrNb2O6 ceramic material: impedance analysis,” World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 1, pp. 37–48, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Kriti Ranjan Sahu and Udayan De. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

621 Views | 369 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.