Fyn Signaling in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Potential and Therapeutic Implications

Du, Fang; Tang, Tao; Li, Qingzhu; Liu, Jiaxin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9112127

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Role of Inflammation Mediators in Neurological Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9112127 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9112127

Fyn Signaling in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Potential and Therapeutic Implications

Fang Du,¹Tao Tang,¹Qingzhu Li,²and Jiaxin Liu¹

Academic Editor: Feng Zhang

Received21 Jul 2022

Revised20 Aug 2022

Accepted27 Aug 2022

Published15 Sept 2022

Abstract

Ischemic stroke caused by arterial occlusion is the most common type of stroke and is one of the leading causes of disability and death, with the incidence increasing each year. Fyn is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase belonging to the Src family of kinases (SFKs), which is related to many normal and pathological processes of the nervous system, including neurodevelopment and disease progression. In recent years, more and more evidence suggests that Fyn may be closely related to cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, including energy metabolism disorders, excitatory neurotoxicity, intracellular calcium homeostasis, free radical production, and the activation of apoptotic genes. This paper reviews the role of Fyn in the pathological process of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, including neuroexcitotoxicity and neuroinflammation, to explore how Fyn affects specific signal cascades and leads to cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. In addition, Fyn also promotes the production of superoxide and endogenous NO, so as to quickly react to produce peroxynitrite, which may also mediate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is discussed in this paper. Finally, we revealed the treatment methods related to Fyn inhibitors and discussed its potential as a clinical treatment for ischemic stroke.

1. Introduction

Stroke is an acute cerebrovascular disease with limited brain tissue necrosis or encephalomalacia caused by blood supply disorders in the brain (stenosis or occlusion of blood supply arteries and inadequate blood supply to the brain) [1]. According to the statistics, there are 2.4 million new stroke patients in my country every year. With the aging of the population, the incidence rate is increasing year by year, and it is the first fatal disease of the Chinese people [2, 3]. It includes both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, and the majority of which are ischemic. Ischemic strokes account for 60% to 70% of all strokes. Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of disability and death [4]. It is characterized by high morbidity, high disability, and high recurrence rates. Ischemic stroke is caused by interruption of cerebral blood flow or blockage of cerebral blood vessels by a thrombus, resulting in local cerebral hypoxia and glucose deficiency, which can eventually lead to devastating and irreversible brain damage [5].

Early recovery or reconstruction of blood reperfusion is the main treatment plan for ischemic stroke, which is also called cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) [6]. Treatment for ischemic stroke focuses on recanalization of the occluded blood vessel as soon as possible to limit brain injuries and salvage threatened brain tissue. However, reperfusion injury persists in many patients despite the rapid restoration of blood vessel patency, which has led to the concept of reperfusion injury [7]. This phenomenon of aggravated brain tissue damage caused by the restoration of blood perfusion is called cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI) [8, 9]. CIRI consists of complex mechanisms and a cascade network, ranging from the ischemic time duration to reperfusion. The physiopathological of CIRI is known to involve neuroexcitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and neuronal cell damage is inevitable consequences of focal cerebral ischemia in the area of cerebral infarction [10]. There is evidence linking oxidative stress, neural excitotoxicity, calcium overload, and inflammation not only accompany the pathological development of I/R but are also major causes of neuronal death [11, 12]. The damage of ischemia-reperfusion is shown in Figure 1.

CIRI is a highly complex cascade reaction process. Reconstruction of blood flow in ischemia-stricken tissue enhances neuroexcitotoxicity, and oxidative stress generates large amounts of ROS and leads to an increased release of inflammatory factors, triggering a series of pathological cascades [13, 14].

At present, the pathological mechanism of CIRI has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, researching and revealing the key molecules of CIRI is of great significance for patients’ early prevention and treatment [15]. The tyrosine kinase Fyn may be one such promising target due to its diverse role in the human nervous system.

The tyrosine kinase Fyn is a member of the Src family kinases (SFK), which is widely expressed in the brain tissue and is involved in the regulation of corticogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation, myelination, neural cell migration, cytokine production, long-term potentiation, excitatory, and inhibitory neuronal receptors. [16, 17]. Previous studies have confirmed that Fyn can regulate inflammation, apoptosis, pyroptosis, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function through various signaling pathways [18, 19]. Similar to other SFK proteins, Fyn has two key tyrosine residues located, Y531 and Y420. Y420 is located in the activation loop of the kinase domain, and when this site is phosphorylated, Fyn is activated to interact with other proteins [16]. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of Y420 and Y531 regulate the activity of Fyn and its ability to interact with other proteins [20, 21].

In adult rodents, Fyn has been demonstrated to be involved in ischemic brain injury. Src or Fyn knockdown decreased neuronal cell passing in a glucose-oxygen hardship cell model [22]. With the top-to-bottom investigation of Fyn in the field of neurological capacity, Fyn has been affirmed to assume a critical administrative part in neurodevelopment and neuroinflammation. In grown-up rodents, Src or Fyn knockdown can reduce hypoxia-induced neuronal cell death and have neuroprotective effects [23]. Fyn can likewise be associated with TLR4 to advance cerebral ischemia-incited neuroinflammation [24]. Fyn intercedes excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and the creation of ROS by enacting numerous flagging pathways, in this way irritating ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Studies have shown that Fyn interacts with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (LVGCC), and GTPase activation at synapses protein (synaptically localized GTPase-activating protein, SynGAP) interact with each other to further exacerbate brain injury [25–27]. NMDA receptors are heteromultimers composed primarily of NR1 and NR2 (NR2A-NR2D) subunits. Fyn has been identified in the NMDAR complex and has been shown to promote tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2A and NR2B [28]. PSD-95 functions as a scaffolding protein, clustering NMDARs with other proteins at postsynaptic sites such as neuronal nitric oxide synthetase and SynGAP [29].

Fyn phosphorylates NMDAR and is involved in the regulation of neuronal growth and function, including the induction of ischemic brain injury. [30, 31]. To exacerbate excitotoxicity, Fyn can also activate the type I IP3 receptor and phospholipase C (PLC) to regulate IP3 production and promote IP3-mediated calcium release [32]. Fyn-mediated NMDAR tyrosine phosphorylation is also involved in the regulation of the susceptibility of kindling and seizure. Calcium influx induced by NMDAR activation can regulate NADPH oxidase to generate superoxide through downstream signaling pathways, which combines with nitric oxide (NO) to form highly cytotoxic peroxynitrite and receptive oxygen species (ROS) [33, 34].

Activated Fyn can phosphorylate PKCδ, and the Fyn-PKC signaling axis can further activate MAP kinase phosphorylation and NF-κB pathway, indicating that Fyn is a proinflammatory major upstream regulator of signaling [35].

Activated Fyn can also phosphorylate the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2, Pyk2, also known as PTK2B and FAK2) [36]. It has a certain relationship with the change of intracellular calcium ion concentration and can be activated through a calcium-dependent mechanism and participate in the downstream signal transmission of Ca²⁺ [37]. Phosphorylation of Pyk2 is increased in ischemic brain injury, and phosphorylation of Pyk2 promotes brain injury-induced neuroinflammation [38].

This review will discuss the effects of Fyn and its downstream signaling pathways on ischemia-reperfusion injury and its related mechanisms and provide therapeutic strategies for alleviating ischemia-reperfusion injury and improving the prognosis of ischemic stroke.

2. Neuroexcitotoxicity and Fyn

During ischemia, glutamate reuptake mechanisms are impaired due to energy deprivation, and as a result, postsynaptic glutamate receptors are chronically hyperactivated. Excitotoxicity is a deleterious cellular process caused by intracellular calcium (iCa²⁺) overload and subsequent dysregulation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) [39]. NMDARs are highly permeable to Ca²⁺, which is essential for excitatory neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity in the nervous system. NMDARs are mobile within the plasma membrane and can diffuse laterally between synaptic and extrasynaptic sites. Under pathological conditions, alterations in the location and function of NMDARs and disruption of the balance between downstream kinases and phosphatases may occur, leading to neuronal death [40]. Excitotoxic mediated by NMDARs is a key mechanism in ischemia-induced damage [41]. Excessive release of neurotransmitters mediated by calcium ion influx causes excitotoxic injury [33].

The main pathways of calcium influx are voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCC) and N-methyl-D-aspartate linked receptor-operated calcium channels (N-methyl-D-aspartate linked receptor-operated) [42]. There are four types of VSCC in neurons, namely T, L, N, and P types [43]. During ischemia, the lack of ATP in neurons will inhibit the Na⁺-K⁺ pump, resulting in the accumulation of Na⁺, promoting the exchange of Na⁺-Ca²⁺, and increasing the concentration of intracellular Ca²⁺ [42]. Overstimulation of NMDA receptors by glutamate during ischemia is the main pathway for the lethal influx of Ca²⁺, and VSCC is also activated during ischemia, which also causes Ca²⁺ influx [44].

When Ca²⁺ influx through NMDARs leads to the production of superoxide and nitric oxide, which react to form highly cytotoxic peroxynitrite. In the brain, nitric oxide is produced by neuronal (nNOS) nitric oxide synthase [33]. On the other hand, recent studies have shown that NMDAR activation-induced superoxide originates primarily from NADPH oxidase (NOX). In neurons, the main NOX isoform is NOX2. The coupling between NMDAR activation and NOX2 activation is mainly through the activation of inositol phosphate 3-kinase (PI3K). PI3K activates neuronal NOX2 by activating PKCζ to generate superoxide. Activation of PI3K leads to phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-biphosphate to generate the second messenger phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP3), which can activate atypical protein kinase C (PKCζ) [45].

Phosphorylation of NMDARs and type I IP3 receptors (IP3R1) is regulated by Fyn. Fyn can positively regulate 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3)-mediated calcium release by phosphorylating IP3R1. Activation of phospholipase Cγ (phospholipase Cγ, PLCγ) to generate IP3. Selective knockout of Fyn or use of Src inhibitors also attenuates IP3-mediated calcium release and induces autophagy [46].

Fyn phosphorylates NR2B at Tyr531 and Tyr1472. When Fyn is phosphorylated at Tyr531, it can inhibit the phosphorylation of NR2B at Tyr1472, thereby inhibiting the extracellular effect of NR2B [47]. Phosphorylation of Y1472 NR2B by Fyn mediates cell death by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Activated Fyn phosphorylates NMDAR and mediates the interaction between NMDAR and PSD-95, which is required for induced neural excitotoxicity. Fyn also promotes the phosphorylation of NR2B at Y1472, preventing AP-2 binding. Removal of the receptor from the synapse requires activator protein-2 (AP-2) binding, thereby altering the internalization of NR2B at the postsynaptic membrane [48].

Overactivation of NMDARs triggers calpain hyperactivation, which in turn leads to TrkB-FL truncation, dysregulated BDNF/TrkB signaling, loss of dendritic spines, and apoptosis [49]. Ischemia-reperfusion injury can release IL-6 into cerebrospinal fluid by activating NMDARs and upregulating endothelin-1 (ET-1) and JNK [50]. ET-1 is a vasoactive peptide. ET-1 is released from ischemic tissue during reperfusion, which may lead to reperfusion injury in adjacent intact tissue [51]. ET-1 can affect the concentration of intracellular Ca²⁺ by directly stimulating the release of Ca²⁺ from the cell, activating PKC to enhance the Ca²⁺ flow of L-type calcium channels, activating Na + -H+ exchange, thereby inversely activating Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange [52]. Na + - Ca²⁺ exchange is the main cause of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

In vivo, endogenous NO synthesized by NO synthases (NOS) can promote the s-nitrosylation of Fyn through s-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) [53, 54]. Global cerebral ischemia-reperfusion promotes a massive increase in glutamate release and activates glutamate receptors, including NMDAR. In ischemic neurons, glutamate increases intracellular Ca concentration by activating NMDAR, resulting in a sustained increase in nNOS activity. Activation of nNOS can lead to the production of endogenous NO, while the intermediate of NO activates guanylate cyclase. The increase of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and the activation of downstream signaling pathways further aggravate CIRI. [55].

Several studies have found that Fyn can phosphorylate and activate mitochondrial dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) through PKCδ, thereby regulating apoptosis and inflammatory responses. Fyn stimulates NADPH oxidase through the PKC pathway to increase NADPH oxidase-dependent mitochondrial ROS [56].

Fyn overexpression also accelerates cognitive impairment in AD model mice, and depletion of Fyn or inhibition of Fyn restores memory function and synaptic density in AD model mice [57]. In the cerebral hemorrhage model, cell apoptosis was reduced after downregulation of Fyn; apoptosis-related proteins AIF, Cyt c, caspase 3, and Bax were all downregulated; anti-apoptosis-related protein Bcl-2 was up-regulated, and tunnel staining was reduced [58]. The Drp1 inhibitor Mdivi-1 (Mitochondrial division inhibitor 1) can reverse the proapoptosis induced by Fyn overexpression. Fyn activates Drp1 signaling by phosphorylating 616 serine in Drp1 to increase neuronal apoptosis in rats after intracerebral hemorrhage [59].

3. Inflammation and Fyn

Neuroinflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke and other forms of ischemic brain injury that result in neuronal damage and dysfunction [60]. Ischemic stroke triggered inflammatory cascades and further enlarged secondary brain injury due to cytotoxic neuronal cell death and neurological dysfunction. Hence, it is of great significance to elucidate the molecular mechanism of inflammation regulation in CIRI for the treatment and outcome of ischemic stroke [61].

Inflammation accompanies ischemia and reperfusion processes and participates in the pathological process of injury. Ischemia maintains an intravascular inflammatory environment by activating leukocytes and inducing the release of proinflammatory cytokines from vascular endothelial cells [62]. Ischemia also leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [63]. Cerebral ischemia leads to disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which is consistent with increased Fyn activity [64]. The release of proinflammatory factors alters the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and leads to the migration of monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes into the brain parenchyma [65]. Fyn may exacerbate cerebral ischemic injury both by activating downstream inflammatory pathways and by causing or contributing to brain edema through BBB disruption [66, 67].

Reoxygenation and glucose replenishment in a tissue previously subject to ischemia boosts oxidative stress and the release of inflammatory mediators and leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury in tissues surrounding the ischemic area. Microglia are resident immune cells in the brain. Microglia can be polarized into different phenotypes after activation. The M1 phenotype has a proinflammatory effect and participates in the occurrence of neuroinflammation, while the M2 phenotype has an anti-inflammatory effect to reduce brain damage caused by inflammation. Ischemia can activate Fyn kinase in microglia to produce reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory factors, which activate and polarize microglia to the M1 type. TNFα, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1 (IL-1) are released by M1-type microglia to aggravate tissue damage. Elevation of interleukin-6 (IL-6), an inflammatory marker of stroke, has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor. IL-6 is involved in the regulation of oxidative stress and angiogenesis [68]. IL-6 is involved in the NMDA response and affects neurodevelopment.

A growing body of evidence suggests that postischemic inflammation is important in different stages of cerebral ischemia. Neuroinflammation leads to further neuronal death by increasing the expression of inflammatory factors caused by changes in the brain environment after excitotoxic injury and oxidative stress in CIRI. The use of anti-inflammatory strategies in the treatment of ischemic stroke is appealing because they have a broader therapeutic window than the currently popular reperfusion-based approaches.

Recent studies have suggested that neuroinflammation may be key to the development of progressive stroke after reperfusion [69]. Fyn is involved in the pathological process of various neurodegenerative diseases and is closely related to neuroinflammation [70].

Fyn is upregulated in chronic inflammation, and Fyn knockout mice can largely attenuate neuroinflammatory responses induced by MPTP, LPS, or 6-OHDA [71]. Previous studies have found that Fyn is highly expressed in the hippocampus of ischemia-reperfusion injury, and inhibition or knockdown of Fyn significantly reduces the expression of related inflammatory molecules in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Functional studies have shown that Fyn is required for proinflammatory responses, including cytokine release and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activation [72].

Fyn is shown to mediate the production of proinflammatory mediators in mast cells, macrophages, basophils, and natural killer cells [73]. Fyn was shown to be activated upon engagement of fibrillar amyloid peptides by its receptor CD36, contributing to the activation and migration of primary macrophages and microglia, and to the neurotoxicity of BV2 microglia by prion proteins activated by fragment stimulation, etc. Fyn knockout mice have less adipose tissue inflammation due to T cell and macrophage infiltration and a higher proportion of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages [74].

Fyn can modulate the transduction of inhibitory or activating signals of immune receptors, and Fyn deficiency has protective effects against arthritis and nephritis in mice. Fyn is involved in the initiation of ITAM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif) receptor-mediated signaling, and Fyn is responsible for ITAM phosphorylation after receptor aggregation, leading to Syk by recruiting downstream effectors such as PI3-kinase and phospholipase C-γ to initiate further signal propagation [35]. Therefore, the activation of Fyn has important significance in neuroinflammation.

Pyk2 localizes to neuronal postsynaptic sites and is involved in the regulation of synaptic plasticity [75, 76]. Pyk2 is thought to be a target of Fyn-specific regulation. The level of Pyk2 tyrosine phosphorylation was substantially increased in the coexpression system of Pyk2 with Fyn [77]. Another study also found increased Pyk2 activity in mice constitutively overexpressing Fyn (FynCA) [78]. Selective regulation of Pyk2 tyrosine phosphorylation by Fyn in vivo was associated with preferential phosphorylation of Pyk2 by Fyn in vitro. Pyk2 knockout mice do not cause significant developmental impairment but affect the cell migration of macrophages and marginal zone B cells [79]. Pyk2 is required for macrophage polarization and migration to sites of inflammation [80].

Pyk2 regulates ASC, an inflammasome adaptor protein that plays a role in innate immune responses and inflammatory diseases by activating auto-oligomerization of the NLRP3 inflammasome [81]. Pyk2 phosphorylation is closely linked to the occurrence and progression of various neurological diseases. Fyn regulates Pyk2 activity, which can hyperphosphorylate tau protein and increase the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Pyk2 inhibition can reduce neuroinflammation by downregulating the expression of Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), [82]. Activated Pyk2 phosphorylates MCU and increases mitochondrial calcium uptake, resulting in mitochondrial calcium overload and dysfunction [83].

Previous studies have found that Npas4, an immediate early gene, is enhanced in Pyk2 knockout mice, but how it is regulated and its molecular mechanisms remain unclear [84]. Inhibition of Fyn can reduce the expression of inflammatory factors and upregulate the expression of Npas4, which is regulated by Pyk2.

Npas4 may be involved in regulating cell death-associated signaling pathways and inflammatory responses [85]. According to Ooe et al., a knockout mouse model of Npas4 (Npas4-/-) exhibited cumulative neurodegeneration in their brains. An increase in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression indicates the activation of glial cells, which causes nerve damage [86]. The number of activated microglia and astrocytes was significantly increased in Npas4-/-mice 96 h after stroke induction. The study also found that using OGD, knockout of Npas4 in cultured neurons resulted in increased susceptibility to cell death and also found that Npas4-/-mice had significantly larger lesion areas than wild-type mice after induction of cerebral ischemia and neurodegeneration. Npas4 levels were significantly higher, confirming its neuroprotective role in ischemic stroke [87]. Figure 2 presents the mechanism of brain injury induced by Fyn activated by ischemia-reperfusion.

4. The Potential of Fyn as a Therapeutic Target for Stroke

Fyn inhibitors have therapeutic effects on many diseases, including tumors, neurological diseases, and osteoarthritis [88–94]. Preclinical studies in rodents with Fyn inhibitors suggest that targeting this kinase family may be beneficial in humans to prevent ischemic brain injury (Table 1 [95].

Saracatinib is an Src inhibitor that also inhibits Fyn, c-Yes, Lyn, BLK, FGR, and Lck and has been shown to reduce glial hyperplasia, neurodegeneration, and nitro-oxidative stress [96]. On123300 is a multi-target kinase inhibitor that inhibits CDK4, ark5/nuak1, PDGFR, FGFR1, RET (c-RET), and Fyn. On123300 has been shown in studies to reduce apoptotic cell death induced by OGD/R, as well as the expression of p-Rb, B-Myb, and Bim and alleviate ischemic/hypoxic nerve injury [97].

PP1 (4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl) pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine) and PP2 (4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl) pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine), are ATP analogs that compete with ATP for the ATP-binding pocket of SFKs, thereby reducing the ability of SFKs to phosphorylate substrates. Both compounds have certain selectivity for Fyn in SFKs, but PP2 is more selective for Fyn [98].

PP2 protects hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons from transient ischemia. Inhibition of Fyn can inhibit calcium overload by promoting the interaction of L-type calcium channels with Bcl-2-related immortal gene 3 (athanogene 3), thereby reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Experiments in the adult rat middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model showed that PP2 reduced infarct volume and Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) leakage [99]. PP2 blocks ET-1-induced elevation of IL-6 [59]. However, the mechanism of PP2 in alleviating cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury has not been fully elucidated.

5. Conclusion

On the one hand, the upregulation of Fyn through neuromodulation may also benefit several aspects such as neuronal migration, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity [100, 101]. Neuromodulation is essential for synaptogenesis and plasticity [102]. Increasing Fyn activity promotes actin dynamics allowing oligodendrocyte maturation and facilitating synaptic regeneration, and subsequent myelin production [103]. On the other hand, increased levels of Fyn correlate with increased microglia activation in PD brains, and Fyn is also involved in T cell differentiation, particularly through the release of proinflammatory cytokines by Th17 [104]. Considering the damage of inflammatory response on brain function after ischemia-reperfusion, special attention needs to be paid to the changes in Fyn activity due to ischemia-reperfusion.

More and more studies suggest that Fyn plays an important management role in ischemia-reperfusion injury, yet many mechanisms remain unexplained. Fyn inhibitors have been shown to reduce exacerbations. The use of Fyn inhibitors inhibits calcium overload and elevated inflammatory cytokines, thereby reducing ischemic brain injury. Fyn inhibitors have a palliative effect in a variety of diseases involving neuroinflammation. Elucidating the mechanism of Fyn inhibitor is helpful to clarify the molecular mechanism of Fyn affecting the prognosis of ischemia-reperfusion injury and the mechanism of Fyn inhibitor protecting nerve injury from ischemia-reperfusion injury and provides potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Data Availability

No original data were used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Jiaxin Liu developed the idea. Fang Du and Tao Tang reviewed the literature and prepared the first draft, and Qingzhu Li revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Fang Du and Tao Tang share the first authorship.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81860338 and 202101AT070115) and the Yunnan Province Foundation of Talent Cultivation (KKSY201960025).

References

Z. Pan, G. Ma, L. Kong, and G. du, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1: regulatory mechanisms and drug development in stroke,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 170, p. 105742, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wu, B. Wu, M. Liu et al., “Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 394–405, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Liu, B. Wu, W. Z. Wang, L. M. Lee, S. H. Zhang, and L. Z. Kong, “Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 456–464, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Maida, R. L. Norrito, M. Daidone, A. Tuttolomondo, and A. Pinto, “Neuroinflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: focus on cardioembolic stroke, background, and therapeutic approaches,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 18, p. 6454, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Feske, “Ischemic stroke,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 134, no. 12, pp. 1457–1464, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hurford, A. Sekhar, T. A. T. Hughes, and K. W. Muir, “Diagnosis and management of acute ischaemic stroke,” Practical Neurology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 304–316, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Molina and J. Alvarez-Sabín, “Recanalization and reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 27, Suppl 1, pp. 162–167, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Sun, H. Jin, X. Sun et al., “Free radical damage in ischemia-reperfusion injury: an obstacle in acute ischemic stroke after revascularization therapy,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 3804979, 17 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Zhang et al., “Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 864426, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Brouns and P. P. De Deyn, “The complexity of neurobiological processes in acute ischemic stroke,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 483–495, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. P. Wang, K. Kang, J. Sun, Q. Lin, Q. L. Lv, and J. Hai, “URB597 and andrographolide improve brain microvascular endothelial cell permeability and apoptosis by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation associated with activation of Nrf2 signaling in oxygen-glucose deprivation,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2022, Article ID 4139330, 23 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhou, H. Chen, L. Wang et al., “Mitochondrial dynamics: a potential therapeutic target for ischemic stroke,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 721428, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Orellana-Urzúa, I. Rojas, L. Líbano, and R. Rodrigo, “Pathophysiology of ischemic stroke: role of oxidative stress,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 26, no. 34, pp. 4246–4260, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Urushitani, Tomoki, Nakamizo et al., “N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated mitochondrial ca(2+) overload in acute excitotoxic motor neuron death: a mechanism distinct from chronic neurotoxicity after ca(2+) influx,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 377–387, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Franke, M. Bieber, P. Kraft, A. N. R. Weber, G. Stoll, and M. K. Schuhmann, “The NLRP3 inflammasome drives inflammation in ischemia/reperfusion injury after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 92, pp. 223–233, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Knox and X. Jiang, “Fyn in neurodevelopment and ischemic brain injury,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 311–320, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Umemori, S. Satot, T. Yagi, S. Aizawal, and T. Yamamoto, “Initial events of myelination involve Fyn tyrosine kinase signalling,” Nature, vol. 367, no. 6463, pp. 572–576, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Panicker, H. Saminathan, H. Jin et al., “Fyn kinase regulates microglial Neuroinflammatory responses in cell culture and animal models of Parkinson’s disease,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 27, pp. 10058–10077, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Takagi, H. H. Cheung, N. Bissoon, L. Teves, M. C. Wallace, and J. W. Gurd, “The effect of transient global ischemia on the interaction of Src and Fyn with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and postsynaptic densities: possible involvement of Src homology 2 domains,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 19, p. 880, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gonfloni, A. Weijland, J. Kretzschmar, and G. Superti-Furga, “Crosstalk between the catalytic and regulatory domains allows bidirectional regulation of Src,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 281–286, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Amatya, D. Y. Lin, and A. H. Andreotti, “Dynamic regulatory features of the protein tyrosine kinases,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1101–1116, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Du, R. Tan, and X. Y. Hou, “Fyn kinases play a critical role in neuronal apoptosis induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation or amyloid-β peptide treatment,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 754–761, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Qiu, T. Qian, T. Wu, T. Gao, Q. Xing, and L. Wang, “Src family kinases inhibition ameliorates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in immature rats,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 746130, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Ko, S. H. Lee, K. C. Kim, S. H. Joo, W. S. Choi, and C. Y. Shin, “The role of TLR4 and Fyn interaction on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated PAI-1 expression in astrocytes,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 8–25, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Du, J. Gao, J. M. Tai et al., “Increased tyrosine phosphorylation of PSD-95 by Src family kinases after brain ischaemia,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 277–285, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, Q. Li, L. Chen et al., “PSD-93 deletion inhibits Fyn-mediated phosphorylation of NR2B and protects against focal cerebral ischemia,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 68, pp. 104–111, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. V. Kalia and M. W. Salter, “Interactions between Src family protein tyrosine kinases and PSD-95,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 720–728, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Moon, M. L. Apperson, and M. B. Kennedy, “The major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in the postsynaptic density fraction is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 3954–3958, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ma, G. Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Z. Yan, and Z. B. Hao, “Lithium suppressed Tyr-402 phosphorylation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase (Pyk2) and interactions of Pyk2 and PSD-95 with NR2A in rat hippocampus following cerebral ischemia,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 357–362, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. T. Patel, M. C. Stevens, A. Dunlap et al., “Effects of the Fyn kinase inhibitor saracatinib on ventral striatal activity during performance of an fMRI monetary incentive delay task in individuals family history positive or negative for alcohol use disorder. A pilot randomised trial,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 840–846, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Rajani, A. S. Sengar, and M. W. Salter, “Src and Fyn regulation of NMDA receptors in health and disease,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 193, p. 108615, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gumbleton and W. G. Kerr, “Role of inositol phospholipid signaling in natural killer cell biology,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, p. 47, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Wang and R. A. Swanson, “Superoxide and non-ionotropic signaling in neuronal excitotoxicity,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 4, p. 861, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Gage and T. Thippeswamy, “Inhibitors of Src family kinases, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and NADPH oxidase as potential CNS drug targets for neurological diseases,” CNS Drugs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Mkaddem, A. Murua, H. Flament et al., “Lyn and Fyn function as molecular switches that control immunoreceptors to direct homeostasis or inflammation,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 246, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Srikanth, “FAK family kinases in brain health and disease,” JMCM, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 177–190, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. López-Molina, J. Fernández-Irigoyen, C. Cifuentes-Díaz et al., “Pyk2 regulates MAMs and mitochondrial dynamics in hippocampal neurons,” Cell, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 842, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhu, S. F. Chu, Y. Peng et al., “Pyk2 inhibition attenuates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal mice,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 797–810, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. I. Stanika, I. Villanueva, G. Kazanina, S. B. Andrews, and N. B. Pivovarova, “Comparative impact of voltage-gated calcium channels and NMDA receptors on mitochondria-mediated neuronal injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 6642–6650, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhu, L. Yang, X. Zhao et al., “Xanthoceraside modulates NR2B-containing NMDA receptors at synapses and rescues learning-memory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 235, no. 1, pp. 337–349, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pregnolato, E. Chakkarapani, A. R. Isles, and K. Luyt, “Glutamate transport and preterm brain injury,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 10, p. 417, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Morley, M. J. Hogan, and A. M. Hakim, “Calcium-mediated mechanisms of ischemic injury and protection,” Brain Pathology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Miller, “Voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 1403–1406, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kalogeris, C. P. Baines, M. Krenz, and R. J. Korthuis, “Ischemia/reperfusion,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 113–170, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Brennan-Minnella, Y. Shen, J. el-Benna, and R. A. Swanson, “Phosphoinositide 3-kinase couples NMDA receptors to superoxide release in excitotoxic neuronal death,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 4, article e580, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Harr, K. S. McColl, F. Zhong, J. K. Molitoris, and C. W. Distelhorst, “Glucocorticoids downregulate Fyn and inhibit IP(3)-mediated calcium signaling to promote autophagy in T lymphocytes,” Autophagy, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 912–921, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Knox, A. M. Brennan-Minnella, F. Lu et al., “NR2B phosphorylation at tyrosine 1472 contributes to brain injury in a rodent model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3040–3047, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Prybylowski, K. Chang, N. Sans, L. Kan, S. Vicini, and R. J. Wenthold, “The synaptic localization of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors is controlled by interactions with PDZ proteins and AP-2,” Neuron, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 845–857, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Qiu, W. Pan, D. Luo et al., “Dysregulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling mediated by NMDAR/Ca2+/calpain might contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aging mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 23, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tamareille, H. Achour, J. Amirian et al., “Left ventricular unloading before reperfusion reduces endothelin-1 release and calcium overload in porcine myocardial infarction,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 343–351, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, F. Niu, W. Fan, J. Shi, J. Zhang, and B. Li, “Modulating effects of preconditioning exercise in the expression of ET-1 and BNP via HIF-1α in ischemically injured brain,” Metabolic Brain Disease, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1299–1311, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. T. Yang, K. Sakurai, H. Sugawara, T. Watanabe, I. Norota, and M. Endoh, “Role of Na+/Ca2+ exchange in endothelin-1-induced increases in Ca2+ transient and contractility in rabbit ventricular myocytes: pharmacological analysis with KB-R7943,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1785–1795, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hao, X. Wei, P. Guo, G. Zhang, and S. Qi, “Neuroprotective effects of inhibiting Fyn S-nitrosylation on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced damage to CA1 hippocampal neurons,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1100, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Chang, J. Y. Chen, M. H. Wu, and M. L. Hu, “Therapeutic treatment with vitamin C reduces focal cerebral ischemia-induced brain infarction in rats by attenuating disruptions of blood brain barrier and cerebral neuronal apoptosis,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 155, pp. 29–36, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Lee, J. W. Choi, and M. S. Choi, “Role of Nitric Oxide and Protein S-Nitrosylation in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury,” Antioxidants (Basel), vol. 11, no. 1, p. 57, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. De Mario, C. Peggion, M. L. Massimino et al., “The link of the prion protein with Ca2+ metabolism and ROS production, and the possible implication in Aβ toxicity,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 18, p. 4640, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Padmanabhan, R. Martínez-Mármol, D. Xia, J. Götz, and F. A. Meunier, “Frontotemporal dementia mutant tau promotes aberrant Fyn nanoclustering in hippocampal dendritic spines,” eLife, vol. 8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Z. Liu, B. Waldau, B. P. Ander et al., “Inhibition of Src family kinases improves cognitive function after intraventricular hemorrhage or intraventricular thrombin,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 2359–2367, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Xiao et al., “Tyrosine kinase Fyn promotes apoptosis after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats by activating Drp1 signaling,” Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berlin, Germany), vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 359–371, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jin, G. Yang, and G. Li, “Inflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: role of inflammatory cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 779–789, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, M. Ye, C. An, L. Pan, and L. Ji, “The effect of cationic albumin-conjugated PEGylated tanshinone IIA nanoparticles on neuronal signal pathways and neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 28, pp. 6893–6905, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Anrather and C. Iadecola, “Inflammation and stroke: an overview,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 661–670, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Liam, W. Tina, R. Maria, and P. Matthew E, “Naked mole-rat cortex maintains reactive oxygen species homeostasis during in vitro hypoxia or ischemia and reperfusion,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 20, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kago, N. Takagi, I. Date, Y. Takenaga, K. Takagi, and S. Takeo, “Cerebral ischemia enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of occludin in brain capillaries,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 339, no. 4, pp. 1197–1203, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Tian and T. R. Kyriakides, “Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deficiency leads to prolonged foreign body response in the brain associated with increased IL-1beta levels and leakage of the blood-brain barrier,” Matrix Biology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 148–159, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen, L. Shao, and L. Ma, “Cerebral edema formation after stroke: emphasis on blood-brain barrier and the lymphatic drainage system of the brain,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 716825, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. V. Freundt, F. A. von Samson-Himmelstjerna, J. T. Nitz et al., “The orphan receptor GPRC5B activates pro-inflammatory signaling in the vascular wall via Fyn and NFκB,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 592, pp. 60–66, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Erta, A. Quintana, and J. Hidalgo, “Interleukin-6, a major cytokine in the central nervous system,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1254–1266, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Denorme, K. Martinod, A. Vandenbulcke et al., “The von Willebrand factor A1 domain mediates thromboinflammation, aggravating ischemic stroke outcome in mice,” Haematologica, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 819–828, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Guglietti, S. Sivasankar, S. Mustafa, F. Corrigan, and L. E. Collins-Praino, “Fyn kinase activity and its role in neurodegenerative disease pathology: a potential universal target?” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 5986–6005, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Saminathan, A. Ghosh, D. Zhang et al., “Fyn kinase-mediated PKCδ Y311 phosphorylation induces dopaminergic degeneration in cell culture and animal models: implications for the identification of a new pharmacological target for Parkinson’s disease,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, p. 631375, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Rahman, T. Senga, S. Ito, T. Hyodo, H. Hasegawa, and M. Hamaguchi, “S-nitrosylation at cysteine 498 of c-Src tyrosine kinase regulates nitric oxide-mediated cell invasion,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. 3806–3814, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rajasekaran, P. Kumar, K. M. Schuldt et al., “Signaling by Fyn-ADAP via the Carma1-Bcl-10-MAP3K7 signalosome exclusively regulates inflammatory cytokine production in NK cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1127–1136, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Lee, H. Kwon, H. Zong et al., “Fyn deficiency promotes a preferential increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue mass and decreased visceral adipose tissue inflammation,” Diabetes, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1537–1546, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lee, S. V. Salazar, T. O. Cox, and S. M. Strittmatter, “Pyk2 signaling through Graf1 and RhoA GTPase is required for amyloid-β oligomer-triggered synapse loss,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1910–1929, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Giralt, V. Brito, Q. Chevy et al., “Pyk2 modulates hippocampal excitatory synapses and contributes to cognitive deficits in a Huntington’s disease model,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 15592, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Qian, S. Lev, N. S. C. . Oers, I. Dikic, J. Schlessinger, and A. Weiss, “Tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 is selectively regulated by Fyn during TCR signaling,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 185, no. 7, pp. 1253–1260, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li and J. Götz, “Pyk2 is a novel tau tyrosine kinase that is regulated by the tyrosine kinase Fyn,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 205–221, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Okigaki, C. Davis, M. Falasca et al., “Pyk2 regulates multiple signaling events crucial for macrophage morphology and migration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 19, pp. 10740–10745, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhu, Y. Bao, Y. Guo, and W. Yang, “Proline-rich protein tyrosine kinase 2 in inflammation and cancer,” Cancers (Basel), vol. 10, no. 5, p. 139, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. C. Chung, C. N. OuYang, S. N. Yuan et al., “Pyk2 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome by directly phosphorylating ASC and contributes to inflammasome-dependent peritonitis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 36214, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Yang, C. C. Lin, L. D. Hsiao, and C. M. Yang, “Galangin inhibits thrombin-induced MMP-9 expression in SK-N-SH cells via protein kinase-dependent NF-κB phosphorylation,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 12, p. 4084, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zhang, J. Yan, L. Wang et al., “The Pyk2/MCU pathway in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemic stroke,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 131, pp. 52–62, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zheng, L. Suo, Y. Zhou et al., “Pyk2 suppresses contextual fear memory in an autophosphorylation-independent manner,” Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 808–821, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Choy, T. Klarić, S. Koblar, and M. Lewis, “The role of the neuroprotective factor Npas4 in cerebral ischemia,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 29011–29028, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Ooe, K. Motonaga, K. Kobayashi, K. Saito, and H. Kaneko, “Functional characterization of basic helix-loop-helix-PAS type transcription factor NXF in vivo: putative involvement in an "on demand" neuroprotection system,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 1057–1063, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Choy, T. S. Klarić, W. K. Leong, S. A. Koblar, and M. D. Lewis, “Reduction of the neuroprotective transcription factor Npas4 results in increased neuronal necrosis, inflammation and brain lesion size following ischaemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1449–1463, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Ferrao Blanco, H. Domenech Garcia, L. Legeai-Mallet, and G. J. V. M. van Osch, “Tyrosine kinases regulate chondrocyte hypertrophy: promising drug targets for osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1389–1398, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sharma, S. Carlson, A. Gregory-Flores, A. Hinojo-Perez, A. Olson, and T. Thippeswamy, “Mechanisms of disease-modifying effect of saracatinib (AZD0530), a Src/Fyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the rat kainate model of temporal lobe epilepsy,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 156, p. 105410, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. Boyd, H. Wang, H. Avila et al., “Combination of an SRC kinase inhibitor with a novel pharmacological antagonist of the urokinase receptor diminishes in vitro colon cancer invasiveness,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1545–1555, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Park, V. Golubovskaya, L. Xu et al., “Activated Src increases adhesion, survival and alpha2-integrin expression in human breast cancer cells,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 378, no. 2, pp. 559–567, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Wang, J. P. Yu, X. An, Z. W. Jia, J. Zhang, and Y. X. Su, “Attenuation of cartilage pathogenesis in osteoarthritis by blocking the phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase Fyn to β-catenin, AZD0530,” Bone, vol. 154, p. 116259, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Demuro, R. M. C. di Martino, J. A. Ortega, and A. Cavalli, “GSK-3β, FYN, and DYRK1A: master regulators in neurodegenerative pathways,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 16, p. 9098, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Perumal, P. Y. Kuo, V. V. Leshchenko et al., “Dual targeting of CDK4 and ARK5 using a novel kinase inhibitor ON123300 exerts potent anticancer activity against multiple myeloma,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1225–1236, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Marotta, F. Basagni, M. Rosini, and A. Minarini, “Role of Fyn kinase inhibitors in switching neuroinflammatory pathways,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 27, pp. 4738–4755, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gage, M. Putra, L. Wachter et al., “Saracatinib, a Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a disease modifier in the rat DFP model: sex differences, neurobehavior, gliosis, neurodegeneration, and nitro-oxidative stress,” Antioxidants (Basel), vol. 11, no. 1, p. 61, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, B. Li, Y. Bu et al., “Sertad1 induces neurological injury after ischemic stroke via the CDK4/p-Rb pathway,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 216–230, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Hanke, J. P. Gardner, R. L. Dow et al., “Discovery of a novel, potent, and Src family-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Study of Lck- and FynT-dependent T cell activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 695–701, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takenaga, N. Takagi, K. Murotomi, K. Tanonaka, and S. Takeo, “Inhibition of Src activity decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of occludin in brain capillaries and attenuates increase in permeability of the blood-brain barrier after transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1099–1108, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bland, M. Zhu, C. Dillon et al., “Leptin controls glutamatergic synaptogenesis and NMDA-receptor trafficking via Fyn kinase regulation of NR2B,” Endocrinology, vol. 161, no. 2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Marangi, S. T. Wieland, and C. Fuhrer, “Laminin-1 redistributes postsynaptic proteins and requires rapsyn, tyrosine phosphorylation, and Src and Fyn to stably cluster acetylcholine receptors,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 883–895, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, “The role of neuromodulation to drive neural plasticity in stroke recovery: a narrative review,” Brain Network and Modulation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jossin, “Reelin functions, mechanisms of action and signaling pathways during brain development and maturation,” Biomolecules, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 964, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ueda, L. Zhou, and P. L. Stein, “Fyn promotes Th17 differentiation by regulating the kinetics of RORγt and Foxp3 expression,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 11, pp. 5247–5256, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Fang Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

286

Downloads

423

Citations