Review Article

The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence

Table 8

Other properties of mTOR inhibitors.

mTOR inhibitorEffect of mTOR inhibitors on de novo tumors

EVRBilbao et al. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41: 2172–6 [92]Six recipients with de novo tumors received oncological treatment/surgery and were converted to EVR-based IS. Five were disease-free at follow-up (mean months after conversion)
EVRFischer et al. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 1855–65 [50]Neoplasms: benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps): 4.0% versus 8.8% (EVR versus CNI, )
SRLJiménez-Romero et al. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011; 58: 115–21 [62]11 of 16 recipients who developed de novo tumors and were switched from CNI/MMF to SRL monotherapy were alive at follow-up (mean follow-up 15.7 months)
SRLVivarelli. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 2579–84 [80]3 of 4 recipients with de novo tumors and who converted to SRL-based IS were alive and tumor-free up to 33 months after conversion

mTOR inhibitorEffect of mTOR inhibitors on neurological symptoms

EVRBilbao et al. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41: 2172–6 [92]3/3 cases of neurotoxicity resolved
EVRMasetti et al. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10: 2252–62 [89]Minor neurological complications: EVR: 3/52 (5.8%), CsA: 5/26 (19.2%)
SRLForgacs et al. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37: 1912–4 [70]7/7 recipients showed improvement or resolution of neurological symptoms
SRL Maramattom and WijdicksNeurology. 2004; 63: 1958–9 [64]No neurotoxicity in 52 recipients treated with SRL from 2001–04
SRLMorard et al. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 658–64 [75]Severe CNI-associated neurological symptoms improved in 6/6 recipients who converted from CNI
SRLVivarelli. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 2579–84 [80]Complete resolution of neurological symptoms in 14/16 recipients who converted from CNI

values are included where available.
CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; CsA: cyclosporine A; EVR: everolimus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; IS: immunosuppression; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; SRL: sirolimus; TAC: tacrolimus.