Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 896283 |

David M. Sawyer, Peter S. Amenta, Ricky Medel, Aaron S. Dumont, "Inflammatory Mediators in Vascular Disease: Identifying Promising Targets for Intracranial Aneurysm Research", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 896283, 10 pages, 2015.

Inflammatory Mediators in Vascular Disease: Identifying Promising Targets for Intracranial Aneurysm Research

Academic Editor: Jan G. C. van Amsterdam
Received12 Jan 2015
Revised18 Mar 2015
Accepted19 Mar 2015
Published01 Apr 2015


Inflammatory processes are implicated in many diseases of the vasculature and have been shown to play a key role in the formation of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Although the specific mechanisms underlying these processes have been thoroughly investigated in related pathologies, such as atherosclerosis, there remains a paucity of information regarding the immunopathology of IA. Cells such as macrophages and lymphocytes and their effector molecules have been suggested to be players in IA, but their specific interactions and the role of other components of the inflammatory response have yet to be determined. Drawing parallels between the pathogenesis of IA and other vascular disorders could provide a roadmap for developing a mechanistic understanding of the immunopathology of IA and uncovering useful targets for therapeutic intervention. Future research should address the presence and function of leukocyte subsets, mechanisms of leukocyte recruitment and activation, and the role of damage-associated molecular patterns in IA.

1. Introduction

Despite advances in surgical and medical management, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) continues to result in significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Although aSAH is devastating, it is rare, occurring in approximately 1% of patients harboring an aneurysm per year [2]. The discovery of an unruptured IA can therefore present a clinical dilemma, with patient and physician weighing the risk of microsurgical or endovascular intervention against the natural history of the disease [3]. As a result, there is a strong need for the development of noninvasive therapies for use in the treatment of patients found to have unruptured IA, or those who are at high risk for developing the disease.

A concerted research effort has been mounted with the goal of identifying the mechanisms that underlie IA formation and rupture. Aneurysm samples collected from human patients during treatment have been examined, providing many clues to the pathology of the disease. However, the majority of experimental studies have been performed in animal models, allowing for the manipulation of specific variables and the observation of the progression of IA. For clarity, it is clearly stated in this paper whether findings regarding IA are the result of human or animal studies.

IA formation is characterized by a distinct and consistent set of changes in the architecture of the arterial wall. Animal models have suggested that loss of the internal elastic lamina (IEL) occurs early in the course of the disease, followed by hyperplasia of the tunica intima and disarray of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the tunica media [4]. Additionally, there is a general decrease in cellularity of the tissue, along with changes in the extracellular matrix composition. Collagen I and fibronectin are distributed ectopically, and the normal predominance of collagen III/IV and laminin is decreased [5, 6]. Functionally, key features of IA demonstrated in animal models include endothelial dysfunction with activation of the vascular endothelium [7], as well as VSMC apoptosis and modulation of VSMCs to a phenotype polarized toward extracelluar matrix (ECM) remodeling and inflammatory signaling [4]. The natural history of IA does not appear to be homogenous; the processes of aneurysm formation, progression, and rupture are likely driven by different mechanisms [8]. Recent findings support the notion that rupture in particular is a distinct event, which has important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies [9, 10]. Currently, many of the pathologic changes underlying IA are thought to be the result of chronic inflammation in the vessel wall, but our knowledge of the mediators and processes involved remains fragmented.

The pathobiological characteristics of IA share many similarities with atherosclerosis; indeed, the two entities appear to overlap to a significant extent. One of the key features of atherosclerotic lesions is the accumulation and oxidation of lipids in the vascular wall, and this process has been well demonstrated in IA. Tulamo et al. first reported the presence of oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDLs) in the walls of aneurysms from human patients [11]. Later work by Frösen et al. further characterized this process, showing that accumulated neutral lipids are taken up by cells such as VSMCs, are oxidized, and produce inflammation and a humoral immune response in human IA walls [12]. Importantly, this study associated these features with degeneration of the vessel wall and aneurysm rupture. A recent review by the same group discusses the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in IAs and the importance of lipid deposition in the progression of the disease [13]. Other studies of human IA tissue have noted the presence of additional atherosclerotic changes such as smooth muscle cell proliferation, macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration, and neointima formation [14, 15]. The similarities in histopathologic appearance, along with shared risk factors, suggest that the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of IA and atherosclerosis are likely fundamentally similar [4]. Working from this hypothesis, this paper will present a focused review of the literature related to the role of inflammatory mediators in vascular disease and intracranial aneurysms, with the goal of highlighting promising avenues of investigation in IA. Special attention will be paid to pro- and anti-inflammatory subsets of leukocytes, which must be delineated in order to allow for their therapeutic modulation.

2. Macrophages

The presence of macrophages in diseased vasculature has been shown to be a central characteristic of both IA and atherosclerosis. Macrophages have been repeatedly identified in tissue samples taken from patients with IA, represent the majority of the leukocytic infiltrates, and are associated with the risk of rupture [1618]. Macrophages have been extensively characterized in the setting of atherosclerosis, and a number of well-designed studies have addressed their role in the formation of aneurysms.

