Review Article

Cisplatin-Associated Ototoxicity: A Review for the Health Professional

Table 3

Studies reflecting cisplatin-associated hearing loss in children.

StudyCountryType of studyAudiological tests conductedPatient populationNumber of patients who developed ototoxicity

Nitz et al. [49]GermanyProspective longitudinal trinational population-basedAir (0.125–8 kHz) conduction pure tone audiometry93 patients with osteosarcoma and 19 with soft-tissue sarcoma receiving cisplatin and/or carboplatin containing chemotherapy55 (49.1%)

Knight et al. [55] USA ProspectiveOtoscopy, tympanometry, pure tone audiometry (0.5–8 kHz), DPOAEs, and ABR32 children with different types of cancers treated with cisplatin and/or carboplatin containing chemotherapy20 (62.5%)
Otoscopy, tympanometry, extended pure tone audiometry (0.5–16 kHz), and DPOAEs17 children with different types of cancers treated with cisplatin and/or carboplatin containing chemotherapy16 (94.1%)

Coradini et al. [44]BrazilRetrospectiveTympanometry, pure tone audiometry (0.25–8 kHz), TEAOEs, and DPOAEs23 children with malignant hepatic tumour, osteosarcoma, and germ cell tumours receiving cisplatin containing chemotherapy12 (52%), pure tone; 5 (22%), TEOAEs; 16 (71%), DPOAEs

Bertolini et al. [56]FranceProspective Otoscopy, immittance audiometry, speech audiometry, play audiometry or free-field audiometry, conventional pure tone audiometry (frequencies not specified), or ABR (depending on the age of the participant)102 children with either neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, germ cell tumour, or osteosarcoma
96 received cisplatin and/or carboplatin containing chemotherapy39 (41%)
52 received cisplatin only19 (37%)

Stavroulaki et al. [57]GreeceProspectiveOtoscopy, immittance audiometry, pure tone audiometry (0.25–8 kHz), TEOAEs, and DPOAEs12 children with either neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, medulloblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or primitive neuroectodermal tumour receiving cisplatin containing chemotherapy6 (50%)