Differences in Gut Microbiota between Healthy Individuals and Patients with Perianal Abscess before and after Surgery

Yin, Hezhai; Luo, Bairu; Wang, Qi; Hong, Zhonghua; Chen, Huilin; Shen, Lidong; Shen, Bin; Hu, Bo

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1165916

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 1165916 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1165916

Differences in Gut Microbiota between Healthy Individuals and Patients with Perianal Abscess before and after Surgery

Hezhai Yin,¹Bairu Luo,²Qi Wang,¹Zhonghua Hong,¹Huilin Chen,¹Lidong Shen,¹Bin Shen,¹and Bo Hu¹

Academic Editor: Guangtao Xu

Received05 Nov 2022

Revised13 Mar 2023

Accepted29 Mar 2023

Published12 Apr 2023

Abstract

Surgery is the most important treatment for perianal abscesses. However, the gut microbiota of patients with perianal abscess and the effects of perianal abscess on the gut microbiota after surgery are unknown. In this study, significant changes in interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the blood of healthy subjects, patients with perianal abscesses, and patients after perianal abscess surgery were identified. 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to detect the changes in the gut microbiota among 30 healthy individuals and 30 patients with perianal abscess before and after surgery. Venn diagrams and alpha diversity analyses indicated differences in the abundance and uniformity of gut microbiota between the healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgery. Beta diversity analysis indicated that the grouping effects among the control, abscess, and surgery groups were good. The classification and compositional analysis showed significant differences in the gut microbiota between healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgery. LEfSe analysis, random forest analysis, and ROC curve analysis showed that Klebsiella () and Bilophila () could be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of perianal abscess. The functional prediction results showed that the differential microbiota is significantly enriched in the pathways related to nutrition and drug metabolism. This study may have important implications for the clinical management and prognostic assessment of patients with perianal abscesses.

1. Introduction

Perianal abscess is the most common type of anorectal abscess, causing severe discomfort to the patients [1, 2]. It occurs at the edge of the anus and, if left untreated, can extend to the ischial anal space or sphincter space because these areas are in continuation with the perianal space and can also cause systemic infections [1, 3]. Pain, swelling, and fever are considered to be their hallmark symptoms, and about 35% of the patients develop an anal fistula [4, 5]. By exploring the records of hospital inpatients and outpatients, it was found that the perianal abscesses and anal fistulas are increasing every year in various countries [6]. Especially the men aged 21-40 years are more likely to develop this disease [7]. The most common treatment for perianal abscesses is incision and drainage [8, 9]. Generally, the patients with perianal abscesses do not need follow-up treatments after surgery, but the pathogenic microorganisms can easily colonize the intestinal tract of patients after surgery [10]. Therefore, the changes in the gut microbiota of the patients with perianal abscesses after surgery are also needed to be focused on. Although perianal abscesses are regarded as nonthreatening conditions, they might affect the well-being and quality of patients’ lives and the expensive conditions of society [11]. Therefore, clinicians must find appropriate therapeutic interventions for perianal abscesses.

