Journal of Toxicology

Journal of Toxicology / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Metals and Disease

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 431287 |

Victor D. Martinez, Emily A. Vucic, Daiana D. Becker-Santos, Lionel Gil, Wan L. Lam, "Arsenic Exposure and the Induction of Human Cancers", Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2011, Article ID 431287, 13 pages, 2011.

Arsenic Exposure and the Induction of Human Cancers

Academic Editor: David O. Carpenter
Received01 May 2011
Revised25 Aug 2011
Accepted25 Aug 2011
Published15 Nov 2011


Arsenic is a metalloid, that is, considered to be a human carcinogen. Millions of individuals worldwide are chronically exposed through drinking water, with consequences ranging from acute toxicities to development of malignancies, such as skin and lung cancer. Despite well-known arsenic-related health effects, the molecular mechanisms involved are not fully understood; however, the arsenic biotransformation process, which includes methylation changes, is thought to play a key role. This paper explores the relationship of arsenic exposure with cancer development and summarizes current knowledge of the potential mechanisms that may contribute to the neoplastic processes observed in arsenic exposed human populations.

1. Introduction

Arsenic (As) is a chemical element classified as a metalloid. The most common oxidation states in the environment are +3 (AsIII, also known as arsenite) and +5 (AsV or arsenate), which exhibit different grades of toxicity [1]. Arsenic compounds can be found in organic (when linked with carbon and hydrogen) and inorganic (when combined with oxygen, chlorine, and sulfur, among other elements) forms [2].

Long term ingestion of inorganic arsenic has been associated with several human diseases. There are various sources of ingested arsenic, such as food (mainly in fish and seafood, algae, and cereals), air (coal-fired power generation and smelting), and water [3]. Of the various sources of arsenic in the environment, long-term exposure of arsenic in drinking water likely poses the greatest threat to human health [4]. Given its daily and widespread consumption, occurrence of arsenic in drinking water has been increasingly recognized as a major public health concern in several regions of the world over the past decades [57]. In fact, groundwater used for drinking contaminated with naturally occurring inorganic arsenic in Bangladesh represents one of the largest mass poisoning of a population in history [8]. Worldwide, an estimated 160 million people live in regions with naturally elevated levels of arsenic in drinking water, due to the presence of arsenic-rich geological formations [7].

Arsenic is a natural component of rocks containing copper or lead, which can result in release of arsenic into water or air in zones of intensive mining activities [6]. Due to these geological conditions and/or anthropogenic activities, soil and water supplies in these areas contain high concentrations of arsenical compounds [9]. This situation is compounded in extremely arid zones (such as in Northern Chile), where water sources are scarce and contaminated water serves as a drinking and irrigation supply. This can lead to massive chronic poisoning—called arsenicosis—affecting local populations [10]. Arsenic-contaminated drinking water represents an important public health issue, especially for developing countries.

Due to its physical characteristics (no odor, no color, and no flavor), arsenic exposure is often unnoticed, especially when ingested through drinking water. In this context, long-term effects are a major health concern in affected areas. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have recommended a threshold of 10 μg/L for inorganic arsenic concentration in drinking water [11, 12]. Unfortunately, millions of people are exposed to toxic levels and are at increased risk for the adverse health effects of arsenic [6, 13]. Concentrations exceeding this threshold have been described in Bangladesh, India, China, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, USA, and Chile, among other countries [14].

There is a strong body of evidence linking arsenic with a variety of health problems, from acute toxicities to chronic diseases which can take years to develop. Arsenic-related diseases include skin lesions, hypertension, ischemia, some endemic peripheral vascular disorders (e.g., “black foot disease”), diabetes, severe arteriosclerosis, neuropathies, and, significantly, many types of cancer [1518]. Cancer-death risk associated with daily consumption of 1.6 liters of water with inorganic arsenic (50 μg/L) has been estimated to be 21/1,000 [19].

Arsenic has been classified as a class I human carcinogen by the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC), meaning that there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity to humans. Despite evidence in humans, animal models fail to replicate these observed effects, hampering elucidation of the exact mode(s) of action underlying arsenic related carcinogenicity [20]. Skin and several types of internal cancers, including bladder, kidney, liver, prostate, and lung have been associated with arsenic ingestion [10, 2125]. Skin cancer is the most common form of neoplasm associated with arsenic ingestion, while lung cancer corresponds to the most deadly [13, 26]. Interestingly, arsenic (specifically arsenic trioxide or As2O3) has been used as a chemotherapeutic agent for several types of cancer, with some studies showing high percentage of response in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) [27, 28]. We will also discuss this issue in further sections.

2. Common Arsenic-Induced Malignancies

2.1. Skin Cancer

The relationship between arsenic and skin cancer has been well documented over the past several decades [29, 30]. The first inferences were made through observations of an increased frequency of skin cancer cases following treatment with Fowler’s solution (1% potassium arsenite), formerly used for a variety of skin and hematological disorders [31]. Bowen’s disease (intraepithelial carcinoma or carcinoma in situ), basal cell carcinoma (BCC)- and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) are the most common malignancies found in patients with long-term exposure to arsenic. Merkel cell carcinoma, an uncommon and highly aggressive cutaneous neoplasm, has been also documented at a lower frequency [3235].

Arsenic-related skin SqCC can develop either de novo or progress from Bowen’s disease, whereas arsenic-related BCC develops usually in multiple foci and areas of the body covered from sun exposure, in contrast to cases originating from other skin carcinogens, such as UV-light [3638]. Arsenic-related Bowen’s disease can appear 10 years after arsenic exposure, while other types of skin cancer can have a latency period of 20 or 30 years [39]. A dose-response relationship and cell-type specificity have been described for arsenic-related skin cancer [40, 41]. Additionally, normal human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to varying noncytotoxic/slightly cytotoxic concentrations of inorganic arsenic exhibit gene expression changes associated with molecular pathways relevant to arsenic-related skin carcinogenesis, such as oxidative stress, increased transcriptional levels of keratinocyte growth factors, and modulation of MAPK and NF-κB pathways [42].

Premalignant skin lesions are relatively early manifestations of arsenic toxicity and are often considered precursors to arsenic-induced skin BCC and SqCC tumors [43]. These lesions include dermal manifestations such hyperpigmentation (a finely freckled, “raindrop” pattern of pigmentation or depigmentation) and hyperkeratosis (skin thickening, mainly at palms and the feet). These lesions are commonly found in chronically exposed populations and are considered a diagnostic criterion of arsenicosis [44]. Moreover, some genetic susceptibilities to these arsenic-related skin lesions have been proposed, since they do not occur in every exposed individual [45]. Hyperkeratosis can appear with shorter periods of arsenic exposure, and it has been described that these lesions give rise to the majority of arsenic-induced skin cancer [46, 47]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that a significant proportion of fatal cases of skin cancer occurred in patients with prior signs of arsenicosis, such as keratosis and hyperpigmentation [31, 48].

