Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 6215350, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6215350
Review Article

Emerging Roles of Immune Cells in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yiqing Yin

Received 2 November 2017; Accepted 25 December 2017; Published 18 February 2018

Academic Editor: Qingdong Guan

Copyright © 2018 Yue Liu and Yiqing Yin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), a long-lasting cognitive decline after surgery, is currently a major clinical problem with no clear pathophysiological mechanism or effective therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that neuroinflammation plays a critical role in POCD. After surgery, alarmins are leaked from the injury sites and proinflammatory cytokines are increased in the peripheral circulation. Neurons in the hippocampus, which is responsible for learning and memory, can be damaged by cytokines transmitted to the brain parenchyma. Microglia, bone marrow-derived macrophages, mast cells, and T cells in the central nervous system (CNS) can be activated to secrete more cytokines, further aggravating neuroinflammation after surgery. Conversely, blocking the inflammation network between these immune cells and related cytokines alleviates POCD in experimental animals. Thus, a deeper understanding of the roles of immune cells and the crosstalk between them in POCD may uncover promising therapeutic targets for POCD treatment and prevention. Here, we reviewed several major immune cells and discussed their functional roles in POCD.

1. Introduction

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) refers to a long-lasting cognitive decline after surgery, characterized by impaired concentration, memory, and learning, which can be detected by a battery of neuropsychological tests [1]. The incidence of POCD is 7 to 26% after major noncardiac surgery and even higher in patients older than 60 years [1, 2]. POCD not only diminishes the patient’s quality of life and imposes a serious burden on healthcare costs but also increases mortality [3]. Although several risk factors for POCD have been identified, the pathophysiological mechanism underlying POCD remains unclear and no effective therapies have been developed to date.

A large number of studies conducted in patients have revealed that POCD is associated with elevated levels of plasma inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α and interleukin- (IL-) 6 [47]. IL-1β and IL-6 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with POCD are higher than those of patients with normal cognitive function after surgery [8, 9]. The learning and memory function was also impaired by surgery and anesthesia in experimental animals, accompanied by the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine levels in both the blood and the brain [1013]. Neuroinflammation, particularly in the hippocampus, has been proved to be one of the main causes of POCD [1417]. The activation of microglia and other blood-derived immune cells orchestrates neuroinflammation and subsequent neuronal damage [1417]. In this review, we discuss the main types of immune cells involved in POCD and their possible roles. We describe their functions in neuroinflammation, put forth a possible mechanism of their involvement in POCD, and point out the fields that need further exploration.

2. Immune Cells in POCD

2.1. Microglia

Microglia are highly specialized tissue-resident macrophages in the central nervous system (CNS) and the major resident immune cells of the brain [18]. Microglia are the only CNS cells originating from hematopoiesis. Primitive macrophage progenitors in the yolk sac colonize the CNS and differentiate into mature microglia, confined behind the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [19]. Unlike other tissue macrophages, such as Kupffer cells in the hepatic sinusoids, which need to be renewed from bone marrow progenitors, microglia are capable of local expansion and maintenance throughout life without reconstitution from the bone marrow [20].

In healthy brains, microglia are ramified and in a resting state, monitoring the local microenvironment and detecting CNS damage [21]. Danger signals, including pathogen invasion, injury, and abnormal protein accumulation, can trigger microglia transformation into an activated amoeboid shape. Activated microglia are both neuroprotective and neurotoxic. Studies in adult and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury models have shown that a complete blockade of microglial activity exacerbates brain damage [22, 23]. However, activated microglia can also produce excessive proinflammatory cytokines, leading to neuronal dysfunction and death. Several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s diseases, have been proved to be associated with the hyperactivation of microglia [2426]. As a specific type of macrophages, activated microglia can have one of the two different phenotypes: classically activated M1 and alternatively activated M2 microglia. M1 microglia promote inflammation by secreting proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF. M2 microglia elicit neuroprotective effects through the release of vascular endothelial growth factor and extracellular matrix proteins [27]. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyloid β (Aβ) sensitizes microglia to subsequent cytokine stimulation and M1 activation [28], whereas the induction of the M2 polarization of microglia by drugs or adeno-associated viral vectors can reduce Aβ deposition and relieve AD symptoms [29, 30]. In other neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, traumatic brain injury, and hepatic encephalopathy, the priming of microglial polarization towards the M1 phenotype plays a pivotal role in neuroinflammation [3134].