The gut microbiota plays a huge role in some of the physiological processes in human body, such as biosynthesis of vitamins and amino acids, decomposition of food components, resistance against pathogenic microorganisms, prevention of epithelial damage, development and training of immune system, promotion of angiogenesis, storage of fats, and modification of nervous and immune actions [12–15]. The studies on human microbiota have demonstrated not only their physiological but also the pathological effects of gut microbiota on human health. The imbalance of gut microbiota can cause a series of diseases, including digestive system diseases, metabolic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and autoimmune diseases [16–18]. Anus is the gateway of digestive tract to the outer body and the perianal diseases are closely related to the microorganisms [19]. At present, the correlations between the perianal abscesses and gut microbiota are not fully understood. Although studying the aerobic and anaerobic organisms, such as Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Clostridium species, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, and Escherichia coli, are considered to be related to the perianal abscesses, their occurrence has a certain connection with gut microbiota [10]. Although uncomplicated perianal fistula can be treated by drainage, abscess formation usually requires emergency surgery [20, 21]. In addition, since many patients use anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs, additional antibiotic treatment is usually included to obtain the best treatment [22]. Although the use of antibiotics has been proved to have a positive effect on discharged anorectal abscess and is recommended, it is very important to adjust the types of antibiotics according to the microbial spectrum to avoid overtreatment and antibiotic resistance [20]. In addition, antibiotic treatment should not be delayed, and the individual characteristics of patients, such as complications and drug treatment, as well as potential microbial spectrum should be considered [22]. This is especially important for patients with perianal fistula and abscess formation because they often receive immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory drugs. However, at present, there is little evidence about the formation of microbial spectrum of perianal abscess, and empirical antibiotic treatment is often insufficient [23]. Although some studies have detected that microorganisms, such as gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci, such as Escherichia coli or Streptococcus, are generally related to the formation of anorectal abscess, there is no data on the microbial spectrum of patients with perianal abscess [22]. Therefore, it is particularly important to study the differences of bacterial flora in patients with perianal abscess before and after surgery and before and after drug treatment.

In this study, a high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to identify the composition of gut microbiota in the fecal samples of healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgery. The high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology could effectively detect the differences between the gut microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgery. This study is of great significance for the patients with perianal abscesses to select sensitive antibiotics for preventing the microbial colonization of possible pathogenic bacteria, as well as for their clinical treatment and prognostic evaluation.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Research Design

The patients newly diagnosed (June-August, 2022) with perianal abscesses by a gastroenterologist were registered for this study. Inclusion criteria for the patients included diagnosis of perianal abscess, agreement to join the microbiota research project, and understanding of the research purpose. Exclusion criteria for the patients included diagnoses of other digestive diseases, such as colorectal cancer and diarrhea, severe cardiovascular diseases, pregnancy, pregnancy or lactation preparation, infectious diseases, local skin trauma or infections, diabetes, hypertension, and lack of informed consent. The feces of 30 healthy people and 30 patients with perianal abscess were collected for subsequent experiments. According to the diagnostic criteria of Gaertner et al., clinical blood tests and contact are used to identify patients with perianal abscess [24]. Collection of feces for follow-up experiments in patients with perianal abscess was done one week after surgery. Healthy people, patients with perianal abscess, and patients after perianal abscess surgery were the control group, abscess group, and surgical group, respectively. The study was approved by the Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the participants signed a written informed consent before participating (ChiCTR2200061815).

2.2. Sample Collection

Stool specimens from all the participants were collected at the time of registration into 10 mL sterile centrifuge tubes immediately after defecation. The stool samples were frozen within 4 hours and stored at -80°C. All the frozen samples were processed within 6 months and shipped to LC-Bio Technologies (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd., for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Meanwhile, blood samples were collected from three groups of patients for subsequent testing of inflammatory factors.

2.3. Blood Test for Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α)

Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 r/min, and serum was separated for the subsequent detection of inflammatory factors. The Roche Chemiluminescence e602 (Roche, Switzerland) was used for the detection of IL-6 and TNF-α in blood samples according to the reagent manufacturer’s instructions (IMMULITE1000, Siemens, Germany).

2.4. DNA Extraction

Following the manufacturer’s instructions, E.Z.N.A. ®Stool DNA Kit (D4015, Omega, Inc., USA) was used for the total bacterial DNA extraction from the stool samples [25]. Nuclease-free water was used as a negative control. The extracted DNA was eluted in a 50 μL elution buffer and stored at -80°C until amplification using PCR by LC-Bio Technologies (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

2.5. PCR Amplification and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

The bacterial V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primers 341F (5-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3) and 805R (5-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3) [25]. The 5 ends of the primers were tagged with specific barcodes per sample and sequenced using universal primers. The PCR amplification was performed on a 25 μL reaction mixture, containing 25 ng of template DNA, 12.5 μL of PCR Premix, 2.5 μL of each primer, and PCR-grade water to adjust the total volume to 25 μL. The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: initial denaturation at 98°C for 30 seconds; 32 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 seconds, annealing at 54°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 45 seconds, and final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR products were confirmed on 2% agarose gel. Ultrapure water was used instead of template DNA as a negative control to exclude the possibility of false-positive PCR results. The PCR products were purified using AMPure XT beads (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA, USA) and quantified using Qubit (Invitrogen, USA). The amplicon libraries were prepared for sequencing. The size and quantity of the amplicon libraries were assessed using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA) and Library Quantification Kit for Illumina (Kapa Biosciences, Woburn, MA, USA), respectively. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq PE250 platform.

