Research Article

Inverse Relationship of the CMKLR1 Relative Expression and Chemerin Serum Levels in Obesity with Dysmetabolic Phenotype and Insulin Resistance

Table 1

Status of body fat storage in individuals in the study group.

Study groupLeanObesity without IRObesity with IR

BMI (kg/m2)[21.6 (18.5–24.7)][32.0 (30.1–34.7)][32.6 (30.2–34.9)]
493253

Measurement
Height (cm)166.0 8.4162.8 7.8163.8 9.0
Body weight (kg)60.0 9.990.1 12.897.3 18.9
Total body fat mass (%)20.3 5.940.3 6.840.6 6.9
Total body fat mass (kg) 12.0 3.636.6 8.839.8 12.4
Trunk body fat mass (%)23.8 10.638.1 11.435.4 10.5
Trunk body fat mass (kg)5.9 2.418.4 3.919.4 6.1
Waist circumference (cm) 78.3 6.6109.6 11.9113.7 13.2
Hip circumference (cm)93.3 4.8115.7 12.4118.8 10.8
Coronal abdominal diameter (cm)30.2 6.438.0 8.744.9 12.0
Sagittal abdominal diameter (cm)16.7 2.124.6 3.425.9 4.4
Total adipose area (cm2) 491.2 82.3967.9 216.61042.5 249.6
Visceral area (cm2)227.4 373.0292.7 516.4599.7 836.1
Subcutaneous abdominal area (cm2)314.2 324.0696.8 560.8562.6 908.7

BMI: body mass index [ (min–max)]. Data are shown in   ± SD. Difference versus lean. Difference versus obesity without IR. Difference versus obesity with IR (P < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey post hoc). IR: insulin resistance.