Journal of Transplantation

Journal of Transplantation / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7187206 | 5 pages |

Effectively Screening for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplant Evaluation

Academic Editor: Simon C. Robson
Received11 Mar 2016
Accepted25 May 2016
Published22 Jun 2016


Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent in patients with end-stage liver disease and associated with poor outcomes when undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT); however, noninvasive screening for CAD in this population is less sensitive. In an attempt to identify redundancy, we reviewed our experience among patients undergoing CAD screening as part of their OLT evaluation between May 2009 and February 2014. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were analyzed. Of the total number of screened patients (), initial screening was more common via stress testing (; 75.8%) than coronary angiography (; 24.2%). Most with initial stress testing underwent angiography (; 39.4%). Among those undergoing angiography, CAD was common (; 23.5%). Across the entire cohort the number of traditional risk factors was linearly associated with CAD, and those with two or more risk factors were found to have CAD by angiography 50% of the time (OR 1.92; CI 1.07–3.44, ). Our data supports that CAD is prevalent among pre-OLT patients, especially among those with 2 or more risk factors. Moreover, we identified a lack of uniformity in practice and the need for evidence-based and standardized screening protocols.

1. Introduction

The average age of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) continues to increase, as do higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and an increasing number of comorbidities for cardiovascular disease, particularly obesity and metabolic syndrome [13]. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent within the OLT population and is associated with greater short and intermediate morbidity and mortality [4, 5]. Moderate to severe coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis) in pre-OLT patients has been reported to be anywhere from 2.5% to 27% [68]. Carey et al. also found 13.3% to have significant CAD (40%–70% stenosis) in those without history of angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass grafting. As many patients who have obstructive CAD are asymptomatic, pre-OLT risk assessment may be obscured by the clinical history [6]. Moreover, previous studies have not ascribed to uniform definitions of significant CAD and an accurate prevalence is therefore difficult to ascertain. Existing stress testing modalities have limitations when employed in the end-stage liver disease (ESLD) population. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been associated with a low sensitivity (62%) for coronary disease, perhaps referable to the ineffectiveness of adenosine or regadenoson to achieve adequate microvascular vasodilation [9]. A recent systematic review revealed the shortcomings of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in this population, having a sensitivity of 32% for detecting CAD [10]. Current guidelines from the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases continue to recommend DSE for the screening of CAD with coronary angiography used to confirm a positive test [11]. In contrast, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) suggest using noninvasive testing to screen for CAD based on the number of risk factors, with 3 or more being the most reasonable [12]. The expanded use of coronary angiography as screening or confirmatory modality may be associated with increased bleeding or vascular complications, although this is not a uniform observation [1317]. The goal of the present report is to describe our experience with CAD screening in the pre-OLT population.

2. Methods

This was a retrospective review, which was approved by the Ohio State University Medical Center’s Institutional Review Committee using data from the electronic medical record. The inclusion criteria were all patients ≥18 years of age seen at the OSU Division of Hepatology Clinic and evaluated for liver transplant between May 1, 2009, and February 1, 2014. Deidentified data from charts were used to construct a database of liver transplant candidates with information on risk factors and preoperative testing. All data regarding complications from left heart catheterization were extracted from an existing database that tracks all patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional procedures. Pre- and postcoronary angiography events were identified using National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) definitions and included cardiogenic shock, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident/stroke, tamponade, new requirement for dialysis, vascular complications, blood transfusion, hematoma, bleeding at access site, or retroperitoneal bleed [18]. Traditional risk factors for CAD were used and included age (men > 45, female > 55), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity (BMI > 30), and family history of premature CAD (diagnosis of CAD in a first-degree male relative before 55 or first-degree female relative before 65) [19]. Coronary artery disease was defined as at least 1 vessel with a ≥50% stenosis; obstructive disease was defined as ≥70% stenosis on coronary angiography. Primary angiography represents those who bypassed noninvasive CAD evaluation due to their risk factor profile. Secondary angiography was defined as those with initial noninvasive CAD testing however underwent coronary angiography afterwards.

Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. For continuous variables, between group differences were analyzed with univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). All values presented are 2-tailed; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed with Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).

3. Results

Within the specified period, a total of 135 patients underwent evaluation for OLT and 132 subsequently underwent CAD screening. Thirty-two (24.2%) of these patients underwent primary coronary angiography while 100 (75.8%) had stress test performed initially. Of the patients who were initially stressed, 52 eventually underwent coronary angiography (Figure 1).

The mean age of the cohort was 56 (range 32–71) and more commonly male (69.7%). The most common cause of liver disease was hepatitis C (56, 42.4%). Cardiac risk factors were prevalent, with 41.2% having ≥2 traditional risk factors (Table 1). Within the cohort 84 (63.3%) underwent coronary angiography, 32 with no prior stress test, 23 with a positive stress test, and 77 with a negative stress test (Figure 1).

Age, years56 ± 7.72
Male, (%)92 (69.7)
Caucasian, (%)117 (88.6)
African American, (%)8 (6.1)
Hepatitis C cirrhosis, (%)56 (42.4)
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, (%)33 (25)
Alcohol cirrhosis, (%)21 (15.9)
Model of end-stage liver disease16.1 ± 5.94
Hypertension, (%)49 (37.1)
Diabetes mellitus, (%)45 (34.1)
Tobacco abuse, (%)47 (35.6)
Hyperlipidemia, (%)18 (13.6)
Obese, (%)36 (27.3)
Family history of premature heart disease, (%)28 (21.2)
Alcohol abuse, (%)27 (20.4)
No coronary risk factors, (%)37 (27.2)
One coronary risk factor, (%)43 (31.6)
Two or more coronary risk factors, (%)56 (41.2)
Serum creatinine1.04 ± 0.62
INR1.57 ± 0.44
Platelet count83.85 ± 43.16

Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.

For coronary angiography the radial access approach was primarily utilized (60.7%). Although the catheterization laboratory employs a radial-first approach, femoral access was utilized in nearly 40% of the cases. These cases reflect occasional anatomical limitations of radial angiography, as well as operator bias. There were no intra- or postprocedure events based upon NCDR definition [18]. Eleven (13.1%) patients were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days, 5 of these were due to intra-abdominal infection, 2 were due to decompensated cirrhosis, and the rest were due to TACE, hyponatremia, upper GI bleed, and viral gastroenteritis (Table 2).

Total coronary angiography, (%)84 (63.6%)
Radial approach, (%)51 (60.7%)
Femoral approach, (%)33 (39.3%)
Coronary artery disease with ≥50% stenosis, (%)31 (36.9%)
Coronary artery disease with ≥70% stenosis, (%)7 (8.3%)
Major adverse events, (%)0
Minor adverse events, (%)0
Readmission within 30 days, (%)11 (13.1%)

Total coronary angiography percentage is of total cohort studied, .

Coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis) was identified in 31 (23.5%) patients. Of those with CAD, 7 (5.3%) demonstrated obstructive disease (≥70%). On univariate analysis no single risk factor was associated with finding CAD. Although recent data has identified poorer cardiovascular outcomes peri-OLT among those with higher MELD scores, we did not find a significant relationship between higher MELD (>15) and the presence of CAD in this cohort (OR 1.17, HR 0.29–4.64, ) [20]. Moreover, the general relationship between CAD risk factors and the presence of angiographic CAD was not significantly affected when the cohort was stratified by MELD greater than or less than 15. The number of traditional risk factors was linearly associated with angiographic coronary artery disease, and those with 2 or more risk factors were found to have CAD by angiography 50% of the time (OR 1.92; CI 1.07–3.44, , Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Limitations of noninvasive testing for CAD in the pre-OLT population have led some to propose a wider adoption of pretransplant coronary angiography. However, there are no existing guidelines based on contemporary data that address the role of coronary angiography in this setting. Based on existing observational data [21], our institution recently employed lower thresholds for pretransplant angiography. This early experience has demonstrated that coronary angiography is safe and might be considered in all patients undergoing pre-OLT CAD screening, particularly those with 2 or more traditional risk factors for CAD.

Complications of cirrhosis include coagulopathy and renal hypoperfusion, increasing the risk of bleeding and associated nephropathy [22]. Despite these presumed risks, we observed no adverse events in the 132 cases reported herein. A “radial-first” approach and the use of strict contrast thresholds may have minimized the expected risk. This is consistent with recent studies and continues to support the safety of coronary angiography in this population [14, 15, 23].

A favorable safety profile may permit wider spread adoption of angiography, but it remains unclear which patients should bypass noninvasive screening and proceed directly to the catheterization laboratory. A major residual issue is determining which preprocedural characteristics predict the presence of CAD in those with ESLD. In the present report, no single CAD risk factor correlated with the presence of CAD. However, among those with 2 or more risk factors the incidence of CAD was 50%. Others have formerly similar results: 2 or more risk factors increased the likelihood of having moderate to severe CAD in any vessel [8].

Although coronary angiography is safe and improves the detection of CAD in pre-OLT patients, whether or not this leads to a reduction in peritransplant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is unresolved but critically important. One multicenter review found that pre-OLT patients with angiographically proven obstructive CAD treated with current CAD strategies had no significant difference in survival after OLT compared to those without significant CAD [24]. This was in stark contrast to an earlier study showing a 50% mortality 1 to 3 years after OLT; of note, none received coronary stenting in that cohort [5]. More recently a single-center study has shown a benefit in OLT outcomes after increasing their reliance on coronary angiography over time [25]. The greatest reduction in mortality occurred when patients were referred to angiography based on the presence of certain cardiac risk factors (age, smoking, family history of CAD, diabetes, hypertension, prior CAD, and obesity).

Our study does include limitations. The data comes from a large tertiary referral center and may not be representative of the burden of CAD, CAD risk factors, or the spectrum of liver disease in other centers. Ascertainment bias is a possibility. Complications from procedures would only have been captured if they occurred during the hospitalization and were readmitted here or to our affiliated hospital within 30 days. That being said, these patients were undergoing transplant evaluation here along with the bulk of their primary and consultative care. Moreover, this is a retrospective review and has the potential for accompanying bias and confounding. Additionally, this observational study took place at a time when the prevalence of CAD in OLT patients was being increasingly recognized, as were the limitations of noninvasive testing. Accordingly, the effect of those realizations on practice patterns cannot be ascertained. Lastly, due to the low volume of liver transplants performed over the time span of the study we cannot comment on the impact angiography-associated treatment or the denial of OLT based on screening had on outcomes. That being said, the results reported herein are from a comparably large population with respect to other studies of CAD in the pre-OLT patients, and many of our findings are in agreement with published literature. Taken together, we submit that the present results, together with others, support pretransplant coronary angiography at least in all pre-OLT patients with 2 or more traditional CAD risk factors [26]. Whether or not wider spread adoption will lead to improving outcomes awaits ongoing prospective reports.

In our institutional experience coronary angiography should be performed in patients undergoing CAD screening for OLT who have 2 or more traditional cardiac risk factors. By using this guideline the hope is to uncover CAD that can be missed by noninvasive testing and improve survival after OLT. As we will undoubtedly find more CAD in the pre-OLT population, continuing to track outcomes will remain important specifically in regard to PCI thresholds.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. V. W. Xia, M. Taniguchi, and R. H. Steadman, “The changing face of patients presenting for liver transplantation,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 280–284, 1531. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. J. Thuluvath, M. K. Guidinger, J. J. Fung, L. B. Johnson, S. C. Rayhill, and S. J. Pelletier, “Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008: Special feature,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 4, part 2, pp. 1003–1019, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. UNOS, United Network for Organ Sharing, Data Resources, 2014,
  4. D. A. Diedrich, J. Y. Findlay, B. A. Harrison, and C. B. Rosen, “Influence of coronary artery disease on outcomes after liver transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3554–3557, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. S. Plotkin, V. L. Scott, A. Pinna, B. P. Dobsch, A. M. De Wolf, and Y. Kang, “Morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation,” Liver Transplantation and Surgery, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 426–430, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. D. Carey, J. A. Dumot, R. R. Pimentel et al., “The prevalence of coronary artery disease in liver transplant candidates over age 50,” Transplantation, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 859–864, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. L. Donovan, P. A. Marcovitz, J. D. Punch et al., “Two-dimensional and dobutamine stress echocardiography in the preoperative assessment of patients with end-stage liver disease prior to orthotopic liver transplantation,” Transplantation, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1180–1188, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. D. Tiukinhoy-Laing, J. S. Rossi, M. Bayram et al., “Cardiac hemodynamic and coronary angiographic characteristics of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 178–181, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Bhutani, J. Tobis, R. Gevorgyan et al., “Accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging to diagnose coronary artery disease in end stage liver disease patients,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 1057–1061, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. Nguyen, J. Plotkin, T. M. Fishbein et al., “Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation: a pooled analysis of accuracy, perioperative and long term cardiovascular prognosis,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1741–1748, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. F. Murray and R. L. Carithers Jr., “AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation,” Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1407–1432, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. L. Lentine, S. P. Costa, M. R. Weir et al., “Cardiac disease evaluation and management among kidney and liver transplantation candidates: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 434–480, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Jacobs, V. Singh, A. Damluji et al., “Safety of transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage liver disease,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 360–366, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Pillarisetti, P. Patel, S. Duthuluru et al., “Cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage liver disease: safety and outcomes,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Sharma, C. Yong, D. Majure et al., “Safety of cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 742–746, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Dickens, S. Lulla, S. Katta, D. Kerbow, J. Berkes, and A. Shroff, “Abstract 32: adverse outcomes among patients with end stage liver disease who undergo cardiac catheterization,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 5, no. 3, supplement, p. A32, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Bhutani, J. Tobis, R. Gevorgyan, W. Suh, H. Honda, and R. Steadman, “Cardiac catheterization in patients with end stage liver disease: risks and outcomes,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 13, supplement, article E70, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Foundation ACoC, Ed., NCDR CathPCI Registry v4.4 Coder's Data Dictionary, 2011.
  19. P. W. F. Wilson, R. B. D'Agostino, D. Levy, A. M. Belanger, H. Silbershatz, and W. B. Kannel, “Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories,” Circulation, vol. 97, no. 18, pp. 1837–1847, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Nicolau-Raducu, M. Gitman, D. Ganier et al., “Adverse cardiac events after orthotopic liver transplantation: a cross-sectional study in 389 consecutive patients,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. Kalaitzakis, A. Rosengren, T. Skommevik, and E. Björnsson, “Coronary artery disease in patients with liver cirrhosis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 467–475, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Feldman, L. S. Friedman, and L. J. Brandt, Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management, 10th edition, 2015.
  23. E. Jacobs, V. Singh, A. Damluji et al., “Safety of transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage liver disease,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 360–366, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Wray, J. C. Scovotti, J. Tobis et al., “Liver transplantation outcome in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease: a multi-institutional study,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 184–191, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Maddur, P. D. Bourdillon, S. Liangpunsakul et al., “Role of cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the preoperative assessment and management of patients before orthotopic liver transplantation,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 664–672, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. Raval, M. E. Harinstein, A. I. Skaro et al., “Cardiovascular risk assessment of the liver transplant candidate,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Bryan C. Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1076 Views | 371 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.