Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 901902 | 8 pages |

Role of Inflammatory Mediators in the Pathogenesis of Epilepsy

Academic Editor: Kiyoshi Matsumura
Received11 Jun 2014
Revised04 Aug 2014
Accepted05 Aug 2014
Published13 Aug 2014


Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic brain disorders worldwide, affecting 1% of people across different ages and backgrounds. Epilepsy is defined as the sporadic occurrence of spontaneous recurrent seizures. Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that there is a positive feedback cycle between epileptogenesis and brain inflammation. Epileptic seizures increase key inflammatory mediators, which in turn cause secondary damage to the brain and increase the likelihood of recurrent seizures. Cytokines and prostaglandins are well-known inflammatory mediators in the brain, and their biosynthesis is enhanced following seizures. Such inflammatory mediators could be therapeutic targets for the development of new antiepileptic drugs. In this review, we discuss the roles of inflammatory mediators in epileptogenesis.

1. Introduction

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures and is often accompanied by cognitive deficits and mood disorders [13]. Approximately 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy. Because seizures are the result of uncontrollable neural excitation in the brain, epilepsy has been considered to primarily be a neuronal disease. The targeting of neuronal ion channels and both gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate receptors has been the primary approach to eliminate seizures. However, studies that have focused exclusively on neurons fail to address the questions that arise from more complex models of epileptogenesis. To date, studies using animal models and human patients with epilepsy have shown that the pathogenesis of epilepsy may be associated with both neuronal and nonneuronal components such as glial cells [4], brain vasculature [5], and leucocytes from the periphery [6].

The aberrant regulation of glial functions can elicit seizures and promote epileptogenesis [4]. Glial abnormalities, including chronically activated astrocytes and microglia, glial scars, and various gliomas, are likely to form epileptic foci in the brain [4]. The mechanisms through which glial cells can promote epileptogenesis can include increased neuronal excitability and inflammatory processes. The key roles of inflammatory processes in relation to epilepsy have been clarified over the last decade. Studies of the mechanisms of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have focused on ion channels, transporters, and excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmission [7]. However, the anti-inflammatory effects of AEDs have received recent attention due to their relevance to antiepileptic properties. For example, carbamazepine and levetiracetam can reduce the expression of inflammatory mediators in glial cell cultures [8, 9]. Levetiracetam can also normalize the resting membrane potential of astrocytes increased by inflammatory mediators [8]. One of the anticonvulsive effects of levetiracetam could be mediated through suppression of astroglial activation by inflammatory mediators [8].

In addition, dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may be responsible for abnormal neuronal firing. Disruption of the BBB causes the leakage of serum protein and leucocyte invasion into the brain. These exogenous inflammatory mediators have the potential to lower seizure thresholds [4, 5, 10, 11], which could alter channel sensitivity, neurotransmitter uptake or release, and glia-associated regulation of extracellular environments, such as potassium concentration [4, 5, 10, 11]. Accordingly, brain inflammation is one of the etiological factors that promote epileptogenesis and ictogenesis.

In this review, we discuss seizure-induced inflammatory mediators and the mechanisms through which these factors exacerbate epilepsy.

2. Inflammatory and Immune Responses in Epilepsy

Direct anti-inflammatory treatments have been reported to suppress some type of epileptic seizures that are resistant to conventional AEDs. For example, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) has been a first-line treatment for infantile spasms [13]. Anti-inflammatory effects of increased steroid hormone by ACTH treatment could play a crucial role in the suppression of refractory epilepsy in West syndrome [14]. In addition, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) can suppress seizures in some types of intractable epilepsy, an effect that may be partially mediated through a reduction in cytokines and a suppression of astrocyte activation [15, 16]. These drugs are also able to confer protection against seizures in mice with some types of epilepsy that are resistant to conventional AEDs [17]. Combined with antiglial functions of conventional AEDs described above, anti-inflammatory medication could be a new promising treatment for refractory epilepsy.

Research with rodent models of epilepsy has uncovered roles for brain inflammation in epileptogenesis and ictogenesis. Pharmacological or electrical stimulation produces epileptic seizures accompanied by robust inflammatory responses in the brains of rodents [1832]. The administration of proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory reagents has also been used to elucidate the effects of inflammatory mediators on seizure latency, frequency, duration, and severity [33, 34]. For instance, lipopolysaccharide, a provocative agent for inflammation, exacerbates seizure severity [33], whereas an inhibitory peptide against high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) inflammatory mediator decreased acute and chronic seizure recurrence [34]. Transgenic mouse models have also been used to evaluate the relationship between inflammatory mediators and seizure severity. Mice overexpressing cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or interleukin-6 (IL-6), within astrocytes developed age-dependent neurological dysfunctions including a reduction in seizure threshold, spontaneous seizure frequency, and neuronal cell loss [35, 36]. These studies suggest the idea that brain inflammation could promote seizures and epileptogenesis.

Inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and HMGB1, are released from astrocytes and microglia after seizures [2224, 37]. IL-1β and HMGB1 activate IL-1R type I [38] and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), respectively [39]. IL-1R/TLR signaling can regulate neuronal excitability, including the alteration of synaptic transmission, the reduction in GABA production, and the inhibition of outward current of channels [10, 4042]. IL1R/TLR signaling may activate the Src kinase-mediated phosphorylation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit 2B (NR2B) [43]. This phosphorylation can increase permeability of NMDA receptor [43]. Consequently, this NMDA-mediated influx could be enhanced in neurons, leading to increased neuronal excitability and excitotoxicity [34, 44]. HGMB1/TLR4 signaling also targets NR2B [36]. Thus, the activation of IL-1β/IL-1R or HMGB1/TLR4 signaling resulting from epileptic insults might result in a rapid change in neuronal excitability and a decreased seizure threshold (Figure 1(a)).

TNF- is another inflammatory factor, and its expression is also upregulated following seizures [18, 36]. TNF- is mainly released by microglia in the brain [45], and it can stimulate astrocytes to release glutamate [46]. An extracellular increase in glutamate concentration may stimulate glutamatergic neurons, thereby depolarizing their membrane potential. Taken together, postseizure production of inflammatory mediators can trigger neuronal hyperexcitability through modulations of ion channels and glutamate release in neurons and glia, respectively (Figure 1(a)).

In addition, the endothelial cells that make up the BBB could be another center for inflammatory processes in the brain. The activation of the IL-1β system following seizures induces neuronal cell loss and a breakdown in the BBB [47]. This breakdown leads to BBB leakage and the entry of albumin into the brain. Albumin entry can induce a further upregulation in inflammatory mediators and reduce the potassium and glutamate uptake of astrocytes, which leads to increased neural excitability [4850]. BBB leakage also initiates the invasion of leucocytes and an enhancement in inflammatory reactions [51]. These findings indicate that a breakdown in the BBB can increase neuronal excitability by enhancing inflammatory responses in the brain (Figure 1(a)).

Taken together, epileptic seizures can provoke inflammatory responses, which enhance calcium influx into neurons, activate glial cells to increase extracellular potassium and glutamate, and induce further inflammatory response via BBB break down. These inflammatory responses may promote neural hyperexcitability and decrease the seizure threshold. Consequently, epileptic seizures and inflammatory mediators can form a positive feedback loop, reinforcing each other (Figure 1(a)).

3. Prostaglandin Production in Epilepsy

In addition to inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandins (PGs) are major factors that stimulate inflammation processes. PGs are known to markedly increase following seizures and may contribute to epileptogenesis and reduction in seizure threshold [10, 52]. Phospholipase A2 liberates arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids. The enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) converts arachidonic acid to PGH2, and the specific PG synthase converts PGH2 to various PGs such as thromboxane A2, , PGE2, PGI2, or PGD2. Consistent with the robust production of PGs in the brain following seizures, an inducible type of COX (COX-2), but not the constitutively expressed COX-1, is rapidly induced in the brain following seizures [16, 53].

Because PGs play an important role in inflammatory responses, the functions of PGs in epileptogenesis have been studied for a considerable amount of time [52, 54]; however, data on the roles of COX-2 in epilepsy appear to be bidirectional. For example, following an injection of kainic acid (KA), postseizure treatment with the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 prevented neuronal cell loss in the hippocampus [55]. However, the administration of another COX-2 inhibitor, nimesulide, prior to an injection of KA strongly aggravated KA-induced seizures and increased the mortality rate [56]. Moreover, pretreatment with NS-398 increased KA-induced TUNEL-positive neuronal death [57]. These conflicting results might be partly explained by possible dual roles for COX-2, which has been shown to play early neuroprotective and late neurotoxic roles following seizures [58]. Thus, the timing of COX-2 inhibitor administration may be crucial when treating epilepsy (Figure 1(b)).

The bifunctional aspects of COX-2 in epileptogenesis can also be explained by the diversity of PGs. For instance, PGD2 and can exhibit anticonvulsive functions. PGD2 synthase H-PGDS-knockout (KO) mice or PGD2 receptor DP1R-KO mice showed more severe seizures after pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) treatment than wild type (WT) mice, whereas deficiencies of the other synthase L-PGDS or receptor DP2R did not alter seizure severity [59]. Additionally, the intracisternal administration of after KA treatment reduced the seizure score and mortality [60]. By contrast, PGE2 mainly functions as a promoter of epileptogenesis and ictogenesis. The administration of PGE2 receptor (EP) antagonists reduced seizure severity and neuronal injury following pilocarpine- or PTZ-induced seizures [6163]. Three PGE2 synthase (PGES) genes have been identified, including membrane-bound PGES (mPGES)-1, mPGES-2, and cytosolic PGES (cPGES). mPGES-1 is induced in the venous endothelia of the brain following an injection of KA [64], and its expression is upregulated in conditions of inflammation, pain, and fever [16, 65, 66]. mPGES-2 and cPGES show constitutive levels of expression, and their physiological functions remain unknown. The finding that the activity of mPGES-1 is tightly coupled to that of COX-2 [67] could support the importance of PGE2 function under epileptic conditions.

Several lines of evidence suggest that PGE2 could have an important role in epileptic neuronal cell death and the reduction in seizure threshold. mPGES-1-KO mice show little postictal production of PGE2, and the lack of increased PGE2 production resulted in the promotion of neuronal survival following KA injection [64, 68]. Furthermore, the intraventricular injection of PGE2 decreased the latency to methylmalonate- (MMA-) induced seizures and increased the amplitude of spikes measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG) in rats [69]. Thus, COX-2-coupled PGE2 production can promote seizures through mechanisms that drive epileptogenesis.

To determine whether mPGES-1-derived PGE2 is directly involved in epileptogenesis, we used mPGES-1-KO mice. To mimic the gradual exacerbation of epileptic seizures, a subconvulsive dose of PTZ was administered to WT or mPGES-1-KO mice every other day (PTZ chemical kindling). WT mice showed rapid increases in seizure severity, whereas mPGES-1-KO mice showed a significantly slower elevation in seizure score (Figure 2(a)). Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that glial fibrillary acidic protein- (GFAP-) positive astrocytes were increased in the hippocampal CA3 region of the wild type mice after the kindling, indicating that PGE2 production promotes reactive astrogliosis (Figure 2(b)). Interestingly, mPGES-1-KO mice did not show any increase in GFAP-positive astrocytes after the kindling (Figure 2(c)). Reactive astrogliosis is one of the pathological hallmarks of temporal lobe epilepsy, which include segmental neuronal loss and increases in GFAP-positive cells in the hippocampus and associated temporal lobe structures [4]. Our results indicate that mPGES-1-KO mice are resistant to the development of PTZ kindling and also to kindling-induced astrogliosis.

How can PGE2 regulate hyperexcitability and epileptogenesis? PGE2 acts on four G protein-coupled receptors named EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. EP receptors have been shown to be localized in the brain cells [70, 71]; however, it still remains unclear on which cells PGE2 acts to produce its epileptogenic effects. By contrast, pharmacological approaches have preceded the clarification of brain PGE2 function. The administration of a selective EP2 antagonist prevented neuronal cell loss after pilocarpine-induced seizures [62]. Furthermore, the pharmacological inhibition of other receptors, EP1, EP3, or EP4, resulted in increases in PTZ-induced seizure latency [63]. These results suggest that PGE2 may cause neuronal cell death and neuronal hyperexcitability via hippocampal EP receptors (Figure 1(b)).

The effects of PGE2 on neurons might be partly similar to those of other inflammatory mediators in terms of their enhancement of neuronal excitability. Several studies have shown that PG synthesis is upregulated by IL-1β treatment. In a lung fibroblast cell line, IL-1β induced mPGES-1 mRNA expression [72]. Additionally, IL-1β treatment increased COX-2 mRNA levels in cultured murine primary astrocytes [73]. Thus, inflammatory cytokines may promote PGE2 synthesis in the brain following epileptic seizures.

PGE2 can act on neuronal EP receptors directly. The application of PGE2 led to significant increases in firing frequency and excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitude in rat hippocampal slice cultures [74]. PGE2-induced increases in neuronal excitability may be partly attributable to an inhibition of potassium currents, resulting in boosted influx [74]. However, given that the mPGES-1 enzyme is preferentially expressed in the brain microvasculature [65], it may be more likely that PGE2 acts on glial cells but not on neurons. PGE2 appears to act on glial processes surrounding brain microvessels. We previously reported that the EP3 receptor was localized to astroglial end feet around microvessels [64]. Additionally, mPGES-1-KO mice showed decreased astrogliosis compared to WT mice following KA treatment [64]. These findings suggest that endothelial PGE2 may act on glial EP3 receptors and alter glial function. In fact, glutamate release from astrocytes was drastically reduced in mPGES-1-KO mice compared to WT mice [66, 75]. Thus, PGE2 is both an inflammatory mediator and a promoter of extracellular gliotransmission via astrocytic EP receptors [46] (Figure 1(b)).

In conclusion, epileptic seizures rapidly induce COX-2 mRNA in neurons and afterwards upregulate both COX-2 and mPGES-1 mRNAs in venous endothelia [16, 6466]. Treatment with NS-398 and nimesulide prior to seizure induction aggravates neuronal damage in the hippocampus, whereas postseizure treatments with NS-398 prevent the damages [55, 56]. Neuronal COX-2-derived PGs appear to protect neurons against seizures, whereas endothelial PG (PGE2) might participate in seizure-induced neuronal cell death by stimulating astrocytes to release glutamate [58]. Thus, PG-mediated inflammation may also form a positive feedback loop to exacerbate epileptic seizures in a late phase after seizures (Figure 1(b)). Epileptic seizures rapidly induce COX-2 in excitatory neurons and increase brain PGE2 levels [64]. However, this neuronal upregulation of COX-2 and PGE2 is transient and simultaneous robust increases in brain PGD2 levels could surpass the effects of PGE2, resulting in suppression of seizures. By contrast, late induction of endothelial COX-2 and mPGES-1 lasts longer than early phase and this sustained production of PGE2 may promote neurodegeneration via astrocytes. Thus, time course and cell type-specific expression of COX-2 could cause the dual effects of PG production on epileptogenesis.

4. Conclusion and Perspective

Most current AEDs act on ion channels that directly control neuronal excitability. These medications have at least two major problems. First, even with optimal AED therapy, 20~30% of patients have poor seizure control and become intractable. Second, as these medications act as general central nervous system (CNS) depressants and must be taken chronically for seizure suppression, they also have marked inhibitory effects on cognitive development. Therefore, the development of new AEDs that can modulate seizures through another mechanism is required for refractory epilepsy treatment.

Animal models and clinical evidence have emphasized the involvement of inflammatory mediators in seizure susceptibility and epileptogenesis [7678]. Robust and general inflammatory responses in the brain lower the seizure threshold, enhance neuronal excitability, increase BBB permeability, and promote epileptogenesis. COX-2 and mPGES-1 are known to play key roles in the inflammatory responses to insults and consequently increase postseizure inflammation and the resulting hyperexcitability of brain neurons. COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib have been developed and prescribed for chronic inflammatory pain and rheumatoid arthritis. Hence, they can be used in conjunction with AEDs to treat brain inflammation and reduce neuronal hyperexcitability. Although celecoxib suppresses epileptogenesis, for example, the development of PTZ-kindling, this inhibitor may be more effective for postseizure inflammation than for the prevention of seizure incidence. However, given that chronic celecoxib treatment can be accompanied by serious cardiovascular side effects [79], persistent COX-2 inhibition would not be beneficial as a therapeutic strategy for intractable epilepsy.

By contrast, the regulation of specific PG signaling should offer more selective actions and fewer complicating adverse effects. Although PGE2 synthase inhibitors may be good candidates for epilepsy treatment, specific inhibitors are still under development. Recently, attention has been paid to EP receptors. An EP2 inhibitor appears to suppress neurodegenerative pathology following epileptic seizures, and the inhibition of the other EP receptors, EP1, EP3, and EP4, might delay seizure induction [6163]. The discovery of selective EP receptor antagonist(s) could contribute to avoid the serious side effects of chronic COX-2 inhibition and provide more selective therapies for refractory epilepsy.

Modulators of PG receptor function could also improve our understanding of the roles of PGs in the brain immune system and inflammation. Consequently, more precise molecular roles of PGs in epileptogenesis will need to be clarified. This knowledge will help to develop newer and better treatments and medications for epilepsy.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank Dr. Shin Yasuda for helping with the software used for statistical analysis. This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant nos. 24700349, 24659093, and 25293239 and MEXT KAKENHI Grant nos. 25110737 and 23110525.


  1. O. Devinsky, “Effects of seizures on autonomic and cardiovascular function,” Epilepsy Currents, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–46, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Pellock, “Understanding co-morbidities affecting children with epilepsy,” Neurology, vol. 62, no. 5, supplement 2, pp. S17–S23, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. E. Jones, J. K. Austin, R. Caplan, D. Dunn, S. Plioplys, and J. A. Salpekar, “Psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents who have epilepsy,” Pediatrics in Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. e9–e14, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Wetherington, G. Serrano, and R. Dingledine, “Astrocytes in the epileptic brain,” Neuron, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 168–178, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Friedman, D. Kaufer, and U. Heinemann, “Blood-brain barrier breakdown-inducing astrocytic transformation: novel targets for the prevention of epilepsy,” Epilepsy Research, vol. 85, no. 2-3, pp. 142–149, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Greenwood, S. Etienne-Manneville, P. Adamson, and P. Couraud, “Lymphocyte migration into the central nervous system: implication of ICAM-1 signalling at the blood-brain barrier,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 315–322, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. L. MacDonald and M. A. Rogawski, “Cellular effects of antiepileptic drugs,” in Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook, pp. 1433–1445, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd edition, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. Haghikia, K. Ladage, D. Hinkerohe et al., “Implications of antiinflammatory properties of the anticonvulsant drug levetiracetam in astrocytes,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 1781–1788, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. Matoth, F. Pinto, C. Sicsic, and T. Brenner, “Inhibitory effect of carbamazepine on inflammatory mediators produced by stimulated glial cells,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 209–212, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. Viviani, F. Gardoni, and M. Marinovich, “Cytokines and Neuronal Ion Channels in Health and Disease,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 82, pp. 247–263, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Vezzani, J. French, T. Bartfai, and T. Z. Baram, “The role of inflammation in epilepsy,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Itoh, M. Watanabe, K. Yoshikawa, Y. Kanaho, L. J. Berliner, and H. Fujii, “Magnetic resonance and biochemical studies during pentylenetetrazole- kindling development: the relationship between nitric oxide, neuronal nitric oxide synthase and seizures,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 757–766, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Vigevano and M. R. Cilio, “Vigabatrin versus ACTH as first-line treatment for infantile spasms: a randomized, prospective study,” Epilepsia, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1270–1274, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. A. Shumiloff, W. M. Lam, and K. B. Manasco, “Adrenocorticotropic hormone for the treatment of West syndrome in children,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 744–754, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. R. Crow, S. Song, J. W. Semple, J. Freedman, and A. H. Lazarus, “A role for IL-1 receptor antagonist or other cytokines in the acute therapeutic effects of IVIg?” Blood, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 155–158, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Yamagata, K. I. Andreasson, W. E. Kaufmann, C. A. Barnes, and P. F. Worley, “Expression of a mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase in brain neurons: regulation by synaptic activity and glucocorticoids,” Neuron, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 371–386, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Maroso, S. Balosso, T. Ravizza et al., “Interleukin-1β biosynthesis inhibition reduces acute seizures and drug resistant chronic epileptic activity in mice,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 304–315, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Minami, Y. Kuraishi, and M. Satoh, “Effects of kainic acid on messenger RNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα and LIF in the rat brain,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 593–598, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Eriksson, R. Tehranian, K. Iverfeldt, B. Winblad, and M. Schultzberg, “Increased expression of mRNA encoding interleukin-1beta and caspase-1, and the secreted isoform of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the rat brain following systemic kainic acid administration,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 266–279, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. G. de Simoni, C. Perego, T. Ravizza et al., “Inflammatory cytokines and related genes are induced in the rat hippocampus by limbic status epilepticus,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2623–2633, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Vezzani, D. Moneta, M. Conti et al., “Powerful anticonvulsant action of IL-1 receptor antagonist on intracerebral injection and astrocytic overexpression in mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 21, pp. 11534–11539, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  22. N. P. Turrin and S. Rivest, “Innate immune reaction in response to seizures: implications for the neuropathology associated with epilepsy,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 321–334, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Voutsinos-Porche, E. Koning, H. Kaplan et al., “Temporal patterns of the cerebral inflammatory response in the rat lithium-pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 385–402, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. A. Gorter, E. A. van Vliet, E. Aronica et al., “Potential new antiepileptogenic targets indicated by microarray analysis in a rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 43, pp. 11083–11110, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. H. Jung, K. Chu, S. T. Lee et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, inhibits the altered hippocampal neurogenesis with attenuation of spontaneous recurrent seizures following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 237–246, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Yoshikawa, Y. Kita, K. Kishimoto, and T. Shimizu, “Profiling of eicosanoid production in the rat hippocampus during kainic acid-induced seizure: dual phase regulation and differential involvement of COX-1 and COX-2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 21, pp. 14663–14669, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. Aronica and J. A. Gorter, “Gene expression profile in temporal lobe epilepsy,” Neuroscientist, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 100–108, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Dhote, A. Peinnequin, P. Carpentier et al., “Prolonged inflammatory gene response following soman-induced seizures in mice,” Toxicology, vol. 238, no. 2-3, pp. 166–176, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. Lee, H. Dziema, K. H. Lee, Y. Choi, and K. Obrietan, “CRE-mediated transcription and COX-2 expression in the pilocarpine model of status epilepticus,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. K. Kulkarni and A. Dhir, “Cyclooxygenase in epilepsy: from perception to application,” Drugs of Today, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 135–154, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Holtman, E. A. van Vliet, P. M. Edelbroek, E. Aronica, and J. A. Gorter, “Cox-2 inhibition can lead to adverse effects in a rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy,” Epilepsy Research, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. N. Polascheck, M. Bankstahl, and W. Löscher, “The COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib is neuroprotective but not antiepileptogenic in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 219–233, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Auvin, D. Shin, A. Mazarati, and R. Sankar, “Inflammation induced by LPS enhances epileptogenesis in immature rat and may be partially reversed by IL1RA,” Epilepsia, vol. 51, supplement 3, pp. 34–38, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Maroso, S. Balosso, T. Ravizza et al., “Toll-like receptor 4 and high-mobility group box-1 are involved in ictogenesis and can be targeted to reduce seizures,” Nature Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 413–419, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. I. L. Campbell, C. R. Abraham, E. Masliah et al., “Neurologic disease induced in transgenic mice by cerebral overexpression of interleukin 6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 21, pp. 10061–10065, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Probert, K. Akassoglou, G. Kassiotis, M. Pasparakis, L. Alexopoulou, and G. Kollias, “TNF-α transgenic and knockout models of CNS inflammation and degeneration,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 137–141, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Vezzani and T. Granata, “Brain inflammation in epilepsy: experimental and clinical evidence,” Epilepsia, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1724–1743, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. Kuno and K. Matsushima, “The IL-1 receptor signaling pathway,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 542–547, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. S. Park, F. Gamboni-Robertson, Q. He et al., “High mobility group box 1 protein interacts with multiple Toll-like receptors,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. C917–C924, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. M. Rodgers, M. R. Hutchinson, A. Northcutt, S. F. Maier, L. R. Watkins, and D. S. Barth, “The cortical innate immune response increases local neuronal excitability leading to seizures,” Brain, vol. 132, no. 9, pp. 2478–2486, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Wang, Q. Cheng, S. Malik, and J. Yang, “Interleukin-1β inhibits γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor current in cultured hippocampal neurons,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 497–504, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. Schäfers and L. Sorkin, “Effect of cytokines on neuronal excitability,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 437, no. 3, pp. 188–193, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Viviani, S. Bartesaghi, F. Gardoni et al., “Interleukin-1β enhances NMDA receptor-mediated intracellular calcium increase through activation of the Src family of kinases,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 25, pp. 8692–8700, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  44. A. Vezzani, M. Maroso, S. Balosso, M. Sanchez, and T. Bartfai, “IL-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling in infection, inflammation, stress and neurodegeneration couples hyperexcitability and seizures,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1281–1289, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Renno, M. Krakowski, C. Piccirillo, J.-. Lin, and T. Owens, “TNF-α expression by resident microglia and infiltrating leukocytes in the central nervous system of mice with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: Regulation by Th1 cytokines,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 944–953, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  46. P. Bezzi, M. Domercq, L. Brambilla et al., “CXCR4-activated astrocyte glutamate release via TNFa: amplification by microglia triggers neurotoxicity,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 702–710, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. Ravizza, B. Gagliardi, F. Noé, K. Boer, E. Aronica, and A. Vezzani, “Innate and adaptive immunity during epileptogenesis and spontaneous seizures: evidence from experimental models and human temporal lobe epilepsy,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 142–160, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Morin-Brureau, A. Lebrun, M. Rousset et al., “Epileptiform activity induces vascular remodeling and zonula occludens 1 downregulation in organotypic hippocampal cultures: role of VEGF signaling pathways,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 29, pp. 10677–10688, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Librizzi, F. Noè, A. Vezzani, M. de Curtis, and T. Ravizza, “Seizure-induced brain-borne inflammation sustains seizure recurrence and blood-brain barrier damage,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. U. Heinemann, D. Kaufer, and A. Friedman, “Blood-brain barrier dysfunction, TGFβ signaling, and astrocyte dysfunction in epilepsy,” GLIA, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1251–1257, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. M. Ransohoff, P. Kivisäkk, and G. Kidd, “Three or more routes for leukocyte migration into the central nervous system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 569–581, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Rantala, R. Tarkka, and M. Uhari, “Systematic review of the role of prostaglandins and their synthetase inhibitors with respect to febrile seizures,” Epilepsy Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 251–257, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. L. Marcheselli and N. G. Bazan, “Sustained induction of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 by seizures in hippocampus: inhibition by a platelet-activating factor antagonist,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 40, pp. 24794–24799, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. T. Takemiya, K. Matsumura, and K. Yamagata, “Roles of prostaglandin synthesis in excitotoxic brain diseases,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 51, no. 2–4, pp. 112–120, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. T. Takemiya, M. Maehara, K. Matsumura, S. Yasuda, H. Sugiura, and K. Yamagata, “Prostaglandin E2 produced by late induced COX-2 stimulates hippocampal neuron loss after seizure in the CA3 region,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. Kunz and E. H. Oliw, “Nimesulide aggravates kainic acid-induced seizures in the rat,” Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 271–276, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. E. J. Baik, E. J. Kim, S. H. Lee, and C. Moon, “Cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors aggravate kainic acid induced seizure and neuronal cell death in the hippocampus,” Brain Research, vol. 843, no. 1-2, pp. 118–129, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. G. E. Serrano, N. Lelutiu, A. Rojas et al., “Ablation of cyclooxygenase-2 in forebrain neurons is neuroprotective and dampens brain inflammation after status epilepticus,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 42, pp. 14850–14860, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. K. Kaushik, K. Aritake, S. Kamauchu et al., “Prostaglandin D2 is crucial for seizure suppression and postictal sleep,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 253, pp. 82–90, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. I. Chung, A. Y. Kim, S. H. Lee, and E. J. Baik, “Seizure susceptibility in immature brain due to lack of COX-2-induced PGF2α,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 249, pp. 95–103, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. Jiang, Y. Quan, T. Ganesh, W. A. Pouliot, F. E. Dudek, and R. Dingledine, “Inhibition of the prostaglandin receptor EP2 following status epilepticus reduces delayed mortality and brain inflammation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 3591–3596, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Jiang, T. Ganesh, Y. Du et al., “Small molecule antagonist reveals seizure-induced mediation of neuronal injury by prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP2,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 3149–3154, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. S. Oliveira, A. F. Furian, L. M. Rambo et al., “Modulation of pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures by prostaglandin E2 receptors,” Neuroscience, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 1110–1118, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. T. Takemiya, K. Matsumura, H. Sugiura et al., “Endothelial microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 exacerbates neuronal loss induced by kainate,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 381–390, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. K. Yamagata, K. Matsumura, W. Inoue et al., “Coexpression of microsomal-type prostaglandin E synthase with cyclooxygenase-2 in brain endothelial cells of rats during endotoxin-induced fever,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2669–2677, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  66. T. Takemiya, K. Matsumura, H. Sugiura et al., “Endothelial microsomal prostaglandin e synthase-1 facilitates neurotoxicity by elevating astrocytic Ca2+ levels,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 489–496, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Murakami, H. Naraba, T. Tanioka et al., “Regulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis by inducible membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase that acts in concert with cyclooxygenase-2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 42, pp. 32783–32792, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  68. P. Ciceri, Y. Zhang, A. F. Shaffer et al., “Pharmacology of celecoxib in rat brain after kainate administration,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 302, no. 3, pp. 846–852, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. G. S. S. Salvadori, C. R. R. Banderõ, A. C. Jesse et al., “Prostaglandin E2 potentiates methylmalonate-induced seizures,” Epilepsia, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 189–198, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. P. J. Cimino, C. D. Keene, R. M. Breyer, K. S. Montine, and T. J. Montine, “Therapeutic targets in prostaglandin E2 signaling for neurologic disease,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 1863–1869, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. N. G. Carlson, M. A. Rojas, J. D. Black et al., “Microglial inhibition of neuroprotection by antagonists of the EP1 prostaglandin E2 receptor,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 6, article 5, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. N. Walters, J. S. Bickford, K. J. Newsom et al., “Regulation of human microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 by IL-1β requires a distal enhancer element with a unique role for C/EBPβ,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 443, no. 2, pp. 561–571, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. K. O'Banion, J. C. Miller, J. W. Chang, M. D. Kaplan, and P. D. Coleman, “Interleukin-1β induces prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) in primary murine astrocyte cultures,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2532–2540, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  74. C. Chen and N. G. Bazan, “Endogenous PGE2 regulates membrane excitability and synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 929–941, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. T. Takemiya and K. Yamagata, “Intercellular signaling pathway among endothelia, astrocytes and neurons in excitatory neuronal damage,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 8345–8357, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. Vezzani and A. Friedman, “Brain inflammation as a biomarker in epilepsy,” Biomarkers in Medicine, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 607–614, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. Friedman and R. Dingledine, “Molecular cascades that mediate the influence of inflammation on epilepsy,” Epilepsia, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 33–39, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. Xu, S. D. Miller, and S. Koh, “Immune mechanisms in epileptogenesis,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 195, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  79. M. R. Weir, R. S. Sperling, A. Reicin, and B. J. Gertz, “Selective COX-2 inhibition and cardiovascular effects: a review of the rofecoxib development program,” The American Heart Journal, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 591–604, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Tadayuki Shimada et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4916 Views | 1507 Downloads | 62 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.