After peripheral surgery, an immune challenge is transmitted to the brain via multiple humoral and neural routes. The integrity of the BBB can be disrupted by a systemic inflammatory response or anesthesia during and after surgery [11, 35, 36]. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), alarmins, and cytokines, which are leaked from an injury site or increase in response to systemic inflammation, enter the brain and activate microglia [11, 3638]. Activated microglia may impair learning and memory via the release of proinflammatory cytokines, among which IL-1β and TNF-α are particularly important [38, 39]. Mild repeated stress or systemic endotoxin challenge can trigger microglia to secrete IL-1β and TNF-α [38, 4042]. After surgery, aged rats and mice demonstrated significant deficits in memory and learning, concurrent with the activation of microglia and increased expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in the hippocampus [43, 44]. Preemptively depleting microglia reduced surgery-induced hippocampal inflammatory cytokine secretion and attenuated the cognitive decline in mice [14]. IL-1β and TNF-α can cause neuronal cell death, reduction of acetylcholine release, and attenuation of glutamatergic transmission, resulting in learning and memory deficits [38, 4042]. Neuroinflammation and POCD were mitigated in IL-1R knockout mice or mice pretreated with an IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) antagonist compared with control mice [10]. Furthermore, microglia can be activated by peripheral TNF-α [38]. Preemptive treatment of anti-TNF antibody is able to limit the release of IL-1 in the hippocampus and prevent cognitive decline in a mouse model of POCD [11]. Therefore, microglia may respond to peripheral TNF-α, secrete more TNF-α and IL-1β in the hippocampus, and amplify neuroinflammation in POCD. Additionally, a study also reported reduced infiltration of bone marrow-derived monocytes into the hippocampus after microglial depletion, suggesting crosstalk between microglia and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) in POCD [14].

No studies to date have reported the polarization of microglia in POCD. However, the main cytokines secreted by activated microglia in POCD are IL-1 and TNF-α [14, 43, 44], suggesting the predominance of the M1 state of microglia in POCD. Furthermore, the M2 response of microglia was impaired after brain ischemia in aged mice [45]. Because older patients are particularly susceptible to POCD, we speculate that the M1 phenotype of microglia plays a central role in neuroinflammation in POCD. Pharmacological approaches that have been successfully used to modulate microglia polarization in other neurological diseases may hold promise for developing POCD treatments [32, 34].

In a synthesis of the existing microglia and POCD research, we can draw a picture of how microglia may orchestrate postoperative neuroinflammation in POCD. As the resident immune cells of the brain parenchyma, microglia are activated by proteins and other signals leaked from the injury sites. The cytokines secreted from the microglia can directly damage neurons and also recruit more immune cells from the blood penetrating into the brain parenchyma, further accelerating neuronal injury.

2.2. Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages

Macrophages are present in virtually all tissues. They differentiate from circulating peripheral-blood mononuclear cells, which migrate into tissues constitutively or in response to inflammation [46]. In a healthy CNS, BMDMs are divided into three classes according to their location: choroid plexus, meningeal, and perivascular macrophages [20]. These macrophages are exterior to the brain parenchyma, and their population homeostasis is achieved by replacement from blood-born monocytes. In disease states, BMDMs respond to inflammation and migrate into the brain parenchyma from the circulation.

BMDMs are a major component of the inflammatory immune response to CNS diseases. Similar to microglia, BMDMs have a proinflammatory M1 phenotype and an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. M2 macrophages can be beneficial for the healing of sterilized wounds, clearing necrotic debris or abnormal proteins. In a spinal cord injury model, macrophages played an anti-inflammatory role during recovery [47]. Furthermore, numerous studies have suggested that BMDMs can infiltrate the brain, reduce the Aβ plaque burden, and alleviate the cognitive decline in AD [48, 49]. In a clinical study, transplantation of autologous M2 macrophages significantly improved motor and cognitive activities in patients with severe cerebral palsy [50]. Other reports, however, have indicated that macrophages mainly play a detrimental role in CNS pathology. Penetration of macrophages into the brain impaired spatial learning and memory after traumatic brain injury in mice [51, 52]. In a model of intracerebral hemorrhage, mice exhibited improved motor function after the depletion of inflammatory monocytes [53]. In addition, circulating monocytes or macrophages have been implicated in the exacerbation and relapses of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) in mice [54, 55].