Kanematsu et al. replicated the histologic characteristics of human aneurysms in a mouse model of IA, showing robust leukocyte infiltration into aneurysm walls composed primarily of macrophages [19]. Furthermore, they demonstrated that macrophage depletion by clodronate liposome treatment greatly reduced the incidence of aneurysms. The mechanism by which macrophages participate in IA pathogenesis can be broadly divided into two categories: remodeling of the ECM and elaboration of inflammatory cytokines.

2.1. Macrophage Contributions to Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

Early evidence that ECM remodeling was important in the pathogenesis of IAs was provided by the examination of proteinases in human aneurysm tissue specimens retrieved by surgical resection [20, 21]. Using in situ zymography, it was found that the activity of serine proteases and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) was elevated in aneurysms, compared to control vessels. Immunohistochemical localization showed that the particular enzymes associated with aneurysms were plasmin, MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP (an activator of MMP2) [22]. Later work in rat and mouse models of IA indicated that macrophage infiltration and MMP expression were associated with aneurysm formation, with specific demonstration of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity [23, 24]. Furthermore, tolylsam, a selective inhibitor of MMP-2, -9, and -12, reduced the progression of aneurysms to an advanced stage in the model [23]. Other reports utilizing mouse models have confirmed the presence of high MMP activity in IA, as well as attenuation of aneurysm formation with MMP blockade or knockout [19, 25]. IEL loss and ECM remodeling are features of IA that are likely to be mediated by MMPs derived from macrophages and VSMCs, leading to the loss of vessel wall integrity that is characteristic of the disease.

Similar roles for proteolytic enzyme activity have been established in atherosclerosis. In this setting, two distinct pathologic processes have been linked to MMP expression. First, outward remodeling of the vessel wall is observed in the presence of atherosclerotic plaques, which is driven by the degradation of elastin and collagen [26]. This increase in vessel diameter is mediated by proteolysis [27] and could be considered analogous to the early stages of aneurysm formation. Later, in more advanced atherosclerotic lesions, collagenase activity promotes thinning of the plaque’s fibrous cap, an event that precedes plaque rupture and is the cause of most thrombotic phenomena in myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke [28]. Some evidence exists to suggest that macrophages play a similar role in the rupture of IA; one study found that inhibition of MMPs with tetracycline stabilized IAs in mice after they had formed, preventing or delaying rupture [29].

2.2. Macrophage Promotion of Inflammation

In addition to their direct effects on ECM remodeling, macrophages are key participants in the elaboration of proinflammatory signaling. Macrophages secrete a number of factors that have been implicated in IA genesis, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and IL-6 [4].

TNF-α in particular has been well characterized as a mediator of IA pathogenesis. A number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene for TNF-α have been identified as risk factors for IA or SAH in patients [30], and human aneurysm specimens display increased expression of the molecule [31]. Increased serum levels of TNF-α are associated with aSAH in patients [32], and TNF-α signaling has been implicated in IA formation and rupture by a large genome-wide association study [33]. TNF-α is known to act on two distinct receptors: TNFR1, which is expressed constitutively and binds soluble TNF-α, and TNFR2, which is expressed on endothelial and immune cells and is acted on by membrane-bound TNF-α [30]. A recent study by Aoki et al. demonstrated that TNFR1 is expressed in rodent intracranial arteries and that deficiency of this receptor markedly diminished IA formation in a mouse model [34]. Any potential contribution by signaling through TNFR2 remains to be determined.

Experimental work in animals has shown that TNF-α is released in aneurysm walls, induces inflammatory cytokine expression and macrophage infiltration [34], and drives both the formation and the rupture of IA [35]. Additionally, TNF-α causes changes in the phenotype of VSMCs. Signaling through Kruppel-like transcription factor 4 (KLF-4), TNF-α reduces production of contractile proteins and induces expression of proinflammatory molecules (including MMPs, MCP-1, and IL-1β) in vitro [36, 37]. However, these phenotypically modified VSMCs may also play a protective role against aneurysm rupture, as they are responsible for the intimal hyperplasia that likely serves to occlude early aneurysm lumens [38].

The loss of functional VSMCs is a characteristic feature of IA that results in the inability to replenish the components of the ECM and is thus strongly associated with disease progression and rupture [38]. A recent study by Marbacher et al. demonstrated that depletion of mural cells from abdominal aortic aneurysms in rats leads to aneurysm growth and rupture, likely due to the lost ability to form an occluding thrombus [39]. The same group showed that transplantation of VSMCs into decellularized, embolized rat aneurysms restored the function of the intraluminal thrombus and protected against wall degradation and rupture [40]. These results highlight the important role that VSMCs play in preventing the progression of aneurysmal changes. Although necrosis and migration/phenotypic modulation may contribute to the loss of VSMC cellularity in IA, a major contributor to this process appears to be apoptosis [38]. In the early stages of IA formation in mice, VSMC apoptosis seems to be driven by inflammatory processes, including the release of macrophage cytokines such as IL-1β [41]. However, further apoptosis leading to wall degeneration and rupture is not associated with cytokine signaling in human tissue and may rather be the result of oxidative stress or lipid accumulation [38, 42]. TNF-α causes diminished VSMC cellularity via apoptosis in atherosclerosis [43], but this effect has not been demonstrated in IA. TNF-α induces apoptosis via signaling through Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and caspase-8 [44]. Although both TNF-α and FADD are increased in human aneurysms [31], a more robust study of human tissue by Laaksamo et al. found no evidence of activation of caspase-8, indicating that apoptosis likely does not occur by extrinsic TNF-α signaling [42].