In addition to directly affecting the carcinogenic process, it has been demonstrated that arsenic toxicity can also be potentiated by other environmental carcinogens. For example, arsenic-exposed individuals with a history of smoking and chronic exposure to environments with high fertilizer use may be more susceptible to cancer-prone skin lesions than those without these risk factors, even at the same level of arsenic exposure [43]. Arsenic can act as a cocarcinogen with UV light in a synergistic mode of action, leading to development of hyperkeratosis [49, 50]. Additionally, the same mode of action was observed between high levels of arsenic (over 100 μg/L) and tobacco smoking with respect to risk of skin lesions in men [51].

2.2. Lung Cancer

There exists a significant dose-response relationship between arsenic concentration in water and incidence of lung cancer and other malignancies for both men and women [52]. The association between lung cancer and ingested arsenic was discovered following therapeutic application of this metalloid in psoriasis patients treated with Fowler’s solution [5355]. Thereafter, an increased lung cancer risk following exposure to arsenic in drinking water was demonstrated by several case-control and cohort-type studies [20]. Consistent, positive, and statistically significant associations among individuals exposed to high concentrations of arsenic in drinking water and increased risk of lung cancer have been detected [56, 57]. Based on large epidemiology studies in 1999, a report from the National Research Council (NRC, USA) concluded that there was sufficient evidence suggesting that the ingestion of arsenic in drinking water causes lung cancer, among other types of malignant neoplasias [58]. After this publication, other major arsenic and lung cancer epidemiological studies were published [25, 59]. Due to mounting evidence, the NRC study was reevaluated in 2001, concluding that the carcinogenic effects of arsenic in humans are significant, and that lung (and bladder) cancer should continue to be the focus of arsenic risk assessment for regulatory decision making [60].

Interestingly, the increase risk of lung cancer associated with arsenic seems to be cancer subtype specific. For example, where SqCC incidence had decreased worldwide and overwhelmingly associated with cigarette smoking; in Northern Chile, a high proportion of SqCC frequently occurs in never smokers who have been chronically exposed to arsenic [25, 61].

As mentioned, Bangladesh represents the largest mass poisoning of a population in history, as groundwater used for drinking is contaminated with naturally occurring inorganic arsenic [8]. In rural areas in Bangladesh, arsenic contamination in drinking water from tube wells is associated with lung cancer in males, with lung SqCC being the predominant histological subtype in areas with arsenic concentrations above 100 μg/L [62]. In these areas, the lifetime mortality risks of lung cancer are 159.1/100 000 for males and 23.1 for females (per 100 000 population) [63].

Blackfoot disease (BFD) is an endemic, peripheral arterial disease characterized by severe systemic arteriosclerosis and spontaneous gangrene resulting in amputation, common to individuals exposed to arsenic in Southwestern Taiwan [18]. In zones affected by BFD, increased incidence and subsequent mortality rates for lung cancer have been demonstrated, especially among those who used arsenic-contaminated well water for ≥40 years [64]. Smokers in this area have a 4.1-fold higher relative risk for lung cancer, suggesting a possible synergistic relationship between arsenic and tobacco exposures in terms of lung tumorigenesis [65]. Also, short-term exposure (5 years) of arsenic-contaminated drinking water (≥0.05 μg/L) can also result in elevated lung cancer risk [66].

The Andean zone in South America is another area where the relationship between chronic arsenic exposure and lung cancer has been demonstrated. A dose-response relationship between arsenic in drinking water and lung cancer was found in central regions of Argentina [67], where arsenic concentrations in water supplies were >100 μg/L, even reaching as high as 2000 μg/L [68]. A correlation between increased arsenic concentration in drinking water and lung cancer incidence was also discovered in Northern Chile [25]. In this area, lung cancer mortality increased ten years after the initiation of high-level exposure (arsenic concentration >90 μg/L in 1958) [10].

Chronic exposures to water contaminated with low concentrations of arsenic do not, however, show the same strong associations with increased cancer incidence and mortality. For example, a study carried out in Denmark [69] did not find any significant association between exposure to low concentrations of arsenic in drinking water (0.05–25.3 μg/L) and risk of melanoma or lung cancer, among other types of neoplasias. Similarly, another study conducted in Belgium did not find a significant correlation between exposure to drinking water containing relatively low arsenic concentrations (20–50 μg/L) and lung cancer mortality [70].

Genetic factors are thought to modulate susceptibility to arsenic-induced lung cancer. Carriers of CYP1A1*2A/GSTM1 homozygous deletion genotype show increased odds ratios for lung cancer, especially among smokers [71, 72]. In addition, our group has recently proposed that genomic aberrations in arsenic induced lung cancers exhibit distinct molecular characteristics. Using a whole genome tiling-path comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array platform (described in [73]), we analyzed DNA copy-number alterations (CNAs) among lung SqCC cases from a Northern Chilean population chronically exposed to inorganic arsenic in drinking water (Figure 1) [74]. We identified unique patterns of chromosomal disruption and gene dosage related to SqCC from never smokers in Northern Chile, which did not correlate with normal DNA copy-number variations (Figure 1). This has led to the growing hypothesis that lung SqCC in arsenic-exposed individuals could represent a molecularly distinct form of this disease [74].

3. Carcinogenic Mechanisms of Arsenic Exposure

3.1. Arsenic Biotransformation as a Toxicity Activation Mechanism

Arsenic metabolism implicates a series of reduction and oxidation reactions. Pentavalent arsenical species are reduced to trivalent species, and oxidative methylation occurs to yield methylated tri- and pentavalent metabolites [75]. However, more than a detoxification mechanism, it has been proposed that methylation can activate the toxic and carcinogenic potential of arsenic, since it has been demonstrated that mono/dimethylated arsenical species (both tri/pentavalent) can affect gene transcription, and are more potent enzyme inhibitors and cytotoxins than non-methylated species [76, 77]. Moreover, since the arsenic biotransformation pathway uses S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as a methyl group donor, arsenic can also interfere with a number of cellular processes that require methyl groups, leading to the idea that alteration of epigenetic mechanisms can also participate in arsenic-induced carcinogenesis [78]. A variety of these arsenic associated toxic events have been elucidated in cell line and animal models (Table 1).

Type of alterationCell model/typeAs speciesReference

Associated to oxidative stress
DNA strand breakHuman fetal lung fibroblast (2BS cells)AsIII[121]
DNA strand breakHuman alveolar epithelial type II (L-132) cellsDMAV[122]
Single-strand DNA breaks, DNA-protein adducts, sister chromatid exchangesHuman fibroblast cell linesAsIII [123]
Formation of apurinic/apyrimidinic sitesHuman alveolar epithelial cell line (L-132)DMA[124]
Induction of 8-OHdGHuman breast cancer MCF-7 adenocarcinoma epithelial cellsAsIII [125]
Increases 8-oxo-G levels through (CH3)2AsOODMAV[126, 127]
Presence markers for oxidative stress were detected, including 8-oxodGMouse bronchiolar Clara cellsDMAV [128]
Double-strand DNA breaksMammalian cells[96]

Epigenetic changes in DNA methylation/histones modification/miRNA expression
Alteration of methylation in p53 promoterA549 cell lineAsIII
Inductor of hypermethylation of the p16INK4a and RASSF1A CpG islands in nontumor lung tissues (including hyperplasia and adenoma) and lung adenocarcinomasLungs of mice exposed during 18 monthsAsV[107]
Increase of dimethylated H3K9Human BEAS-2B cell lineAsIII[112]
Increased H3K9 dimethylation and decreased H3K27 tri-methylation (gene silencing), increasing H3K4 tri-methylation (gene-activating mark), increases histone methyltransferase G9a protein levelsHuman A549 cell lineAsIII[112]
Changes to histone H3 acetylation, DNA promoter methylation, and decreases expression of the DBC1, FAM83A, ZSCAN12, and C1QTNF6 genesHuman nontumorogenic cell lines[113]
Altered expression of hsa-miR-210, -22, -34a, -221, and -222Human lymphoblastoid cellsAsIII[116]
Reduction in levels of miR-200Immortalized p53-knocked down human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs)AsIII[117]
Decrease in expression of miRNA-9, -181b, -124, and -125bChick embryosAsIII[118]

Other changes
Amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase geneMouse 3T6 cellsAsIII[129]
MAPK activation; phosphorylation of ATF-2 and c-Jun, elevated IL-8 releaseHuman BEAS 2B lineAsIII[130]
Induction of p53-independent expression of GADD45 protein (a G2/M cell-cycle checkpoint protein)Human BEAS 2B lineAsIII[131]
Stabilization of GADD45 alpha mRNA through nucleolinHuman BEAS 2B lineAsIII[132]
Mostly decreased expression for transcripts involved in angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, oxygen transport, apoptosis, cell cycle, and immune responseLung of mice exposedAsIII[133]
Induction of the expression of genes involved with cancer, the cell cycle, cellular proliferation, DNA replication, recombination and repair, lipid metabolism, cell-cell signaling and interaction, molecular transport, and immunological disease pathways in Ogg1−/− miceLungs of Ogg1−/− mutant mice exposedDMAV[134]
Enhanced centrosome amplification in p53-compromised cells. Resistance to arsenite-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and arsenite-induced apoptosis in p53-compromised cells. Reductions in arsenite-induced enhancement of p53, p21, and Gadd45a expressions (at 5–10 μM), Higher (200%) cell colony formation in p53-inhibited BEAS-2B cells (5 μM)H1355 cells (human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with mutation in p53) Human BEAS-2B line p53-inhibited BEAS-2B cellsAsIII[135]
Increased expression of ER-alpha and genes related to estrogen signaling in the fetal lung of female miceLung samples from gestation day 18 female fetal C3H miceAsIII[136]
Downregulation of (validated genes): Tpi1, Ldha, and Pgk1. Upregulation of (validated genes): Cox6a2; Variable: Id1, GpnmbRat lung epithelial cell line (L2)AsIII[137]
Increased cell viability (≤0.5 μM). Downregulation of APE1 and Polβ mRNA (above 1 μM)GM847-immortalized human lung fibroblastAsIII[138]
Increased plating efficiency (cell growth advantage), micronuclei incidence (marker of chromosomal instability), gene amplification (PALA resistance), invasive capabilities; anchorage-independent growth (oncogenic transformation); lost of β4 integrin expression; upregulated phosphorylation of Rb and ERK; decreased expression of p53 proteinh-TERT-immortalized human small airway epithelial cellsAsIII[139]

After reduction of AsV to AsIII by purine nucleoside phosphorylase, AsIII is methylated via a AsIII-methyltransferase, using SAM as a methyl group donor [79], producing mono and dimethylated trivalent species, such as monomethylarsonous acid (MMAIII), dimethylarsinous acid (DMAIII), and equivalent pentavalent species (monomethylarsonic acid or MMAV, and dimethylarsinic acid or DMAV. Interestingly, there is little evidence of methylated arsenic metabolites in skin, and in vitro studies have demonstrated that keratinocytes display very slow rates of arsenic methylation, and only mono-methylated species are produced [45, 80]. It has been proposed that AsIII could be one of the responsible agents in arsenic related skin carcinogenicity, since it acts as a cocarcinogenic to mouse skin [81]. Additionally, individuals with arsenic-related skin lesions or skin cancer exhibit lower levels of dimethylated species in urine (in contrast to monomethylated species) [8285], indicating that a lower methylation activity could predispose individuals to arsenic-related skin malignancies.

3.2. Arsenic-Induced Oxidative Stress

Cellular induced damage derived from arsenic biotransformation leading to carcinogenic processes have usually been described to occur through oxidative stress by generation of toxic species, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to genomic aberrations. Generation of ROS has been described as one of the earliest and most important mechanisms of arsenic-induced carcinogenicity [8691]. Oxidative damage (measured as guanine oxidation) is significantly associated with skin tumors associated with arsenic exposure [92, 93]. It has also been shown that oxidative stress can modify gene transcription profiles of human hyperkeratosis, affecting several cancer-relevant pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin and calcium signaling pathways [94, 95]. Both single- and double DNA strand breaks are characteristic of most cancer types and have been shown to be induced by chronic arsenic exposure, even at low concentrations [96, 97].

