Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 137357 |

Sim K. Singhrao, Alice Harding, Sophie Poole, Lakshmyya Kesavalu, StJohn Crean, "Porphyromonas gingivalis Periodontal Infection and Its Putative Links with Alzheimer’s Disease", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 137357, 10 pages, 2015.

Porphyromonas gingivalis Periodontal Infection and Its Putative Links with Alzheimer’s Disease

Academic Editor: Elisabetta Buommino
Received13 Jan 2015
Accepted01 Apr 2015
Published30 Apr 2015


Periodontal disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are inflammatory conditions affecting the global adult population. In the pathogenesis of PD, subgingival complex bacterial biofilm induces inflammation that leads to connective tissue degradation and alveolar bone resorption around the teeth. In health, junctional epithelium seals the gingiva to the tooth enamel, thus preventing bacteria from entering the gingivae. Chronic PD involves major pathogens (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia) which have an immune armoury that can circumvent host’s immune surveillance to create and maintain an inflammatory mediator rich and toxic environment to grow and survive. The neurodegenerative condition, AD, is characterised by poor memory and specific hallmark proteins; periodontal pathogens are increasingly being linked with this dementing condition. It is therefore becoming important to understand associations of periodontitis with relevance to late-onset AD. The aim of this review is to discuss the relevance of finding the keystone periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis in AD brains and its plausible contribution to the aetiological hypothesis of this dementing condition.

1. Introduction

Organ Specific Inflammation

(a) The Oral Cavity. Bacterial diseases such as chronic periodontal disease evoke the host’s immune responses, involving both the innate and adaptive signalling mechanisms with cell recruitment from the systemic circulation (macrophages, plasma cells, and T and B lymphocytes) that infiltrate the gingival soft tissues [1]. In periodontal disease (PD) there is paucity of information concerning the molecular pathways in the host cells, which could regulate their inflammatory response to complex subgingival bacterial biofilms. In the gingival inflammatory infiltrate, the outcome of the cytokine/chemokine response is regulated by the production of proinflammatory cytokines that are encountered by anti-inflammatory cytokines [2]. Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) has been proposed as the keystone periodontal pathogen in maintaining the PD associated inflammophilic microbiota [3, 4]. An inflammatory pathology is a disease condition where the host’s immune defences constantly encounter invading pathogens or bacterial virulence factors. The host’s defence failure in the gingival tissues, leads to the keystone inflammophilic microbe, P. gingivalis, colonising the subgingival areas and subsequently disseminating to distant organs [57]. The subversive armoury of this bacterium not only provides nutritional sustenance from sustainable inflammatory milieu but also allows for continued survival of P. gingivalis in the highly toxic niches [8].

(b) The Brain. The brain is immunologically privileged due to a physical blood brain barrier (BBB) and due to the absence of a lymphatic system and therefore displays low levels of molecules that are critical to antigen presentation. Thus, during neurodegeneration, the brain relies less on the recruitment of peripheral adaptive immune surveillance cells but more on the resident central nervous system (CNS) cells to recognise and mount a response against the invading pathogens. Although astrocytes and neurons have the capacity to deal with infection, it is the microglial cells that serve as the primary protective guardians of the healthy brain. Susceptibility to microbial infection appears to increase during advancing age and just before clinical diagnosis of dementia is confirmed [9]. This is attributed to the fact that, during aging, microglia appear to develop functional defects [10]. Thus, it can be argued that where age is a known risk factor (as in AD), infections will play a major role in the specific disease processes leading to dementia.

2. The Oral Cavity

The oral cavity is equally important for both nutritional and communication functions which are necessary for a healthy and social existence in animal species as well as for bacteria which exist in this niche. It includes a variety of specialised structures including teeth, keratinised and non-keratinised mucosa, gingivae, periodontal structures, salivary glands, and specialist linings for taste. The oral cavity has its own protective barriers to reduce colonisation of these bacteria including the buccal, gingival, and tongue mucosal epithelial surfaces [11]. These surfaces work together with the internal secretions such as saliva, mucous, and the gingival crevicular fluid to protect the epithelial membrane [12]. Saliva contains a range of both innate and adaptive immune molecules designed to minimise the attachment and survival of organisms that may establish within the gingival surface [13]. Chemical factors such as antimicrobial peptides including defensins (α-defensins expressed in neutrophils; β-defensins from gingival mucosa) [1416] are an example of the innate immune mechanisms, which are involved in controlling pathogenic bacterial colonisation. Measures controlling the adaptive immune response include immunoglobulins (IgA) specific for the mucosal surfaces [17, 18] and various enzymes (lactoferrin and lysozyme) designed to prevent bacterial metabolic processes [19] essential for their colonisation and lysis.

In addition, the gingival mucosa has developed a direct protective response against bacterial antigenic challenges through the action of cell-mediated immunity within the periodontal structures [20, 21] via antigen presentation. This results in the subsequent infiltration of T and B cells, a hallmark of the host’s response to the presence of these non host organisms [2023]. If the balance between natural protective barriers and bacterial colonisation is disrupted, the bacterial load increases in favour of oral inflammatory conditions such as PD [24] in susceptible individuals.

3. Periodontal Disease

There are two distinct inflammatory conditions that make up PD: gingivitis, a plaque-induced, reversible condition; and chronic periodontitis, an irreversible condition.

