Cardiovascular Effects Mediated by HMMR and CD44

Jaskuła, Kinga; Sacharczuk, Mariusz; Gaciong, Zbigniew; Skiba, Dominik S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4977209

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Role of Inflammation in the Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 4977209 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4977209

Cardiovascular Effects Mediated by HMMR and CD44

Kinga Jaskuła,¹Mariusz Sacharczuk,^1,2Zbigniew Gaciong,³and Dominik S. Skiba¹

Academic Editor: Elena Dozio

Received27 May 2021

Accepted07 Jun 2021

Published10 Jul 2021

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. The most dangerous life-threatening symptoms of CVD are myocardial infarction and stroke. The causes of CVD are not entirely clear, and new therapeutic targets are still being sought. One of the factors involved in CVD development among vascular damage and oxidative stress is chronic inflammation. It is known that hyaluronic acid plays an important role in inflammation and is regulated by numerous stimuli, including proinflammatory cytokines. The main receptors for hyaluronic acid are CD44 and RHAMM. These receptors are membrane proteins that differ in structure, but it seems that they can perform similar or synergistic functions in many diseases. Both RHAMM and CD44 are involved in cell migration and wound healing. However, their close association with CVD is not fully understood. In this review, we describe the role of both receptors in CVD.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a main cause of death globally, causing an estimated 17.9 million deaths annually. CVD is a general term for a group of heart and blood vessel diseases including coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Late manifestations of CVD are heart attack and stroke mainly caused by previous vascular damage. Chronic inflammation is one of the causes of vascular damage or narrowing [1]. CD44 plays an important role in both inflammation and vascular injury [2]. Inflammation is associated with increased vascular permeability, recruitment of inflammatory cells, and release of inflammatory mediators. The cascade of inflammatory reactions can alter blood flow in the altered tissues by inflammatory cells infiltrating vascular tissues and releasing proteases, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species, which trigger vasoconstriction or relaxation [3], neointimal growth [4], and angiogenesis and tissue remodeling [5, 6]. The main ligand for the CD44 receptor is hyaluronic acid (HA) which binds also to RHAMM (hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor) [7]. HA is regulated by numerous stimuli, including proinflammatory cytokines [8]. Thus, the local production of cytokines within inflammatory lesions in the vessels increases the expression of HA on endothelial cells facilitating CD44-HA interactions and hence causing extravasation of inflammatory cells [9]. The role of CD44 in cardiovascular disease is well described; however, the role of another RHAMM receptor in CVDs is little known. This review discusses the role of both receptors in CVDs and their connections.

2. CD44 and RHAMM: Structure and Expression

CD44 is a widely expressed cellular adhesion molecule that serves as the major receptor for components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [10]. Apart from HA, CD44 binds other carbohydrate ligands, such as heparan sulfate [11], as well as noncarbohydrate ligands: collagen and osteopontin [12]. CD44 occurs as a series of isoforms with molecular weights ranging from 85 to over 200 kDa [13]. The most commonly expressed CD44 receptor is the 85-90 kDa glycoprotein which represents the standard CD44 molecule which does not contain products with spliced exon variants [14]. CD44 is structurally and functionally polymorphic. Its gene consists of at least 20 exons, of which 12 can be alternatively spliced. The heterogeneity of the protein is mainly due to the variable splicing of 10 exons encoding the extracellular region located between the invariant HA-binding domain at the NH2 terminus and the membrane proximal extracellular domain [15]. The most common isoform of CD44, called standard form (CD44s), does not contain any exon variants. It consists of a large extracellular domain of 248 amino acids, a 21-amino acid segment encompassing the membrane, and a relatively short cytoplasmic part of 72 amino acids [16]. The CD44 gene contains 20 exons, of which exons 1-5, 15-17, and 19 encode the CD44 isoform, while exons 6.6a and 7-14 (also designated as vl-v10) are alternatively spliced to generate variant isoforms with insertion into the membrane proximal region of the extracellular domain between amino acids 202 and 203. The amino terminal region is relatively conserved in mammalian species (about 85% homology) and contains a hyaluronan-binding domain, while the membrane proximal region is relatively unconservative (about 35-45% sequence similarity between species) and has several sites for glycosylation and chondroitin sulfate attachment [17, 18]. The transmembrane domain ensures a way to interact with cofactors and adapter proteins and to direct the influx of lymphocytes [19]. The intracellular domain of CD44 has short- and long-tail configurations and performs nuclear localization functions for the regulation of transcription [20].CD44 is expressed in a variety of cell types (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)), including lymphocytes, macrophages, erythrocytes, fibroblasts, neurons, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells [18]. CD44 supports the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells [10], induces the secretion of chemokines from macrophages, and regulates the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells [21].

(a)

(b)

In contrast to CD44, the main hyaluronan receptor, RHAMM, is less well studied and mainly is involved in cell locomotion. It was firstly described by Turley et al. [22, 23] and soon was linked to ras transformation and tumor progression [24]. The HMMR gene encodes an 85 kDa protein—RHAMM—with an extensive helix structure and a basic globular domain at the amino terminus [25]. It has approximately 35% protein sequence homology to KIF15, a member of the kinesin family [26]. RHAMM does not contain a signal peptide for export via the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum [7]. RHAMM is a member of the hyaladherin protein family, has two hyaluronan-binding domains, and interacts with it through 9–11-amino acid basic motifs [27]. The extracellular part of RHAMM activates signaling cascades that control the expression of cell cycle genes and genes related to cell motility [28, 29]. The intracellular domain of RHAMM is required for the formation of the mitotic spindle and may play a role in the direction of cell motility [30]. The HMMR gene is located on the human chromosome 5q33.2 and contains 18 exons [31]. RHAMM, also described as CD168, does not have a transmembrane domain but is anchored by the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) group in the plasma membrane where it can interact with CD44 and participate in many cell functions, including cell motility, wound healing, and modification of the Ras signaling cascade. Interestingly, RHAMM does not contain a signal peptide and is believed to be transported to the cell surface by unconventional transport mechanisms where it binds to the cell surface by docking to HA synthase [32] and, like CD44, transmits signals affecting cell mobility [27]. It has been shown that RMAMM interacts with hyaluronan in an ionic manner via a 35-amino acid basic C-terminal region, which can be further subdivided into two motifs of 10 and 11 amino acids, respectively [33]. RHAMM is present on the cell surface, in the cytoplasm, and in the nucleus of different types of cells [25] and regulates cell movement and proliferation [24, 25]. RHAMM under physiological conditions is poorly expressed on various cell types (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) such as lymphocytes, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts; however, its expression rises in pathological conditions [34, 35].

Although CD44 and RHAMM have different primary amino acid sequences and although CD44 is conservatively expressed in cells and RHAMM is tightly regulated, both receptors possess transforming properties that may be related to their ability to promote motility [34, 36]. Research indicates that during inflammation, wound healing, and tumor formation, cell migration is mediated by CD44 and may require RHAMM surface expression [36]. This means that these receptors may act synergistically in some diseases.

3. Atherosclerosis and Vascular Inflammation

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease of the walls of large and medium arteries. Its etiology is not fully understood, but there are several factors influencing its development. Chronic inflammation and increased levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the blood play a major role in the development of atherosclerosis. Abnormal blood flow in the vessels can cause increased wall tension and promote the production of proteoglycans by arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs), which can bind and retain lipoprotein molecules, facilitating their oxidative modification, thereby promoting an inflammatory response at lesion sites [38]. Vascular endothelial cells become activated by proinflammatory stimuli and begin to express selective adhesion molecules on the surface, which recruit monocytes and T lymphocytes and which are likely to be involved in the recruitment of blood-borne cells for atherosclerotic lesions [39, 40].

Atherosclerosis at the developed stage is characterized by the formation of atherosclerotic plaque containing macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), foam cells, lymphocytes, and other inflammatory cells. In advanced age, atherosclerotic plaque calcifications appear [41]. Not only the vascular wall is affected but also the adventitia and adipose tissue attached to the vessel express some degree of inflammation which may precede vascular dysfunction [42, 43]. Dendritic cells and lymphocytes are found in the adventitia and perivascular adipose tissue of normal arteries, but their number is significantly increased in the atherosclerotic arteries [43]. Under internal atherosclerotic lesions, leukocytes organize themselves into clusters resembling tertiary lymphoid tissue [44]. These features of atherosclerotic plaques illustrate that atherosclerosis is a complex disease in which many elements of the vascular, metabolic, and immune systems take part. Atherosclerotic changes result from inflammatory triggers, subsequent release of various cytokines, proliferation of smooth muscle cells, synthesis of the connective tissue matrix, and accumulation of macrophages and lipids [39, 45, 46]. In those processes, CD44 and RHAMM may play an important role (Figure 2).

Numerous studies suggest that the CD44 cell adhesion molecule may promote atherosclerosis by mediating the recruitment of inflammatory cells into platelets and activation of vascular cells [47, 48]. In the atherosclerosis model of apoE^-/- mice, vascular expression of CD44 was highest in areas prone to damage [48, 49]. This was confirmed in human studies where CD44 was present in areas of human atherosclerotic plaques, rich in macrophages, and susceptible to rupture, compared to healthy vascular tissues [50, 51]. Elevated expression of CD44 correlated with a 10-fold increase in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 by endothelial cells and macrophages. These cytokines in turn increased CD44 expression [50, 51]. Such a positive feedback loop may exacerbate arteriosclerosis, leading to plaque instability. The elimination of CD44 in mice with the apoE knockout led to a significant reduction in aortic lesions and a reduction in the number of macrophages present in the lesions by 90% [48]. Moreover, gene expression profiling in the aorta of CD44 knockout mice compared to a wild type led to the discovery that CD44 regulates focal adhesion formation, extracellular matrix deposition, and angiogenesis, critical processes for atherosclerosis [49]. To investigate the mechanism by which CD44 controls atherosclerosis, bone marrow chimeras were generated using bone marrow transplant from a wild type (WT) and CD44-null donor to apoE^-/- and apoE^-/- CD44^-/-. The expression of CD44 in both the vascular and bone marrow cells contributed to the development of changes in the apoE^-/- model. It means that CD44, on both the resident and recruited cells, is essential for its full proatherogenic effect in vivo [47]. Moreover, the CD44 deletion also favored an increase in fibrotic lesions in apoE^-/- CD44^-/- mice compared to apoE^-/- mice, which indicates that CD44 also regulates the lesion composition and influences the stability of atherosclerotic plaques [47].

So far, RHAMM has not been directly associated with atherosclerosis, but it is known that it plays a vital role in inflammation, an important factor in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [36]. It has been shown that RHAMM interacts with growth factor receptors such as PDGFR [52], TGF-β receptor I [53], or bFGFR [54]. Growth factors regulate the function of ERK signaling and are responsible for the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation [52]. In addition, ERK signaling has been shown to play a role in altering cholesterol homeostasis in human macrophages [55]. By interacting, RHAMM takes part in the mobility necessary for the inflammation by activating ERK1/2/MAPK. Nuclear RHAMM is also associated with the ERK1/2/MAP kinase, which mediates the activation of PAI-1 and MMP-9, which are involved in cell mobility and inflammation [56]. RHAMM also participates in HA-dependent regulation. HA is produced during tissue damage, causing activation of inflammatory cells to induce innate immune response and regulation of the behavior of epithelial cells and fibroblasts [57–59]. Additional confirmation of the importance of RHAMM is the fact that the use of a 15-mer peptide with homology to RHAMM-binding sequences has been shown to block HA signaling and reduce inflammation and fibrogenesis [60].

Macrophages in atherosclerotic plaque formation play a fundamental role [61]. Macrophages colonizing the atherosclerotic plaque have a reduced migration capacity, which leads to the maintenance of inflammation and further progression into the atherosclerotic plaque [62]. Moreover, they participate in the intake and accumulation of lipoproteins. Cholesterol uptake by macrophages leads to their transformation to foam cells in the vascular wall. At this stage of atherosclerosis, fatty streaks are observed in the vasculature. The RHAMM receptor is expressed on macrophages. In a rat model of acute lung damage, the expression of RHAMM and HA is increased in macrophages responding to intratracheal injury [63, 64]. Moreover, Hmmr^-/- transgenic mice have been shown to exhibit reduced macrophage chemotaxis [65]. Another element essential in the development of atherosclerotic lesions includes vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). VSMCs, under the influence of vascular damage, are able to change the quiescent “contractile” phenotype into a “proinflammatory” phenotype. Activated VSMCs can effectively multiply and migrate, helping to repair vascular walls. However, in the chronic inflammation that occurs in atherosclerosis, VSMCs are misregulated, leading to extracellular matrix formation in the plaque areas [66]. Research has shown that RHAMM can be an important element in these processes. In vitro studies have shown that HA mediates VSMC migration through CD44 and RHAMM receptors as well as VSMC proliferation but only through the CD44 receptor [2, 67, 68]. On the basis of the culture of bovine vascular smooth muscle cells, an increase in RHAMM expression was observed after scratch wound assay. It was concluded that vascular damage leads to an increase in RHAMM expression and is localized in the VSMC at the edge of the lesion [68].

4. Ischemic Heart Disease

Ischemic heart disease is one of the most common causes of death in developed countries. After myocardial infarction (MI), billions of cardiomyocytes undergo apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis, resulting in a noncontractile collagen scar that reduces heart function [69]. The mammalian heart’s ability to replace lost cardiomyocytes is limited, while adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) can successfully regenerate the heart following apical ventricular amputation throughout its lifetime [70, 71]. A key factor in the regeneration process in zebrafish is the ability of preexisting cardiomyocytes to proliferate after organ damage [72–74].

After analyzing the proteomic changes following ventricular apex resection in adult zebrafish, increased expression of the RHAMM was identified. It was also investigated that after zebrafish ventricular resection, the area of scar tissue was significantly larger in the RHAMM knockdown fish, suggesting that the RHAMM knockdown blocked heart regeneration. The importance of hyaluronic acid in the regeneration of the heart was also determined. It was found that after inhibition of HA synthesis, after ventricular resection in zebrafish, significant scar tissue was still present compared to minimal or no scar tissue in controls [75].

Studies on the role of CD44 in regeneration after MI have shown a correlation between inflammatory mediators and CD44 in regulating the inflammatory response, repairing the heart, and differentiating the heart fibroblasts after MI [76]. Studies in CD44-deficient mice that underwent myocardial infarction showed prolonged inflammation, reduced collagen deposition in scars, decreased myofibroblast infiltration, and decreased TGF-β signaling [77]. Following acute MI, IL-6 has been shown to enhance CD44 and HA synthase (HAS-1 and HAS-2) expression in cardiac fibroblasts, resulted in a matrix rich in HA. As a result, proinflammatory cytokines and the expression of smooth muscle α-actin were induced through CD44-HA interactions. This interaction, together with circulating IL-6, changed the nature of the ECM, modulated the differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts, and promoted the immune responses [78].

5. Vascular Remodeling

Restrictive remodeling assumes that SMCs reorganize the ECM, while the factors causing constrained remodeling compared to external remodeling remain poorly defined [79]. The contraction of the vessel wall is similar to that of a cutaneous wound. SMCs repopulate the sites of vascular damage and cause the production and remodeling of the ECM, which changes the geometry of the vessel wall. It is known that matrix remodeling depends in part on direct adhesion interactions of ECM cells. In in vitro studies on SMCs, HA consistently increased the adhesion of SMCs to collagen-precoated plates and blocking or removing RHAMM weakened SMC adhesion to collagen with or without exogenous HA [80]. That suggests that the endogenous production of HA is sufficient to activate RHAMM. RHAMM activation by HA significantly influences the adhesive interactions between SMC and ECM and contributes to remodeling of the wall and narrowing of the lumen after carotid artery ligation [80]. RHAMM-blocking strategies at sites of vascular injury may be potentially useful in the prevention of clinical restenosis.

The role that CD44 plays in remodeling, for example, after angioplasty, is unclear. Available data published on that topic does not clearly indicate whether CD44 may be a remodeling factor or may play a protective role by inhibiting neointimal formation [81, 82]. However, studies have shown that the deficiency of the CD44 gene significantly enhanced neointimal hyperplasia, which suggests that the CD44 gene is involved in the process of pathological remodeling and may play a protective role. The remodeling response to injury involves circulating cells that arise from the bone marrow as well as cells from the local artery wall. Compared with damaged femoral arteries in CD44^+/+ mice, CD44^-/- mice showed significantly greater femoral vascular remodeling. In remodeled femoral arteries from CD44^-/- mice, no significant changes were observed in CD44 expression when compared to intact arteries. After the use of low-mass weight (LMW) heparin, the damaged arteries showed a significant reduction in neointimal thickness and a significant increase in CD44 expression. This suggests that CD44 may be the route by which LMW heparin diminishes the remodeling process [83].

6. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels from existing vessels (Figure 2). It can occur in a pathological form in the context of circulatory diseases or cancer and in a physiological form in the case of tissue ischemia, wound healing, etc. [84]. To investigate the involvement of CD44 in blood vessel formation, in vivo angiogenesis was studied in CD44-deficient mice [85]. Initial studies were performed in a model in which vessels develop around and within subcutaneously implanted Matrigel plugs containing B16 murine melanoma tumor cells as a source of angiogenic growth factors. Vascularization of the plugs was observed in wild-type animals, but not in CD44 knockout mice, confirming the involvement of CD44 in the pathological formation of blood vessels [86]. In addition, in a mouse oral carcinogenesis model, after implantation of Matrigel plugs with suspended cancer cells into the dorsal chamber of the skin fold, CD44^+/+ mice showed a higher microvascular density than CD44^-/- [87]. It has also been shown that inhibition of CD44 reduces the adhesion of endothelial cells (EC) to HA immobilized on the plastic surface [54]. This means that an increase in CD44 expression may allow the adhesion of the EC to the components of the ECM, which is one of the processes enabling the formation of new blood vessels [1]. Whether CD44 plays a role in physiological angiogenesis has also been investigated. Wound closure in animals with the CD44 knockout was shown to be delayed within 1 to 3 days after wounding, relative to wild-type animals. Vascular density at the edge of the wounds on day 3 was reduced by around 20% in CD44^-/- animals compared to wild-type mice. This means that the lack of CD44 results in an early delay in skin wound closure, which is associated with reduced neovascularization of the injured tissue. The above results thus confirmed that CD44 may be involved in physiological angiogenesis [86]. The differentiation and organization of EC in blood vessels is a critical step in angiogenesis [88]. To investigate the role of RHAMM receptors in blood vessel formation, the effect of anti-RHAMM antibodies on EC function and in vivo angiogenesis was determined. Using the endothelial tube formation model on Matrigel, anti-RHAMM antibodies were found to inhibit tube formation by human endothelial cells. It was also investigated that the use of an anti-RHAMM antibody in a mouse model of angiogenesis significantly reduced the vascularization of the plugs [54].

7. Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is a disorder characterized by persistent elevated pulmonary arterial pressure with unknown causes [89]. The primary mechanism of IPAH is pulmonary vascular remodeling involving pre- and intra-acinar arteries, such as stenotic lesions and complex lesions characterized by plexiform lesions (Figure 2) [90]. The plexiform injury has been studied in relation to idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension as a marker of the severity or rapid progression of pulmonary hypertension [91], but it also contributed to the pathogenesis of the disease. Studies have shown that CD44 was frequently expressed in plexiform lung lesions in IPAH patients and was mainly located in endothelial cells that make up the microvasculature of the lesions and surrounding T lymphocytes. However, CD44 was not found in any of the vascular cells of normal pulmonary arteries. This suggests that CD44 is involved in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension [92]. The role of RHAMM in pulmonary hypertension is not fully understood. However, studies have shown that loss of PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ) is associated with pulmonary hypertension [93]. It has been shown that PPARγ expression is significantly reduced in plexiform lesions in humans with PH. Reduced PPARγ expression was also demonstrated in vascular lesions in a rat model of severe pulmonary hypertension [94]. It has also been investigated that by pharmacological inhibition of PPARγ, RHAMM was upregulated in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells in a sheep model of pulmonary hypertension. The increased expression of RHAMM was also confirmed in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) with PPARγ depletion. These results suggest that HMMR plays a large role in hypertension but it would be worthwhile to conduct more research in this area [95].

8. Conclusions

CD44 and RHAMM mediate different cardiovascular effects in normal and pathological conditions. Herein, we discussed the role of these receptors not only in cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, and ischemic heart disease but also in cardiovascular processes such as vascular inflammation, vascular remodeling, and angiogenesis. Expression of RHAMM in contrast to CD44 is relatively low in vascular cells and blood. However, RHAMM expression rises in pathological conditions. Expression of CD44 was found to be upregulated in areas prone to atherosclerosis. The important role of RHAMM in atherosclerosis development is its role in the motility of the immune cells. The gained ability of migration mediated by RHAMM allows cells to the inflammatory response. This process is important also in other conditions where vascular remodeling is present. In conditions after myocardial infarction, CD44 and RHAMM help in wound healing by reorganization of the extracellular matrix and collagen deposition. Inhibition or lack of RHAMM or CD44 blocks angiogenesis in both the physiological and pathological conditions. Summarizing the role of both described receptors is similar apart from its different role in vascular remodeling. However, the RHAMM receptor is significantly less studied in cardiovascular diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (project numbers 2019/35/D/NZ5/02820 and 2014/15/B/NZ5/03566).

References

G. W. Sullivan, I. J. Sarembock, and J. Linden, “The role of inflammation in vascular diseases,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 591–602, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jain, Q. He, W. S. Lee et al., “Role of CD44 in the reaction of vascular smooth muscle cells to arterial wall injury,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 596–603, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Peitzman, B. G. Harbrecht, A. O. Udekwu, T. R. Billiar, E. Kelly, and R. L. Simmons, “Hemorrhagic shock,” Current Problems in Surgery, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 925–1002, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Hansson, “Immunological control mechanisms in plaque formation,” in Arteriosclerosis, vol. 89, Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH and Co. KG, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Wilensky, K. L. March, I. Gradus-Pizlo, G. Sandusky, N. Fineberg, and D. R. Hathaway, “Vascular injury, repair, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 2995–3005, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Mach, U. Schönbeck, R. P. Fabunmi et al., “T lymphocytes induce endothelial cell matrix metalloproteinase expression by a CD40L-dependent mechanism: implications for tubule formation,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 229–238, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jiang, R. Casalegno-Garduno, H. Chen, A. Schmitt, M. Schmitt, and C. A. Maxwell, “Multifunctional proteins bridge mitosis with motility and cancer with inflammation and arthritis,” ScientificWorldJournal, vol. 10, pp. 1244–1257, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Cao, H. S. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Y. Lin, R. P. Phipps, and T. J. Smith, “Activation of human orbital fibroblasts through CD40 engagement results in a dramatic induction of hyaluronan synthesis and prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2 expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 45, pp. 29615–29625, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Puré and C. A. Cuff, “A crucial role for CD44 in inflammation,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 213–221, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. I. Khan, S. M. Kerfoot, B. Heit et al., “Role of CD44 and hyaluronan in neutrophil recruitment,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 12, pp. 7594–7601, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jalkanen and M. Jalkanen, “Lymphocyte CD44 binds the COOH-terminal heparin-binding domain of fibronectin,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 817–825, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. Weber, S. Ashkar, M. J. Glimcher, and H. Cantor, “Receptor-ligand interaction between CD44 and osteopontin (Eta-1),” Science, vol. 271, no. 5248, pp. 509–512, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Goodison, V. Urquidi, and D. Tarin, “CD44 cell adhesion molecules,” Molecular Pathology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 189–196, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Aruffo, I. Stamenkovic, M. Melnick, C. B. Underhill, and B. Seed, “CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate,” Cell, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1303–1313, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Martegani, F. Del Prete, A. Gasbarri, P. G. Natali, and A. Bartolazzi, “Structural variability of CD44v molecules and reliability of immunodetection of CD44 isoforms using mAbs specific for CD44 variant exon products,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 291–300, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Borland, J. A. Ross, and K. Guy, “Forms and functions of CD44,” Immunology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Isacke and H. Yarwood, “The hyaluronan receptor, CD44,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 718–721, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ilangumaran, B. Borisch, and D. C. Hoessli, “Signal transduction via CD44: role of plasma membrane microdomains,” Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 35, no. 5-6, pp. 455–469, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Williams, K. Motiani, P. V. Giridhar, and S. Kasper, “CD44 integrates signaling in normal stem cell, cancer stem cell and (pre)metastatic niches,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 324–338, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Okamoto, Y. Kawano, H. Tsuiki et al., “CD44 cleavage induced by a membrane-associated metalloprotease plays a critical role in tumor cell migration,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1435–1446, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. McKee, M. B. Penno, M. Cowman et al., “Hyaluronan (HA) fragments induce chemokine gene expression in alveolar macrophages: the role of HA size and CD44,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 2403–2413, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Turley and J. Torrance, “Localization of hyaluronate and hyaluronate-binding protein on motile and non- motile fibroblasts,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Turley, D. Moore, and L. J. Hayden, “Characterization of hyaluronate binding proteins isolated from 3T3 and murine sarcoma virus transformed 3T3 cells,” Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2997–3005, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Hall, B. Yang, X. Yang et al., “Overexpression of the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM is transforming and is also required for H-ras transformation,” Cell, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Hardwick, K. Hoare, R. Owens et al., “Molecular cloning of a novel hyaluronan receptor that mediates tumor cell motility,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 1343–1350, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Maxwell, J. J. Keats, M. Crainie et al., “RHAMM is a centrosomal protein that interacts with dynein and maintains spindle pole stability,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2262–2276, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yang, B. L. Yang, R. C. Savani, and E. A. Turley, “Identification of a common hyaluronan binding motif in the hyaluronan binding proteins RHAMM, CD44 and link protein,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 286–296, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Slevin, “Oligosaccharides of hyaluronan induce angiogenesis through distinct CD44 and RHAMM-mediated signalling pathways involving Cdc2 and γ-adducin,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 35, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mohapatra, X. Yang, J. A. Wright, E. A. Turley, and A. H. Greenberg, “Soluble hyaluronan receptor RHAMM induces mitotic arrest by suppressing Cdc2 and cyclin B1 expression,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 1663–1668, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Silverman-Gavrila, L. Silverman-Gavrila, G. Hou, M. Zhang, M. Charlton, and M. P. Bendeck, “Rear polarization of the microtubule-organizing center in neointimal smooth muscle cells depends on PKCα, ARPC5, and RHAMM,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 895–910, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, J. Entwistle, G. Hou, Q. Li, and E. A. Turley, “The characterization of a human _RHAMM_ cDNA: conservation of the hyaluronan- binding domains,” Gene, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 299–306, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Klewes, E. A. Turley, and P. Prehm, “The hyaluronate synthase from a eukaryotic cell line,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. 791–795, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yang, L. Zhang, and E. A. Turley, “Identification of two hyaluronan-binding domains in the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 12, pp. 8617–8623, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Pilarski, A. Masellis-Smith, A. R. Belch, B. Yang, R. C. Savani, and E. A. Turley, “RHAMM, a receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility, on normal human lymphocytes, thymocytes and malignant B cells: a mediator in B cell malignancy?” Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 14, no. 5-6, pp. 363–374, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tolg, S. R. Hamilton, K. A. Nakrieko et al., “Rhamm-/- fibroblasts are defective in CD44-mediated ERK1,2 motogenic signaling, leading to defective skin wound repair,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 1017–1028, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Misra, V. C. Hascall, R. R. Markwald, and S. Ghatak, “Interactions between hyaluronan and its receptors (CD44, RHAMM) regulate the activities of inflammation and cancer,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 6, p. 201, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Uhlen, L. Fagerberg, B. M. Hallstrom et al., “Tissue-based map of the human proteome,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6220, article 1260419, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Andreou and I. Andreadou, “Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Crowther, “Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, vol. 2005, no. 1, pp. 436–441, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Hansson, “Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 16, pp. 1685–1695, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Weber and H. Noels, “Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1410–1422, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Galkina, A. Kadl, J. Sanders, D. Varughese, I. J. Sarembock, and K. Ley, “Lymphocyte recruitment into the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially L-selectin dependent,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 5, pp. 1273–1282, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Skiba, R. Nosalski, T. P. Mikolajczyk et al., “Anti-atherosclerotic effect of the angiotensin 1-7 mimetic AVE0991 is mediated by inhibition of perivascular and plaque inflammation in early atherosclerosis,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 174, no. 22, pp. 4055–4069, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Srikakulapu, D. Hu, C. Yin et al., “Artery tertiary lymphoid organs control multilayered territorialized atherosclerosis B-cell responses in aged ApoE-/- mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1174–1185, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Weber, A. Zernecke, and P. Libby, “The multifaceted contributions of leukocyte subsets to atherosclerosis: lessons from mouse models,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 802–815, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Hansson and P. Libby, “The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 508–519, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, E. Lee, A. M. Zukas et al., “CD44 expressed on both bone marrow-derived and non-bone marrow-derived cells promotes atherogenesis in ApoE-deficient mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1283–1289, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Cuff, D. Kothapalli, I. Azonobi et al., “The adhesion receptor CD44 promotes atherosclerosis by mediating inflammatory cell recruitment and vascular cell activation,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 1031–1040, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, J. A. Hall, N. Levenkova et al., “CD44 regulates vascular gene expression in a proatherogenic environment,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 886–892, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hägg, S. Sjöberg, L. M. Hultén et al., “Augmented levels of CD44 in macrophages from atherosclerotic subjects: a possible IL-6-CD44 feedback loop?” Atherosclerosis, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 291–297, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Krettek, G. K. Sukhova, U. Schönbeck, and P. Libby, “Enhanced expression of CD44 variants in human atheroma and abdominal aortic aneurysm: possible role for a feedback loop in endothelial cells,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 1571–1581, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, M. C. Y. Chang, D. Zylka, S. Turley, R. Harrison, and E. A. Turley, “The hyaluronan receptor RHAMM regulates extracellular-regulated kinase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 18, pp. 11342–11348, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Park, Y. Kim, H. Kim et al., “Hyaluronic acid promotes angiogenesis by inducing RHAMM-TGFβ receptor interaction via CD44-PKCδ,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 563–574, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Savani, G. Cao, P. M. Pooler, A. Zaman, Z. Zhou, and H. M. DeLisser, “Differential involvement of the hyaluronan (HA) receptors CD44 and receptor for HA-mediated motility in endothelial cell function and angiogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 39, pp. 36770–36778, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Li, J. E. McLaren, D. R. Michael, M. Clement, C. A. Fielding, and D. P. Ramji, “ERK is integral to the IFN-γ–mediated activation of STAT1, the expression of key genes implicated in atherosclerosis, and the uptake of modified lipoproteins by human macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 3041–3048, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tolg, J. B. McCarthy, A. Yazdani, and E. A. Turley, “Hyaluronan and RHAMM in wound repair and the “cancerization” of stromal tissues,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 103923, 18 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Slevin, J. Krupinski, J. Gaffney et al., “Hyaluronan-mediated angiogenesis in vascular disease: uncovering RHAMM and CD44 receptor signaling pathways,” Matrix Biology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Jiang, J. Liang, J. Fan et al., “Regulation of lung injury and repair by toll-like receptors and hyaluronan,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1173–1179, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Itano, F. Atsumi, T. Sawai et al., “Abnormal accumulation of hyaluronan matrix diminishes contact inhibition of cell growth and promotes cell migration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 3609–3614, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tolg, S. R. Hamilton, E. Zalinska et al., “A RHAMM mimetic peptide blocks hyaluronan signaling and reduces inflammation and fibrogenesis in excisional skin wounds,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1250–1270, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Moore, F. J. Sheedy, and E. A. Fisher, “Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 709–721, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Randolph, “Mechanisms that regulate macrophage burden in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1757–1771, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zaman, Z. Cui, J. P. Foley et al., “Expression and role of the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM in inflammation after bleomycin injury,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 447–454, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Savani, G. Hou, P. Liu et al., “A role for hyaluronan in macrophage accumulation and collagen deposition after bleomycin-induced lung injury,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 475–484, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Foley, D. Lam, H. Jiang et al., “Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), transforming growth factor-β, hyaluronan (HA), and receptor for HA-mediated motility (RHAMM) are required for surfactant protein A-stimulated macrophage chemotaxis,,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 44, pp. 37406–37419, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Chistiakov, A. N. Orekhov, and Y. V. Bobryshev, “Vascular smooth muscle cell in atherosclerosis,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. G. Maier, B. Sadowitz, S. Cullen, X. Han, and V. Gahtan, “Thrombospondin-1-induced vascular smooth muscle cell migration is dependent on the hyaluronic acid receptor CD44,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 198, no. 5, pp. 664–669, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Savani, C. Wang, B. Yang et al., “Migration of bovine aortic smooth muscle cells after wounding injury: the role of hyaluronan and RHAMM,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1158–1168, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schaper, “Ultrastructural changes of the myocardium in regional ischaemia and infarction,” European Heart Journal, vol. 7, suppl B, pp. 3–9, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Poss, L. G. Wilson, and M. T. Keating, “Heart regeneration in zebrafish,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5601, pp. 2188–2190, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Itou, H. Kawakami, T. Burgoyne, and Y. Kawakami, “Life-long preservation of the regenerative capacity in the fin and heart in zebrafish,” Biol Open, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 739–746, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jopling, E. Sleep, M. Raya, M. Martí, A. Raya, and J. C. I. Belmonte, “Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7288, pp. 606–609, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kikuchi, J. E. Holdway, A. A. Werdich et al., “Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4⁺ cardiomyocytes,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7288, pp. 601–605, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Lien, M. Schebesta, S. Makino, G. J. Weber, and M. T. Keating, “Gene expression analysis of zebrafish heart regeneration,” PLoS Biology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. e260–e296, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Missinato, K. Tobita, N. Romano, J. A. Carroll, and M. Tsang, “Extracellular component hyaluronic acid and its receptor Hmmr are required for epicardial EMT during heart regeneration,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 487–498, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Suleiman, N. Abdulrahman, H. Yalcin, and F. Mraiche, “The role of CD44, hyaluronan and NHE1 in cardiac remodeling,” Life Sciences, vol. 209, pp. 197–201, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Huebener, T. Abou-Khamis, P. Zymek et al., “CD44 is critically involved in infarct healing by regulating the inflammatory and fibrotic response,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 4, pp. 2625–2633, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Müller, S. Gorressen, M. Grandoch et al., “Interleukin-6-dependent phenotypic modulation of cardiac fibroblasts after acute myocardial infarction,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 109, no. 6, p. 440, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Geary, S. T. Nikkari, W. D. Wagner, J. K. Williams, M. R. Adams, R. H. Dean et al., “Wound healing: a paradigm for lumen narrowing after arterial reconstruction,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 96–108, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ma, J. D. Pearce, D. B. Wilson, W. P. English, M. S. Edwards, and R. L. Geary, “Loss of the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM prevents constrictive artery wall remodeling,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 804–813, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Travis, M. G. Hughes, J. M. Wong, W. D. Wagner, and R. L. Geary, “Hyaluronan enhances contraction of collagen by smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts,” Circulation Research, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Vendrov, N. R. Madamanchi, Z. S. Hakim, M. Rojas, and M. S. Runge, “Thrombin and NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated regulation of CD44 and BMP4-Id pathway in VSMC, restenosis, and atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1254–1263, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhao, R. S. Shaik, H. Zhao, J. Beagle, S. Kuo, and C. A. Hales, “Low molecular weight (LMW) heparin inhibits injury-induced femoral artery remodeling in mouse via upregulating CD44 expression,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1359–1367.e3, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, C. Fu, Q. Zhang, C. He, F. Zhang, and Q. Wei, “The role of CD44 in pathological angiogenesis,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 13125–13139, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Teder, R. W. Vandivier, D. Jiang et al., “Resolution of lung inflammation by CD44,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5565, pp. 155–158, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Cao, R. C. Savani, M. Fehrenbach et al., “Involvement of endothelial CD44 during _in vivo_ angiogenesis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 325–336, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Ludwig, M. J. Szczepanski, A. Gluszko et al., “CD44(+) tumor cells promote early angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Cancer Letters, vol. 467, pp. 85–95, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Pardue, S. Ibrahim, and A. Ramamurthi, “Role of hyaluronan in angiogenesis and its utility to angiogenic tissue engineering,” Organogenesis, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 203–214, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Rubin, “Primary pulmonary hypertension,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Pietra, F. Capron, S. Stewart et al., “Pathologic assessment of vasculopathies in pulmonary hypertension,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. S25–S32, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Pietra, W. D. Edwards, J. M. Kay et al., “Histopathology of primary pulmonary hypertension. A qualitative and quantitative study of pulmonary blood vessels from 58 patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Registry,” Circulation, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1198–1206, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ohta-Ogo, H. Hao, H. Ishibashi-Ueda et al., “CD44 expression in plexiform lesions of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension,” Pathology International, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 219–225, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Nisbet, R. L. Sutliff, and C. M. Hart, “The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in pulmonary vascular disease,” PPAR Research, vol. 2007, 10 pages, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ameshima, H. Golpon, C. D. Cool et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) expression is decreased in pulmonary hypertension and affects endothelial cell growth,” Circulation Research, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1162–1169, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tian, A. Smith, J. Nechtman et al., “Effect of PPARγ inhibition on pulmonary endothelial cell gene expression: gene profiling in pulmonary hypertension,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 48–60, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Kinga Jaskuła et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

644

Downloads

938

Citations