3.3. Epigenetic Changes

Arsenic, arsenic metabolites, and metabolism, directly and indirectly, affect normal epigenetic transcriptional regulation at both the level of DNA methylation, histone maintenance, and miRNA expression (reviewed in [98, 99]). As previously mentioned, biotransformation and reduction of arsenic leads to the formation of highly toxic methylated arsenic species which act as potent cytotoxics and enzyme inhibitors. Since this process utilizes SAM, the cell’s own methyl group donor, arsenic is thought to interfere with the cell’s ability to maintain normal epigenetic regulation via the disruption of normal DNA methylation patterns, histone modification, and expression of microRNAs (miRNAs), possibly by the depletion of cellular pools of methyl groups (Figure 2). Epigenetic modifications do not alter the DNA sequence itself but instead result in chemical modifications to DNA or histone tail residues. Cells and tissues exposed to arsenic display epigenetic aberrations that mimic early hallmarks of cancer, providing evidence for an epigenetic role in arsenic-mediated tumorigenesis. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is a highly dynamic process that can be modulated by existing therapeutics [100, 101] which may potentially apply to arsenic-related malignancies.

3.3.1. DNA Methylation

In the human genome, DNA methylation occurs at the 5-carbon position of cytosine in CpG dinucleotide sequences, resulting in 5′-methylcytosine (5mC), often within short evolutionarily conserved regions enriched for CpG dinucleotides, called CpG islands [102, 103]. When located in promoter regions of genes, CpG islands are typically unmethylated (~90%); however, promoters without CpG islands are frequently methylated [104]. Therefore, the bulk of methylated DNA in the human genome occurs in repetitive DNA sequences, where it is thought to have an important role in silencing transposable elements and maintaining genomic stability. The transfer of the donor methyl group from SAM to the cytosine in a CpG dinucleotides is catalyzed by DNA methyl transferase (DNMT) enzymes, responsible for the de novo methylation throughout development (DNMT3a, DNMT3b, and DNMT3L) and maintenance of methylation patterns in somatic tissue (DNMT1). Aberrant DNA methylation is implicated in a vast spectrum of diseases and disorders and is one of the earliest and most frequent aberrations in cancer. DNA hypomethylation is associated with genomic instability and the reexpression of parasitic DNA, in addition to activation of genes normally silenced by methylation in a tissue-specific manner. Conversely, aberrant DNA promoter hypermethylation is strongly linked to transcriptional gene silencing, particularly for tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) and cancer.

DNA methylation patterns observed in human cancers resemble those of arsenic-related premalignant and malignant cells and tissues. For example, the DNA methylation patterns of several well-known cancer genes have been studied in the context of, and found to correlate with, arsenic exposure in in vitro cell models and in populations exposed to arsenic. The activation of proliferative genes in rat liver epithelial cell lines which undergo malignant transformation following chronic, low-level arsenic exposure is associated with aberrant DNA hypomethylation [105]. Exposure to AsIII and AsV in the lung cancer cell line (A549), resulted in promoter hypermethylation and subsequent transcriptional silencing of p53 [106]. Mice, chronically exposed to AsV through drinking water, acquire frequent promoter hypermethylation of the tumor suppressors p16INK4A and RASSF1A in lung tumor tissues [107]. A study analyzing 351 cases of bladder cancer cases found that arsenic exposure was associated with promoter methylation of RASSF1A and PRSS3 [108]. Intriguingly, in one study, individuals with no cancer, but who were exposed to high arsenic concentrations (>251 μg/L), had a significant degree of DNA hypermethylation in promoter regions of p53 and p16INK4A compared to nonexposed controls [109], suggesting that arsenic related-hypermethylation events may be some of the earliest causal tumorigenic events. Collectively, these and other findings (see [98, 99]) support the notion that arsenic-induced changes to DNA methylation play a role in tumor formation.

3.3.2. Histone Modification

Histones proteins enable condensation of double-stranded supercoiled eukaryotic DNA into nucleosomes, which are made up of two copies each of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 proteins. The N-terminal tails of histones are accessible to modifying enzymes, which function in catalyzing posttranslational modifications to the amino acid residues residing within the histone tail, including acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, and phosphorylation amongst others [110, 111]. Specific patterns of these modifications, commonly referred to as the “histone code”, correlate with transcriptional states of associated genes as well as to disease phenotypes. Working in conjunction with transcriptional coactivators or repressors, histone modifying enzymes catalyze the addition or removal of these modifications to generally induce or maintain an (1) open euchromatic state, through the addition of acetyl groups (via histone acetyltransferases) or (2) a closed or heterchromatic state, through the addition of methyl groups (via histone methyltransferases) or removal of acetyl groups (via histone deacetylases) on specific histone residues. Therefore, transcriptional activity of associated genes correlates with the formation of euchromatin or heterochromatin.

Arsenic metabolites have been shown to modulate normal histone patterns. AsIII has also been shown to modify methylation patterns on H3K4, H3K9, and H3K27 [112]. A549 cells exposed to 2.5–5 μM of AsIII exhibited an increase in H3K9 dimethylation and a decrease in H3K27 trimethylation, both of which are associated with heterochromatin (gene silencing), and a decrease in H3K4 trimethylation which is associated with euchromatin formation (an activation mark). When the normal bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) was exposed to 1-2 μM of AsIII, an increase in dimethylation of H3K9 was observed.

Arsenic compounds were also shown to induce malignant transformation of human nontumorigenic cell lines through changes to histone H3 acetylation, DNA promoter methylation, and decreases expression of the DBC1, FAM83A, ZSCAN12, and C1QTNF6 genes [113]. For each of these underexpressed genes, DNA methylation inversely correlated with the histone acetylation levels for their respective promoter regions, leading authors to conclude that changes in histone H3 acetylation occur during arsenic-induced malignant transformation.

3.3.3. MicroRNAs

miRNAs are small, noncoding RNA species that orchestrate the expression of genes involved in many key aspects of cell biology by degradation and translational inhibition of their target mRNAs (reviewed in [114]). In humans, more than 1400 miRNAs have been identified to date (miRBase data base; Release 17, April 2011). miRNAs inhibit gene expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated region of mRNAs through imperfect base pairing; consequently, a single miRNA can negatively regulate the expression of multiple and sometimes upwards of hundreds target genes. As a result, miRNAs deregulations are implicated in diverse human pathologies, including cancer (reviewed in [115]).

An increasing number of studies show that arsenic exposure can alter miRNA expression levels in vitro and in vivo. Human lymphoblastoid cells exposed to sodium AsIII over six days showed altered expression of five miRNAs (hsa-miR-210, -22, -34a, -221, and -222) [116]. The authors hypothesized that these alterations could be a consequence of changes in methylation patterns, since the same alterations were observed when cells were grown under folate-deficient conditions, which can lead to reduced levels of SAM. Furthermore, overexpression of hsa-miR-222 was confirmed in human peripheral blood-derived cells from individuals with insufficient dietary folate. The induced changes in miRNA expression could be reversed by the restoration of folate, suggesting that continuous exposure to agents like arsenic may be necessary to permanently alter the expression of miRNAs.