3.1. Gingivitis

Gingivitis represents the most prevalent disease to affect the periodontium, affecting up to 60% of teenagers and 40–50% of adults [25]. Gingivitis is caused by the accumulation of dental plaque and may manifest after only days or weeks following plaque accumulation [26], whereas periodontitis takes longer to develop [27]. To support the aetiological link between plaque and gingivitis, studies aiming to reduce or eliminate dental plaque have led to disease resolution [26, 28, 29]. Differences in susceptibility of individuals to gingivitis have been demonstrated. It has been suggested that these differences have been down to the microbial makeup of the plaque or the rate of plaque accumulation [26]. Local factors that may encourage an increased plaque accumulation, and therefore increase the susceptibility to gingivitis, include developmental or anatomical tooth variations, pathological tooth conditions, caries, frenum position, gingival developmental conditions, and iatrogenic factors (e.g., overhangs on restorations) [28]. Systemic factors may also contribute to an individual’s susceptibility to gingivitis. These include metabolic factors (e.g., puberty, pregnancy), genetic factors, environmental factors (e.g., smoking, medication, and nutritional status), and systemic conditions (neutropenia, HIV disease) [28]. More recently, the individual’s susceptibility (irrespective of quantitative or qualitative plaque accumulations) to the development of gingivitis has been investigated. Trombelli et al. [29] experimentally demonstrated two distinct groups, “high responders” and “low responders.” These groups showed significantly different severities of gingivitis to similar plaque accumulation rates. These results reinforce the hypothesis of subject-specific effects of poor oral hygiene on gingival tissues. Although gingivitis does not always progress to periodontitis, it has been shown that individuals who show an increased susceptibility to gingivitis will also have an increased susceptibility to developing periodontitis, although, to date, there are no reliable means to predict susceptibility to periodontitis [30].

3.2. Periodontitis

Periodontitis is the most common infectious inflammatory disease of humans. A recent survey in the USA concluded that 47.2% of adults aged 30 years and older had periodontitis [31]. Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory destruction of the gingival connective tissue attachment to the root surface, cementum, and adjacent alveolar bone resulting from continuous inflammatory response triggered by subgingival bacterial biofilm. The causal bacteria typically include P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola (T. denticola), and Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia) [24]. The established PD lesion is the subgingival pocket, which has variable (5–10 mm) depth, in which 1 × 109 mixed communities of inflammophilic bacteria can flourish around the teeth [12]. These increased numbers represent a significant bacterial load with the loss of collagen fibers and attachment to the cementum surface, apical migration of junctional epithelium, formation of deep periodontal pockets, and resorption of alveolar bone. Alveolar bone is continuously undergoing the process of remodelling such as constant bone resorption by osteoclasts followed by a phase of bone formation by osteoblasts through a coupling mechanism.

4. Inflammatory Bacterial Challenge Driving Periodontal Disease Process

In PD, the inflammatory response is initiated by bacteria but also involves other molecules known as pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). These include lipopolysaccharide (LPS), capsular proteins, flagellin, fimbrillin, peptidoglycan, bacterial DNA, proteases, (gingipains, dentisilin, and trypsin-like proteases) [32], and other protein modifying enzymes [33], which act to both stimulate and/or dampen the hosts’ innate immune responses [1, 33]. The stimulation causes hosts’ pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to produce a range of cytokines which recruit appropriate immune cells to the site of infection [32]. In addition, the metabolic products of bacteria cause the periodontal pocket epithelium to secrete neuropeptides (such as substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) that promote vasodilation of local blood vessels and permit an influx of neutrophils in response to signals from chemokines [1]. The immune dampening response accompanying the bacterial infection protects the periodontopathogen (P. gingivalis) by compromising the host’s innate defences in diverse ways [3335].

5. P. gingivalis, the Keystone Pathogen, and Its Ability to Bypass Inflammatory Signalling Cascades

A keystone pathogen is defined as an organism that can hold an entire arch together [3, 36]. Holding the arch can be viewed as an essential scaffold that acts as a guardian for the survival of new inflammophilic synergistic microbial communities in the same ecological niche. In PD, this crucial bacterium is said to be P. gingivalis. The metabolic dominance of this bacterium in terms of its population in PD appears to be maintained at low levels, perhaps to avoid direct competition within the same species or for natural selection of a dominant bacterium. Its mastery at evading hosts’ immune mechanisms to evoke and sustain inflammatory milieu via a number of signalling cascades affords protection not only to itself but also to other inflammophilic organisms that may be less able to survive such toxic conditions [8]. The main innate immune system signalling pathways for bacteria and/or their products include the integrin receptor CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling [37] and the complement cascade [38]. For a fuller appreciation of the complement cascade involvement [38] in PD, see Hajishengallis et al. [4] and Hajishengalis [37]. In brief, a functioning complement system comprises of at least three different activation pathways (classical, alternative, and the mannan binding lectin), all of which converge upon the central component C3 which then leads to the terminal pathway activation. Through this activation process, numerous enzymatic activation fragments are generated many of which have immunomodulatory functions; examples of these include the anaphylatoxins C3a, C5a and the cytolytic membrane attack complex (MAC). There is cross talk between these pathways for cytokine liberation, and other downstream signalling pathways such as the extracellular signal-regulated pathways of activation which are also fully described by Hajishengalis [37].

6. Virulence Factors of P. gingivalis

Holt et al. [39] extensively reviewed the macromolecules associated with P. gingivalis that, in vivo, might function in the inflammatory and destructive events of PD. These include the capsule, outer membrane, its associated LPS, fimbriae, proteinases, and selected enzymes. LPS is an integral component of all bacteria and is found in the outer membrane layer. LPS may also be found in a cell-free form occurring after bacterial autolysis as a result of exposure to antibiotics during rapid growth or when essential nutrients have depleted from the environment. It is a stable molecule, which can withstand heating to 100°C for several hours. When in the host, main role of LPS appears to be linked to priming of tissue specific antigen presenting cells [40].

P. gingivalis LPS is generally of smooth type [41], consisting of three regions: lipid A, R polysaccharide, and O polysaccharide [42]. The lipid A region of LPS in many cell types promotes antigen presenting cell (neutrophils, dendritic cells) and activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide [43]. This can result in the stimulation of prostaglandin and leukotriene production and activation of the complement cascade and the coagulation cascade [44]. Hence, high levels of LPS within the host can result in an elevated immune response, which, once above the hosts’ threshold level, will result in damage to the tissue [44]. P. gingivalis contains two LPS macromolecules, an O-LPS containing the O polysaccharide attached to the lipid A core and an A-LPS where the phosphorylated branched, mannan repeating unit is also attached to the lipid A core [45]. In addition, P. gingivalis LPS possesses significant amounts of lipid A heterogeneity containing tetra- and penta-acylated structures. The heterogeneity of LPS includes differences in the number of phosphate groups together with both the amount of lipid A fatty acids and their specific position. The presence of multiple lipid A structures makes it more difficult for the innate host responses to recognise the molecule thereby aiding the virulence of P. gingivalis [34].

Another important factor regarding the LPS of P. gingivalis is its ability to modify certain surface proteins. Veith et al. [35] demonstrated that the gingipain protease complex from P. gingivalis W50 has an intimate association with LPS glycosylation sites of these proteins. These glycosylation sites give rise to the cross-reactivity between monoclonal antibodies against LPS and to the carbohydrate moieties on gingipains [35]. O’Brien-Simpson et al. [46] suggested that the modification recognised by the P. gingivalis monoclonal antibody (clone 1B5) is located in the C-terminal segment of RgpB, suggesting that gingipains can be modified by LPS attachment to the conserved C-terminal segment. This could have implications in the virulence of this pathogen as it displays a mechanism by which the gingipains attach to the outer membrane [47]. LPS also activates the immune response through PRRs on the membrane of host cells or with both the tetra- and penta-acylated lipid A structures of P. gingivalis. The latter differentially activate the TLR-mediated nuclear factor kappa enhancer of B cell (NF-κB) signalling pathway. P. gingivalis LPS has been shown to use both TLR-2 and TLR-4, depending on the cell type [48]. Bacteria also secrete exotoxins, proteins (often enzymes and metabolic by-products) that exert damage on the host following their release. These PAMPs include proteases, coagulases, and fibrinolysins, which act on their specific substrates [39, 47, 49]. For example, P. gingivalis has the ability to secrete a large variety of enzymes such as peptidylarginine deiminase, an enzyme which can modify free or peptide-bound arginine to citrulline [33, 50]. Others include collagenases, which break the peptide bonds in collagen (the main structural protein of connective tissues) [51].

P. gingivalis is also armed with two types of gingipains, lysine specific (Kgp) and arginine specific (Rgps) as determined by the specificity for their cleaving sites [52]. Gingipains are known to play a major role in the progression of PD, inducing inflammation and tissue destruction in the periodontium [53].

Peptidoglycan is the only cell wall component common to all Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and is the essential scaffold of all cell walls that provides rigidity. Peptidoglycan, the major component of Gram-positive bacterial cells, is formed of glycan strands cross-linked via short peptides. The glycan segment comprises two alternating amino-hexose sugars: N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetyl muramic acid, cross-linked by short chains of amino acids. Usually, L-alanine is bound to muramic acid in Gram-positive bacteria, or mesodiaminopimelic acid in Gram-negative bacteria [5456]. Peptidoglycan is capable of inciting innate immune responses in general [57, 58] and to those that ultimately contribute to sepsis [59]. Both bacterial peptidoglycan and its products (muramyl peptides) have been shown to act as inflammatory mediators by activating host’s innate PRR (TLRs) and intracellular signalling receptors such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain or NOD 1 and NOD 2 [60]. Of these, TLR-2 is one that recognises peptidoglycan through MyD-88/NF-κB subsequently leading to chemokine/cytokine release [57, 58].

A genome-wide in vitro expression profile of neutrophils [40] demonstrated that the cord blood following challenge by the Gram-positive bacterial peptidoglycan was capable of activating neutrophils. Neutrophil activation was detected by expression of the integrin receptor CR3 (CD11b) and the NF-κB signalling pathway of cyto/chemokine release (TNF-α, IL-8) [40]. During the process, significant production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was also recorded, suggesting that peptidoglycan may be a potential source of ROS during an infectious episode [40].

7. Immune Evasion Strategies of P. gingivalis

Plethora of data supports the idea that P. gingivalis is a master evader of the host’s immune system [3335, 6167]. The structural nature of a biofilm provides a physical barrier against immune cells of the host [68]. In addition, a number of active mechanisms are employed by bacteria including degradation of complement fragments (avoiding opsonisation by protease digestion of complement fragments), recruitment of hosts’ regulatory proteins (Factor H, C4 binding protein), and protection by the bacterial cell wall. In the latter, either the MAC is unable to form, or their cell wall component (polysaccharides) mediated complement activation is suppressed [63, 6971]. P. gingivalis is very resistant to destruction by complement due to the ability of the gingipains to degrade C3 and C5 thereby preventing the deposition of C3b on the surface of the bacterial cell walls [67, 72]. Gingipains have been found to be modified by, and reactive with, an LPS recognising monoclonal antibody (MAb 1B5) suggesting a mechanism for the attachment of the RgpA and Kgp complexes to the outer membrane [35]. This attachment potentially increases the virulence of the bacterium, as gingipains present on the surface of the bacterial cell wall will be readily available to degrade complement proteins thus evading the hosts’ immune response. Gingipains can also attach to C4b binding protein avoiding destruction by complement mediated lysis [63].

Another immune evasion mechanism demonstrated by P. gingivalis is its adherence to erythrocytes via complement receptor 1 (CR1). This enables the bacteria to pass undetected by circulating phagocytes and provide a potential transport mechanism for the movement of P. gingivalis via the systemic circulation [66]. The additional ability of P. gingivalis to alter the lipid A structure of LPS could be one of the strategies utilised to evade innate host defence in gingival tissues potentially contributing to the pathogenesis of PD [73]. Our in-house data has demonstrated cleavage of the CD14 receptor from the neuroblastoma (IMR32) cell line during in vitro exposure to P. gingivalis crude culture supernatant containing abundant gingipains.

P. gingivalis strains are also capable of evading the innate immune recognition by degrading complement component C3 [61] and can intercept the cross talk at the C5 convertases stage by expressing peptidylarginine deiminase enzyme to inactivate C5a for its own survival [33].

The immune invasion strategies of P. gingivalis are of great importance not only in PD, but also in relation to systemic disease as this bacterium and its virulence factors access the systemic organs. In doing so, P. gingivalis and/or its products and any inflammatory mediators generated within the blood can potentially reach remote body organs. Routine dental procedures, including dental extraction, periodontal surgery, tooth scaling, and even tooth brushing and flossing seed oral bacteria into the systemic circulation [7477]. Fitting with the theory of “focal infection” periodontal bacteria have the potential to go undetected by the immune system (via immune evasion mechanisms) and ultimately access remote body organs of individuals with susceptibilities for developing inflammatory pathologies. Currently, PD has been linked directly with cardiovascular disease [7880], diabetes mellitus [81], respiratory infections [82, 83], rheumatoid arthritis [84, 85], osteoporosis [86], obesity [87], and adverse pregnancy outcomes [88] including low birth weight [89] and preterm birth [90]. Most recently PD has been linked with the aetiology of AD [9193].

8. Alzheimer’s Disease: A Neurodegenerative Disease

Proteostasis (tau and/or Aβ plaques) is a central component of pathology in Alzheimer’ disease [94]. AD is characterised by the accumulation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, which are composed of microtubule binding protein tau assembled into paired helical and straight filaments [95] and the extracellular deposits of fibrillary Aβ [94]. Altered synaptic plasticity and synaptic loss correlates with cognitive dysfunction [96, 97]. Chronic intracerebral inflammation is also a pivotal factor driving neurodegeneration in the form of activated glia [98]. The amyloid hypothesis of Hardy and Selkoe [99] relies on intracerebral factors especially Aβ being pivotal to AD pathogenesis. Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and the chronic activation of the complement cascade are all features of AD inflammatory pathology attributed to Aβ deposition [98].

The “aetiological” hypothesis accounts for extrinsic inflammatory factors contributing to the subclinical and clinical phases of the late-onset form of AD [6, 100105]. Evidence from genome-wide studies suggests the innate immune system is involved in the onset of AD [106, 107] and this supports a role for microbes and/or their immunogenic components that classically initiate innate immune responses. Further evidence linking microbes to Aβ plaque deposition supports the ability of this hallmark protein to act as an antimicrobial peptide to counteract infections [108]. It is therefore not surprising that Aβ functions are related to innate immune defence mechanisms that mediate intrinsic responses [109]. In addition, multiple systemic infections can exacerbate premorbid cognitive status in AD patients and the current view indicates that this is the result of proinflammatory mediators crossing the BBB [93, 100, 101].

Poole et al. [6] reported that periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis components are also identified in AD subjects, and this could help to explain the associations of PD with the onset of, and perpetuating inflammation via, the keystone pathogen hypothesis described by Hajishengallis et al. [3]. In terms of the time-frame of the chronicity of inflammation of the two diseases under discussion, PD presents after 30 years of age [31], whereas the late-onset AD appears later (80+ years onwards) in life. Thus there is sufficient time for an established chronic periodontal pathogen such as P. gingivalis [110, 111] to exploit the haematogenous route [66] to access the brain as illustrated by Singhrao et al. [112].

Our recent work tested the proof of concept using mouse model of experimental periodontitis, whereby mice were periodontally infected with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, T. forsythia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum as mono- and polybacterial infections. Following chronic gingival infection and molecular identification using nucleotide sequencing, a statistically significant number of mice brains contained the P. gingivalis genomic DNA. These results demonstrated that the periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis was able to access the mice brains [7].

As this keystone pathogen remains in low amounts (103) in the subgingival niche, the larger brain tissue ratio to number of actual P. gingivalis cells in the dementing human brain would make it difficult to detect by molecular methodologies. Given the resilience of P. gingivalis in the human host, even the presence of fewer P. gingivalis in the brain over at least three decades would be sufficient to contribute to a low but persistent level of local inflammation for its own nutritional sustenance and survival. One of the traits of a keystone inflammophilic pathogen is to establish communities of other microbes that can thrive under toxic inflammatory environment and contribute further to inflammation in the host. This could explain why specific microbes are also said to associate with AD hallmark protein Aβ. These include herpes simplex virus type I [104], Chlamydophila pneumoniae [103], and several species of spirochetes of which the well cited ones are T. denticola and Borrelia burgdorferi [91, 105]. Activation of the complement cascade in the AD brain can be direct via the hallmark proteins or from whole bacteria, or their components (LPS and peptidoglycan), and indirect activation via liberation of proinflammatory cytokines from other (TLR) signalling cascades [103115]. Furthermore, liberation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species also takes place when innate immune responses are activated by Aβ [98] and due to peptidoglycan from bacterial cell walls [40]. Such an environment is conducive to these inflammophilic pathogens in AD brains.

Our research also examined the inflammatory component arising from the innate immune responses relating to the dissemination of this bacterium into the brains of our mouse PD model. By using antibodies against the complement activation products of C3 convertase stage and the membrane attack complex on brain tissue sections from the mice, microglia in both infected and sham-infected groups, demonstrated strong intracellular labelling with C3 and C9. This was concluded as ongoing biosynthesis by microglial cells because Singhrao et al. [116, 117] had previously demonstrated that, in human brain tissue sections from another neurodegenerative condition, glia were the source of complement whilst the in vitro study [117] demonstrated that neurons were vulnerable from attack. Thus, from the infected mice brains, it was clear that pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus were opsonised with C3 activation fragments () and were likely to have been vulnerable from activated complement [7]. The data from the human brains and that from the in vivo mouse study suggested specific associations of P. gingivalis with AD inflammatory pathology [7].