Taken as a whole, these findings call for a more thorough investigation of the mechanisms by which macrophage-associated inflammatory signaling contributes to IA and whether interruption of this signaling could prove to be a viable therapeutic approach.

Subpopulations of macrophages do exist, although their role in inflammatory vascular disease is only now coming to light. Recent research has identified two groups of activated macrophages with distinct functions that are polarized by the inflammatory signaling milieu. M1 macrophages are proinflammatory cells that are activated by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and which produce reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and elaborate IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 [45]. In contrast, M2 macrophages are involved in the resolution of inflammation and repair of tissue. They are activated by IL-4 and IL-13 likely produced by T helper-2 cells via the nuclear receptor PPARγ, which also suppresses NF-κB activity in these cells [46]. Products of M2 macrophages are anti-inflammatory and include IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) [45, 46].

Both M1 and M2 macrophages have been identified in IAs from human patients, and a predominance of M1 polarization is associated with rupture [47]. This is consistent with the previously demonstrated importance of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 in aneurysm pathogenesis. Similarly, advanced atherosclerotic lesions exhibit a high relative proportion of M1 cells, with models of plaque healing characterized by elevated numbers of M2 cells [26]. However, these findings do not fully describe the range of functions that activated macrophages can exert in vivo, and further research is needed to determine the potentially contradictory roles of these cells in both diseases [48].

2.3. Macrophage Recruitment and Activation

As macrophages are likely to be early mediators of the inflammatory cascade in IA, it is important to understand the mechanisms by which they are recruited into the vascular tissue and activated. In both aneurysm and atherosclerosis, the key initiating factor appears to be activation of the endothelium and subsequent endothelial dysfunction. Patterns of hemodynamic shear stress play a role in activating the endothelium in both diseases [7, 4952], accounting for the preferential formation of aneurysms and plaques at areas of turbulent blood flow, such as arterial bifurcations. Lipid metabolism and accumulation are additional inducers of endothelial activation that have been identified in atherosclerosis [5355].

Some of the mechanisms by which endothelial cells participate in the recruitment of macrophages to the site of an IA have been uncovered, and related research in the realm of atherosclerosis may provide clues for further investigation. The chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) has been shown to be expressed in human aneurysm specimens [19]. Its causal role has been investigated in mouse models utilizing MCP-1 blockade and knockout, where disruption of MCP-1 signaling is associated with decreased macrophage accumulation, MMP expression, and aneurysm formation [56]. Expression of MCP-1 as a feature of endothelial activation appears to be induced by signaling through the transcription factor NF-κB, which is induced by hemodynamic shear stress [57]. Aoki et al. reported that NF-κB is highly upregulated in the walls of human IAs and that knockout or blockade of the transcription factor in animal models resulted in decreased aneurysm formation [58]. Furthermore, NF-κB colocalized with endothelial cells expressing MCP-1 in this study.

NF-κB and its induction of MCP-1 have likewise been implicated in the recruitment of macrophages to atherosclerotic plaques [59, 60], with additional research demonstrating the importance of upregulation of cellular adhesion molecules. Classical extravasation of macrophages has been demonstrated in atherosclerosis, mediated by selectins/selectin-ligands and integrins/cellular adhesion molecules [48]. Aoki et al. tied the expression of the adhesion molecule VCAM-1 to NF-κB signaling in rat aneurysms [58], but no study has comprehensively examined the behavior of endothelial cellular adhesion molecules and the process of leukocyte extravasation in IA.

3. Antigen-Presenting Cells

An additional aspect of macrophage function that has received little attention in the IA literature is the detection of molecular signals of cellular injury and death, known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Classically, these signals are represented by the subclass pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), a set of conserved biochemical features of microbes that are detected primarily via toll-like receptors (TLRs) and which induce an immune response through NF-κB signaling [61]. However, further research has revealed that the DAMP pathway can be activated by endogenous molecules whose release or modification signals trauma to cells [61].

In the setting of atherosclerosis, DAMPs have been readily identified and shown to play a key role in recruiting inflammation. Specifically, a class of molecules known as oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs) has been implicated. These are host-derived molecules that have been altered by reactive oxygen species, and they are thought to be one of the early initiators of inflammation in atherosclerosis [62]. A common manifestation of the OSE is in the form of OxLDLs, which have been clearly demonstrated to accumulate in human IA [11, 12]. Studies of atherosclerosis have shown that OxLDLs are recognized by macrophage pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) such as CD36 and TLR-4 [62] and promote proinflammatory signaling, such as TNF-α [26, 30] and leukocyte recruitment [62]. Dendritic cells, which are antigen-presenting cells (APCs), also play an important role in response to the presence of OSEs. Dendritic cells are important drivers of the maturation and polarization of T cells and thus represent an important link between the innate and adaptive immune systems in atherosclerotic disease [63].

More evidence for the importance of DAMP recognition in IA has been provided by genome-wide association studies conducted using tissue from human patients. Kurki et al. found that TLR signaling is one of the processes strongly associated with ruptured aneurysms [33]. Additionally, a similar but smaller study by Krischek et al. found that the major ontological group of differentially expressed genes corresponded to the function of “antigen processing” [64]. Follow-up using real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical localization led the authors to conclude that APCs, specifically monocytes and macrophages expressing major histocompatibility complex II (MHCII), perform an important function in the pathogenesis of aneurysms.

Macrophages and dendritic cells clearly exhibit a strong influence on the pathogenesis of IA, and their specific contributions should be more fully explored. Figure 1 highlights the roles that have been demonstrated and hypothesized for macrophages and dendritic cells in IA. Potential lines of future research include strategies for reducing ECM remodeling, blockade of proinflammatory signaling, and prevention of macrophage recruitment and activation.

4. Lymphocytes

Studies of human aneurysm tissue collected during surgical resection have provided evidence for the involvement of lymphocytes in the generation of IA. Infiltrates of T cells and more rarely B cells have been described in aneurysm walls [16]. Greater numbers of lymphocytes are associated with aneurysms that have ruptured [17] and these cells are preferentially located in tissue around the area of rupture [14]. Despite these observations, it remains undetermined whether lymphocytes play a causal role in the formation of aneurysms or whether they merely represent a response to tissue injury.

Furthermore, little is known about the presence or role of the many subsets of lymphocytes in aneurysms. Important and widely differentiated effects have been attributed to CD4+ T helper (TH) cells, T regulatory (Treg) cells, and subpopulations of B-cells (B1 and B2) in atherosclerotic disease, and their potential contributions to IA should be investigated. Figure 2 outlines the roles that some of the subclasses of lymphocytes could play in the progression of IA.

5. T Cells

Helper T cells can be further subdivided into and cells, characterized by their differing cell-surface markers and secreted cytokines. Classically, these subgroups are associated with cellular and humoral immunity, respectively [65]. cells are disproportionately represented in atherosclerotic plaques and elaborate the soluble factors IFN-γ and TNF-α, resulting in proinflammatory and proatherogenic effects [66]. As previously described, TNF-α plays a vital and well-characterized role in the pathogenesis of IA, suggesting that cells may be involved in mediating the disease. IFN-gamma has not been studied in the setting of IA but is a key effector of macrophage and plasma B-cell activation and a promoter of endothelial adhesion molecules [67, 68]. Conversely, cells are found less commonly in plaques, and their function in atherosclerosis is ill-defined and controversial [67].

Regulatory T cells are important modulators of the immune system, responsible for maintaining tolerance to self-antigen and abrogating autoimmune disease. In general, Treg cells antagonize the effects of TH cells through the secretion of IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [66]. In the setting of atherosclerosis, these cells predictably confer a protective benefit against plaque formation. Experiments have shown increased atherogenesis in mouse models characterized by depletion of Treg cells or blockade of IL-10 and TGF-β [69, 70]. No studies have assessed the function of Treg cells or IL-10 in IA, though TGF-β signaling has interestingly been associated with both protective and pathologic effects in aneurysms from human patients [7173].

6. B Cells

B-lymphocytes are likewise implicated in atherosclerosis and consist of subgroups with differential effects on disease progression. A basic distinction can be made between B1 cells, which are primarily found in the lungs and peritoneum, and B2 cells, which are prominent in lymphatic tissue and the spleen [74].

B2 cells may have a proinflammatory effect. Experiments involving selective depletion of B2 populations via anti-CD20 antibodies and BAFFR knockouts have shown decreased plaque burden in mice [7577]. Additionally, transfer of B2 cells into lymphocyte-deficient mice induces atherosclerosis, further suggesting that these cells contribute to atherogenic inflammation [78]. Multiple hypotheses exist to explain this effect, but of particular interest is the involvement of IgG and IgE antibodies, which have been associated with cardiovascular disease [79, 80]. IgG may facilitate macrophage-mediated uptake of OSEs and damage to endothelial cells, and IgE could play a role in destabilizing plaques [81]. Production of IgG and IgE is selectively accomplished by the B2 subpopulation and requires antibody class switching to occur under the influence of T-cell cytokines such as IL-4 and IFN-γ [74].

Conversely, the B1 subpopulation has been shown to exhibit a clear atheroprotective effect, through well-characterized mechanisms. In contrast to the dependence of IgG and IgE production on inflammatory cytokine signaling, B1 cells produce predominantly IgM via a T-cell-independent process [81]. A dominant portion of the IgM secreted by these cells is natural antibody (NAb) that possesses specificity to OSEs and mediates the removal of OxLDL and apoptotic cells from tissue [8284]. This clearance of debris blocks the proinflammatory effects of the OSEs and prevents the formation of foam cells, abrogating the process of atherogenesis in animal models [81].

Although the importance of B cells in IA is not well characterized, multiple studies have implicated humoral immunity in the pathology of aneurysms. Deposition of IgG and IgM in the walls of human IA specimens has been identified [11], and the presence of antibodies specific for oxidized lipids has likewise been shown [12]. Interestingly, these studies question the characterization of IgG as pathologic and IgM as protective. Frösen et al. showed that serum levels of anti-lipid IgG were in fact higher in patients who had unruptured IAs, compared to those with rupture and SAH [12]. The plasma levels of IgM showed a similar but nonsignificant trend. Furthermore, there is lack of evidence showing that deposition of immunoglobulin in IA walls is correlated with the infiltration of leukocytes [13], contrary to what may be hypothesized from the atherosclerosis literature. Further research is needed to determine the influence of B cells and humoral immunity on the processes underlying IA formation and rupture.

7. Discussion

A wealth of recent research has characterized IA as a disease driven primarily by inflammatory processes occurring in the walls of cerebral vessels. Although many well-designed studies have addressed the roles of individual inflammatory mediators in IA, the field lacks a comprehensive understanding of its immunopathology. Many parallels have been drawn between IA and atherosclerotic disease, and the large volume of literature produced in the context of the latter could provide a roadmap for future investigation.

Table 1 presents a simplified view of some of the known and potential contributors to inflammation in the context of IA. It is evident that there are some key recurring factors that are likely to play important roles in the immunopathology of the disease. Interferon gamma produced by cells is an activator of both M1 macrophages and B2 lymphocytes and the proinflammatory subsets of those respective cell types. Thus, interferon gamma represents a potential therapeutic target for the suppression of inflammation [67]. Similarly, IL-4 and IL-13 elaborated by cells are capable of activating M2 macrophages involved in tissue repair and the resolution of inflammation [46]. Although cytokines are not commonly present in vascular inflammatory lesions [67], these factors could represent a strategy for polarizing the lymphocyte and macrophage populations toward anti-inflammatory subsets. There is evidence from models of atherosclerosis that identifying and targeting these reparative cells could even allow healing of the pathologic features of vascular inflammatory disease [26].

Inflammatory targets in intracranial aneurysm

Cell typeActivatorsEffectorsFunctionTargets for intracranial aneurysm

M1 macrophagesIFN-, NF-BIL-1, TNF-, IL-6, and MMPsProinflammatory signaling, ECM remodelingIFN-, TNFR1/TNFR2
M2 macrophagesIL-4, IL-13IL-10, TGF-, and IL-1RaResolution of inflammationIL-10, TGF-
EndotheliumShear stress, NF-κBMCP-1Leukocyte recruitment/activationSelectins, selection-ligands, integrins, and CAMs
Antigen-presenting cellsDAMPsNF-κB, TNF-α, and lymphocyte activationDetection of tissue injuryDAMPs, dendritic cells
TH1 lymphocytesIL-2, IL-12IFN-γ, TNF-αMacrophage activation, endothelial activationIFN-
TH2 lymphocytesIL-4IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13UnknownIL-4, IL-13
Treg lymphocytesIL-10, TGF-βAntagonize TH1 cells and attenuate inflammationIL-10, TGF-
B1 lymphocytesIgM NAbClearance of DAMPsIgM NAb
B2 lymphocytesIL-4, IFN-γIgG, IgEEndothelial damage, macrophage uptake of DAMPsIL-4, IFN-, IgG, and IgE

In addition to the contributions of these cell types to the formation and rupture of aneurysms, functional questions remain to be addressed. The process of leukocyte recruitment and extravasation should be thoroughly characterized in IA, as it represents a link between the known features of endothelial activation and inflammatory infiltration. Therapeutic intervention could potentially block this key stage in the disease, as demonstrated in previous animal studies [85, 86]. Additionally, the role of damage-associated molecular patterns in the pathogenesis of IA should be investigated. Due to their importance in the activation of macrophages and T-lymphocytes (via dendritic cells), DAMPs are likely to be involved in aneurysm formation. However, the identity of these molecules and the specific actions they exert are unknown. Furthermore, therapeutic manipulation of B-lymphocyte subsets may allow regulation of the macrophage reaction to DAMPs [74]. While B2 cells promote proinflammatory macrophage uptake of DAMPs, natural antibodies produced by B1 cells neutralize these molecules and allow them to be cleared without an inflammatory response [84].

Exploring these possibilities will require a concerted multidisciplinary research effort. Animal models will remain important, allowing investigators to block or deplete specific cell populations or signaling factors. Actions of inflammatory mediators could also be studied via selective reconstitution of cells and/or molecules into immune-deficient animals [87]. In vitro work could also provide important insight. In particular, coculture techniques hold promise in the demonstration of interactions between endothelial cells, VSMCs, and leukocytes in a controlled environment [88]. Finally, the prevalent use of anti-inflammatory medications by the general population provides an opportunity for the investigation of their effects on aneurysm formation and rupture in large human cohorts [89].

8. Conclusions

IA is an important disease that causes significant mortality and morbidity, and for which a noninvasive therapeutic option is currently unavailable. It is clear that inflammation is a key factor underlying the pathogenesis of aneurysms, and elucidating the mechanisms involved could uncover targets for the development of better treatments. A focused and sustained research effort will be necessary to fully characterize the immunopathology of IA. Intracranial aneurysm seems to share features with other inflammatory diseases of the vasculature, and insight may be gained from comparison and contrast of these disorders.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank Bryn E. Heidenreich for her assistance in preparing the figures for this paper.


  1. S. C. Johnston, S. Selvin, and D. R. Gress, “The burden, trends, and demographics of mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage,” Neurology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1413–1418, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. L. Brisman, J. K. Song, and D. W. Newell, “Cerebral aneurysms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 9, pp. 928–939, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. O. Wiebers, J. P. Whisnant, J. Huston III et al., “Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment,” The Lancet, vol. 362, no. 9378, pp. 103–110, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Chalouhi, M. S. Ali, P. M. Jabbour et al., “Biology of intracranial aneurysms: role of inflammation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1659–1676, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. M. Austin, S. Fisher, D. Dickson, D. Anderson, and S. Richardson, “The significance of the extracellular matrix in intracranial aneurysms,” Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  6. T. Kilic, M. Sohrabifar, Ö. Kurtkaya et al., “Expression of structural proteins and angiogenic factors in normal arterial and unruptured and ruptured aneurysm walls,” Neurosurgery, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 997–1007, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Jamous, S. Nagahiro, K. T. Kitazato et al., “Endothelial injury and inflammatory response induced by hemodynamic changes preceding intracranial aneurysm formation: experimental study in rats,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 405–411, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Chalouhi, B. L. Hoh, and D. Hasan, “Review of cerebral aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3613–3622, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Tada, K. Wada, K. Shimada et al., “Roles of hypertension in the rupture of intracranial aneurysms,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 579–586, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Tada, K. Wada, K. Shimada et al., “Estrogen protects against intracranial aneurysm rupture in ovariectomized mice,” Hypertension, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1339–1344, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Tulamo, J. Frösen, S. Junnikkala et al., “Complement system becomes activated by the classical pathway in intracranial aneurysm walls,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 168–179, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Frösen, R. Tulamo, T. Heikura et al., “Lipid accumulation, lipid oxidation, and low plasma levels of acquired antibodies against oxidized lipids associate with degeneration and rupture of the intracranial aneurysm wall,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 71, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Frösen, R. Tulamo, A. Paetau et al., “Saccular intracranial aneurysm: Pathology and mechanisms,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 773–786, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. A. Kosierkiewicz, S. M. Factor, and D. W. Dickson, “Immunocytochemical studies of atherosclerotic lesions of cerebral berry aneurysms,” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 399–406, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Killer-Oberpfalzer, M. Aichholzer, S. Weis et al., “Histological analysis of clipped human intracranial aneurysms and parent arteries with short-term follow-up,” Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 299–306, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Chyatte, G. Bruno, S. Desai, and D. R. Todor, “Inflammation and intracranial aneurysms,” Neurosurgery, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1137–1147, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Frösen, A. Piippo, A. Paetau et al., “Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2287–2293, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Kataoka, M. Taneda, T. Asai, A. Kinoshita, M. Ito, and R. Kuroda, “Structural fragility and inflammatory response of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a comparative study between ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1396–1401, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Kanematsu, M. Kanematsu, C. Kurihara et al., “Critical roles of macrophages in the formation of intracranial aneurysm,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 173–178, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. C. Kim, M. Singh, J. Huang et al., “Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in cerebral aneurysms,” Neurosurgery, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 642–666, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Bruno, R. Todor, I. Lewis, and D. Chyatte, “Vascular extracellular matrix remodeling in cerebral aneurysms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 431–440, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Zucker, M. Drews, C. Conner et al., “Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) binds to the catalytic domain of the cell surface receptor, membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MT1-MMP),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 1216–1222, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Aoki, H. Kataoka, M. Morimoto, K. Nozaki, and N. Hashimoto, “Macrophage-derived matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 promote the progression of cerebral aneurysms in rats,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 162–169, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. L. Hoh, G. J. Velat, E. N. Wilmer, K. Hosaka, R. C. Fisher, and E. W. Scott, “A novel murine elastase saccular aneurysm model for studying bone marrow progenitor-derived cell-mediated processes in aneurysm formation,” Neurosurgery, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 544–550, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Nuki, T.-L. Tsou, C. Kurihara, M. Kanematsu, Y. Kanematsu, and T. Hashimoto, “Elastase-induced intracranial aneurysms in hypertensive mice,” Hypertension, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1337–1344, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Libby, I. Tabas, G. Fredman, and E. A. Fisher, “Inflammation and its resolution as determinants of acute coronary syndromes,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1867–1879, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Liu, G. K. Sukhova, J.-S. Sun, W.-H. Xu, P. Libby, and G.-P. Shi, “Lysosomal cysteine proteases in atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1359–1366, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Libby, “Collagenases and cracks in the plaque,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 3201–3203, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Makino, Y. Tada, K. Wada et al., “Pharmacological stabilization of intracranial aneurysms in mice: a feasibility study,” Stroke, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2450–2456, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. Jayaraman, A. Paget, Y. S. Shin et al., “TNF-α-mediated inflammation in cerebral aneurysms: a potential link to growth and rupture,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 805–817, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  31. T. Jayaraman, V. Berenstein, X. Li et al., “Tumor necrosis factor alpha is a key modulator of inflammation in cerebral aneurysms,” Neurosurgery, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 558–564, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. M. Witkowska, M. H. Borawska, K. Socha, J. Kochanowicz, Z. Mariak, and M. Konopka, “TNF-alpha and sICAM-1 in intracranial aneurismal rupture,” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 137–140, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. I. Kurki, S.-K. Häkkinen, J. Frösen et al., “Upregulated signaling pathways in ruptured human saccular intracranial aneurysm wall: an emerging regulative role of toll-like receptor signaling and nuclear factor-κB, hypoxia-inducible factor-1A, and ETS transcription factors,” Neurosurgery, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1667–1675, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. Aoki, M. Fukuda, M. Nishimura, K. Nozaki, and S. Narumiya, “Critical role of TNF-alpha-TNFR1 signaling in intracranial aneurysm formation,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications, vol. 2, article 34, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. M. Starke, N. Chalouhi, P. M. Jabbour et al., “Critical role of TNF-α in cerebral aneurysm formation and progression to rupture,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 11, article 77, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Z. S. Galis, M. Muszynski, G. K. Sukhova et al., “Cytokine-stimulated human vascular smooth muscle cells synthesize a complement of enzymes required for extracellular matrix digestion,” Circulation Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 181–189, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. S. Ali, R. M. Starke, P. M. Jabbour et al., “TNF-α induces phenotypic modulation in cerebral vascular smooth muscle cells: implications for cerebral aneurysm pathology,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1564–1573, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Frösen, “Smooth muscle cells and the formation, degeneration, and rupture of saccular intracranial aneurysm wall—a review of current pathophysiological knowledg,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 347–356, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Marbacher, J. Marjamaa, K. Bradacova et al., “Loss of mural cells leads to wall degeneration, aneurysm growth, and eventual rupture in a rat aneurysm model,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 248–254, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Marbacher, J. Frosen, J. Marjamaa et al., “Intraluminal cell transplantation prevents growth and rupture in a model of rupture-prone saccular aneurysms,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3684–3690, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. Moriwaki, Y. Takagi, N. Sadamasa, T. Aoki, K. Nozaki, and N. Hashimoto, “Impaired progression of cerebral aneurysms in interleukin-1β-deficient mice,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 900–905, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. Laaksamo, R. Tulamo, A. Liiman et al., “Oxidative stress is associated with cell death, wall degradation, and increased risk of rupture of the intracranial aneurysm wall,” Neurosurgery, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. J. Boyle, P. L. Weissberg, and M. R. Bennett, “Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes macrophage-induced vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis by direct and autocrine mechanisms,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1553–1558, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Alikhani, Z. Alikhani, M. Raptis, and D. T. Graves, “TNF-alpha in vivo stimulates apoptosis in fibroblasts through caspase-8 activation and modulates the expression of pro-apoptotic genes,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 341–348, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Mantovani, A. Sica, and M. Locati, “Macrophage polarization comes of age,” Immunity, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 344–346, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. A. Bouhlel, B. Derudas, E. Rigamonti et al., “PPARγ activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Hasan, N. Chalouhi, P. Jabbour, and T. Hashimoto, “Macrophage imbalance (M1 vs. M2) and upregulation of mast cells in wall of ruptured human cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 9, article 222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. J. Moore and I. Tabas, “Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Cell, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 341–355, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Hashimoto, H. Meng, and W. L. Young, “Intracranial aneurysms: Links among inflammation, hemodynamics and vascular remodeling,” Neurological Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 372–380, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. M. Malek, S. L. Alper, and S. Izumo, “Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 21, pp. 2035–2042, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. S. Cunningham and A. I. Gotlieb, “The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. S. Chatzizisis, A. U. Coskun, M. Jonas, E. R. Edelman, C. L. Feldman, and P. H. Stone, “Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 2379–2393, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. De Caterina, J. K. Liao, and P. Libby, “Fatty acid modulation of endothelial activation,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 1, supplement, pp. 213S–223S, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  54. C. K. Glass and J. L. Witztum, “Atherosclerosis. the road ahead,” Cell, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 503–516, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Mestas and K. Ley, “Monocyte-endothelial cell interactions in the development of atherosclerosis,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 228–232, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. Aoki, H. Kataoka, R. Ishibashi, K. Nozaki, K. Egashira, and N. Hashimoto, “Impact of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 deficiency on cerebral aneurysm formation,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 942–951, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. I. S. Bhullar, Y.-S. Li, H. Miao et al., “Fluid shear stress activation of IκB kinase is integrin-dependent,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 46, pp. 30544–30549, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Aoki, H. Kataoka, M. Shimamura et al., “NF-kappaB is a key mediator of cerebral aneurysm formation,” Circulation, vol. 116, no. 24, pp. 2830–2840, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. W. Erl, C. Weber, C. Wardemann, and P. C. Weber, “α-tocopheryl succinate inhibits monocytic cell adhesion to endothelial cells by suppressing NF-κB mobilization,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 273, no. 2, part 2, pp. H634–H640, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  60. L. Gu, Y. Okada, S. K. Clinton et al., “Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice,” Molecular Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. E. Bianchi, “DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. I. Miller, S.-H. Choi, P. Wiesner et al., “Oxidation-specific epitopes are danger-associated molecular patterns recognized by pattern recognition receptors of innate immunity,” Circulation Research, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 235–248, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. H. Ait-Oufella, A. P. Sage, Z. Mallat, and A. Tedgui, “Adaptive (T and B Cells) immunity and control by dendritic cells in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1640–1660, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. B. Krischek, H. Kasuya, A. Tajima et al., “Network-based gene expression analysis of intracranial aneurysm tissue reveals role of antigen presenting cells,” Neuroscience, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 1398–1407, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Zhu and W. E. Paul, “CD4 T cells: fates, functions, and faults,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1557–1569, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. Tse, H. Tse, J. Sidney, A. Sette, and K. Ley, “T cells in atherosclerosis,” International Immunology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 615–622, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. L. Lintermans, C. A. Stegeman, P. Heeringa, and W. H. Abdulahad, “T cells in vascular inflammatory diseases,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, article 504, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. E. Ammirati, F. Moroni, M. Magnoni, and P. G. Camici, “The role of T and B cells in human atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 173–187, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Z. Mallat, A. Gojova, C. Marchiol-Fournigault et al., “Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling accelerates atherosclerosis and induces an unstable plaque phenotype in mice,” Circulation Research, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 930–934, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. I. Gotsman, N. Grabie, R. Gupta et al., “Impaired regulatory T-cell response and enhanced atherosclerosis in the absence of inducible costimulatory molecule,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 19, pp. 2047–2055, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. B. L. Loeys, U. Schwarze, T. Holm et al., “Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-β receptor,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 8, pp. 788–798, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. T. Santiago-Sim, S. Mathew-Joseph, H. Pannu et al., “Sequencing of TGF-beta pathway genes in familial cases of intracranial aneurysm,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1604–1611, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. Frösen, A. Piippo, A. Paetau et al., “Growth factor receptor expression and remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm walls: implications for biological therapy preventing rupture,” Neurosurgery, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 534–541, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. Tsiantoulas, A. P. Sage, Z. Mallat, and C. J. Binder, “Targeting B cells in atherosclerosis: closing the gap from bench to bedside,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 296–302, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. H. Ait-Oufella, O. Herbin, J.-D. Bouaziz et al., “B cell depletion reduces the development of atherosclerosis in mice,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 8, pp. 1579–1587, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. T. Kyaw, C. Tay, H. Hosseini et al., “Depletion of B2 but not B1a B cells in BAFF receptor-deficient ApoE mice attenuates atherosclerosis by potently ameliorating arterial inflammation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e29371, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. P. Sage, D. Tsiantoulas, L. Baker et al., “BAFF receptor deficiency reduces the development of atherosclerosis in mice–brief report,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1573–1576, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. T. Kyaw, C. Tay, A. Khan et al., “Conventional B2 B cell depletion ameliorates whereas its adoptive transfer aggravates atherosclerosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 7, pp. 4410–4419, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. Wang, X. Cheng, M.-X. Xiang et al., “IgE stimulates human and mouse arterial cell apoptosis and cytokine expression and promotes atherogenesis in Apoe-/- mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 3564–3577, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. P. T. Kovanen, M. Mänttäri, T. Palosuo, V. Manninen, and K. Aho, “Prediction of myocardial infarction in dyslipidemic men by elevated levels of immunoglobulin classes A, E, and G, but not M,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 158, no. 13, pp. 1434–1439, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. D. Tsiantoulas, C. J. Diehl, J. L. Witztum, and C. J. Binder, “B cells and humoral immunity in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1743–1756, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. S. Hörkkö, D. A. Bird, E. Miller et al., “Monoclonal autoantibodies specific for oxidized phospholipids or oxidized phospholipid-protein adducts inhibit macrophage uptake of oxidized low-density lipoproteins,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. P. X. Shaw, S. Hörkkö, M.-K. Chang et al., “Natural antibodies with the T15 idiotype may act in atherosclerosis, apoptotic clearance, and protective immunity,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1731–1740, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M.-Y. Chou, L. Fogelstrand, K. Hartvigsen et al., “Oxidation-specific epitopes are dominant targets of innate natural antibodies in mice and humans,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1335–1349, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. D. Kling, J. Fingerle, and J. M. Harlan, “Inhibition of leukocyte extravasation with a monoclonal antibody to CD18 during formation of experimental intimal thickening in rabbit carotid arteries,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 997–1007, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. M. W. Wakelin, M.-J. Sanz, A. Dewar et al., “An anti-platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 antibody inhibits leukocyte extravasation from mesenteric microvessels in vivo by blocking the passage through the basement membrane,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 229–239, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. N. Kutsuna, S. Yamazaki, T. Kaiga et al., “Chimeric acceleration by donor CD4+CD25+T-reg depleted fraction in splenocyte transplantation,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 133–138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. H. W. Kim, A. Murakami, M. V. Williams et al., “Mutagenicity of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as detected by co-culture of activated inflammatory leukocytes and AS52 cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 235–241, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  89. D. M. Hasan, K. B. Mahaney, R. D. Brown et al., “Aspirin as a promising agent for decreasing incidence of cerebral aneurysm rupture,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3156–3162, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 David M. Sawyer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.