Chronic exposure to AsIII has also been shown to induce malignant transformation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in concert with reduction in levels of miR-200 family members in immortalized p53-knocked downhuman bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) but not in p53-intact HBECs [117]. Interestingly, stable expression of miR-200b alone was capable of entirely reversing and preventing AsIII-induced EMT and malignant transformation. Arsenic exposure depleted the miR-200 s through the induction of EMT-inducing transcription factors zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox factor 1 (ZEB1) and ZEB2 and increased methylation of miR-200 promoters.

A recent study examining the global expression of miRNAs and mRNAs of chick embryos after arsenic exposure revealed a dramatic decrease in expression of miRNA-9, -181b, -124, and -125b [118]. NRP1—a transmembrane receptor involved in angiogenesis—which is upregulated at the mRNA level in arsenic-treated chick embryos was found to be a target gene of miR-9 and miR-181b. Overexpression of miR-9 or miR-181b suppressed AsIII-induced NRP1 expression, cell migration and tube formation, supporting involvement of these miRNA species in AsIII-induced angiogenesis via NRP1 gene activation.

Despite its carcinogenic potential, AsIII has also been used as a treatment option for APL, which is frequently associated with a gene fusion involving the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) and the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) gene [119]. Saumet et al. have shown that PML-RARA is able to transcriptionally repress several miRNAs associated with critical pathways linked to leukemogenesis, such as HOX proteins and cell adhesion molecules [120]. Expression of these miRNAs was restored by retinoic acid and AsIII, suggesting that, in APL, these agents may function to inhibit cell growth, at least in part by impacting miRNA expression.

4. Conclusion

Arsenic contamination of drinking water remains a serious public health problem, affecting hundreds of millions individuals worldwide. The more severe effects, such as cancer, are evident up to several decades after exposure has ceased. Although mitigation measures have been taken, the natural origin of this contamination keeps this problem an active preoccupation that requires strategies to monitor arsenic concentrations in drinking water and to define markers associated with early health effects.

Overall, reviewed literature indicates that arsenic exposure exerts deleterious health effects primarily through the induction of oxidative stress, alterations to DNA methylation, histone modification, and miRNA expression. Understanding these events in the context of arsenic toxicity may provide powerful biomarkers for arsenic-induced carcinogenicity and elucidation of early steps in arsenic-induced malignancies that may be reversed by targeted therapies or preventative chemotherapeutics. Larger, carefully designed epidemiologic studies will be required to more comprehensively examine the presence and consequence of these alterations in populations affected by arsenic contamination. Since synergistic cocarcinogenicity, especially in skin and lung cancer, occurs in arsenic-exposed individuals, considerations of other environmental agents should be taken into account in these studies. Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the initiation and promotion of carcinogenesis related to arsenic’s biotransformation processes and metabolites is of foremost importance to the development of early detection and treatment regimes for affected individuals.


This work was supported by Grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) (MOP-86731, MOP-77903, and MOP-110949), Canadian Cancer Society (CCS20485), and INNOVA-CORFO Grants (07CN13PBT-48). V. D. Martinez was supported by fellowships from the Government of Canada Awards Programme and the MECESUP-UCH0306 project. E. A. Vucic is supported by a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship from CIHR.


  1. M. Vahter, “Mechanisms of arsenic biotransformation,” Toxicology, vol. 181-182, pp. 211–217, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Toxicological Profile for Arsenic, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), “Scientific opinion on arsenic in food,” EFSA Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, articel 1351, 199 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. N. G. Mazumder, “Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arsenic poisoning,” in United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. Argos, T. Kalra, P. J. Rathouz et al., “Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): a prospective cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9737, pp. 252–258, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. K. Nordstrom, “Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5576, pp. 2143–2145, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), “Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic,” in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 84, International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), Lyon, France, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. H. Smith, E. O. Lingas, and M. Rahman, “Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1093–1103, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. I. D. Gregori, E. Fuentes, M. Rojas, H. Pinochet, and M. Potin-Gautier, “Monitoring of copper, arsenic and antimony levels in agricultural soils impacted and non-impacted by mining activities, from three regions in Chile,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 287–295, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Marshall, C. Ferreccio, Y. Yuan et al., “Fifty-Year study of lung and bladder cancer mortality in Chile related to arsenic in drinking water,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 920–928, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
  12. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Technical Fact Sheet: Proposed Rule for Arsenic in Drinking Water, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  13. M. N. Mead, “Arsenic: in search of an antidote to a global poison,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. A378–A386, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. Chakraborti, M. M. Rahman, K. Paul et al., “Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent: what lessons have been learned?” Talanta, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. J. Chen, Y. M. Hsueh, M. S. Lai et al., “Increased prevalence of hypertension and long-term arsenic exposure,” Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. R. Engel, C. Hopenhayn-Rich, O. Receveur, and A. H. Smith, “Vascular effects of chronic arsenic exposure: a review,” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184–209, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  17. T. Kadono, T. Inaoka, N. Murayama et al., “Skin manifestations of arsenicosis in two villages in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 841–846, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. P. Tseng, “Effects and dose response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 19, pp. 109–119, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. N. Bates, A. H. Smith, and C. Hopenhayn-Rich, “Arsenic ingestion and internal cancers: a review,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 462–476, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  20. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), “Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. Monographs on chloramine, chloral and chloral hydrate, dichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic acid and 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone,” in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 84, pp. 269–477, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. J. Chen and C. J. Wang, “Ecological correlation between arsenic level in well water and age-adjusted mortality from malignant neoplasms,” Cancer Research, vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 5470–5474, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. H. Smith, M. Goycolea, R. Haque, and M. L. Biggs, “Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 147, no. 7, pp. 660–669, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Hopenhayn-Rich, M. L. Biggs, A. Fuchs et al., “Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina,” Epidemiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. H. Morales, L. Ryan, T. L. Kuo, M. M. Wu, and C. J. Chen, “Risk of internal cancers from arsenic in drinking water,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 655–661, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Ferreccio, C. González, V. Milosavjlevic, G. Marshall, A. M. Sancha, and A. H. Smith, “Lung cancer and arsenic concentrations in drinking water in Chile,” Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 673–679, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. H. Smith, C. Hopenhayn-Rich, M. N. Bates et al., “Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 97, pp. 259–267, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  27. V. Mathews, B. George, E. Chendamarai et al., “Single-agent arsenic trioxide in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term follow-up data,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 24, pp. 3866–3871, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. Y. Wang and Z. Chen, “Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from highly fatal to highly curable,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 2505–2515, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. L. Armando and A. O. Angel, “Chronic arsenic poisoning,” Boletin Medico del Hospital Infantil de Mexico, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 849–861, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  30. R. Zaldivar, L. Prunes, and G. L. Ghai, “Arsenic dose in patients with cutaneous carcinomata and hepatic haemangio-endothelioma after environmental and occupational exposure,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. Cuzick, S. Evans, M. Gillman, and D. A. P. Evans, “Medicinal arsenic and internal malignancies,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 904–911, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  32. H. H. Wong and J. Wang, “Merkel cell carcinoma,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 134, no. 11, pp. 1711–1716, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  33. W. Boonchai, A. Green, J. Ng, A. Dicker, and G. Chenevix-Trench, “Basal cell carcinoma in chronic arsenicism occurring in Queensland, Australia, after ingestion of an asthma medication,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 664–669, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. H. C. Lien, T. F. Tsai, Y. Y. Lee, and C. H. Hsiao, “Merkel cell carcinoma and chronic arsenicism,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 641–643, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. S. Wong, K. C. Tan, and C. L. Goh, “Cutaneous manifestations of chronic arsenicism: review of seventeen cases,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 38, no. 2 I, pp. 179–185, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Castren, A. Ranki, J. A. Welsh, and K. H. Vähäkangas, “Infrequent p53 mutations in arsenic-related skin lesions,” Oncology Research, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 475–482, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  37. C. H. Lee, C. L. Yu, W. T. Liao et al., “Effects and interactions of low doses of arsenic and UVB on keratinocyte apoptosis,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1199–1205, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. S. Yu, C. H. Lee, S. H. Jee, C. K. Ho, and Y. L. Guo, “Environmental and occupational skin diseases in Taiwan,” Journal of Dermatology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 628–631, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  39. T. Yoshida, H. Yamauchi, and G. F. Sun, “Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via the drinking water: dose-response relationships in review,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 243–252, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Haque, D. N. G. Mazumder, S. Samanta et al., “Arsenic in drinking water and skin lesions: dose-response data from West Bengal, India,” Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 174–182, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. R. Guo, H. S. Yu, H. Hu, and R. R. Monson, “Arsenic in drinking water and skin cancers: cell-type specificity (Taiwan, ROC),” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 909–916, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. A. Bailey, S. D. Hester, G. W. Knapp, R. D. Owen, and S. F. Thai, “Gene expression of normal human epidermal keratinocytes modulated by trivalent arsenicals,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 981–998, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Melkonian, M. Argos, B. L. Pierce et al., “A prospective study of the synergistic effects of arsenic exposure and smoking, sun exposure, fertilizer use, and pesticide use on risk of premalignant skin lesions in Bangladeshi men,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Caussy, Ed., A Field Guide for Detection, Management, and Surveillance of Arsenicosis Cases, World Health Organization, Regional Office of South-East Asia, New Delhi, India, 2005.
  45. T. G. Rossman, A. N. Uddin, and F. J. Burns, “Evidence that arsenite acts as a cocarcinogen in skin cancer,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 394–404, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Arsenic Toxicity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, USA.
  47. K. C. Saha, “Diagnosis of arsenicosis,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 255–272, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. IARC, “Some Metals and Metallic Compounds,” in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 20, pp. 39–141, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  49. H. Danaee, H. H. Nelson, H. Liber, J. B. Little, and K. T. Kelsey, “Low dose exposure to sodium arsenite synergistically interacts with UV radiation to induce mutations and alter DNA repair in human cells,” Mutagenesis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. De Chaudhuri, M. Kundu, M. Banerjee et al., “Arsenic-induced health effects and genetic damage in keratotic individuals: involvement of p53 arginine variant and chromosomal aberrations in arsenic susceptibility,” Mutation Research, vol. 659, no. 1-2, pp. 118–125, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. Chen, J. H. Graziano, F. Parvez et al., “Modification of risk of arsenic-induced skin lesions by sunlight exposure, smoking, and occupational exposures in Bangladesh,” Epidemiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 459–467, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. M. Wu, T. L. Kuo, Y. H. Hwang, and C. J. Chen, “Dose-response relation between arsenic concentration in well water and mortality from cancers and vascular diseases,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1123–1132, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. C. Sommers and R. G. McManus, “Multiple arsenical cancers of skin and internal organs,” Cancer, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 347–359, 1953. View at: Google Scholar
  54. A. W. Williamson, “Arsenical skin cancer and lung cancer. A report of two cases,” Guy's Hospital Reports, vol. 109, pp. 42–45, 1960. View at: Google Scholar
  55. A. O. Robson and A. M. Jelliffe, “Medicinal arsenic poisoning and lung cancer,” British Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 5351, pp. 207–209, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  56. I. Celik, L. Gallicchio, K. Boyd et al., “Arsenic in drinking water and lung cancer: a systematic review,” Environmental Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. Gibb, C. Haver, D. Gaylor et al., “Utility of recent studies to assess the National Research Council 2001 estimates of cancer risk from ingested arsenic,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 284–290, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  58. NRC (National Research Council), Arsenic in Drinking Water, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
  59. S. M. Tsai, T. N. Wang, and Y. C. Ko, “Mortality for certain diseases in areas with high levels of arsenic in drinking water,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  60. National Research Council (NRC), Arsenic in Drinking Water-2001 Update, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  61. Servicio de Salud Antofagasta (Unidad de Registro de Cancer), in Proceedings of the III Anuario Registro Regional de Cancer Segunda Region Chile 2000 (Incluye Informacion 1998–2000), Ministerio de Salud, Ed., Antofagasta, Chile, 2000.
  62. M. G. Mostafa, J. C. McDonald, and N. M. Cherry, “Lung cancer and exposure to arsenic in rural Bangladesh,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 765–768, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. L. Chen, L. I. Hsu, H. Y. Chiou et al., “Ingested arsenic, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk: a follow-up study in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 292, no. 24, pp. 2984–2990, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. J. Chen, Y. C. Chuang, and S. L. You, “A retrospective study on malignant neoplasms of bladder, lung and liver in blackfoot disease endemic area in Taiwan,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 399–405, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  65. H. Y. Chiou, Y. M. Hsueh, K. F. Liaw et al., “Incidence of internal cancers and ingested inorganic arsenic: a seven- year follow-up study in Taiwan,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1296–1300, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  66. T. Tsuda, A. Babazono, E. Yamamoto et al., “Ingested arsenic and internal cancer: a historical cohort study followed for 33 years,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 198–209, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  67. C. Hopenhayn-Rich, M. L. Biggs, and A. H. Smith, “Lung and kidney cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Cordoba, Argentina,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 561–569, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. H.B. Nicolli, T. E. O'Connor, and J. M. Suriano, “Geoquimica del arsenico y de otros oligoelementos en aguas subterraneas de la llanura Sudoriental de la provinda de Cordoba,” Miscelanea, vol. 71, pp. 1–112, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  69. R. Baastrup, M. Sørensen, T. Balstrøm et al., “Arsenic in drinking-water and risk for cancer in Denmark,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. P. Buchet and D. Lison, “Mortality by cancer in groups of the Belgian population with a moderately increased intake of arsenic,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Adonis, V. Martínez, P. Marín, D. Berrios, and L. Gil, “Smoking habit and genetic factors associated with lung cancer in a population highly exposed to arsenic,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. Adonis, V. Martínez, P. Marín, and L. Gil, “CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genetic polymorphisms in lung cancer populations exposed to arsenic in drinking water,” Xenobiotica, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 519–530, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. K. Watson, R. J. deLeeuw, D. E. Horsman, J. A. Squire, and W. L. Lam, “Cytogenetically balanced translocations are associated with focal copy number alterations,” Human Genetics, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 795–805, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. V. D. Martinez, T. P. H. Buys, M. Adonis et al., “Arsenic-related DNA copy-number alterations in lung squamous cell carcinomas,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1277–1283, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. W. R. Cullen, B. C. McBride, and J. Reglinski, “The reaction of methylarsenicals with thiols: some biological implications,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 179–194, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  76. M. Styblo, Z. Drobna, I Jaspers, S. Lin, and D. J. Thomas, “The role of biomethyl-ation in toxicity and carcinogenicity of arsenic: a research update,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 110, pp. 767–771, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  77. D. J. Thomas, M. Styblo, and S. Lin, “The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 127–144, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. P. P. Simeonova and M. I. Luster, “Mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenicity: genetic or epigenetic mechanisms?” Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  79. S. Lin, Q. Shi, F. B. Nix et al., “A novel S-adenosyl-L-methionine:arsenic(III) methyltransferase from rat liver cytosol,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 13, pp. 10795–10803, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Vega, M. Styblo, R. Patterson, W. Cullen, C. Wang, and D. Germolec, “Differential effects of trivalent and pentavalent arsenicals on cell proliferation and cytokine secretion in normal human epidermal keratinocytes,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 225–232, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. K. P. Cantor, “Drinking water and cancer,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 292–308, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. M. Hsueh, Y. F. Ko, Y. K. Huang et al., “Determinants of inorganic arsenic methylation capability among residents of the Lanyang Basin, Taiwan: arsenic and selenium exposure and alcohol consumption,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 137, no. 1-2, pp. 49–63, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. C. Yu, K. H. Hsu, C. J. Chen, and J. R. Froines, “Arsenic methylation capacity and skin cancer,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1259–1262, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  84. Y. M. Hsueh, H. Y. Chiou, Y. L. Huang et al., “Serum beta-carotene level, arsenic methylation capability, and incidence of skin cancer,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 589–596, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  85. L. M. Del Razo, G. G. García-Vargas, H. Vargas et al., “Altered profile of urinary arsenic metabolites in adults with chronic arsenicism. A pilot study,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 211–217, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. M. Kessel, S. X. Liu, A. Xu, R. Santella, and T. K. Hei, “Arsenic induces oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 234-235, no. 1-2, pp. 301–308, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. K. T. Kitchin and S. Ahmad, “Oxidative stress as a possible mode of action for arsenic carcinogenesis,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 137, no. 1-2, pp. 3–13, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. H. Shi, X. Shi, and K. J. Liu, “Oxidative mechanism of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 255, no. 1-2, pp. 67–78, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. R. C. Lantz and A. M. Hays, “Role of oxidative stress in arsenic-induced toxicity,” Drug Metabolism Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 791–804, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. Valko, C. J. Rhodes, J. Moncol, M. Izakovic, and M. Mazur, “Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. K. T. Kitchin, “Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 249–261, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y. An, Z. Gao, Z. Wang et al., “Immunohistochemical analysis of oxidative DNA damage in arsenic-related human skin samples from arsenic-contaminated area of China,” Cancer Letters, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. M. Matsui, C. Nishigori, S. Toyokuni et al., “The role of oxidative DNA damage in human arsenic carcinogenesis: Detection of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine in arsenic-related Bowen's disease,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. C. Hidalgo and P. Donoso, “Crosstalk between calcium and redox signaling: from molecular mechanisms to health implications,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1275–1312, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. H. C. Korswagen, “Regulation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by redox signaling,” Developmental Cell, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 687–688, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. S. Ying, K. Myers, S. Bottomley, T. Helleday, and H. E. Bryant, “BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination is required for repair of Arsenite-induced replication lesions in mammalian cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 5105–5113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. A. D. Kligerman, S. I. Malik, and J. A. Campbell, “Cytogenetic insights into DNA damage and repair of lesions induced by a monomethylated trivalent arsenical,” Mutation Research, vol. 695, no. 1-2, pp. 2–8, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. X. Ren, C. M. McHale, C. F. Skibola, A. H. Smith, M. T. Smith, and L. Zhang, “An emerging role for epigenetic dysregulation in arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  99. J. F. Reichard and A. Puga, “Effects of arsenic exposure on DNA methylation and epigenetic gene regulation,” Epigenomics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–104, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. I. Kurtze, J. Sonnemann, and J. F. Beck, “KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer cells are responsive to either co-treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib and histone deacetylase inhibitors or single treatment with lapatinib,” Oncology Reports, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1021–1029, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  101. W. Brazelle, J. M. Kreahling, J. Gemmer et al., “Histone deacetylase inhibitors downregulate checkpoint kinase 1 expression to induce cell death in non-small cell lung cancer cells,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID e14335, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. R. J. Klose and A. P. Bird, “Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. E. Li, “Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 662–673, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Weber, I. Hellmann, M. B. Stadler et al., “Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 457–466, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. C. Q. Zhao, M. R. Young, B. A. Diwan, T. P. Coogan, and M. P. Waalkes, “Association of arsenic-induced malignant transformation with DNA hypomethylation and aberrant gene expression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 20, pp. 10907–10912, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. J. Mass and L. Wang, “Arsenic alters cytosine methylation patterns of the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene p53 in human lung cells: a model for a mechanism of carcinogenesis,” Mutation Research, vol. 386, no. 3, pp. 263–277, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. X. Cui, T. Wakai, Y. Shirai, K. Hatakeyama, and S. Hirano, “Chronic oral exposure to inorganic arsenate interferes with methylation status of p16INK4a and RASSF1A and induces lung cancer in A/J mice,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 372–381, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. C. J. Marsit, M. R. Karagas, A. Schned, and K. T. Kelsey, “Carcinogen exposure and epigenetic silencing in bladder cancer,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1076, pp. 810–821, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. S. Chanda, U. B. Dasgupta, D. Guhamazumder et al., “DNA hypermethylation of promoter of gene p53 and p16 in arsenic-exposed people with and without malignancy,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 431–437, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. C. L. Peterson and M.-A. Laniel, “Histones and histone modifications,” Current Biology, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. R546–R551, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  111. T. Kouzarides, “Chromatin modifications and their function,” Cell, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 693–705, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. X. Zhou, H. Sun, T. P. Ellen, H. Chen, and M. Costa, “Arsenite alters global histone H3 methylation,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1831–1836, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. T. J. Jensen, P. Novak, K. E. Eblin, J. A. Gandolfi, and B. W. Futscher, “Epigenetic remodeling during arsenical-induced malignant transformation,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1500–1508, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. W. Filipowicz, S. N. Bhattacharyya, and N. Sonenberg, “Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight?” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. G. A. Calin and C. M. Croce, “MicroRNA signatures in human cancers,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 857–866, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. C. J. Marsit, K. Eddy, and K. T. Kelsey, “MicroRNA responses to cellular stress,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 22, pp. 10843–10848, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. Z. Wang, Y. Zhao, and E. Smith, “Reversal and prevention of arsenic-induced human bronchial epithelial cell malignant transformation by microRNA-200b,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 121, no. 1, Article ID 10.1093/toxsci/kfr029, pp. 110–122, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  118. Y. Cui, Z. Han, H. Yi et al., “MicroRNA-181b and microRNA-9 mediate arsenic-induced angiogenesis via NRP1,” Journal of Cellular Physiology. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. G. B. Zhou, W. L. Zhao, Z. Y. Wang, S. J. Chen, and Z. Chen, “Retinoic acid and arsenic for treating acute promyelocytic leukemia,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, article e12, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. A. Saumet, G. Vetter, M. Bouttier et al., “Transcriptional repression of microRNA genes by PML-RARA increases expression of key cancer proteins in acute promyelocytic leukemia,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 412–421, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. J. T. Dong and X. M. Luo, “Arsenic-induced DNA-strand breaks associated with DNA-protein crosslinks in human fetal lung fibroblasts,” Mutation Research, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. K. Yamanaka, H. Hayashi, M. Tachikawa et al., “Metabolic methylation is a possible genotoxicity-enhancing process of inorganic arsenics,” Mutation Research, vol. 394, no. 1–3, pp. 95–101, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. S. A. Mouron, C. A. Grillo, F. N. Dulout, and C. D. Golijow, “Induction of DNA strand breaks, DNA-protein crosslinks and sister chromatid exchanges by arsenite in a human lung cell line,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 279–285, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. K. Yamanaka, H. Hayashi, K. Kato, A. Hasegawa, and S. Okada, “Involvement of preferential formation of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites in dimethylarsenic-induced DNA strand breaks and DNA-protein crosslinks in cultured alveolar epithelial cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 244–249, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. R. Ruiz-Ramos, L. Lopez-Carrillo, A. D. Rios-Perez, A. De Vizcaya-Ruíz, and M. E. Cebrian, “Sodium arsenite induces ROS generation, DNA oxidative damage, HO-1 and c-Myc proteins, NF-kappaB activation and cell proliferation in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells,” Mutation Research, vol. 674, no. 1-2, pp. 109–115, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. K. Yamanaka, K. Katsumata, K. Ikuma, A. Hasegawa, M. Nakano, and S. Okada, “The role of orally administered dimethylarsinic acid, a main metabolite of inorganic arsenics, in the promotion and progression of UVB-induced skin tumorigenesis in hairless mice,” Cancer Letters, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. K. Yamanaka, M. Mizoi, K. Kato, A. Hasegawa, M. Nakano, and S. Okada, “Oral administration of dimethylarsinic acid, a main metabolite of inorganic arsenic, in mice promotes skin tumorigenesis initiated by dimethylbenz(a)anthracene with or without ultraviolet B as a promoter,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 510–514, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. Y. An, K. Kato, M. Nakano, H. Otsu, S. Okada, and K. Yamanaka, “Specific induction of oxidative stress in terminal bronchiolar Clara cells during dimethylarsenic-induced lung tumor promoting process in mice,” Cancer Letters, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. F. W. Alt, R. E. Kellems, J. R. Bertino, and R. T. Schimke, “Selective multiplication of dihydrofolate reductase genes in methotrexate-resistant variants of cultured murine cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 253, no. 5, pp. 1357–1370, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  130. J. M. Samet, L. M. Graves, J. Quay et al., “Activation of MAPKs in human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to metals,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. L551–L558, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  131. F. Chen, Y. Lu, Z. Zhang et al., “Opposite effect of NF-kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase on p53-independent GADD45 induction by arsenite,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 14, pp. 11414–11419, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. Y. Zhang, D. Bhatia, H. Xia, V. Castranova, X. Shi, and F. Chen, “Nucleolin links to arsenic-induced stabilization of GADD45{alpha} mRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 485–495, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. A. S. Andrew, V. Bernardo, L. A. Warnke et al., “Exposure to arsenic at levels found in U.S. drinking water modifies expression in the mouse lung,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 75–87, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. A. Kinoshita, H. Wanibuchi, K. Morimura et al., “Carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid in Ogg1-deficient mice,” Cancer Science, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 803–814, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. W. T. Liao, P. Lin, T. S. Cheng, H. S. Yu, and L. W. Chang, “Arsenic promotes centrosome abnormalities and cell colony formation in p53 compromised human lung cells,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 162–170, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. J. Shen, J. Liu, Y. Xie, B. A. Diwan, and M. P. Waalkes, “Fetal onset of aberrant gene expression relevant to pulmonary carcinogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma development induced by in utero arsenic exposure,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. T. Posey, T. Weng, Z. Chen et al., “Arsenic-induced changes in the gene expression of lung epithelial L2 cells: implications in carcinogenesis,” BMC Genomics, vol. 9, article 115, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. P. Sykora and E. T. Snow, “Modulation of DNA polymerase beta-dependent base excision repair in cultured human cells after low dose exposure to arsenite,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 385–394, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. G. Wen, G. M. Calaf, M. A. Partridge et al., “Neoplastic transformation of human small airway epithelial cells induced by arsenic,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 2–10, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Victor D. Martinez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.