9. Implications of Inflammation in the Brain

Direct implications of bacterial infections in the elderly is said to affect memory [9, 100] via cytokine release in response to infection [100]. Indeed an increased amount of cytokines especially the macrophage secreted TNF-α has been reported in plasma of AD subjects [93]. Furthermore, elderly individuals appear to harbour a higher titre of circulating IgG from several periodontal pathogens [118], and clinical studies support this to correlate with a possible onset of mild cognitive impairment and even result in AD [119]. Persisting chronic peripheral/intrinsic inflammation is hypothesised to affect BBB capillary wall which likely prevents efflux of soluble/insoluble Aβ from the CNS. This hypothesis was tested following vaccination of anti-Aβ antibodies whereby amyloid plaque Aβ was shown to exit the brain via the cerebral blood vessel walls but failed and accessed the perivascular spaces instead [120].

10. An Overview of the Role of Periodontal Pathogens Modulating CNS Inflammation

Bacteria and/or their immunogenic components at the appropriate concentration initiate the classical innate immune signalling pathways via TLR-2 and TLR-4 mechanisms whereby the release of cytokines by microglia (IFN-γ and TNF-α) is an inevitable consequence. Chronic release of cytokines will eventually change the permeability at the BBB and reduce the efflux of Aβ from the CNS into the systemic circulation [121]. Under appropriate concentrations of LPS/peptidoglycan, TLR-2 and TLR-4 signalling, and release of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species such as superoxide ions, iNOS/NO, cytokine secretion and bacterial activation of the complement system become inseparable. Together these factors lead to vital neurons being destroyed and enhanced maintenance of chronic inflammation with consequences for development of disease [98, 113, 122125]. Inheritable inflammatory traits related to cytokines exist within our population and especially in the decedents of those having suffered from the late-onset AD [126]. Thus, all immunogens that initiate innate immune responses of the host resulting in the liberation of proinflammatory cytokines may be detrimental in the individuals with inflammatory susceptibility traits.

11. Conclusions

Periodontal disease(s) are among the most common chronic infections of humans, characterized by the loss of periodontal ligament, connective tissue, and alveolar bone, and are a major cause of tooth loss. Major periodontal pathogens lead to chronic systemic inflammation due to recurrent transient bacteraemia, resulting in high levels of systemic cytokines and chemokines. Multiple epidemiological, clinical, and molecular studies have shown that PD associated chronic inflammation is associated with increased risk of dementia, including AD. Recently, an in vivo study in mice periodontally infected with P. gingivalis demonstrated the presence of P. gingivalis bacterial genomic DNA in the brain and activated the complement cascade [7]. The keystone hypothesis of Hajishengallis et al. [3] helps to explain the contribution that P. gingivalis may cause the early development of a neurodegenerative condition such as Alzheimer’s disease. In our view, P. gingivalis (highly virulent strains) access the CNS during healthy stages but only those individuals with inflammatory susceptibility traits are likely to develop progressive inflammatory component representing neurodegenerative disease processes. Thus, P. gingivalis may be a missing link that, in time, will reveal if infection driven inflammation represents the early stage in the development of AD pathology followed by appearance of hallmark proteins.


Sophie Poole recently completed her Ph.D. supervised by StJohn Crean, Sim K. Singhrao, and Lakshmyya Kesavalu. Alice Harding has recently completed her M.Sc on the same subject but from the clinical aspects.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Lakshmyya Kesavalu, Sim K. Singhrao, and StJohn Crean have an established collaboration on the subject of this review article. Jointly everyone has contributed to the data and basis of the content of this paper and has written their section of expertise. Lakshmyya Kesavalu and StJohn Crean contributed equally.


This review was supported by the NIH National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE020820; Dr. Kesavalu). The work performed in the UK was fully funded by the University of Central Lancashire.


  1. E. J. Ohlrich, M. P. Cullinan, and G. J. Seymour, “The immunopathogenesis of periodontal disease,” Australian Dental Journal, vol. 54, no. s1, pp. S2–S10, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. Ghannad, D. Nica, M. I. G. Fulle et al., “Absence of αvβ6 integrin is linked to initiation and progression of periodontal disease,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 172, no. 5, pp. 1271–1286, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Hajishengallis, R. P. Darveau, and M. A. Curtis, “The keystone-pathogen hypothesis,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 717–725, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Hajishengallis, T. Abe, T. Maekawa, E. Hajishengallis, and J. D. Lambris, “Role of complement in host-microbe homeostasis of the periodontium,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. M. Velsko, S. S. Chukkapalli, M. F. Rivera et al., “Active invasion of oral and aortic tissues by Porphyromonas gingivalis in mice causally links periodontitis and atherosclerosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e97811, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Poole, S. K. Singhrao, L. Kesavalu, M. A. Curtis, and S. Crean, “Determining the presence of periodontopathic virulence factors in short-term postmortem Alzheimer's disease brain tissue,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 665–677, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Poole, S. K. Singhrao, S. Chukkapalli et al., “Active invasion of an oral bacterium and infection-induced complement activation in ApoEnull mice brains,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 43, pp. 67–80, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. Hajishengallis, “The inflammophilic character of the periodontitis-associated microbiota,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 248–257, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Dunn, M. Mullee, H. Perry, and C. Holmes, “Association between dementia and infectious disease: evidence from a case-control study,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 91–94, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. I. Mosher and T. Wyss-Coray, “Microglial dysfunction in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 594–604, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. D. Marsh, “Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm,” Caries Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 204–211, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. J. Loesche and D. E. Lopatin, “Interactions between periodontal disease, medical diseases and immunity in the older individual,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 80–105, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. K. Fábián, P. Hermann, A. Beck, P. Fejérdy, and G. Fábián, “Salivary defense proteins: their network and role in innate and acquired oral immunity,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 4295–4320, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S.-U. Gorr and M. Abdolhosseini, “Antimicrobial peptides and periodontal disease,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 126–141, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. O. Chung and J. Y. An, “Periodontal disease and gingival innate immunity—who has the upper hand?” in Periodontal Diseases—A Clinician's Guide, J. Manakil, Ed., chapter 3, InTech, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Q. Lu, L. Jin, R. P. Darveau, and L. P. Samaranayake, “Expression of human β-defensins-1 and -2 peptides in unresolved chronic periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 221–227, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. F. Kinane, P. Hodge, J. Eskdale, R. Ellis, and G. Gallagher, “Analysis of genetic polymorphisms at the interleukin-10 and tumour necrosis factor loci in early-onset periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 379–386, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. F. Cole, S. P. Fitzsimmons, M. J. Sheridan, and Y. Xu, “Humoral immunity to commensal oral bacteria: Quantitation, specificity and avidity of serum IgG and IgM antibodies reactive with Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in children,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 591–598, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H.-F. Bu, X. Wang, Y.-Q. Zhu et al., “Lysozyme-modified probiotic components protect rats against polymicrobial sepsis: role of macrophages and cathelicidin-related innate immunity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 12, pp. 8767–8776, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, J. L. Virelizier, and W. Fiers, “Interferons as macrophage-activating factors. III. Preferential effects of interferon-γ on the interleukin 1 secretory potential of fresh or aged human monocytes,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 2444–2448, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Taubman and T. Kawai, “Involvement of T-lymphocytes in periodontal disease and in direct and indirect induction of bone resorption,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Medzhitov, “Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7164, pp. 819–826, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Kumagai, O. Takeuchi, and S. Akira, “Pathogen recognition by innate receptors,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. S. Socransky and A. D. Haffajee, “The bacterial etiology of destructive periodontal disease: current concepts,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 322–331, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. J. Brown and H. Löe, “Prevalence, extent, severity and progression of periodontal disease,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 2, pp. 57–71, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Loe, E. Theilade, and S. B. Jensen, “Experimental gingivitis in man,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 36, pp. 177–187, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Lindhe, S. E. Hamp, and H. Loe, “Experimental periodontitis in the Beagle dog,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. N. Tatakis and L. Trombelli, “Modulation of clinical expression of plaque-induced gingivitis: I. Background review and rationale,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 229–238, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Trombelli, C. Scapoli, E. Orlandini, M. Tosi, S. Bottega, and D. N. Tatakis, “Modulation of clinical expression of plaque-induced gingivitis: III. Response of ‘high responders’ and ‘low responders’ to therapy,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 253–259, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Trombelli, “Susceptibility to gingivitis: a way to predict periodontal disease?” Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 265–269, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. I. Eke, B. A. Dye, L. Wei, G. O. Thornton-Evans, and R. J. Genco, “Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the united states: 2009 and 2010,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 914–920, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Kawai and S. Akira, “Pathogen recognition with Toll-like receptors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 338–344, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. E. Bielecka, C. Scavenius, T. Kantyka, M. Jusko, and D. Mizgalska, “Peptidyl arginine deiminase from Porphyromonas gingivalis abolishes anaphylatoxin C5a activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 47, pp. 32481–32487, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. A. Reife, S. R. Coats, M. Al-Qutub et al., “Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide lipid A heterogeneity: differential activities of tetra- and penta-acylated lipid A structures on E-selectin expression and TLR4 recognition,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 857–868, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. D. Veith, G. H. Talbo, N. Slakeski et al., “Major outer membrane proteins and proteolytic processing of RgpA and Kgp of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 363, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. P. Darveau, G. Hajishengallis, and M. A. Curtis, “Porphyromonas gingivalis as a potential community activist for disease,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 816–820, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Hajishengalis, “Complement and periodontitis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1992–2001, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. Ricklin, G. Hajishengallis, K. Yang, and J. D. Lambris, “Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 785–797, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. C. Holt, L. Kesavalu, S. Walker, and C. A. Genco, “Virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 168–238, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. O. N. Fong, K. Y. Y. Chan, K. T. Leung et al., “Expression profile of cord blood neutrophils and dysregulation of HSPA1A and OLR1 upon challenge by bacterial peptidoglycan,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 169–178, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. S. Kabanov and I. R. Prokhorenko, “Structural analysis of lipopolysaccharides from gram-negative bacteria,” Biochemistry (Moscow), vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 383–404, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. R. H. Raetz and C. Whitfield, “Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 71, pp. 635–700, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Beutler, K. Hoebe, X. Du, and R. J. Ulevitch, “How we detect microbes and respond to them: the Toll-like receptors and their transducers,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 479–485, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. A. Taubman, P. Valverde, X. Han, and T. Kawai, “Immune response: they key to bone resorption in periodontal disease,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 2033–2041, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Rangarajan, J. Aduse-Opoku, N. Paramonov et al., “Identification of a second lipopolysaccharide in Porphyromonas gingivalis W50,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 8, pp. 2920–2932, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. M. O'Brien-Simpson, P. D. Veith, S. G. Dashper, and E. C. Reynolds, “Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains: the molecular teeth of a microbial vampire,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 409–426, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. Sandholm, “Proteases and their inhibitors in chronic inflammatory periodontal disease,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Kocgozlu, R. Elkaim, H. Tenenbaum, and S. Werner, “Variable cell responses to P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 741–745, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. G. Daly, G. J. Seymour, and J. B. Kieser, “Bacterial endotoxin: a role in chronic inflammatory periodontal disease?” Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. A. V. Moelants, G. Loozen, A. Mortier et al., “Citrullination and proteolytic processing of chemokines by Porphyromonas gingivalis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 2511–2519, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Travis, R. Pike, T. Imamura, and J. Potempa, “Porphyromonas gingivalis proteinases as virulence factors in the development of periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 120–125, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Imamura, “The role of gingipains in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 111–118, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Miyachi, K. Ishihara, R. Kimizuka, and K. Okuda, “Arg-gingipain a DNA vaccine prevents alveolar bone loss in mice,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 446–450, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. Thiemermann, “Interactions between lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan from Staphylococcus aureus: a structural and functional analysis,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 927–935, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. M. Ghuysen, “Use of bacteriolytic enzymes in determination of wall structure and their role in cell metabolism,” Bacteriological Reviews, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 425–464, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  56. J.-M. Ghuysen and J. L. Strominger, “Sturcture of the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus, strain copenhages. II. Separation and structure of disaccharides,” Biochemistry, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1119–1125, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Balamayooran, G. Balamayooran, and S. Jeyaseelan, “Toll-like receptors and NOD-like receptors in pulmonary antibacterial immunity,” Innate Immunity, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 201–210, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A.-K. Ekman and L. O. Cardell, “The expression and function of Nod-like receptors in neutrophils,” Immunology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. H. Kumar, T. Kawai, and S. Akira, “Pathogen recognition in the innate immune response,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 420, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. T. Sorbara and D. J. Philpott, “Peptidoglycan: a critical activator of the mammalian immune system during infection and homeostasis,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 40–60, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. H. A. Schenkein, “Failure of Bacteroides gingivalis W83 to accumulate bound C3 following opsonization with serum,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. J. Lamont and H. F. Jenkinson, “Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1244–1263, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  63. M. Potempa, J. Potempa, M. Okroj et al., “Binding of complement inhibitor C4b-binding protein contributes to serum resistance of Porphyromonas gingivalis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 5537–5544, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. H. Mahtout, F. Chandad, J. M. Rojo, and D. Grenier, “Porphyromonas gingivalis mediates the shedding and proteolysis of complement regulatory protein CD46 expressed by oral epithelial cells,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 396–400, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Potempa and R. N. Pike, “Corruption of innate immunity by bacterial proteases,” Journal of Innate Immunity, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–87, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. Belstrøm, P. Holmstrup, C. Damgaard et al., “The atherogenic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis evades circulating phagocytes by adhering to erythrocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1559–1565, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. M. Slaney, A. Gallagher, J. Aduse-Opoku, K. Pell, and M. A. Curtis, “Mechanisms of resistance of Porphyromonas gingivalis to killing by serum complement,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 5352–5361, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. S. Socransky and A. D. Haffajee, “Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 12–55, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. A. Thompson, “Campylobacter surface-layers (S-layers) and immune evasion,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. V. Mcdowell, J. Frederick, D. P. Miller et al., “Identification of the primary mechanism of complement evasion by the periodontal pathogen, Treponema denticola,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 140–149, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. N. Shimotahira, Y. Oogai, M. Kawada-Matsuo et al., “The surface layer of Tannerella forsythia contributes to serum resistance and oral bacterial coaggregation,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1198–1206, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. Popadiak, J. Potempa, K. Riesbeck, and A. M. Blom, “Biphasic effect of gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis on the human complement system,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 7242–7250, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. T. D. K. Herath, R. P. Darveau, C. J. Seneviratne, C.-Y. Wang, Y. Wang, and L. Jin, “Tetra- and penta-acylated lipid A strucures of Porphyromonas gingivlis LPS differentially activate TLR4-mediated NF-κB signal transduction cascade and immune-inflammaory response in human gingival fibroblasts,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e58496, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. L. Forner, T. Larsen, M. Kilian, and P. Holmstrup, “Incidence of bacteremia after chewing, tooth brushing and scaling in individuals with periodontal inflammation,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 401–407, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Savarrio, D. Mackenzie, M. Riggio, W. P. Saunders, and J. Bagg, “Detection of bacteraemias during non-surgical root canal treatment,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 293–303, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. C. G. Daly, D. H. Mitchell, J. E. Highfield, D. E. Grossberg, and D. Stewart, “Bacteremia due to periodontal probing: a clinical and microbiological investigation,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 210–214, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. I. Tomás, M. Álvarez, J. Limeres, C. Potel, J. Medina, and P. Diz, “Prevalence, duration and aetiology of bacteraemia following dental extractions,” Oral Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. K. J. Mattila, M. S. Nieminen, V. V. Valtonen et al., “Association between dental health and acute myocardial infarction,” British Medical Journal, vol. 298, no. 6676, pp. 779–781, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. F. DeStefano, R. F. Anda, H. S. Kahn, D. F. Williamson, and C. M. Russell, “Dental disease and risk of coronary heart disease and mortality,” British Medical Journal, vol. 306, no. 6879, pp. 688–691, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. P. B. Lockhart, A. F. Bolger, P. N. Papapanou et al., “Periodontal disease and atherosclerotic vascular disease: does the evidence support an independent association?: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 125, no. 20, pp. 2520–2544, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Bascones-Martinez, P. Matesanz-Perez, M. Escribano-Bermejo, M.-Á. González-Moles, J. Bascones-Ilundain, and J.-H. Meurman, “Periodontal disease and diabetes—review of the literature,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 722–729, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. F. A. Scannapieco, G. D. Papandonatos, and R. G. Dunford, “Associations between oral conditions and respiratory disease in a national sample survey population,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 251–256, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. F. A. Scannapieco, “Role of oral bacteria in respiratory infection,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 793–802, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. Tolo and L. Jorkjend, “Serum antibodies and loss of periodontal bone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 288–291, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. C. Gleissner, B. Willershausen, U. Kaesser, and W. W. Bolten, “The role of risk factors for periodontal disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 387–392, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  86. M. K. Jeffcoat, “Osteoporosis: a possible modifying factor in oral bone loss,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 312–321, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. J. Suvan, F. D'Aiuto, D. R. Moles, A. Petrie, and N. Donos, “Association between overweight/obesity and periodontitis in adults. A systematic review,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 501, pp. e381–e404, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. Offenbacher, H. L. Jared, P. G. O'Reilly et al., “Potential pathogenic mechanisms of periodontitis associated pregnancy complications,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 233–250, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. S. Offenbacher, V. Katz, G. Fertik et al., “Periodontal infection as a possible risk factor for preterm low birth weight,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 1103–1113, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. Jeffcoat, S. Parry, M. Sammel, B. Clothier, A. Catlin, and G. MacOnes, “Periodontal infection and preterm birth: successful periodontal therapy reduces the risk of preterm birth,” BJOG, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 250–256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. G. Riviere, K. H. Riviere, and K. S. Smith, “Molecular and immunological evidence of oral Treponema in the human brain and their association with Alzheimer's disease,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. P. S. Stein, M. Desrosiers, S. J. Donegan, J. F. Yepes, and R. J. Kryscio, “Tooth loss, dementia and neuropathology in the Nun Study,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 1314–1322, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. R. Kamer, R. G. Craig, E. Pirraglia et al., “TNF-α and antibodies to periodontal bacteria discriminate between Alzheimer's disease patients and normal subjects,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 92–97, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. H. Braak and E. Braak, “Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 239–259, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. J. Q. Trojanowski, M. L. Schmidt, R.-W. Shin, G. T. Bramblett, D. Rao, and V. M.-Y. Lee, “Altered tau and neurofilament proteins in neuro-degenerative diseases: diagnostic implications for alzheimer's disease and lewy body dementias,” Brain Pathology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. R. D. Terry, E. Masliah, D. P. Salmon et al., “Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 572–580, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. E. Masliah, A. Miller, and R. D. Terry, “The synaptic organization of the neocortex in Alzheimer's disease,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 334–340, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. H. Akiyama, S. Barger, S. Barnum et al., “Inflammation and Alzheimers disease,” Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–421, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  99. J. Hardy and D. J. Selkoe, “The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5580, pp. 353–356, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. C. Holmes, M. El-Okl, A. L. Williams, C. Cunningham, D. Wilcockson, and V. H. Perry, “Systemic infection, interleukin 1β, and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 788–789, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. C. Holmes, C. Cunningham, E. Zotova et al., “Systemic inflammation and disease progression in Alzheimer disease,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 768–774, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. A. R. Kamer, R. G. Craig, A. P. Dasanayake, M. Brys, L. Glodzik-Sobanska, and M. J. de Leon, “Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease: possible role of periodontal diseases,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 242–250, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. B. J. Balin, C. S. Little, C. J. Hammond et al., “Chlamydophila pneumoniae and the etiology of late-onset Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 371–380, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  104. R. F. Itzhaki and M. A. Wozniak, “Herpes simplex virus type 1 in Alzheimer's disease: the enemy within,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 393–405, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  105. J. Miklossy, “Chronic inflammation and amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer's disease—role of spirochetes,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 381–391, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  106. J. C. Lambert, S. Heath, G. Even et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1094–1099, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. D. Harold, R. Abraham, P. Hollingworth et al., “Erratum: Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 1156, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. S. J. Soscia, J. E. Kirby, K. J. Washicosky et al., “The Alzheimer's disease-associated amyloid β-protein is an antimicrobial peptide,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID e9505, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. Zaiou, “Multifunctional antimicrobial peptides: therapeutic targets in several human diseases,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 317–329, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. J. Slots and R. J. Genco, “Black-pigmented Bacteroides species, Capnocytophaga species, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease: virulence factors in colonization, survival, and tissue destruction,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 412–421, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. Slots and M. A. Listgarten, “Bacteroides gingivalis, bacteroides intermedius and actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal diseases,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 85–93, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. S. K. Singhrao, A. Harding, T. Simmons, S. Robinson, L. Kesavalu, and S. Crean, “Oral inflammation, tooth loss, risk factors, and association with progression of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 723–737, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  113. U.-K. Hanisch, “Microglia as a source and target of cytokines,” Glia, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 140–155, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. B. P. Morgan and P. Gasque, “Expression of complement in the brain: role in health and disease,” Immunology Today, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 461–466, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Matsushita, S. Thiel, J. C. Jensenius, I. Terai, and T. Fujita, “Proteolytic activities of two types of mannose-binding lectin-associated serine protease,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 2637–2642, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. S. K. Singhrao, J. W. Neal, B. P. Morgan, and P. Gasque, “Increased complement biosynthesis by microglia and complement activation on neurons in Huntington's disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 362–376, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. S. K. Singhrao, J. W. Neal, N. K. Rushmere, B. P. Morgan, and P. Gasque, “Spontaneous classical pathway activation and deficiency of membrane regulators render human neurons susceptible to complement lysis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 905–918, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. P. S. Sparks Stein, M. J. Steffen, C. Smith et al., “Serum antibodies to periodontal pathogens are a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 196–203, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. K. Okuda, T. Kato, Y. Naito, M. Ono, Y. Kikuchi, and I. Takazoe, “Susceptibility of Bacteroides gingivalis to bactericidal activity of human serum,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1024–1027, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. C. Holmes, D. Boche, D. Wilkinson et al., “Long-term effects of Aβ42 immunisation in Alzheimer's disease: follow-up of a randomised, placebo-controlled phase I trial,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9634, pp. 216–223, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. R. O. Weller, D. Boche, and J. A. R. Nicoll, “Microvasculature changes and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer's disease and their potential impact on therapy,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 87–102, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. N. Laflamme and S. Rivest, “Toll-like receptor 4: the missing link of the cerebral innate immune response triggered by circulating gram-negative bacterial cell wall components,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 155–163, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. J. K. Olson and S. D. Miller, “Microglia initiate central nervous system innate and adaptive immune responses through multiple TLRs,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 3916–3924, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. P. Gasque, “Complement: a unique innate immune sensor for danger signals,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1089–1098, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. L. Qin, G. Li, X. Qian et al., “Interactive role of the toll-like receptor 4 and reactive oxygen species in LPS-induced microglia activation,” Glia, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 78–84, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. E. van Exel, P. Eikelenboom, H. Comijis et al., “Vascular factors and markers of inflammation in offspring with a parental history of late-onset Alzheimer disease,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1263–1270, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Sim K. Singhrao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.