Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8328490 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8328490

Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Diverticular Disease

Academic Editor: Jan Fric
Received29 Oct 2018
Revised13 Jan 2019
Accepted04 Feb 2019
Published14 Mar 2019

Abstract

Diverticulosis of the colon is the most common condition in Western societies and it is the most common anatomic alteration of the human colon. Recurrent abdominal pain is experienced by about 20% of patients with diverticulosis, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms of its occurrence are not completely understood. In the last years, several fine papers have showed clearly the role of low-grade inflammation both in the occurrence of symptoms in people having diverticulosis, both in symptom persistence following acute diverticulitis, even if the evidence available is not so strong. We do not know yet what the trigger of this low-grade inflammation occurrence is. However, some preliminary evidence found colonic dysbiosis linked to low-grade inflammation and therefore to symptom occurrence in those patients. The aim of this paper is to summarize current evidences about the role of inflammation in symptom occurrence in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease and in symptom persistence after an episode of acute diverticulitis.

1. Introduction

Diverticulosis of the colon is the most frequent anatomic alteration that can be detected during colonic exploration, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. It is a common finding especially in developed countries: by the age of 85, the large majority of the population living in developed countries will have developed colonic diverticula [1]. Recent epidemiology studies found different prevalence in European countries according to socioeconomic status: countries with a lower socioeconomic status report a 5.3% frequency of diverticulosis in patients aged 30–39, 8.7% in those aged 40–49, 19.4% between 50 and 59, and up to 29.6% in subjects over the seventh decade, while maximal incidences were found in patients aged 70–79 and above 80 of 40.2% and 57.9%, respectively [2]. Although diverticulosis prevalence in Africa and Asia remains low, more recent epidemiology studies found its prevalence increasing also in the developing world, probably because of changes in lifestyle [2].

Most people with colonic diverticulosis remain asymptomatic. Just about one-fourth to one-fifth of those people will develop symptoms without complications, experiencing the so-called “Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease” (SUDD), and about 20-25% of them will ultimately develop diverticulitis (uncomplicated or complicated) [36].

Although advancing age is obviously associated with diverticulosis, the occurrence of symptoms is probably not only linked to age but also to the prolonged time course, during which the colonic wall is exposed and makes the colon more susceptible to other pathogenetic factors.

The pathogenesis of the disease is poorly understood and several etiological factors may play a role in its onset. In this paper, we focused on the roles of inflammation as part of the pathophysiology of diverticular disease.

2. Pathophysiology of Diverticulosis

Diverticulosis is characterized by the presence of sac-like protrusions of mucosa and submucosa, called diverticula, which occur in the weakest point of the muscle layer. This occurs due to age-related degeneration of the mucosal wall and segmental increases in colonic pressure resulting in bulging at points of weakness, typically at the insertion of the vasa recta [3].

Although the underlying pathological mechanisms that cause the formation of colonic diverticula remain unclear, itis likely to be the result of complex interactions between genetic factors, age, diet, changes in colonic structure and colonic motility, and therefore colonic microbial imbalance [3].

Inflammation probably does not play any role in the occurrence of colonic diverticulosis. Two European papers, published at the beginning of this decade, found that no signs of histological inflammation were found in people having colonic diverticulosis [7, 8]. These data have been recently confirmed by a study conducted in the United States. Peery et al. analyzed data about colonic mucosal biopsy specimens from people having diverticulosis. Assessing levels of interleukin (IL) 6 (IL6), IL10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and numbers of immune cells (CD4+, CD8+, CD27+, and mast cell tryptase), they found that there was no association between diverticulosis and TNF (odds ratio (OR), 0.85; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.63-1.16) and no association with CD4+ cells (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.87-1.60), CD8+ cells (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.71-1.32), or CD 57+ cells (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.09). Compared with controls without diverticulosis, biopsy specimens from people having diverticulosis were less likely to express the inflammatory cytokine IL 6 (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96). Moreover, there was no association between diverticulosis and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.05) [9]. Theoretically, we cannot exclude that inflammation could play a role in the pathogenesis of diverticulosis, but this role is just marginal. At present, inflammation does not seem to show a significant role in the pathogenesis of diverticulosis.

3. Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Symptoms and Clinical Setting

As stated, just one-fourth to one-fifth of patients with diverticulosis develop symptoms, the so-called Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease (SUDD). The pathogenetic mechanisms that lead to the occurrence of symptoms are still under debate, probably because there is still no consensus about the definition forms of the disease.

SUDD is characterized by nonspecific attacks of abdominal pain without macroscopic evidence of an inflammatory process, with abdominal pain, bloating, and changes in bowel habits that may resemble IBS. As a consequence, several authors still talk about “IBS with diverticulosis.” For example, Jung et al. found that IBS occurs 4.7-fold more likely in patients after an episode of acute diverticulitis than controls [10], and more recently, Järbrink-Sehgal et al. found that diverticulosis was associated with diarrhea-predominant IBS (OR, 9.55; 95% CI, 1.08-84.08; ) [11].

It is likely that those patients are suffering from SUDD than from “IBS with diverticulosis,” even when we describe symptoms’ occurrence/persistence following an episode of acute diverticulitis. This is because IBS and SUDD are not the same clinical entity, as showed by clinical data currently available. IBS and SUDD do not share the same epidemiology [12] but only part of clinical features, and patients with SUDD do not generally fulfil IBS criteria [13, 14]. Moreover, the characteristics of the abdominal pain (left lower-abdominal pain lasting for more than 24 h characterizes SUDD, diffuse and short-lived abdominal pain characterizes IBS) seem likely the most effective clinical tool in discriminating between patients with SUDD with those having IBS [13, 14].

4. Inflammation and Pathogenesis of Acute Diverticulitis

As it is well known, acute diverticulitis (AD) shows significant sign of inflammation [3]. However, its real pathogenesis is still unclear. Inflammation could play a pathogenetic role in explaining some finding, in particular in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD), but not at all. For example, we know that the majority of patients having acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) are at the first appearance of the disease, without any significant symptom before complication [15]. Recently, a review article underlines two other mechanisms explaining the AD occurrence, the “traumatic” and the “ischemic” hypotheses [16]. The “traumatic” mechanism takes into account the damage to the mucosa due to fecalith impaction, which occurs in the large diverticula. However, not uncommonly, acute diverticulitis (AD) develops in young patients with only few and small diverticula, where fecalith trapping is very unlikely. The “ischemic” mechanisms may be caused by the compression of vascular structures in the neck of the diverticular task, as a result of prolonged and/or recurrent contractile spikes related to neuromuscular alterations in the diverticular tract. Clearly, the “traumatic” and “ischemic” mechanisms of acute diverticulitis are not mutually exclusive and may act in different patients.

Also, inflammation may play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Dai et al. showed a different expression of prostaglandin E2-related enzyme in patients with AD. In particular, they observed a downregulation of cyclooxygenase-2/PGE2 and upregulation of 15-PGDH in the human colonic mucosa that may be predisposing factors for the development of acute DD [17]. Based on this finding, authors hypothesized that the change of COX-2/15-PGDH and the resulting decrease of PGE2 may predispose to AD occurrence. Moreover, we found that AD and Crohn’s disease (CD) have a similar pattern of expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), syndecan 1 (SD1), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF α), supporting the hypothesis that inflammation may also activate the fibrosis process [18].

About the role of TNFα, its overexpression in AD as well as CD is not regulated by the same gene superfamily 15 (TNFSF15), which is an immunoregulatory, antiangiogenic gene [19, 20]. A recent study found that not all TNFSF15 superfamilies are shared among these two diseases. In particular, the CD GAGGA haplotype was significantly associated with diverticulitis () in all DD versus all control comparison. A second haplotype, rs6478108 (A), rs6478109 (G), rs7869487 (A), and rs4263839 (G), was also associated with DD in that cohort (). A third haplotype, rs6478108 (A), rs6478109 (G), rs7848647 (G), rs7869487 (A), and rs4263839 (G), was demonstrated in the years versus years’ comparison (). This study demonstrates clearly that distinct but overlapping TNFSF15 haplotypes can be found in diverticulitis patients versus healthy controls when compared with the known CD haplotype suggesting similar but distinct genetic predispositions [21]. This study strengthens therefore the role for a genetic predisposition to diverticulitis that involves the TNFSF15 immunoregulatory gene [22], triggering the occurrence of inflammation as a consequence.