BMDMs were found in the hippocampi of mice with POCD [56]. Depletion of BMDMs attenuated surgery-induced increases of the IL-6 levels in serum and the hippocampus, reduced hippocampal macrophage infiltration, and prevented surgery-induced memory dysfunction [15]. Inhibiting the proinflammatory signaling pathway in BMDMs or preserving the integrity of the BBB can also reduce the infiltration of BMDMs in the hippocampus and prevent POCD [56]. Furthermore, mice deficient in IL-6 exhibited less IL-1β and TNF-α expression in the hippocampus and better working memory [57]. These findings indicate that, with the BBB integrity disrupted, BMDMs infiltrate into the hippocampus and secrete proinflammatory cytokines, exacerbating neuroinflammation in POCD.

The depletion of microglia has also been shown to prevent BMDMs infiltrating the hippocampus without impairing the capacity of monocytes to penetrate into the brain [14]. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), also known as CCL2, is a major chemoattractant to recruit BMDMs [58]. Postoperative hippocampal MCP-1 levels were reduced by the depletion of microglia [14] but not BMDMs [15], indicating that microglia are the major source of secreted MCP-1. Taken together, these studies show that microglia attract BMDMs into the brain via MCP-1 secretion after injury.

High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), a ubiquitous nucleosomal protein, is passively released into the circulation from damaged necrotic cells, and circulating HMGB1 levels increase after surgery [36, 59]. Blocking the HMGB1 function with a monoclonal antibody reduced the hippocampal expression of MCP-1 and postoperative memory decline in mice [60]. Furthermore, the depletion of BMDMs prevented an HMGB1-mediated memory decline after surgery [60]. Together with the previous studies, these results indicate that HMGB1 may stimulate hippocampal microglia to secrete MCP-1, enabling monocyte recruitment. Similar to HMGB1, many cytokines can simulate microglia. In a model of peripheral organ inflammation, microglia were stimulated by peripheral TNF-α and attracted circulating monocytes into the brain [61]. Moreover, plasma TNF-α levels were upregulated early after aseptic surgery, and a blockade of TNF-α prevented POCD in mice [11]. However, whether the TNF-α/microglia/BMDM pathway is essential in the pathogenesis of POCD is still unknown.

In summary, the activation of microglia and BMDM recruitment play important roles in POCD. However, the relationship between microglia and BMDMs in POCD needs further investigation. The possibility of BMDM infiltration into the CNS after surgery through other microglia-independent pathways also needs exploration.

2.3. Mast Cells

Mast cells (MCs) are myeloid cells originating from CD34+/CD117+ pluripotent progenitor cells [62]. MCs contain many cytoplasmic granules, which store a number of preformed mediators, including histamine, heparin, serotonin, chymase, tryptase, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes. MCs are best known for their roles in allergic disease and host defense. Crosslinking immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptors of MCs triggers the release of many allergic and inflammatory mediators [63]. MCs are abundant within tissues exposed to the external environment, such as the skin, gut, and the respiratory tract. MCs are also present in the CNS, mainly located in the perivascular spaces and along the leptomeninges [64, 65]. Upon activation, MCs can release the mediators and infiltrate into the brain parenchyma, participating in the pathophysiological processes of various neurological diseases.

It is well established that MCs contribute to general vascular permeability through the production of vasodilators, such as histamine and serotonin. Ample evidence also exists that the vasodilatory and proinflammatory mediators released by MCs contribute to the impairment of the BBB integrity (reviewed in [66]). For instance, histamine can open the tight junctions between the endothelia in the BBB [67]. Proteinases secreted by MCs, including tryptase and gelatinase, can degrade protein constituents of the neurovascular matrix, thus damaging the BBB [67]. In recent decades, studies have demonstrated that MCs play critical roles in the disruption of the BBB and associated neurological diseases. Acute stress increased the permeability of BBB through the activation of MCs [68]. Furthermore, compared with wild-type mice, MC-deficient mice showed decreased BBB permeability, reduced T cell infiltration, and, consequently, less severe EAE [69]. In addition, in a mouse model of brain ischemia, animals that were deficient in MCs or treated with the MC stabilizer Cromolyn exhibited improved BBB integrity and reduced brain edema [70].

Studies have suggested that MCs are the predominant cells that initiate glial activation. In a model of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia, MCs were found to be the “first responders,” with their activation preceding that of microglia [71]. In addition, the clinical conditions of depression and mild neurocognitive disorders are closely related to the malfunction of the MC-glia crosstalk [72]. Microglia express a large variety of proteins/receptors that can be activated by MC-secreted mediators. For instance, tryptase can trigger microglia activation through the proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) [73]. Furthermore, microglia express all four histamine receptors (HRs) and can be activated by MCs via HRs [74, 75]. Astrocytes also express PAR2 and HRs and can be activated by MCs [76, 77]. The interactions between MCs and glial cells are not restricted to the receptors mentioned above (reviewed in [78]), and accumulating evidence indicates that MCs and glial cells work in concert to promote neuroinflammation [78].

While numerous studies in rodents have explored the role of MCs in neurological diseases, relatively few have focused on MC function in POCD. Surgery was found to induce MC degranulation in mice [79]. Rats treated with the MC stabilizer Cromolyn showed less severe cognitive deficits after surgery, accompanied by increased BBB stability [16] and reduced microglia and astrocyte activation [79, 80]. Therefore, via disrupting BBB and activating microglia, MCs promote neuroinflammation in POCD. In the studies of MCs in POCD, Cromolyn was administered intracerebroventricularly [16, 79, 80]; the therapeutic efficacy of Cromolyn administered via other routes remains to be established. Masitinib, an oral selective tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, can effectively inhibit the survival, migration, and activity of MCs. In a clinical trial, masitinib slowed the cognitive decline in patients with AD [81]. The effectiveness of masitinib in the treatment and prevention of POCD also needs further investigation.

2.4. T Cells

The thymus-derived T cells constitute key players in antigen-specific immune responses. T cells are divided into three main functional subsets: CD8 cells, also known as cytotoxic T cells; helper CD4 cells (Th cells); and regulatory CD4 cells (Treg cells). In healthy noninflamed CSF, 90% of the total cells are T cells, predominantly CD4 cells [82]. In a pathological state, T cells can penetrate into the brain parenchyma. Multiple studies have shown the importance of T cells in autoimmune and virus infectious neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and herpes simplex virus encephalitis [83]. Recently, the roles of T cells in neurodegenerative diseases have also received much attention. The activation of Th cells enhances the loss of dopaminergic neurons in a mouse model of PD [84], while Treg cells provide neuroprotection through the attenuation of microglial activation in this disorder [85].

There is no direct evidence of T cells participating in the pathological process of POCD. One study demonstrated that surgery-induced cognitive impairment in mice was accompanied by upregulation of IL-17 and downregulation of IL-10 expression, mainly in Th17 (a subset of Th cells) and Treg cells, respectively [17]. This study proposed the possibility that a T cell-subtype imbalance may contribute to POCD. More evidence is needed to uncover the role of T cells in POCD.

3. Conclusion

While a plethora of studies have suggested that immune cells trigger neuroinflammation in response to surgery leading to POCD, the neurobiological basis of POCD remains unknown (Figure 1). As the major resident immune cells in the CNS, microglia are activated by proteins released from the injury sites and circulating cytokines upregulated by surgery. The activation of microglia results in neuronal damage via the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Circulating BMDMs are recruited into the brain in response to surgery, a process that may be initiated by microglia-secreted MCP-1. The degranulation of MCs contributes to BBB disruption and the activation of microglia, further aggravating POCD. T cells may also be involved in POCD.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of immune cells in POCD. (a) Under a normal condition, neurons are normally functioning. Microglia are ramified and in a resting state. The BBB is intact. Monocytes, mast cells, and T cells are restricted outside the brain parenchyma. (b) After surgery, many cytokines are released from the injured sites and damage the BBB. Microglia are triggered by these cytokines and turned into an activated, amoeboid shape. Microglia-secreted cytokines can damage neurons and also recruit BMDMs and other inflammatory cells from the blood. BMDMs and MCs infiltrate into the brain parenchyma and release more cytokines, which can directly damage neurons and also activate microglia. Cytokines secreted by T cells also participate in neuroinflammation in POCD. The immune cells and cytokines compose an inflammation network that aggravates neural damage, leading to POCD. POCD: postoperative cognitive dysfunction; BBB: blood-brain barrier; BMDM: bone marrow-derived macrophage; MC: mast cell.

These immune cells interact with one another in the pathogenesis of POCD. Different elements of the resulting network of neuroinflammation may serve as targets in the prevention and treatment of POCD. First, cytokines leaking from the injury site are the primary trigger of the immune response in the CNS. Thus, approaches that inhibit cytokine release may prevent POCD. Second, microglia occupy the central position of the inflammatory network; hence, drugs that stabilize microglia or promote their transition to the M2 state may have beneficial effects. Third, other circulating immune cells penetrating into the brain parenchyma and secreting inflammatory cytokines exacerbate neuroinflammation. Therefore, therapies that reduce cytokine secretion by these immune cells may also be effective for treating POCD. Studies in rodents using blocking antibodies and other agents interfering with the neuroinflammation network have provided proof of concept for these strategies as POCD treatments [10, 11, 15, 17, 56, 60, 79, 80]. However, their feasibility in humans still needs to be validated. Further research on the mechanisms of immune cell involvement in POCD is urgently required to identify other potential targets for POCD treatment and prophylaxis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. S. Newman, J. Stygall, S. Hirani, S. Shaefi, and M. Maze, “Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review,” Anesthesiology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 572–590, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Paredes, L. Cortinez, V. Contreras, and B. Silbert, “Post-operative cognitive dysfunction at 3 months in adults after non-cardiac surgery: a qualitative systematic review,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1043–1058, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Steinmetz, K. B. Christensen, T. Lund, N. Lohse, L. S. Rasmussen, and ISPOCD Group, “Long-term consequences of postoperative cognitive dysfunction,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 548–555, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. X. Lin, T. Wang, M. H. Chen, Z. H. Hu, and W. Ouyang, “Serum high-mobility group box 1 protein correlates with cognitive decline after gastrointestinal surgery,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 668–674, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. U. Zheng, Z. Ma, and X. Gu, “Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor‑α in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients serve as a predictor for the incidence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction following orthopedic surgery,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1443–1447, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Sun, L. Yang, Y. Wu, R. Liu, J. Han, and L. Wang, “Effect of intravenous infusion of dobutamine hydrochloride on the development of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients via inhibiting the release of tumor necrosis factor-α,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 741, pp. 150–155, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Peng, L. Xu, and W. Ouyang, “Role of peripheral inflammatory markers in postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD): a meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, article e79624, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. H. Ji, H. M. Yuan, G. F. Zhang et al., “Changes in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in aged patients with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction following total hip-replacement surgery,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 236–242, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Buvanendran, J. S. Kroin, R. A. Berger et al., “Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 and interleukins in the central nervous system and peripheral tissue during and after surgery in humans,” Anesthesiology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Cibelli, A. R. Fidalgo, N. Terrando et al., “Role of interleukin-1β in postoperative cognitive dysfunction,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 360–368, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Terrando, C. Monaco, D. Ma, B. M. J. Foxwell, M. Feldmann, and M. Maze, “Tumor necrosis factor-alpha triggers a cytokine cascade yielding postoperative cognitive decline,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 47, pp. 20518–20522, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Wu, Y. Lu, Y. Dong et al., “The inhalation anesthetic isoflurane increases levels of proinflammatory TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1364–1378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. Valentim, P. Di Giminiani, P. O. Ribeiro, P. Rodrigues, I. A. S. Olsson, and L. M. Antunes, “Lower isoflurane concentration affects spatial learning and neurodegeneration in adult mice compared with higher concentrations,” Anesthesiology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 1099–1108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Feng, M. Valdearcos, Y. Uchida, D. Lutrin, M. Maze, and S. K. Koliwad, “Microglia mediate postoperative hippocampal inflammation and cognitive decline in mice,” JCI Insight, vol. 2, no. 7, article e91229, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. V. Degos, S. Vacas, Z. Han et al., “Depletion of bone marrow-derived macrophages perturbs the innate immune response to surgery and reduces postoperative memory dysfunction,” Anesthesiology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 527–536, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Zhang, H. Dong, X. Zhang, N. Li, J. Sun, and Y. Qian, “Cerebral mast cells contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction by promoting blood brain barrier disruption,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 298, Part B, pp. 158–166, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Tian, H. Ma, X. Cao, R. Zhang, X. Wang, and B. Wu, “Vitamin D improves cognitive function and modulates Th17/Treg cell balance after hepatectomy in mice,” Inflammation, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 500–509, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. M. Ransohoff and V. H. Perry, “Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 119–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Ginhoux, M. Greter, M. Leboeuf et al., “Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6005, pp. 841–845, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. M. Ransohoff and B. Engelhardt, “The anatomical and cellular basis of immune surveillance in the central nervous system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 623–635, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Nimmerjahn, F. Kirchhoff, and F. Helmchen, “Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5726, pp. 1314–1318, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. V. Faustino, X. Wang, C. E. Johnson et al., “Microglial cells contribute to endogenous brain defenses after acute neonatal focal stroke,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 36, pp. 12992–13001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Lalancette-Hebert, G. Gowing, A. Simard, Y. C. Weng, and J. Kriz, “Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2596–2605, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Akiyama, S. Barger, S. Barnum et al., “Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Politis, N. Pavese, Y. F. Tai et al., “Microglial activation in regions related to cognitive function predicts disease onset in Huntington’s disease: a multimodal imaging study,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 258–270, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Qian, P. M. Flood, and J. S. Hong, “Neuroinflammation is a key player in Parkinson’s disease and a prime target for therapy,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 117, pp. 971–979, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. Pena-Altamira, S. Petralla, F. Massenzio, M. Virgili, M. L. Bolognesi, and B. Monti, “Nutritional and pharmacological strategies to regulate microglial polarization in cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 175, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. R. S. Jones, A. M. Minogue, O. Fitzpatrick, and M. A. Lynch, “Inhibition of JAK2 attenuates the increase in inflammatory markers in microglia from APP/PS1 mice,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2716–2724, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. H. Latta, T. L. Sudduth, E. M. Weekman et al., “Determining the role of IL-4 induced neuroinflammation in microglial activity and amyloid-β using BV2 microglial cells and APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Zhu, N. Yang, Y. Y. Liu, J. Zheng, C. Ji, and P. P. Zuo, “M2 macrophage transplantation ameliorates cognitive dysfunction in amyloid-β-treated rats through regulation of microglial polarization,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 483–495, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. Hernandez-Rabaza, A. Cabrera-Pastor, L. Taoro-Gonzalez et al., “Hyperammonemia induces glial activation, neuroinflammation and alters neurotransmitter receptors in hippocampus, impairing spatial learning: reversal by sulforaphane,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 41, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Qin, W. H. Fan, Q. Liu et al., “Fingolimod protects against ischemic white matter damage by modulating microglia toward M2 polarization via STAT3 pathway,” Stroke, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3336–3346, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Kumar, J. P. Barrett, D. M. Alvarez-Croda, B. A. Stoica, A. I. Faden, and D. J. Loane, “NOX2 drives M1-like microglial/macrophage activation and neurodegeneration following experimental traumatic brain injury,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 58, pp. 291–309, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Chen, R. Hou, S. Xu, and C. Wu, “Donepezil regulates 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced microglial polarization in Parkinson’s disease,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1708–1714, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. U. Heinemann, “New dangers of anesthesia: isoflurane induced opening of the blood-brain barrier (commentary on Tetrault et al.),” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 7, p. 1329, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. K. Chan, J. Roth, J. J. Oppenheim et al., “Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 2711–2719, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Koizumi, K. Ohsawa, K. Inoue, and S. Kohsaka, “Purinergic receptors in microglia: functional modal shifts of microglia mediated by P2 and P1 receptors,” Glia, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Pickering, D. Cumiskey, and J. J. O'Connor, “Actions of TNF-α on glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the central nervous system,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 663–670, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Tanaka, H. Kondo, K. Kanda et al., “Involvement of interleukin-1 in lipopolysaccaride-induced microglial activation and learning and memory deficits,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 506–514, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Taepavarapruk and C. Song, “Reductions of acetylcholine release and nerve growth factor expression are correlated with memory impairment induced by interleukin-1β administrations: effects of omega-3 fatty acid EPA treatment,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1054–1064, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Cunningham, D. C. Wilcockson, S. Campion, K. Lunnon, and V. H. Perry, “Central and systemic endotoxin challenges exacerbate the local inflammatory response and increase neuronal death during chronic neurodegeneration,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 40, pp. 9275–9284, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Tanaka, M. Ide, T. Shibutani et al., “Lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation induces learning and memory deficits without neuronal cell death in rats,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 557–566, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. L. Wang, R. H. Ma, H. Fang, Z. G. Xue, and Q. W. Liao, “Impaired spatial learning memory after isoflurane anesthesia or appendectomy in aged mice is associated with microglia activation,” Journal of Cell Death, vol. 8, pp. 9–19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Y. Wang, H. He, D. Li et al., “The role of the TLR4 signaling pathway in cognitive deficits following surgery in aged rats,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1137–1142, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Suenaga, X. Hu, H. Pu et al., “White matter injury and microglia/macrophage polarization are strongly linked with age-related long-term deficits in neurological function after stroke,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 272, pp. 109–119, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. M. Mosser and J. P. Edwards, “Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 958–969, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. Shechter, A. London, C. Varol et al., “Infiltrating blood-derived macrophages are vital cells playing an anti-inflammatory role in recovery from spinal cord injury in mice,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, article e1000113, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. E. Bernstein, Y. Koronyo, B. C. Salumbides et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme overexpression in myelomonocytes prevents Alzheimer’s-like cognitive decline,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 1000–1012, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. O. Butovsky, G. Kunis, M. Koronyo-Hamaoui, and M. Schwartz, “Selective ablation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells increases amyloid plaques in a mouse Alzheimer’s disease model,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 413–416, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. R. Chernykh, M. Y. Kafanova, E. Y. Shevela et al., “Clinical experience with autologous M2 macrophages in children with severe cerebral palsy,” Cell Transplant, vol. 23, Supplement 1, pp. 97–104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. C. L. Hsieh, C. C. Kim, B. E. Ryba et al., “Traumatic brain injury induces macrophage subsets in the brain,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2010–2022, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. L. Hsieh, E. C. Niemi, S. H. Wang et al., “CCR2 deficiency impairs macrophage infiltration and improves cognitive function after traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 31, no. 20, pp. 1677–1688, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. D. Hammond, R. A. Taylor, M. T. Mullen et al., “CCR2+Ly6Chi inflammatory monocyte recruitment exacerbates acute disability following intracerebral hemorrhage,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 3901–3909, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Ajami, J. L. Bennett, C. Krieger, K. M. McNagny, and F. M. Rossi, “Infiltrating monocytes trigger EAE progression, but do not contribute to the resident microglia pool,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1142–1149, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. I. L. King, T. L. Dickendesher, and B. M. Segal, “Circulating Ly-6C+ myeloid precursors migrate to the CNS and play a pathogenic role during autoimmune demyelinating disease,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 14, pp. 3190–3197, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Terrando, L. I. Eriksson, J. K. Ryu et al., “Resolving postoperative neuroinflammation and cognitive decline,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 986–995, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. L. Sparkman, J. B. Buchanan, J. R. Heyen, J. Chen, J. L. Beverly, and R. W. Johnson, “Interleukin-6 facilitates lipopolysaccharide-induced disruption in working memory and expression of other proinflammatory cytokines in hippocampal neuronal cell layers,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 42, pp. 10709–10716, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. Shi and E. G. Pamer, “Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 762–774, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. J. Cohen, K. Brohi, C. S. Calfee et al., “Early release of high mobility group box nuclear protein 1 after severe trauma in humans: role of injury severity and tissue hypoperfusion,” Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 6, article R174, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. S. Vacas, V. Degos, K. J. Tracey, and M. Maze, “High-mobility group box 1 protein initiates postoperative cognitive decline by engaging bone marrow-derived macrophages,” Anesthesiology, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1160–1167, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. D'Mello, T. Le, and M. G. Swain, “Cerebral microglia recruit monocytes into the brain in response to tumor necrosis factorα signaling during peripheral organ inflammation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 2089–2102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. C. Bischoff and G. Sellge, “Mast cell hyperplasia: role of cytokines,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 118–122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. J. Galli and M. Tsai, “Mast cells in allergy and infection: versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1843–1851, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Khalil, J. Ronda, M. Weintraub, K. Jain, R. Silver, and A. J. Silverman, “Brain mast cell relationship to neurovasculature during development,” Brain Research, vol. 1171, pp. 18–29, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. R. M. Ransohoff and M. A. Brown, “Innate immunity in the central nervous system,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1164–1171, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. Ribatti, “The crucial role of mast cells in blood–brain barrier alterations,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. N. Li, X. Zhang, H. Dong, Y. Hu, and Y. Qian, “Bidirectional relationship of mast cells-neurovascular unit communication in neuroinflammation and its involvement in POCD,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 322, Part A, pp. 60–69, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. Esposito, D. Gheorghe, K. Kandere et al., “Acute stress increases permeability of the blood–brain-barrier through activation of brain mast cells,” Brain Research, vol. 888, no. 1, pp. 117–127, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. A. Sayed, A. L. Christy, M. E. Walker, and M. A. Brown, “Meningeal mast cells affect early T cell central nervous system infiltration and blood-brain barrier integrity through TNF: a role for neutrophil recruitment?” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 6891–6900, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. C. M. McKittrick, C. E. Lawrence, and H. V. Carswell, “Mast cells promote blood brain barrier breakdown and neutrophil infiltration in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 638–647, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Y. Jin, A. J. Silverman, and S. J. Vannucci, “Mast cells are early responders after hypoxia-ischemia in immature rat brain,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 3107–3112, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. D. Skaper, L. Facci, and P. Giusti, “Neuroinflammation, microglia and mast cells in the pathophysiology of neurocognitive disorders: a review,” CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1654–1666, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. S. Zhang, X. Zeng, H. Yang, G. Hu, and S. He, “Mast cell tryptase induces microglia activation via protease-activated receptor 2 signaling,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 5-6, pp. 931–940, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. X. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Dong, Y. Xu, and S. Zhang, “Induction of microglial activation by mediators released from mast cells,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1520–1531, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. H. Dong, W. Zhang, X. Zeng et al., “Histamine induces upregulated expression of histamine receptors and increases release of inflammatory mediators from microglia,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1487–1500, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. L. Dm Juri, M. Krzan, and M. Lipnik-Stangelj, “Histamine and astrocyte function,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 111, pp. 774–783, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. X. Zeng, S. Zhang, L. Xu, H. Yang, and S. He, “Activation of protease-activated receptor 2-mediated signaling by mast cell tryptase modulates cytokine production in primary cultured astrocytes,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2013, Article ID 140812, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. D. Skaper, L. Facci, and P. Giusti, “Mast cells, glia and neuroinflammation: partners in crime?” Immunology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 314–327, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. X. Zhang, H. Dong, N. Li et al., “Activated brain mast cells contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction by evoking microglia activation and neuronal apoptosis,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 127, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. X. Zhang, H. Yao, Q. Qian, N. Li, W. Jin, and Y. Qian, “Cerebral mast cells participate in postoperative cognitive dysfunction by promoting astrocyte activation,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 1-2, pp. 104–116, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. F. Piette, J. Belmin, H. Vincent et al., “Masitinib as an adjunct therapy for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial,” Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. Kivisakk, D. J. Mahad, M. K. Callahan et al., “Human cerebrospinal fluid central memory CD4+ T cells: evidence for trafficking through choroid plexus and meninges via P-selectin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 14, pp. 8389–8394, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. R. S. Liblau, D. Gonzalez-Dunia, H. Wiendl, and F. Zipp, “Neurons as targets for T cells in the nervous system,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 315–324, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. V. Brochard, B. Combadiere, A. Prigent et al., “Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 182–192, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. A. D. Reynolds, D. K. Stone, J. A. Hutter, E. J. Benner, R. L. Mosley, and H. E. Gendelman, “Regulatory T cells attenuate Th17 cell-mediated nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a model of Parkinson’s disease,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 2261–2271, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus