Immune Checkpoint Receptors Tim-3 and PD-1 Regulate Monocyte and T Lymphocyte Function in Septic Patients

Xia, Qi; Wei, Li; Zhang, Yuntao; Sheng, Jifang; Wu, Wei; Zhang, Yi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1632902

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 1632902 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1632902

Immune Checkpoint Receptors Tim-3 and PD-1 Regulate Monocyte and T Lymphocyte Function in Septic Patients

Qi Xia,¹Li Wei,¹Yuntao Zhang,²Jifang Sheng,¹Wei Wu,¹and Yi Zhang^3,4

Academic Editor: Mirella Giovarelli

Received03 Apr 2018

Revised18 Sept 2018

Accepted27 Sept 2018

Published22 Nov 2018

Abstract

We aim to investigate the effects of Tim-3 and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) on the monocytes and T lymphocytes in septic patients. Expression of Tim-3 and PD-1 on the CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes and monocytes was determined using flow cytometry. CBA technique was utilized to determine the expression of cytokines in the lymphocyte supernatant in addition to the IL-10 and TNF-α positivity in monocytes in the presence of Tim-3 and/or PD-1 receptor blockade. Compared with the normal control, significant elevation was observed in the expression of PD-1 on CD3 (), CD4, and CD8 monocytes. Blockade of the Tim-3 signaling pathway contributed to the significant elevation of IL-10 and TNF-α in the supernatant of T lymphocytes in the septic patients, while the PD-1 signaling pathway blockade only triggered the obvious elevation of TNF-α in the T lymphocytes. Blockade of Tim-3 and PD-1 induced the positivity of IL-10- and TNF-α-expressing cells in the peripheral monocytes. Significant changes were noticed in the Tim-3 and PD-1 in the T lymphocytes and monocytes. Blockade of Tim-3 and PD-1 contributed to the function of lymphocytes and monocytes. In the septic process, Tim-3 and PD-1 played crucial roles in the immune response of T lymphocytes and monocytes.

1. Introduction

Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [1], is still a challenge as it is one of the leading causes for mortality in ICU despite the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of such disease [2–5]. To date, extensive studies have been performed to investigate the pathogenesis of sepsis which are aimed at facilitating the diagnosis and treatment, as well as improving the survival rates. Among these studies, the immunological function of human body is considered to play crucial roles in the sepsis [1, 4–6]. Besides, even the survivors after sepsis also showed severe immune suppression in a long time [7]. Thus, the immunosuppression in septic patients, especially these with functional defect of T lymphocytes and monocytes, has been considered as a new hot topic in the field of sepsis [8, 9].

T cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) are two important regulatory molecules in cell-mediated immunity that are expressed in various immune cells, including T lymphocytes and monocytes [10, 11]. In the previous description, Tim-3 and PD-1 have been reported to be closely involved in the pathogenesis of tumor, autoimmune diseases, and chronic viral diseases [11–17]. These two factors also mediated the functional failure of T lymphocytes, and several studies have been carried out to determine their roles in sepsis; however, the exact mechanisms are still not well defined [18].

In this study, we aim to investigate the expression of Tim-3 and PD-1 in T lymphocytes and monocytes of the peripheral blood in septic patients. Besides, their roles in mediating immune response were determined.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Twenty-three septic patients admitted in the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2017 to July 2017 were included in this study. Diagnosis of sepsis was based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Besides, 20 healthy individuals recruited from the Physical Examination Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University during the same time period served as normal control. The exclusion criteria were as follows: those aged < 18 years, with a history of autoimmune diseases, a recent infection within 6 months, cancer, and pregnancy, as well as a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Blood samples were collected within 24 hrs after confirmation of sepsis. The demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects are summarized in Table 1. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. The study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang University.

2.2. Flow Cytometry

To determine the frequency of distinct leukocyte subpopulations, heparinized blood was lysed using TQ-Prep (Beckman Coulter), followed by staining with antibodies against CD3-Pacific Blue, CD4-FITC, CD8-PECy7, TIM-3-APC, PD-1-PE (BD Bioscience), as well as evaluating using flow cytometry (Canto-II, BD). Gating strategy of different immune cell populations was shown in Figure 1. The frequencies of granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes within the leukocyte population were determined based on their FSC-SSC profile. Isotype-matched immunoglobulins served as control.

(a)

(b)

(c)

2.3. Measurement of Plasma Cytokine Levels

The concentrations of serum IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10, were determined from each subject using a cytometric bead array (CBA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the tests were performed at least in triplicate.

2.4. Intracelluar Cytokine Assays

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from subjects were stimulated with Dynabeads Human T-Activator CD3/CD28 (Dynal, Invitrogen) for 6 hrs. CD3/28 beads served as the stimulator for the lymphocytes in PBMCs, and the supernatant was utilized to detect the lymphatic function. LPS served as the stimulator for monocytes in PBMCs and was used to detect their function. Then, monensin (1.7 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to inhibit cytokine secretion. The cells were stained with anti-CD3 or anti-CD14 for 20 min at 4°C, followed by fixation and permeabilization. The cells were then stained with anti-TNF-α-PE, anti-IL-10-PE, or isotype control for 30 min at room temperature, followed by flow cytometry.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number (percentage). The difference of independent data between two groups was analyzed by the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test. Chi-square test was utilized for the comparison of gender structure between the patients and normal control. One-way ANOVA test was used for the comparison between the age of patients and normal control. A two-sided value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

3. Results

3.1. Number of White Blood Cell, Lymphocytes, and Monocytes in the Peripheral Blood in Septic Patients

Table 1 showed the number of white blood cell, lymphocytes, and monocyte in the peripheral blood in septic patients. Compared with the normal control, the number of white blood cell showed significant elevation in the septic patients (), whereas the absolute number and percentage of lymphocytes showed significant decrease in the septic cases (). No statistical differences were noticed in the monocytes in the septic patients compared with that of the normal control ().

3.2. Expression of Tim-3 on the T Lymphocytes and Monocytes in Septic Patients

Flow cytometry indicated that significant increase was noticed in the expression of Tim-3 on the CD3+ (), CD3+CD4+ (), and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes () in the septic patients compared with that of the control group (Figure 1(b)). Compared to the lymphocytes, the expression of Tim-3 on the CD14+16+ monocytes showed significant decrease (). The expression of Tim-3 on the CD14+ monocytes and CD14+16− monocyte subpopulation showed no statistical differences compared with those of the control group (, Figure 2(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 on the Expression of T Lymphocytes and Monocytes in Septic Patients

The expression of PD-1 on the CD3+ lymphocytes (), CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes (), and CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes () showed significant increase compared to the control (Figure 1(c)). Besides, the expression of PD-1 on the CD14+16+ monocytes showed significant increase compared to that of the normal control (, Figure 2(b)). For the PD-1-related ligands, the expression of PD-L1 showed significant increase in the monocytes in septic patients compared with that of the normal control (); however, no statistical differences were noticed in the expression of PD-L2 in the monocytes between the two groups (, Figure 2(c)).

3.4. Blockade of the TIM-3 and PD-1 Signaling Pathway Contributed to T Lymphocyte Expression of Cytokines

We determined the expression of IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in the supernatants in the following sets: subject to no simulation, bead, bead plus PD-1 antibody blockade, bead plus Tim-3 antibody blockade, bead plus PD-1 antibody, and Tim-3 antibody blockade, respectively. Tim-3 antibody blocking may induce significant increase of TNF-α and IL-10 in the T lymphocytes after stimulating with bead. However, in the presence of PD-1 antibody blockade, only the serum TNF-α showed elevation and the other cytokines showed no changes in secretion (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.5. Blockade of the Tim-3 and PD-1 Signaling Pathway Triggered Increase of Monocytes Secreting IL-10 and TNF-α in Septic Patients

In this section, we determined the expression of IL-10- and TNF-expressing monocytes in the absence of stimulation, in the presence of LPS stimulation, LPS stimulation and PD-1 antibody blockade, LPS stimulation and Tim-3 antibody blockade, and LPS stimulation and PD-1 and Tim-3 antibody blockade. Our data showed that the proportion of IL-10- and TNF-α-secreting monocytes increases in the presence of LPS stimulation after PD-1 and Tim-3 antibody blockade (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).

3.6. Measurement of Serum Cytokines

In this section, we determined the IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in the peripheral blood in patients and normal control. Compared with the normal control, the serum IL-6 (), IL-10 (), and TNF-α () showed significant increase in the septic patients (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Immune functional imbalance plays a pivotal role in the T lymphocyte and monocyte dysfunction in septic patients [5]. Moreover, it is the major cause for the opportunistic infection and secondary infection in these patients. In this study, we found that the expression of Tim-3 and PD-1 showed significant changes in the T lymphocytes and monocytes in the peripheral blood in septic patients. Besides, blockade of Tim-3 and PD-1 signaling pathways contributed to the recovery of cytokine secretion.

The regulation of Tim-3 was modulated by environmental factors, and the upregulation of Tim-3 expression was associated with the proliferation, apoptosis, and functional failure of the lymphocytes [17, 19, 20]. Our previous studies showed that the Tim-3 expression on peripheral T cell subsets was correlated with disease progression in hepatitis B infection and blockade of Tim-3 signaling could restore the virus-specific CD8+ T cell response [13, 14]. In vitro experiments showed that Tim-3 antibody blockade involved in regulating the secretion of TNF-α and IFN-γ. In this study, we found that the expression of Tim-3 in the peripheral blood in septic patients showed significant elevation and the number of lymphocyte count showed significant decrease in these patients compared with that of the normal control. This, together with our previous description [13], indicated that blockade of the Tim-3 signaling pathway promoted the proliferation of T lymphocytes. On this basis, we considered that the high expression of Tim-3 on the lymphocytes may be associated with the apoptosis of the T lymphocytes, which may further trigger in the decrease of lymphocytes.

According to our previous description, the decreased Tim-3 expression was associated with functional abnormalities of monocytes in decompensated cirrhosis without overt bacterial infection. Besides, the endotoxin may induce the downregulation of Tim-3 on the monocytes. Zhang et al. reported that the expression of Tim-3 on the monocytes was downregulated after the activation of Toll-like receptors in the monocytes [21], which may be related to the infection, elevation of endotoxin, and massive activation of Toll-like receptors [21]. The monocytes could be divided into various subsets according to the expression of CD16. The CD14+CD16+ monocytes were closely related to the immune response, and its number showed significant increase in the septic patients [22, 23]. Our data showed that the decrease of Tim-3 was only in the CD14+CD16+ monocytes, while no significant changes were noticed in the expression of CD14⁺CD16⁻ monocytes. On this basis, we speculated that Tim-3 was mainly involved in the regulation of CD16+ monocytes during the pathogenesis of sepsis.

PD-1 is mainly responsible for the maintenance of immune balance through inhibiting the aggressive immune responses. PD-1 could induce T cell exhaustion and downregulate the proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes as well as the cytokines. Also, the proliferation of T lymphocytes showed significant increase after PD-1 blockade [24]. In animal models, PD-1 antibody could attenuate the decrease of white blood cell count in septic patients and inhibit the apoptosis of lymphocytes, which then improved the survival rates [9, 25, 26]. PD-L1 and PD-L2 are the two forms of PD-1 receptors, which show difference in the structure and function. Among these two forms, PD-L1 played important roles. Our data showed the PD-1 expression on the T lymphocytes, and CD14+CD16+ monocytes showed significant increase in the septic patients together with the PD-L1 on the CD14+CD16+ monocytes compared to those of the normal control. Therefore, it was reasonable to speculate that PD-1 may involve in the regulation of T lymphocytes and monocytes in septic patients, especially in the regulation of CD16+ monocytes that were closely related to the inflammation.

In this study, we firstly investigated the secretion of T lymphocytes and monocytes in septic patients through Tim-3 and PD-1 antibody blockade in vitro. Our data showed that the secretion of IL-10 and TNF-α in the T lymphocytes increased after Tim-3 antibody blockade, while PD-1 blockade enhanced the secretion of TNF-α by T lymphocytes. The other cytokines showed no statistical differences after blockade. After Tim-3 and PD-1 antibody blockade, the IL-10- and TNF-α-secreting monocytes showed increase in number in the peripheral blood in septic patients. This implied that Tim-3 and PD-1 blockade contributed to the recovery of secretion function of lymphocytes and monocytes in different ways. Interestingly, simultaneous blockade of these two signaling pathways caused no significant increase in the secretion function compared with single blockade of Tim-3 or PD-1. We hypothesized that there was redundant overlap between Tim-3 and PD-1 signaling pathways. Therefore, simultaneous blockade of both pathways triggered no significant net efficacy than blockade of either alone. In the future, further studies are required to investigate the exact potential mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, Tim-3 and PD-1 played crucial roles in regulating the immune responses of monocytes and T lymphocytes in septic patients. In the near future, these two molecules may serve as potential targets for the immunotherapy of sepsis.

Data Availability

The dataset generated during this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

QX carried out the flow cytometric analysis, participated in the design of the study, and helped in drafting the manuscript. LW carried out the cell isolation and cytokine measurements, participated in the design of the study, and helped in drafting the manuscript. YZ and JS analyzed and interpreted the results and revised the manuscript. WW participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript. YZ conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Qi Xia and Li Wei contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81671949 and 81670567) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (no. LY16H150003).

References

M. Singer, C. S. Deutschman, C. W. Seymour et al., “The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3),” JAMA, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 801–810, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Vincent, J. C. Marshall, S. A. Namendys-Silva et al., “Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit,” The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 380–386, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Fleischmann, A. Scherag, N. K. Adhikari et al., “Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 259–272, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Patil, J. K. Bohannon, and E. R. Sherwood, “Immunotherapy: a promising approach to reverse sepsis-induced immunosuppression,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 111, pp. 688–702, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Hutchins, J. Unsinger, R. S. Hotchkiss, and A. Ayala, “The new normal: immunomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 224–233, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Hotchkiss, G. Monneret, and D. Payen, “Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 260–268, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Arens, S. A. Bajwa, C. Koch et al., “Sepsis-induced long-term immune paralysis – results of a descriptive, explorative study,” Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 93, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Guignant, A. Lepape, X. Huang et al., “Programmed death-1 levels correlate with increased mortality, nosocomial infection and immune dysfunctions in septic shock patients,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 2, p. R99, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, J. Li, J. Lou et al., “Upregulation of programmed death-1 on T cells and programmed death ligand-1 on monocytes in septic shock patients,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 1, p. R70, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Anderson, D. E. Anderson, L. Bregoli et al., “Promotion of tissue inflammation by the immune receptor Tim-3 expressed on innate immune cells,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5853, pp. 1141–1143, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Keir, M. J. Butte, G. J. Freeman, and A. H. Sharpe, “PD-1 and Its ligands in tolerance and immunity,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 677–704, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Rabinovich and J. R. Conejo-Garcia, “Shaping the immune landscape in cancer by galectin-driven regulatory pathways,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 428, no. 16, pp. 3266–3281, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wu, Y. Shi, S. Li et al., “Blockade of Tim-3 signaling restores the virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response in patients with chronic hepatitis B,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1180–1191, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wu, Y. Shi, J. Li, F. Chen, Z. Chen, and M. Zheng, “Tim-3 expression on peripheral T cell subsets correlates with disease progression in hepatitis B infection,” Virology Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 113, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Peng, S. Li, W. Wu, X. Tan, Y. Chen, and Z. Chen, “PD-1 upregulation is associated with HBV-specific T cell dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B patients,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 963–970, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Vilgelm, D. B. Johnson, and A. Richmond, “Combinatorial approach to cancer immunotherapy: strength in numbers,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 275–290, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhu, A. C. Anderson, and V. K. Kuchroo, “TIM-3 and its regulatory role in immune responses,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 350, pp. 1–15, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Monneret, M. Gossez, and F. Venet, “Sepsis in PD-1 light,” Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 186, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Ferris, B. Lu, and L. P. Kane, “Too much of a good thing? Tim-3 and TCR signaling in T cell exhaustion,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 193, no. 4, pp. 1525–1530, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Boomer, J. Shuherk-Shaffer, R. S. Hotchkiss, and J. M. Green, “A prospective analysis of lymphocyte phenotype and function over the course of acute sepsis,” Critical Care, vol. 16, no. 3, p. R112, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, C. J. Ma, J. M. Wang et al., “Tim-3 regulates pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine expression in human CD14+ monocytes,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Fingerle-Rowson, J. Auers, E. Kreuzer, P. Fraunberger, M. Blumenstein, and L. H. W. Zeegler-Heitbrock, “Expansion of CD14⁺CD16⁺ monocytes in critically ill cardiac surgery patients,” Inflammation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 367–379, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Fingerle, A. Pforte, B. Passlick, M. Blumenstein, M. Strobel, and H. W. Ziegler-Heitbrock, “The novel subset of CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes is expanded in sepsis patients,” Blood, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 3170–3176, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ghiotto, L. Gauthier, N. Serriari et al., “PD-L1 and PD-L2 differ in their molecular mechanisms of interaction with PD-1,” International Immunology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 651–660, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Lou et al., “PD-L1 blockade improves survival in experimental sepsis by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and reversing monocyte dysfunction,” Critical Care, vol. 14, no. 6, p. R220, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Brahmamdam, S. Inoue, J. Unsinger, K. C. Chang, J. E. McDunn, and R. S. Hotchkiss, “Delayed administration of anti-PD-1 antibody reverses immune dysfunction and improves survival during sepsis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Qi Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2026

Downloads

987

Citations