5. Inflammation and Symptoms’ Persistence following Acute Diverticulitis

We know that up to 20% of patients complain of persistent abdominal pain after surgical treatment of diverticulitis [23], and the quality of life of those patients is significantly worse [24]. Persistence of symptoms following an episode of AD has been linked to several factors, ranging from significant attenuation in serotonin-transporter expression to persistence of low-grade inflammation [25, 26]. Persistent low-grade inflammation of the colon may also explain clinical symptom persistence following AD, even if surgically treated. In fact, these findings have been recently confirmed by Lahat. Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-determining cytokine levels, authors found that TNFα, interleukin- (IL-) 6, and IL-1β levels were significantly higher and histology was significantly worse in patients having symptom persistence following severe AUD ( for all comparisons) [27].

6. Inflammation and Risk of Acute Diverticulitis Recurrence

Persistent low-grade inflammation following an episode of AD may also explain the recurrence of AD. At the end of a 24-month follow-up period, we found that endoscopic inflammation was still detected in 27.67% of patients and active histological inflammation in 36.6% of patients following an episode of AD. Only the detection of endoscopic and of histological inflammation during the follow-up was a predictor of diverticulitis recurrence () [26].

Inflammation persistence may be therefore a risk factor for both symptoms’ persistence and disease recurrence. Despite this, a recent review found mesalazine, an anti-inflammatory drug widely used in the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, not superior to placebo in preventing diverticulitis recurrence [28]. It is probably due to the heterogeneity of the current trials and the heterogeneity of the patients enrolled in those trials [29]. Although it is advisable that further randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of rigorous design have to be performed to specify the effects of mesalazine in the management of diverticulitis, we mean that this is the best evidence that could ever be obtained on this topic, since mesalazine is now out of patent and it is unlikely that any large RCT could ever be sponsored.

7. Inflammation and Pathogenesis of Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease

As stated, diverticulosis is merely the presence of colonic diverticula without symptoms or macroscopic/microscopic signs of inflammation. In this way, no signs of inflammation should be detected, both at endoscopic and also at histological assessment.

A different scenario may be observed when we analyze patients with SUDD. In those patients, low-grade inflammation seems to really play a significant role in determining symptom occurrence and complication. The current evidences are as follows.

7.1. Microscopic Inflammation

SUDD shows a significant microscopic inflammatory infiltrate. More than ten years ago, Narayan and Floch found a significant inflammatory infiltrate in SUDD patients compared with healthy controls [30]. We assessed both neutrophilic and lymphocytic infiltrate in SUDD, AUD, and healthy controls (HC). While neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate was found only in AUD, the mean lymphocytic cell density was significantly higher in SUDD than in asymptomatic diverticulosis and HC ().

7.2. Enhanced Expression of TNFα

TNF-α, a 17 kDa polypeptide produced by macrophages, lymphocytes, and natural killer cells, has been shown to play a major role in the inflammatory process, with high levels being found both in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and in rheumatoid arthritis patients [3133]. Hypothesizing a role of low-grade inflammation in the occurrence of SUDD, TNFα was assessed in those patients yet.

Assessing its mucosal expression on biopsy samples by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, we found that TNFα expression was significantly higher not only in AUD than in HC () but also in SUDD than in HC () and in asymptomatic diverticulosis (). Moreover, TNFα expression in AUD did not differ significantly from that of UC () and SCAD (). Finally, it was significantly higher in UC, SCAD, and AUD than in SUDD (, , and , respectively) [34]. The same results were drawn by Humes et al., who found that TNFα expression was significantly higher in SUDD than in asymptomatic diverticulosis () [8].

7.3. Paradoxical Expression of IL-10

IL-10 is an important anti-inflammatory mediator that suppresses the production of proinflammatory cytokines [35]. Surprisingly, IL-10 expression in SUDD seems to have an opposite behaviour than expected. Turco et al. found that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression was significantly increased in SUDD and SUDD following acute diverticulitis (SUDD-AD) patients compared to controls (). Moreover, they found a slight increase of IL-10 release in SUDD and a significant IL-10 release in SUDD-AD than HC () [36]. We recently confirmed these results. Using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) analysis on fecal samples, we found an increased release of IL-10 from HC up to asymptomatic diverticulosis and SUDD patients. In particular, mean IL-10 expression was 3.32 (95% CI 0.43-7.91) pg/g in HC, 3.42 (95% CI 1.87-5.10) pg/g in asymptomatic diverticulosis, and 4.24 (95% CI 1.90-7.53) pg/g in SUDD. However, no significant difference was found among the 3 study groups () [37].

Thus, we can speculate that IL-10 expression in SUDD may be an attempt of the immune system to control a low-grade inflammation. This hypothesis seems to be confirmed by Dai et al., who found an inverse expression of prostaglandin E2 in colonic mucosa between acute diverticulitis and IBD [17]. We know that prostaglandin E2 is the dominant prostaglandin in the colon and it is associated with colonic inflammation, but we also know that it has a protective mechanism in the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. Lower prostaglandin E2 level may decrease the normal protection of the mucosa, which is made more susceptible to luminal insults, thus creating a permissive environment for the development of acute diverticulitis.

7.4. Fecal Calprotectin Overexpression

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a cytoplasmic antimicrobial compound prominent in granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages, and it accounts for approximately 60% of the total cytosolic protein. It is released from cells during cell activation or death, and it is stable in feces for several days after excretion [38]. This has been shown to be a sensitive marker of activity both in CD and in Ulcerative Colitis (UC); it is the stronger inflammatory marker predictor of relapse in those people as well [39].

After a preliminary report describing an increase of FC expression in patients with “symptomatic diverticular disease” (no more information were provided by authors) [40], we performed a case control study assessing FC in asymptomatic diverticulosis, SUDD, AUD, IBS, and HC patients. FC was not increased in HC and IBS patients; no difference was found between asymptomatic diverticulosis, HC, and IBS patients as well (). Higher FC values were found in AUD () and SUDD () than in HC and IBS patients. Moreover, FC values correlated significantly with inflammatory infiltrate () and decreased to normal values after treatment both in AUD () and in SUDD () [41]. Although this study is limited by using a semiquantitative method, which requires careful evaluation in patients with small or aqueous feces [42] and does not provide a clear cut-off, it suggests that FC may be a useful tool in detecting inflammation in the colon harboring diverticula, distinguishing symptoms coming from diverticular inflammation than that coming from IBS overlapping diverticulosis.

7.5. Significant Benefit When Using Mesalazine

Several clinical trials in SUDD patients found 5-aminosalicilic acid (alone or in combination) [4345] effective in reducing SUDD symptoms and in primary prevention of acute diverticulitis, further supporting the possibility that chronic inflammation occurrence during the course of diverticular disease plays a role in its pathogenesis.

Some studies tried to show that these are flaw evidences, since patients having diverticulosis and chronic abdominal symptoms do not show any evidence of inflammation [9]. However, the definition of “abdominal chronic symptoms in diverticulosis” does not fulfil the current definition of SUDD [46]. On the contrary, patients fulfilling the correct definition of SUDD show all the reported evidences on the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of SUDD [47].

8. Relationship between Low-Grade Inflammation and Other Mechanisms Leading to Symptoms’ Occurrence

Low-grade inflammation may also interact with other pathogenetic mechanisms to lead symptom occurrence.

For example, visceral hypersensitivity has been suggested as a possible mechanism involved in causing symptoms in those patients [48, 49]. Humes et al. found that SUDD patients had greater expression of neurokinin 1 (NK1) than the asymptomatic patients with diverticulosis (); a higher but not significant expression of galanin 1 receptor (GALR1) in SUDD than asymptomatic patients was found [8] as well. The increase in expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα, and an upregulation of the neuropeptide receptor NK1, suggests that SUDD patients may exhibit visceral hypersensitivity due to peripheral sensitization with both inflammatory and neurochemical factors playing a role.

Recent studies demonstrated that DD is associated with peculiar alterations of the enteric nervous system (ENS), encompassing myenteric oligoneuronal hypoganglionosis, decreased intramuscular nerve fibers, and altered neurochemical coding [4053]. Analyzing the expression of the glial markers S100β, Cossais et al. found very recently that S100β expression was increased in the submucosal and myenteric plexus of patients with DD compared with that in controls, whereas the expression of other glial factors remained unchanged. Moreover, this S100β overexpression was correlated to CD3+ lymphocytic infiltrates in patients with DD, whereas no correlation was observed in controls [54].

8.1. Why Inflammation Occurs in Diverticular Disease: The Role of Colonic Microbial Imbalance

It has been hypothesized that microbial imbalance, which is known as dysbiosis, may be the trigger of inflammation (and therefore symptoms) in people having diverticulosis [55]. Daniels et al. found that patients at the first episode of acute diverticulitis have a higher diversity of Proteobacteria than controls [56], and Schieffer et al. found that Microbacteriaceae were the most significant species associated with the disease [57]. Microbiota imbalance was found also in SUDD, sometimes significantly differing from that reported occurring in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). For example, we know that Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucolytic bacteria living in the mucus barrier that degrades mucin for utilization as a carbon and nitrogen energy source [58] and producing short-chain fatty acids to maintain intestinal homeostasis [59], is significantly decreased in IBD [60]. The same occurs when we assess the relative abundance in IBD of another mucolytic bacteria, Roseburia hominis [61]. In SUDD, it seems the opposite: A. muciniphila and R. hominis have a significant abundance in SUDD [6265], and their decrease by therapy is associated to a significant improvement of symptoms [6265].

9. Conclusion

Diverticulosis is a common condition that sometimes becomes symptomatic and may lead to severe complications.

The pathophysiologic hypotheses behind symptom occurrence in those patients have changed in the last years. Although most of the mechanisms leading to its occurrence remain to be elucidated, the role of low-grade inflammation seems to be a proven fact (Figure 1 reassumes the main concepts discussed in the manuscript).

Why inflammation occurs in only a minority of people having diverticulosis is still under debate, and it has to be further elucidated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. L. E. Hughes, “Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon. I. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis,” Gut, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 336–344, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Tursi, “Diverticulosis today: unfashionable and still under-researched,” Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 213–228, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Tursi, A. Papa, and S. Danese, “Review article: the pathophysiology and medical management of diverticulosis and diverticular disease of the colon,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 664–684, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Garcia, “Diverticulitis,” in Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, M. T. Blaser, D. D. Smith, and J. I. Ravdin, Eds., pp. 306–316, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. G. Parks, “Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon,” Clinics in Gastroenterology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–69, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  6. N. S. Painter and D. P. Burkitt, “Diverticular disease of the colon, a 20th century problem,” Clinics in Gastroenterology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. Tursi, G. Brandimarte, W. Elisei et al., “Assessment and grading of mucosal inflammation in colonic diverticular disease,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 699–703, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. J. Humes, J. Simpson, J. Smith et al., “Visceral hypersensitivity in symptomatic diverticular disease and the role of neuropeptides and low grade inflammation,” Neurogastroenterology & Motility, vol. 24, no. 4, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. F. Peery, T. O. Keku, C. Addamo et al., “Colonic diverticula are not associated with mucosal inflammation or chronic gastrointestinal symptoms,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 884–891.e1, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. K. Jung, R. S. Choung, G. R. Locke, C. D. Schleck, A. R. Zinsmeister, and N. J. Talley, “Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is associated with diverticular disease: a population-based study,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 652–661, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. E. Järbrink-Sehgal, A. Andreasson, N. J. Talley, L. Agréus, J. Y. Song, and P. T. Schmidt, “Symptomatic diverticulosis is characterized by loose stools,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1763–1770.e1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Jones, R. Latinovic, J. Charlton, and M. Gulliford, “Physical and psychological co-morbidity in irritable bowel syndrome: a matched cohort study using the General Practice Research Database,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 879–886, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Cuomo, G. Barbara, P. Andreozzi et al., “Symptom patterns can distinguish diverticular disease from irritable bowel syndrome,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1147–1155, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Tursi, W. Elisei, M. Picchio, G. M. Giorgetti, and G. Brandimarte, “Moderate to severe and prolonged left lower-abdominal pain is the best symptom characterizing symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon: a comparison with fecal calprotectin in clinical setting,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 218–221, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. R. Chapman, E. J. Dozois, B. G. Wolff, R. E. Gullerud, and D. R. Larson, “Diverticulitis: a progressive disease? Do multiple recurrences predict less favorable outcomes?” Annals of Surgery, vol. 243, no. 6, pp. 876–883, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Zullo, “Medical hypothesis: speculating on the pathogenesis of acute diverticulitis,” Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 747–749, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Dai, D. W. King, D. S. Perera, D. Z. Lubowski, E. Burcher, and L. Liu, “Inverse expression of prostaglandin E2-related enzymes highlights differences between diverticulitis and inflammatory bowel disease,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1236–1246, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Tursi, W. Elisei, C. D. Inchingolo et al., “Chronic diverticulitis and Crohn’s disease share the same expression of basic fibroblastic growth factor, syndecan 1 and tumour necrosis factor-α,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 844–846, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Haritunians, K. D. Taylor, S. R. Targan et al., “Genetic predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1830–1840, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Q. Shih, R. Barrett, X. Zhang et al., “Constitutive TL1A (TNFSF15) expression on lymphoid or myeloid cells leads to mild intestinal inflammation and fibrosis,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 1, article e16090, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. M. Connelly, C. S. Choi, A. S. Berg, L. Harris III, J. Coble, and W. A. Koltun, “Diverticulitis and Crohn’s disease have distinct but overlapping tumor necrosis superfamily 15 haplotypes,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 214, pp. 262–269, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Tursi, “TNFSF15 polymorphism and diverticulitis of the colon: another step toward a more tailored approach in a complex disease,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 265, no. 4, article e33, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Bargellini, J. Martellucci, P. Tonelli, and A. Valeri, “Long-term results of treatment of acute diverticulitis: still lessons to be learned?” Updates in Surgery, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Scarpa, D. Pagano, C. Ruffolo et al., “Health-related quality of life after colonic resection for diverticular disease: long-term results,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. M. Costedio, M. D. Coates, A. B. Danielson et al., “Serotonin signaling in diverticular disease,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1439–1445, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Tursi, W. Elisei, G. M. Giorgetti et al., “Detection of endoscopic and histological inflammation after an attack of colonic diverticulitis is associated with higher diverticulitis recurrence,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Lahat, “Prolonged recurrent abdominal pain is associated with ongoing underlying mucosal inflammation in patients who had an episode of acute complicated diverticulitis,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Carter, M. Alsayb, J. K. Marshall, Y. Yuan, and Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group, “Mesalamine (5‐ASA) for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 10, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Tursi and S. Danese, “Preventing diverticulitis recurrence by selecting the right therapy for a complex disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 733–736, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Narayan and M. H. Floch, “Microscopic colitis as part of the the natural history of diverticular disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, Supplement, no. 9, pp. S112–S113, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. P. Braegger, S. Nicholls, S. H. Murch, T. T. MacDonald, and S. Stephens, “Tumour necrosis factor alpha in stool as a marker of intestinal inflammation,” The Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8785, pp. 89–91, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. E. Plevy, C. J. Landers, J. Prehn et al., “A role for TNF-alpha and mucosal T helper-1 cytokines in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, no. 12, pp. 6276–6282, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  33. B. Berner, D. Akça, T. Jung, G. A. Muller, and M. A. Reuss-Borst, “Analysis of Th1 and Th2 cytokines expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis by flow cytometry,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1128–1135, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. Tursi, W. Elisei, G. Brandimarte et al., “Musosal tumour necrosis factor α in diverticular disease of the colon is overexpressed with disease severity,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. e258–e263, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. F. Neurath, “Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 329–342, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Turco, P. Andreozzi, I. Palumbo et al., “Bacterial stimuli activate nitric oxide colonic mucosal production in diverticular disease. Protective effects of L. casei DG® (Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-1572),” United European Gastroenterology Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 715–724, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Tursi, P. Mastromarino, D. Capobianco, W. Elisei, M. Picchio, and G. Brandimarte, “No changes in interleukin-10 expression in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 476-477, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Costa, M. G. Mumolo, M. Bellini et al., “Role of faecal calprotectin as non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 642–647, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. G. Mumolo, L. Bertani, L. Ceccarelli et al., “From bench to bedside: fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical setting,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 33, pp. 3681–3694, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Pezzilli, A. Barassi, A. M. Morselli Labate et al., “Fecal calprotectin levels in patients with colonic polyposis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Tursi, G. Brandimarte, W. Elisei, G. M. Giorgetti, C. D. Inchingolo, and F. Aiello, “Faecal calprotectin in colonic diverticular disease: a case–control study,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. A. Vestergaard, S. L. Nielsen, J. F. Dahlerup, and N. Hornung, “Fecal calprotectin: assessment of a rapid test,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 343–347, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Picchio, W. Elisei, G. Brandimarte et al., “Mesalazine for the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon and for primary prevention of diverticulitis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 50, pp. S64–S69, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Tursi and M. Picchio, “Mesalazine in preventing acute diverticulitis occurrence: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 409–411, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Picchio, W. Elisei, and A. Tursi, “Mesalazine to treat symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease and to prevent acute diverticulitis occurrence. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 291–297, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Tursi, M. Picchio, W. Elisei, F. Di Mario, C. Scarpignato, and G. Brandimarte, “Management of patients with diverticulosis and diverticular disease: consensus statements from the 2nd international symposium on diverticular disease,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 50, pp. S101–S107, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Tursi and C. Scarpignato, “Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease: chronic abdominal pain in diverticulosis is not enough to make the diagnosis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2001-2002, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Simpson, J. H. Scholefield, and R. C. Spiller, “Origin of symptoms in diverticular disease,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 899–908, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. Simpson, F. Sundler, D. J. Humes, D. Jenkins, J. H. Scholefield, and R. C. Spiller, “Post inflammatory damage to the enteric nervous system in diverticular disease and its relationship to symptoms,” Neurogastroenterology & Motility, vol. 21, no. 8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. H. Clemens, M. Samsom, J. Roelofs, G. van Berge Henegouwen, and A. J. Smout, “Colorectal visceral perception in diverticular disease,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 717–722, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Golder, D. E. Burleigh, A. Belai et al., “Smooth muscle cholinergic denervation hypersensitivity in diverticular disease,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9373, pp. 1945–1951, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Wedel, V. Büsing, G. Heinrichs et al., “Diverticular disease is associated with an enteric neuropathy as revealed by morphometric analysis,” Neurogastroenterology & Motility, vol. 22, no. 4, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Böttner, M. Barrenschee, I. Hellwig et al., “The enteric serotonergic system is altered in patients with diverticular disease,” Gut, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1753–1762, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. F. Cossais, S. Leuschner, M. Barrenschee et al., “Persistent increased enteric glial expression of S100β is associated with low-grade inflammation in patients with diverticular disease,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. E. M. Quigley, “Gut microbiota, inflammation and symptomatic diverticular disease. New insights into an old and neglected disorder,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 127–129, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  56. L. Daniels, A. E. Budding, N. de Korte et al., “Fecal microbiome analysis as a diagnostic test for diverticulitis,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1927–1936, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. M. Schieffer, K. Sabey, J. R. Wright et al., “The microbial ecosystem distinguishes chronically diseased tissue from adjacent tissue in the sigmoid colon of chronic, recurrent diverticulitis patients,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 8467, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. K. Rooijers, C. Kolmeder, C. Juste et al., “An iterative workflow for mining the human intestinal metaproteome,” BMC Genomics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Derrien, E. E. Vaughan, C. M. Plugge, and W. M. de Vos, “Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1469–1476, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. C. W. Png, S. K. Lindén, K. S. Gilshenan et al., “Mucolytic bacteria with increased prevalence in IBD mucosa augment in vitro utilization of mucin by other bacteria,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 2420–2428, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. Machiels, M. Joossens, J. Sabino et al., “A decrease of the butyrate-producing species Roseburia hominis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Gut, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1275–1283, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. R. Ponziani, F. Scaldaferri, V. Petito et al., “The role of antibiotics in gut microbiota modulation: the eubiotic effects of rifaximin,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 269–278, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. G. Barbara, E. Scaioli, M. R. Barbaro et al., “Gut microbiota, metabolome and immune signatures in patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease,” Gut, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1252–1261, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Tursi, P. Mastromarino, D. Capobianco et al., “Assessment of fecal microbiota and fecal metabolome in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 50, pp. S9–S12, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. Laghi, P. Mastromarino, W. Elisei et al., “Impact of treatments on fecal microbiota and fecal metabolome in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon: a pilot study,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1421–1432, 2018. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Antonio Tursi and Walter Elisei. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1769 Views | 399 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder