Review Article

Therapy of Chagas Disease: Implications for Levels of Prevention

Table 1

Indication of treatment against Trypanosoma cruzi infection based on different levels of quality of evidences and tools to assess efficacy or failure.

Indication (strength of the recommendation, and level of evidence)DrugEfficacyTime elapsedFailureComments

Acute phase:
vector transmission ((A) I) [10]
Congenital transmission ((A) II) [1115]
Bz, Nftx65–100%8 months or more5%Medium term of followup to asses efficacy
Good tolerance

Early chronic phase (children) ((A) I) [1622]Bz50–70%3–15 years5%Most of the cases were children under 12 yo.
Long term of followup to asses efficacy
Good tolerance
Different response for T. cruzi lineage I and II
Some resistant clones were observed

Late chronic phase (adults, indeterminate, cardiac/digestive/other diseases) ((B) II; (C) II) [7, 18, 2331]Bz, Nftx30%>20 years10%Long term of followup
Frequent side effects
Efficacy to prevent evolution is under research
Moderate-bad tolerance
Different response for T. cruzi lineage I and II
Some resistant clones were observed

Pregnant ((E) III) [32, 33]NANANANASome accidental or necessary treatment during pregnant with acute phase did not show damaging effect in the child
Treatment of pregnant women is currently not recommended [7, 9]

Immunocompromised (i.e., HIV, Transplant, other) ((A) II) [3440]Bz, NftxNDND<5%Etiological treatment aborts severe forms of reactivation as meningoencephalitis, myocarditis, panniculitis, and so forth,
Good response
No evidence about prophylaxis. Under research

Accidents ((B) III) [33]Bz, NftxNANANA10–15 days treatment immediately after accidents avoid infection

Maximum rate of seronegativization.
Maximum rate of positive parasitologic test after treatment.
Bz: benznidazole, NA: not applicable, ND: no data, Nftx: nifurtimox.