Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 4302412 | 9 pages |

Adiposity Measures and Plasma Adipokines in Females with Rheumatoid and Osteoarthritis

Academic Editor: Rosa E. Navarro-Hernandez
Received08 Jun 2017
Revised25 Sep 2017
Accepted02 Oct 2017
Published01 Nov 2017


The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between adipokines and adiposity in individuals with rheumatoid and osteoarthritis in the Atlantic PATH cohort. Using a nested case-control analysis, participants in the Atlantic PATH cohort with rheumatoid or osteoarthritis were matched for measures of adiposity with participants without a history of arthritis. Both measured and self-reported data were used to examine disease status, adiposity, and lifestyle factors. Immunoassays were used to measure plasma markers. BMI was positively correlated with percentage body fat, fat mass index (FMI), and a change in BMI from 18 years of age in all 3 groups. There were no statistical differences between levels of plasma adipokines; adiponectin levels were 6.6, 7.9, and 8.2 μg/ml, leptin levels were 10.3, 13.7, and 11.5 ng/ml, and resistin levels were 10.0, 12.1, and 10.8 ng/ml in participants without arthritis, with rheumatoid arthritis, and with osteoarthritis, respectively. Those with higher levels of adiponectin were more likely to have osteoarthritis (but not rheumatoid arthritis). No association was found between arthritis types and leptin or resistin. This study demonstrates differences in measures of adiposity and adipokines in specific types of arthritis and highlights the need for more research targeting specific adipokines during arthritic disease progression.

1. Introduction

Arthritis is a condition that affects joints and the surrounding tissues, causing chronic pain, limiting mobility, and contributing to disability. The Atlantic Provinces have some of the highest rates of arthritis in Canada; the overall prevalence of arthritis in Canada is approximately 16%, whereas Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick each report a prevalence of 25% [1].

Research suggests that there are nonmodifiable risk factors such as age, sex, and genetics that impact the risk of developing arthritis. For example, data from the Canadian Community Health Survey in 2014 indicated similar rates of individuals who report being diagnosed with arthritis at younger ages, but at 45 years of age, the prevalence of arthritis is higher in females than in males [1]. Modifiable risk factors including physical activity, diet, and maintaining a healthy body weight may also prevent disease progression, reduce pain, and improve movement [2].

Excess body weight is associated with many comorbidities that decrease lifespan, produce a substantial economic burden, and increase the risk of multiple chronic diseases. Similar to the high rates of arthritis, the percent of individuals that are obese in Atlantic Canada (24–30%) is well above the national average (20%) [3]. Meta-analyses have demonstrated a dose response in the prevalence of both rheumatoid and osteoarthritis with increasing body mass index (BMI) [47].

Earlier work suggested that a simple mechanical mechanism was responsible for the relationship between obesity and arthritis. But more recently, associations between obesity and non-weight-bearing joints suggest that the mechanism might be more complex, involving adipose-tissue-derived proteins that have immunomodulatory and bone remodeling properties [8]. In obesity, there are substantial changes in the inflammatory mediators (cytokines and adipokines) secreted from adipose tissue [9], which may regulate physiological actions in tissue and cells of the joints involved in arthritic disease progression [10, 11]. The adipokine known as adiponectin is generally considered anti-inflammatory, and circulating levels decrease with obesity. However, in the case of arthritis, adiponectin may act as a proinflammatory mediator by promoting the degradation of joint tissues [11, 12]. Thus, the complex relationship between these adipokines in arthritis is not yet fully understood and direct comparisons of adipokine levels in both lean and obese individuals with specific types of arthritis (osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid) are lacking. While rheumatoid arthritis has long been viewed as an inflammatory condition, more recently, we have started to understand that inflammatory mediators also play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of osteoarthritis [13, 14]. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the association between plasma adipokine levels in specific types of arthritis (rheumatoid and osteoarthritis) among a cohort of Atlantic Canadians.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population and Data Collection

Questionnaire data, physical measures, and biological samples were collected between 2009 and 2015 from participants aged 35 to 69 years that were residents of New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia, Canada. The questionnaires included data on sociodemographic, health, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Recruitment and data collection has been previously described [15]. All individuals provided written informed consent prior to participation. The original data and sample collection were approved by the Research Ethics Boards in each Atlantic Canadian province and the secondary analysis of biological samples was approved by the Dalhousie University Research Ethics Board (#2016-3884).

2.2. Assessment of Arthritis, Obesity, and Lifestyle Risk Factors

The prevalence of arthritis among Atlantic Canadians was derived from the self-reported incidence of arthritis in the Atlantic PATH cohort. Participants were asked to respond “yes” or “no” if a doctor had ever told them that they had arthritis. If yes, participants indicated the age at first diagnosis as well as the type of arthritis by checking: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, do not know, or other. In the current study, there were 30549 participants that provided data on ever being diagnosed with arthritis, and of those participants, anthropometric measures such as height and weight were provided by 24569 participants. As part of the questionnaire, participants were asked to self-report anthropometric data including height, weight, and waist and hip circumference measurements. Additionally, body composition (i.e., fat mass and fat-free mass) was measured by bioelectrical impedance, using a Tanita Segmental Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita BC-418), and standard anthropometric measures (height, weight, and hip and waist circumference) were collected by research nurses at assessment centres. Both self-reported and measured height, weight, and waist and hip circumference were used for calculating BMI and waist-to-hip ratios. BMI values were used to quantify the percent of Atlantic PATH participants who were underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese as defined by having a BMI of <18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25.0–29.9, or >30.0, respectively. Additional adiposity measures, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference are also useful to identify individuals at an increased risk of obesity-related comorbidities and were used as measures of body fat distribution in this study. The waist-to-hip ratio was set at >0.85 for women [16] and abdominal obesity was defined as having a waist circumference ≥ 88 cm for women [15, 16]. The fat mass index and fat-free mass index were calculated by dividing fat mass and fat-free mass by height in meters squared, respectively [17]. Questions related to lifestyle and behavior, including diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and education were assessed. Education was categorized as high school or lower, college level, and university level or higher. For smoking behavior, participants were asked if they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their life and if they answered no, they were classified as never smoked. If yes, participants further answered the question, at the present time, do you smoke cigarettes daily, occasionally (at least one in the past 30 days), or not at all (did not smoke at all in the past 30 days)? And they were classified as a current smoker (daily or in the past 30 days) or former smoker (has not smoked in the past 30 days). For alcohol consumption, participants were classified as an abstainer, occasional drinker (<3 times/month), regular drinker (1–3 times/week), and habitual drinker (4–7 times/week). For fruit and vegetable intake, total servings of fruit and vegetables consumed in a typical day were used.

2.3. Assessment of Physical Activity

Participants were asked to report their levels of physical activity using open-ended questions in the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ long form). Participants were asked to identify the frequency and duration of all vigorous, moderate, and walking PA (i.e., inclusive of occupational, domestic, and leisure time) within the last seven days. Each question defined the specific intensity and domain, as well as provided examples. Using the IPAQ guidelines for data processing and analyses, daily and weekly metabolic equivalents of a task (MET) values were calculated for each domain. Total score of PA in MET (minutes/week) were calculated by summing up all MET values across all domains. In accordance with the criteria of IPAQ scoring protocol, categorical PA score was defined as inactive, moderately active, and active.

2.4. Biological Samples

In addition to the questionnaire and physical measures data, a subgroup of 21160 participants provided biological samples. Blood samples were collected from participants via arm venipuncture into vacutainer tubes by a phlebotomist. For plasma samples, blood was collected in EDTA-containing tubes, inverted 8 times then stored at 4°C for transport. Samples were shipped on ice to a central processing facility where they were centrifuged at 1500 for 10 minutes at 4°C. Samples were processed within 24 hours of collection, then aliquoted into cryotubes and placed in −80°C freezers for long-term storage. Plasma levels of adipokines were measured by magnetic bead-based immunoassays; adiponectin was measured as a singleplex assay (171-A7003M, Bio-Rad Laboratories), whereas leptin and resistin were measured together in a multiplex assay (171-A7001M, Bio-Rad Laboratories). For measurements of adiponectin, samples were diluted 1 : 400, and for detection of leptin/resistin, samples were diluted 1 : 4. Data were acquired on the Bio-Plex MAGPIX and Bio-Plex 200 systems (Bio-Rad). The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were ≤10 and 15%, respectively. Data were analyzed in duplicate using the Bio-Plex Manger 6.0 software (Bio-Rad).

Since adipokine levels are influenced by obesity [9] and participants in the Atlantic PATH cohort with arthritis had higher reported measures of adiposity compared to those without arthritis (data not shown), we conducted a nested case-control study () of participants with rheumatoid, with osteoarthritis, or without arthritis that were matched for BMI (Table 1). Females were more likely than males to have arthritis, and arthritis was also increasingly prevalent with advancing age (data not shown). Thus, to simplify the analysis and avoid sex/age-based variations, the nested case-controlled analysis included only female Atlantic PATH participants over the age of 50 years who self-identified as being diagnosed with a specific type of arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid or osteoarthritis).

No arthritisRheumatoidOsteoarthritis

n (%)
Age group
 50–5949 (61.3)35 (43.8)36 (45.0)
 60–6931 (38.8)45 (56.3)44 (55.0)
 Nova Scotia43 (53.8)40 (50.0)38 (47.5)
 New Brunswick22 (27.5)15 (18.8)22 (27.5)
 Newfoundland and Labrador6 (7.5)20 (25.0)15 (18.8)
 Prince Edward Island9 (11.3)5 (6.3)5 (6.3)
 High school or less14 (17.5)20 (25.3)13 (16.3)
 College level24 (28.6)33 (41.8)27 (33.8)
 University level42 (52.5)26 (32.9)40 (50.0)
Smoking status
 Never40 (50.0)33 (41.3)38 (47.5)
 Former35 (43.8)42 (52.5)35 (43.8)
 Current5 (6.3)5 (6.3)7 (8.8)
Alcohol drinking
 Abstainer12 (15.0)15 (18.8)12 (15.0)
 Occasional drinker32 (40.0)36 (45.0)34 (42.5)
 Regular drinking23 (28.7)24 (30.0)18 (22.5)
 Habitual drinker13 (16.3)5 (6.3)16 (20.0)
Fruits & vegetables (five a day)57 (71.3)43 (53.8)46 (57.5)
Diabetes17 (3.8)25 (8.8)26 (7.6)
Hypertension3 (21.3)7 (32.1)6 (32.5)
BMI > 3040 (33.3)40 (33.3)40 (33.3)
Waist-to-hip ratioa53 (66.3)54 (67.5)52 (65.8)
Abdominal obesityb42 (52.5)54 (67.5)54 (68.4)
Physical activity levelc
 Inactive16 (20.0)22 (27.8)13 (16.3)
 Moderately active21 (26.3)20 (25.3)20 (25.0)
 Active43 (53.8)37 (46.8)47 (58.8)

Mean (SD)
Age57.7 (5.1)60.3 (5.6)59.7 (5.1)
Duration of arthritis (years)15.8 (15.7)$10.5 (10.0)
Height, cm166.0 (10.2)166.5 (8.7)165.1 (9.2)
Weight, kg78.9 (24.2)78.5 (20.3)77.3 (20.1)
Waist, cm87.3 (21.8)92.8 (15.8)92.4 (18.1)
Hips, cm99.7 (21.8)105.8 (14.7)105.0 (16.2)
Body mass index (BMI), kg/m228.5 (7.6)28.4 (7.6)28.5 (7.7)
Waist-to-hip ratio0.88 (0.1)0.88 (0.1)0.88 (0.1)
Percentage body fat, %32.7 (9.9)33.2 (11.2)33.6 (10.5)
Fat mass index, kg/m29.8 (5.5)9.9 (6.0)10.2 (6.0)
BMI at 18 years20.1 (4.3)19.8 (3.4)20.3 (4.1)
Change in BMI from 18 years5.0 (6.5)7.7 (6.2)5.5 (6.1)

aWaist-to-hip ratio > 0.85 for women; bwaist circumference ≥ 88 cm for women; cphysical activity levels: inactive was classified as not meeting guidelines, and moderately active and active were classified as meeting guidelines of 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Significant difference from no arthritis () as determined by Kruskal-Wallis test; $significant difference from osteoarthritis () as determined by Student’s t-test.
2.5. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are described as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables are described as means ± standard deviation. Data analyses were performed with SPSS (Version 22 IBM) and statistical significance was defined as . The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test for normal distribution of data. If normally distributed, groups were compared with ANOVA, and nonnormally distributed groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess correlations between different adiposity measures in participants without arthritis, with rheumatoid arthritis, or with osteoarthritis. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess adipokine concentrations as predictors of incidence of arthritis.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Participants

The participants in each of the arthritis groups were older compared to the group without arthritis. Lifestyle risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, education, fruit and vegetable intake, and physical activity level were similar between all three participant groups (Table 1). Participants in the case-controlled analysis not only were matched for BMI, but also had similar measures of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, percent body fat, FMI, BMI at 18 years, and a change in BMI from 18 years of age (Table 1).

Since the correlation between BMI and fat mass varies with age, sex, and disease condition such as rheumatoid cachexia [1820], we examined the correlation between measures of adiposity in each of the study groups. There was a significant correlation between several of the adiposity measures in participants without arthritis, with rheumatoid arthritis, and with osteoarthritis (Table 2). More specifically, BMI was positively correlated with percentage body fat, FMI, and change in BMI from 18 years of age. No significant association between BMI, waist circumference, or waist-to-hip ratio was found in any of the groups (Table 2). FMI was positively correlated with BMI, percent body fat, and a change in BMI from 18 years of age (Table 2) in all groups. Waist circumference was positively correlated with the waist-to-hip ratio in all groups. Waist-to-hip ratio was inversely correlated with BMI, percentage body fat, and FMI in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (Table 2).

Waist circumferenceBody mass index (BMI)Waist-to-hip ratioPercentage body fatFat mass indexChange in BMI from 18 years

No arthritis
Waist circumference
Body mass index (BMI)0.185
Waist-to-hip ratio0.244−0.079
Percentage body fat0.1640.755−0.065
Fat mass index0.1600.930−0.0570.903
Change in BMI from 18 years0.1450.7490.0030.3230.535
Rheumatoid arthritis
Waist circumference
Body mass index (BMI)−0.052
Waist-to-hip ratio0.5770.224
Percentage body fat−0.0490.7970.250
Fat mass index−0.1010.9000.2930.931
Change in BMI from 18 years−0.1360.7930.0800.2680.481
Waist circumference
Body mass index (BMI)0.179
Waist-to-hip ratio0.6930.061
Percentage body fat0.0850.807−0.011
Fat mass index0.1480.9520.0370.935
Change in BMI from 18 years0.1280.7470.0870.3650.561

Significance at .
3.2. Plasma Adipocytokine Levels

Plasma adiponectin levels were 7.9, 8.2, and 6.6 μg/ml in participants with rheumatoid, with osteoarthritis, and without arthritis, respectively (, ) (Figure 1(a)). Plasma leptin levels were 13.7, 11.5, and 10.3 ng/ml in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, with osteoarthritis, and without arthritis, respectively (, ) (Figure 1(b)). Plasma resistin levels were 12.1, 10.8, and 10.0 ng/ml in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, with osteoarthritis, and without arthritis, respectively (, ) (Figure 1(c)).

Logistic regression analysis found no significant association between adipokines and rheumatoid arthritis (Table 3). In contrast, plasma adiponectin levels were significantly associated with osteoarthritis (Table 4). This relationship remained after adjusting for age, education, smoking, alcohol use, and fruit and vegetable consumption (Table 4). There was no association between plasma leptin or resistin levels and osteoarthritis (Table 4).

Odds ratio (95% CIs) value

Unadjusted1.059 (0.990–1.133)0.096
Model 11.059 (0.989–1.135)0.100
Model 21.048 (0.977–1.125)0.188
Unadjusted1.020 (0.994–1.047)0.128
Model 11.016 (0.990–1.042)0.222
Model 21.015 (0.989–1.041)0.252
Unadjusted1.041 (0.994–1.090)0.092
Model 11.038 (0.990–1.087)0.123
Model 21.042 (0.991–1.096)0.109

Model 1: adjusted for age; model 2: adjusted for age, education, smoking, alcohol use, and fruit and vegetable intake.

Odds ratio (95% CIs) value

Unadjusted1.071 (1.002–1.145)0.042
Model 11.072 (1.002–1.147)0.045
Model 21.072 (1.001–1.148)0.045
Unadjusted1.009 (0.994–1.037)0.519
Model 11.005 (0.978–1.033)0.709
Model 21.005 (0.978–1.028)0.731
Unadjusted1.021 (0.973–1.073)0.396
Model 11.018 (0.970–1.070)0.467
Model 21.022 (0.971–1.076)0.402

Model 1: adjusted for age; model 2: adjusted for age, education, smoking, alcohol use, and fruit and vegetable intake.

4. Discussion

Arthritis is among the most commonly reported chronic conditions in Canada and although associations with BMI have been reported, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood. This study demonstrates a significant association between several measures of adiposity (BMI, percent body fat, and FMI) in female participants with arthritis and shows that of several adipokines assessed, only adiponectin was associated with a specific type of arthritis.

Previous studies have reported that only 24% of women with arthritis have a BMI ≥ 30.0 [6], whereas a higher prevalence of participants with arthritis (38%) had a BMI in the obese range in the Atlantic PATH cohort (data not shown). Although, with the ever increasing obese population [3] and increased incidence of arthritis in those over the age of 45–55 years [21], the prevalence in the current cohort may not be all that surprising. Several others have reported a higher incidence of arthritis in those with increasing BMI [4, 7, 22, 23]. However, BMI is not the only measure associated with excess body weight. Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and percent body fat/fat mass are also commonly associated with the metabolic complications of obesity [2426]. Some studies have attempted to include more than one variable [2730]; however, there is a lack of research directly comparing these distinct measures of adiposity in individuals with different types of arthritis. The results of the current study show a strong association between different measures of adiposity such as BMI, percent body fat, FMI, and a change in BMI from 18 years of age in participants without arthritis and those with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. BMI at 18 years of age has been shown to be a strong predictor of obesity in adulthood, and gain in BMI has been associated with increased risk of disease (e.g., diabetes and hypertension, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis) [3133].

Similar to our results, a significant association has been reported between BMI and percent fat mass, as well as the correlation between percent fat mass and waist-to-hip ratio [28]. Likewise, percent body fat and FMI were reported to be significantly higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to controls [34]. Previous research suggests that BMI and percent body fat are associated with osteoarthritis of the hand, knee, and hip in both sexes [2830]. In addition, an association with the waist-to-hip ratio in patients with hand osteoarthritis has been documented [28]. We did not observe a significant association in waist-to-hip ratio and other adiposity measures in participants with either form of arthritis or without arthritis; however, we were not able to differentiate between the location of arthritis in the current study. Adiposity measurements in relationship to specific locations of arthritic joints may be considered in future research.

The relationship linking arthritis and obesity is complex and additional investigation is needed to better understand the complex pathophysiology of the disease. Obesity is a state of chronic low-grade inflammation and it is possible that the deterioration and loss of cartilage in arthritis may be due to an imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines that result in catabolic effects on cartilage [911, 35]. Recent reports suggest that factors secreted directly from the adipose tissue, adipokines, may be involved in the inflammatory process, as well as cartilage and bone remodeling [8]. Thus, we examined the relationship between systemic markers (such as adipokines) and arthritis in obese individuals with specific types of arthritis.

Previous research into the molecular causes of rheumatoid arthritis has shown mixed results with some studies reporting no difference or increased levels of adiponectin in those with rheumatoid arthritis compared to those without [36]. Although we observed slightly higher levels of both adiponectin and leptin in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, no significant association was found. In contrast, a meta-analysis of 6 prospective cohort studies showed that leptin levels were higher in rheumatoid patients with higher disease activity [37]. Interestingly, the duration of rheumatoid arthritis ranged from 14 months to 17 years and leptin levels were highest in those with the shortest duration of disease. Although we did not measure disease activity in the current study, the average duration of rheumatoid arthritis among participants was almost 16 years. Yoshino et al. examined the same 3 adipokines as the current study and reported both higher levels of leptin and adiponectin in females with rheumatoid arthritis but similar levels of resistin [38]. Importantly, the abovementioned study reported differences of adipokines levels between sexes and was examining a population with an average BMI within the normal range. These distinctions between participants and studies may be important when considering what types of adipokines may be potential therapeutic targets in the future.

Much of the previous research in osteoarthritis suggested higher circulating adipokine levels in osteoarthritis patients [3944], and although we observed higher adiponectin and leptin levels in participants with osteoarthritis, only adiponectin resulted in a significant association with osteoarthritis. It is worth noting that the extent of osteoarthritis may influence adipokine levels as associations with adipokines and grading or severity of disease have been documented [12, 40, 42]. One study which examined adiponectin, leptin, and resistin found that all 3 adipokines were elevated in those with osteoarthritis; however, these patients all had severe osteoarthritis and were significantly older than control participants [42]. In addition, the location of osteoarthritis may also be worth considering when reporting inflammatory mediators. For example, higher IL6 were reported in both the synovial fluid and serum of patients with hip osteoarthritis, whereas serum leptin levels have been reported to be higher in patients with knee osteoarthritis [45]. A limitation of the current study is that no data on the location site of arthritis was collected. Perhaps different cytokines and adipokines are distinct at various locations and stages of the disease process. Furthermore, adipokines may be more predictive as markers when combined with other established biomarkers of osteoarthritis or inflammatory mediators involved in cartilage degradation. For instance, adiponectin levels have been shown to correlate with inflammatory mediators as well as enhance the secretion of inflammatory mediators from cultured cartilage [12, 46].

A strength of the current study is that multiple measures of obesity including BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and body composition were utilized to assess adiposity. In addition, blood samples and objectively measured anthropometric variables on the majority of participants in the Atlantic PATH cohort are also major strengths. As with any self-reported data, there are disadvantages, including issues related to participant recall of disease and other health and lifestyle factors. The Atlantic PATH data was limited to the self-report of the disease history, age of diagnosis, type of arthritis, and there was no site-specific information provided. Site-specific arthritis may be considered for future studies as a high BMI has been associated with an increased odds ratio of osteoarthritis of the knee and hand but not the hip [47]. As well, pharmacological management of arthritis was not taken into account prior to examining the nested case-control sample. Accordingly, future research should explore the use of medications that may influence plasma adipokines levels in these populations. Furthermore, previous research has demonstrated that measurement of cytokine levels in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis may be augmented by interfering factors such as rheumatoid factor [48, 49]; however, similar to previous cytokine research, not all adipokines may be influenced by such factors [50]. Rheumatoid factor was not measured in the current study, but further investigation into the potential interference of rheumatoid factor and other heterophilic antibodies with multiplex immunoassays should be considered for future work in this area.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the current nested case-control study examined the levels of adipokines in female participants with arthritis and obesity from a region of Canada that has particularly high levels of the two diseases. The findings demonstrated a significant correlation between various types of adiposity measures in participants with rheumatoid and osteoarthritis. Adipokines adiponectin, leptin, and resistin were analyzed in all groups; however, the only association was observed with adiponectin and those with osteoarthritis. Future research should focus on the complex relationship between adipokines and arthritis in obese individuals with specific types of arthritis, precisely how these levels change over time with disease progression. The Atlantic PATH cohort is intended to be longitudinal and data on participants will be collected for up to 30 years, opening the door for further exploration into the complex relationship between obesity and arthritis.


The views expressed herein represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and Health Canada. The authors would like to acknowledge all the Atlantic PATH participants who donated their time, personal health history, and biological samples to this project as well as the Atlantic PATH team members for the data collection, capturing, and coding.


  1. Statistics Canada, “Arthritis 2014,” 2015, July 2017, View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. K. Vincent, K. Heywood, J. Connelly, and R. W. Hurley, “Obesity and weight loss in the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis,” PM&R, vol. 4, Supplement 5, pp. S59–S67, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Statistics Canada, Overweight and Obese Adults (Self-Reported), 2014, 2015, July 2017,
  4. B. Qin, M. Yang, H. Fu et al., “Body mass index and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 17, p. 86, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Z. Y. Zhou, Y. K. Liu, H. L. Chen, and F. Liu, “Body mass index and knee osteoarthritis risk: a dose-response meta-analysis,” Obesity, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 2180–2185, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Jiang, Y. Chen, D. Manuel, H. Morrison, Y. Mao, and Obesity Working Group, “Quantifying the impact of obesity category on major chronic diseases in Canada,” Scientific World Journal, vol. 7, pp. 1211–1221, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Reyes, K. M. Leyland, G. Peat, C. Cooper, N. K. Arden, and D. Prieto-Alhambra, “Association between overweight and obesity and risk of clinically diagnosed knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1869–1875, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Neumann, S. Junker, G. Schett, K. Frommer, and U. Muller-Ladner, “Adipokines in bone disease,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 296–302, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. C. DeClercq, J. S. Goldsby, D. N. McMurray, and R. S. Chapkin, “Distinct adipose depots from mice differentially respond to a high-fat, high-salt diet,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 146, no. 6, pp. 1189–1196, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Thijssen, A. van Caam, and P. M. van der Kraan, “Obesity and osteoarthritis, more than just wear and tear: pivotal roles for inflamed adipose tissue and dyslipidaemia in obesity-induced osteoarthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 588–600, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Gomez, J. Conde, M. Scotece, J. J. Gomez-Reino, F. Lago, and O. Gualillo, “What’s new in our understanding of the role of adipokines in rheumatic diseases?” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 528–536, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Koskinen, S. Juslin, R. Nieminen, T. Moilanen, K. Vuolteenaho, and E. Moilanen, “Adiponectin associates with markers of cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis and induces production of proinflammatory and catabolic factors through mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 6, article R184, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Berenbaum, “Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!),” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. C. Boissier, L. Semerano, S. Challal, N. Saidenberg-Kermanac'h, and G. Falgarone, “Rheumatoid arthritis: from autoimmunity to synovitis and joint destruction,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. M. Yu, L. Parker, and T. J. Dummer, “Depressive symptoms, diet quality, physical activity, and body composition among populations in Nova Scotia, Canada: report from the Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow’s Health,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 61, pp. 106–113, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. M. Grundy, J. I. Cleeman, S. R. Daniels et al., “Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 17, pp. 2735–2752, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. Schutz, U. U. Kyle, and C. Pichard, “Fat-free mass index and fat mass index percentiles in Caucasians aged 18-98 y,” International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 953–960, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Romero-Corral, V. K. Somers, J. Sierra-Johnson et al., “Accuracy of body mass index in diagnosing obesity in the adult general population,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 32, pp. 959–966, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Q. Nuttall, “Body mass index: obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review,” Nutrition Today, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 117–128, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. C. Elkan, I. L. Engvall, T. Cederholm, and I. Hafstrom, “Rheumatoid cachexia, central obesity and malnutrition in patients with low-active rheumatoid arthritis: feasibility of anthropometry, mini nutritional assessment and body composition techniques,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 315–322, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. W. Omariba, “Gender differences in functional limitations among Canadians with arthritis: the role of disease duration and comorbidity,” Health Reports, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 7–14, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. B. Jarvholm, S. Lewold, H. Malchau, and E. Vingard, “Age, bodyweight, smoking habits and the risk of severe osteoarthritis in the hip and knee in men,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 537–542, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. L. Holliday, D. F. McWilliams, R. A. Maciewicz, K. R. Muir, W. Zhang, and M. Doherty, “Lifetime body mass index, other anthropometric measures of obesity and risk of knee or hip osteoarthritis in the GOAL case-control study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Bennasar-Veny, A. A. Lopez-Gonzalez, P. Tauler et al., “Body adiposity index and cardiovascular health risk factors in Caucasians: a comparison with the body mass index and others,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, article e63999, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. M. Lee, R. R. Huxley, R. P. Wildman, and M. Woodward, “Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 646–653, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Bosy-Westphal, C. Geisler, S. Onur et al., “Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 475–483, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, G. S. Metsios, Y. Koutedakis et al., “Redefining overweight and obesity in rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1316–1321, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. W. Visser, A. Ioan-Facsinay, R. de Mutsert et al., “Adiposity and hand osteoarthritis: the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 16, article R19, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. K. Karlsson, H. Magnusson, M. C. Coster, T. Vonschewelov, C. Karlsson, and B. E. Rosengren, “Patients with hip osteoarthritis have a phenotype with high bone mass and low lean body mass,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 472, no. 4, pp. 1224–1229, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. K. Karlsson, H. Magnusson, M. Coster, C. Karlsson, and B. E. Rosengren, “Patients with knee osteoarthritis have a phenotype with higher bone mass, higher fat mass, and lower lean body mass,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 473, no. 1, pp. 258–264, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. K. Friedenberg, D. M. Tang, V. Vanar, and T. Mendonca, “Predictive value of body mass index at age 18 on adulthood obesity: results of a prospective survey of an urban population,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 342, no. 5, pp. 371–382, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. W. Karlson, L. A. Mandl, G. N. Aweh, O. Sangha, M. H. Liang, and F. Grodstein, “Total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis: the importance of age, obesity, and other modifiable risk factors,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Lu, L. T. Hiraki, J. A. Sparks et al., “Being overweight or obese and risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis among women: a prospective cohort study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1914–1922, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. H. Dao, Q. T. Do, and J. Sakamoto, “Abnormal body composition phenotypes in Vietnamese women with early rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1250–1258, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Kapoor, J. Martel-Pelletier, D. Lajeunesse, J. P. Pelletier, and H. Fahmi, “Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. H. Lee and S. C. Bae, “Circulating adiponectin and visfatin levels in rheumatoid arthritis and their correlation with disease activity: a meta-analysis,” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Cao, J. Lin, W. Chen, G. Xu, and C. Sun, “Baseline adiponectin and leptin levels in predicting an increased risk of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and systematic review,” Autoimmunity, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 547–553, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. Yoshino, N. Kusunoki, N. Tanaka et al., “Elevated serum levels of resistin, leptin, and adiponectin are associated with C-reactive protein and also other clinical conditions in rheumatoid arthritis,” Internal Medicine, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 269–275, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. B. Laurberg, J. Frystyk, T. Ellingsen et al., “Plasma adiponectin in patients with active, early, and chronic rheumatoid arthritis who are steroid- and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive compared with patients with osteoarthritis and controls,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1885–1891, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Filkova, M. Liskova, H. Hulejova et al., “Increased serum adiponectin levels in female patients with erosive compared with non-erosive osteoarthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 295-296, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Senolt, K. Pavelka, D. Housa, and M. Haluzik, “Increased adiponectin is negatively linked to the local inflammatory process in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Cytokine, vol. 35, no. 5-6, pp. 247–252, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. N. de Boer, W. E. van Spil, A. M. Huisman et al., “Serum adipokines in osteoarthritis; comparison with controls and relationship with local parameters of synovial inflammation and cartilage damage,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 846–853, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. Zhang, Z. H. Zhong, H. T. Yu, and B. Liu, “Significance of increased leptin expression in osteoarthritis patients,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 4, article e0123224, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. X. C. Li, F. Tian, and F. Wang, “Clinical significance of resistin expression in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 208016, 11 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Bas, A. Finckh, G. J. Puskas et al., “Adipokines correlate with pain in lower limb osteoarthritis: different associations in hip and knee,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2577–2583, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Lago, R. Gomez, M. Otero et al., “A new player in cartilage homeostasis: adiponectin induces nitric oxide synthase type II and pro-inflammatory cytokines in chondrocytes,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1101–1109, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Grotle, K. B. Hagen, B. Natvig, F. A. Dahl, and T. K. Kvien, “Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand: an epidemiological study in the general population with 10 years follow-up,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9, p. 132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. J. Todd, N. Knowlton, M. Amato et al., “Erroneous augmentation of multiplex assay measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis due to heterophilic binding by serum rheumatoid factor,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 894–903, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. M. Churchman, J. Geiler, R. Parmar et al., “Multiplexing immunoassays for cytokine detection in the serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: lack of sensitivity and interference by rheumatoid factor,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 534–542, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. Meyer, J. Sellam, S. Fellahi et al., “Serum level of adiponectin is a surrogate independent biomarker of radiographic disease progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 15, no. 6, article R210, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Vanessa DeClercq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

701 Views | 213 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder