Research Article
Visceral Leishmaniasis Clinical Management in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal, and Bangladesh
Table 4
Physician perspectives of VL management.
| | India | Nepal | Bangladesh | Overall | | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 |
| No. of physicians interviewed | () | () | () | () | () | () | () | () | Rk39 test as decision criteria to treat VL | 18/19 (95%) | 13/21 (62%) | 7/7 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) | 4/4 (100%) | 4/4 (100%) | 29/30 (97%) | 19/27 (70%) | Physicianβs use of VL drug | | | | | | | | | β (i) SAG | 8/19 (42%) | 10/21 (48%) | 0/7 (0%) | 0/2 (0%) | 4/4 (100%) | 4/4 (100%) | 12/30 (40%) | 14/27 (52%) | β (ii) Amphotericin B | 11/19 (58%) | 3/21 (14%) | 5/7 (71%) | 1/2 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 0/4 (0%) | 16/30 (53%) | 4/27 (15%) | β (iii) Miltefosine | 17/19 (89%) | 20/21 (95%) | 5/7 (71%) | 1/2 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 4/4 (100%) | 22/30 (73%) | 25/27 (93%) | Physician criteria for VL drug selection | | | | | | | | | β (i) Available | 14/19 (74%) | 19/21 (90%) | 4/7 (57%) | 2/2 (100%) | 4/4 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 22/30 (73%) | 24/27 (89%) | β (ii) Affordable | 8/19 (42%) | 11/21 (52%) | 1/7 (14%) | 0/2 (0%) | 4/4 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 13/30 (43%) | 14/27 (52%) | β (iii) Safe | 18/19 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) | 4/7 (57%) | 1/2 (50%) | 4/4 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 26/30 (87%) | 25/27 (93%) | β (iv) Effective | 12/19 (63%) | 12/21 (57%) | 4/7 (57%) | 1/2 (50%) | 4/4 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 20/30 (67%) | 16/27 (59%) | No. physician advises blood tests (%)? | 12/19 (63%) | 12/21 (57%) | 7/7 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) | 4/4 (100%) | 2/4 (50%) | 23/30 (77%) | 16/27 (59%) | Reason for not advising blood tests? | | | | | | | | | βNo need | 4/7 (57%) | β | β | β | β | 1/2 (50%) | 4/7 (57%) | 1/11 (9%) | βNo lab technician | β | 9/9 (100%) | β | β | β | 1/2 (50%) | β | 10/11 (91%) | No. physician aware of Miltefosine side effects (%) | | | | | | | | | β (i) Diarrhea | 19/19 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) | 5/7 (71%) | 2/2 (100%) | 0/4 (0%) | 0/4 (0%) | 24/30 (80%) | 23/27 (85%) | β (ii) Vomiting | 19/19 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) | 5/7 (71%) | 2/2 (100%) | 0/4 (0%) | 3/4 (75%) | 24/30 (80%) | 26/27 (96%) | β (iii) Jaundice | 0/19 (0%) | 12/21 (57%) | 0/7 (0%) | 1/2 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 1/4 (25%) | 0/30 (0%) | 14/27 (52%) | β (iv) Abdominal pain | 5/19 (26%) | 9/21 (43%) | 1/7 (14%) | 2/2 (100%) | 0/4 (0%) | 3/4 (75%) | 6/30 (20%) | 14/27 (52%) | β (v) Renal toxicity | 14/19 (74%) | 4/21 (19%) | 2/7 (29%) | 1/2 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 0/4 (0%) | 16/30 (53%) | 5/27 (19%) | β (vi) Teratogenicity | 11/19 (58%) | 11/21 (52%) | 1/7 (14%) | 1/2 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 0/4 (0%) | 12/30 (40%) | 12/27 (44%) | No. physician recommend home based Miltefosine treatment (%) | 10/19 (53%) | 20/21 (95%) | 5/7 (71%) | 1/2 (50%) | 3/4 (75%) | 4/4 (100%) | 18/30 (60%) | 25/27 (93%) | No. physician feel home-based Miltefosine treatment is effective (%)? | 15/19 (79%) | 20/21 (95%) | 6/7 (86%) | 2/2 (100%) | 1/4 (25%) | 4/4 (100%) | 22/30 (73%) | 26/27 (96%) |
|
|