2.6. Data Analysis

The samples were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq platform following the manufacturer’s instructions provided by LC-Bio Technologies (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Paired-end sequencing reads were assigned to the samples based on their unique barcodes and truncated by cutting off the barcodes and primer sequences. The paired-end sequencing reads were merged using the FLASH software. The quality filtration of the raw sequencing reads was performed under specific filtering conditions to obtain the high-quality clean sequence reads according to the fqtrim (v0.94). Chimeric sequences were filtered using the VSEARCH software (v2.3.4). After removing duplicated sequences using DADA2, the feature table and feature sequences were obtained. The alpha and beta diversities were calculated by normalizing to the same sequences randomly. Then, according to SILVA database (release 132) classifier, the feature abundance was normalized using the relative abundance of each sample. The alpha diversity was applied to analyze the complexity of species diversity for a sample using 4 indices, including Chao1, observed species, Shannon, and Simpson indices; all these indices were calculated using QIIME2 (v2019.4). The beta diversity was also calculated using QIIME2 (v2019.4), and the graphs were drawn using R package. BLAST was used for the sequence alignment, and the feature sequences were annotated using the SILVA database for each of the representative sequences. LEfSe (linear discriminant analysis effect size) was performed to detect differentially abundant taxa across groups using the default parameters, and species with significant multigroup differences was detected by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Other diagrams were implemented using the R package (v3.5.2).

3. Results

3.1. Study Subjects

A total of 30 male subjects, including 30 healthy individuals and 30 patients with perianal abscesses, were included in this study. The ages of the subjects were within the range of 19 and 60 years, which are shown in Figure 1(a). As shown in Figure 1(b), there was no significant difference in body weight between patients in the control group, abscess group, and surgical group (). IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher in patients in the abscess group compared with the control group (). In addition, IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly decreased in patients in the surgical group compared with the abscess group (). This indicates that an inflammatory response occurred in patients with perianal abscess and that the inflammatory response in postoperative patients was suppressed by treatment.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. Difference of α-Diversities of Gut Microbiota before and after Surgery in the Healthy Individuals and Patients with Perianal Abscess

A total of 4,010,545 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were obtained after filtration using QIIME2 (v2019.4) with DADA2. The Venn diagram shows the shared and unique ASVs among the control, abscess, and surgery groups (Figure 2). There were 378 ASVs shared by the three groups, while 1568, 701 and 580 ASVs were the unique ASVs of the control, abscess, and surgery groups, respectively.

The abundance and uniformity of gut microbiota in each group were evaluated using the four α-diversity indices, including Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, and observed species indices. As shown in Figure 3, in comparison with the surgery group, the Shannon () and Simpson () indices of the control and abscess groups significantly decreased. Meanwhile, the observed species in the surgery groups changed significantly as compared to the control group. This indicated that the abundance and uniformity of gut microbiota altered after surgical treatment.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Differences in the β-Diversity of Gut Microbiota before and after Surgeries in the Healthy Individuals and Patients with Perianal Abscess

The PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distance was used to evaluate the β-diversity of the samples. As shown in Figure 4, the distance between the samples is represented by the two principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2), where the samples that are located close together were more similar in their compositions. The values in Figure 4 were obtained using the Adonis test and show that the differences between the groups were significant.

3.4. Differences in the Abundance of Gut Microbiota between the Healthy Individuals and Patients with Perianal Abscess before and after Surgery

The taxonomic compositional analysis of the gut microbiota suggested that the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the main bacterial species in the intestine at phylum level (Figure 5(a)). The abundance of these gut microbiota went through significant changes (Figure 6(a)). As compared to the control group, the relative abundances of Actinobacteriota and Bacteroidota were significantly lower in the surgery group. At the same time, the relative abundance of Bacteroidota in the surgery group was significantly lower than that in the abscess group.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Figure 5(b) shows the 30 most abundant bacteria in the gut microbiota at the genus level. The relative abundances of these gut microbiota altered significantly among the control, abscess, and surgery groups. The top 10 most abundant bacterial species were selected for the statistical analysis of differences (Figure 6(b)). As compared to the control group, the relative abundances of Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Klebsiella in the surgery group significantly increased, while those of Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and Collinsella significantly decreased. Meanwhile, as compared to the surgery group, the relative abundance of Enterococcus in the surgery group significantly increased, while those of Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Megamonas, and Collinsella significantly decreased.

3.5. Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) Analysis of the Composition of Gut Microbiota in the Three Groups

In order to further explore the differences in the four groups of intestinal microbial communities, LEfSe analysis was performed, which showed that the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores were higher than 2.0. As shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b), the LEfSe analysis showed a significant difference between the control and abscess groups and the abscess and surgery groups. These differences should be focused on in the future.

(a)

(b)

Figure 7

Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis of the differences in the composition of gut microbiota composition between (a) control and abscess groups and (b) abscess and surgery groups. The different circle layers show evolutionary relationships among the six taxonomic levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species from the inside to the outside. The larger nodes of each level represent higher abundance of the species. The yellow and red nodes indicate the insignificant and significant differences of the species from the control group. The gates with significant differences are directly marked in the figure, and the species nodes with other different levels are marked with letters, which specifically represent species.

3.6. Random Forest Analysis

The random forest analysis at the genus level (Figure 8(a)) shows the difference contribution degree of microorganisms at the genus level among the control group, the abscess group and the surgery group. As shown in Figure 8(a), the heat map in the middle shows the change of microbial abundance at the TOP 100 genus level. It can be seen from the mean decrease accuracy on the right that seven microorganisms, Blautia, Anaerostipes, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Monolobus, Klebsiella, and Bilophila, also showed high differential contribution.

(a)

(b)

3.7. Screening of Biomarkers for Perianal Abscess

Using the LEfSe analysis for the control and abscess groups, a total of 10 different bacterial groups were screened at genus level as biomarkers for perianal abscess. At the same time, the sensitivity and accuracy of the 10 different bacterial groups were verified using ROC curve (Figure 8). The ROC curve determines the sensitivity of biomarkers through area under the curve (AUC). The results of the ROC curve showed that the AUCs of Klebsiella and Bilophila were 0.7467 and 0.72, respectively, among the seven genera and could be used as potential diagnostic markers for perianal abscesses.

3.8. Prediction of the Function of Gut Microbiota

The differences in the functions of gut microbiota between the control and abscess groups and abscess and surgery groups were analyzed using the PICRUSt2 software. As compared to the control group, the pathways, such as carbohydrate metabolism, plant-pathogen interaction, carbohydrate digestion and absorption, and vitamin B6 metabolism, were significantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the abscess group, which were closely related to the pathogenesis of perianal abscess (Figure 9(a)). In addition, after surgical treatment, as compared to the abscess group, the functions of gut microbiota in the surgery group were significantly enriched in thiamine metabolism, metabolism of xenobiology by cytochrome P450, ascorbate and aldate metabolism, drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, amino acid-related enzymes, lysine biosynthesis, aminobenzoate degradation, glutathione metabolism, and other pathways related to nutrient and drug metabolism (Figure 9(b)).

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

In this study, the gut microbiota of the healthy people and patients with perianal abscesses were studied before and after surgeries. Previous studies have shown that the gut microbiota plays an important role in intestinal diseases, such as enteritis and colon cancer, and is closely related to the physiological metabolism, inflammation, and immune response of the intestine [14, 26, 27]. Importantly, it was found in previous studies that the intestinal diseases are often accompanied by changes in the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota, indicating that each microorganism or the entire gut microbiota are the cause of intestinal diseases [13–15]. Anus is the gateway of digestive tract to the outside of body. Perianal abscesses might be related to gut microbiota. The studies on the microbiota around the anus are limited, and the data on the microbial abundance and diversity is not enough. Therefore, evaluating the abundance of microorganisms and determining their types, clarifying the role of gut microbiota in the occurrence and development of perianal abscesses, and enabling individualized treatment for the patients of perianal abscesses similar to cancer precision medicine are highly important.

In this study, significant changes in interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the blood of healthy subjects, patients with perianal abscesses, and patients after perianal abscess surgery were analyzed. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing results showed the changes in the gut microbiota between the healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries. Venn diagrams and α-diversities indicated the differences in the abundance and uniformity of gut microbiota between the healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries. In addition, β-diversity indicated that the grouping effects among the three groups were good. The analysis of the classification and composition of gut microbiota showed significant differences in that of healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries. In addition, LEfSe analysis was used to compare the differences in the gut microbiota between healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries. These differential gut microbiota at the genus level screened by the LEfSe analysis might be used as diagnostic markers for perianal abscess. Since the treatment effects on the patients with perianal abscess before and after surgeries were not evaluated, the gut microbiota that can evaluate the prognosis of patients with perianal abscess for ROC curve analysis were not screened. However, the differential microbiota in the patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries were selected using the LEfSe analysis, which might provide a reference for the postoperative treatment and medication of the patients with perianal abscesses.

In this study, a total of 7 gut microbial species were validated, which could differentiate the healthy individuals from the patients with perianal abscesses. The results of the random forest analysis and ROC curve analysis showed that the classification effects of Klebsiella and Bilophila were better. Klebsiella is a parasite of the respiratory tract or intestinal tract of animals and an opportunistic pathogen. It can cause human pneumonia and nosocomial bacterial infection [28]. A diversity study of Klebsiella oxytoca and related bacteria based on the publicly available shotgun metagenomic datasets suggested that approximately one in 10 neonatal stool samples contained Klebsiella spp. [29]. Another study showed that the high-alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was closely related to alcoholic fatty liver disease [30]. All these studies demonstrated the potential of using Klebsiella as a diagnostic marker for disease. Bilophila, as a sulfur-producing bacterium in the intestine, is also closely related to other intestinal diseases [31]. Studies have shown that some of the sulfur-producing bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Desulfovibrio, and Bilophila wadsworthia, affect the progression of colorectal cancer by producing hydrogen sulfide [32]. In addition, other studies have shown that Bilophila wadsworthia, which grows in foods containing red-processed meat proteins, can erode the mucus layer on the surface of colon, thereby allowing more bacterial flora to approach the lining cells and thus promote inflammation. Perianal abscess is closely related to inflammation [33]. Therefore, Bilophila might be used as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of perianal abscess.

In the postoperative treatment of perianal abscesses, some pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus, and other acquired resistant strains are frequently detected [34]. Therefore, it is particularly important to monitor the pathogenic organisms that may be present in the postoperative perianal abscess. In our results, the three microorganisms Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Bacteroides in the genus level after surgery for perianal abscess were dominant and differed significantly. Enterococcus cecorum, also a common hospital infection, was first found in the cecum of chickens [35]. Enterococcus was significantly elevated in the surgery group compared to the abscess group, suggesting that we should pay extra attention to the effects of Enterococcus after surgery for perianal abscess. The clinically isolated β-hemolytic streptococci and Streptococcus pyogenes of the genus Streptococcus are also common pathogenic bacteria that cause purulent infections [36]. In the results, Streptococcus was significantly higher in the surgery group compared to control. Therefore, we should also pay extra attention to Streptococcus in the postoperative treatment of perianal abscesses. Finally, Bacteroides decreased significantly in the surgery group compared to the abscess group. The effects of Bacteroides on the body are bidirectional [35]. Some beneficial Bacteroides are involved in the metabolic regulation of the body, but B. fragilis is the most common and often isolated from clinical specimens and is considered the most virulent Bacteroides [35]. Due to limitations in 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we were unable to accurately distinguish harmful bacteria in the genus Bacteroides. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the effects of harmful bacteria of the genus Streptococcus for the time being. These findings will guide postoperative antibiotic therapy for perianal abscesses.

The differences in the function of gut microbiota before and after surgery in the healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgeries were compared. As compared to the control group, the plant-pathogen interaction pathway was significantly enriched in the abscess group, which suggested that some pathogenic bacteria might be colonized in the intestines of the patients with perianal abscesses. In addition, a significant decrease in the abundance of gut microbiota enriched in metabolism-related pathways, such as carbohydrate metabolism, carbohydrate digestion, and absorption, and vitamin B6 metabolism indicated that the patients with perianal abscess might have a metabolic disorder, which was consistent with the results of a previous intestinal disease study [12].

At the same time, the functions of the different gut microbiota in the patients with perianal abscesses before and after surgery were also compared. Among them, as compared to the abscess group, the gut microbiota in the surgery group were significantly enriched in the drug metabolism-cytochrome P450 pathway. This result indicated that, after surgery, intestinal drug metabolism in the patients with perianal abscess might increase. This might also be related to the patient’s medication after surgery. It was worth noting that, as compared to the abscess group, the glutathione metabolism pathway in the surgery group was also significantly enriched. Glutathione helps in maintaining the normal functioning of immune system and has antioxidant and detoxifying effects. The changes in the concentration of glutathione in the intestines of patients with perianal abscess might be accompanied by the effects on the intestinal immune function and oxidative stress, which require further verification in future studies [37, 38]. In addition, the gut microbiota was differentially enriched in thiamine metabolism, metabolism of xenobiology by cytochrome P450, ascorbate and aldehyde metabolism, amino acid-related enzymes, lysine biosynthesis, and aminobenzoate degradation pathways, which also indicated the disorder of amino acid and thiamine metabolism in the patients with perianal abscess after surgery [39–41].

This study screened the differences in the gut microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with perianal abscess before and after surgeries and also screened the biomarker Bilophila for perianal abscess. However, more detailed aspects of these findings should be clarified in future studies, such as studying the effects of fecal transplantation or antibiotic intervention, in order to better characterize the differential gut microbiota and verify the biomarker Bilophila selected in this study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

The sponsors of the study were not involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

Yin H. and Shen B. conceived and designed the experiments; Luo B., Shen L., Wang Q., Hong Z., and Hu B. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Shen B. contributed materials for the research and supervised the research; Yin H. and Hu B. wrote the paper. Hezhai Yin and Bairu Luo have contributed equally to this work and therefore shared first authorship.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Med-Health Sci-Tech Planning Project of Zhejiang, China (grant no. 2022KY392 to Yin H), the Basic Public Welfare Planning Project of Zhejiang, China (grant no. LGF22H270005 to Yin H), the TCM Sci-Res Fund Project of Zhejiang, China (grant no. 2020ZB256 to Yin H), and the Sci-Tech Planning Project of Jiaxing, China (grant nos. 2022AD30111 to Shen L, 2019AD32046 to Shen B, and 2019AY32008 to Hu B). We apologize to all those researchers whose work could not be cited due to space limitations.

References

Y. S. Choi, D. S. Kim, D. H. Lee et al., “Clinical characteristics and incidence of perianal diseases in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Annals of Coloproctology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 138–143, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Wang, C. Cai, S. H. Q. Du JL, Q. W. Liu, Z. H. Dai, and Z. F. Zhong, “Role of interleukin-17 in the pathogenesis of perianal abscess and anal fistula: a clinical study on 50 patients with perianal abscess,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 244–247, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ikeda, R. Konaka, Y. Adachi et al., “Perianal abscess due to a long fish bone: a case report,” Journal of Surgical Case Reports, vol. 2021, no. 3, article rjab084, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sainio, “Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects,” Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 219–224, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
L. H. Zheng, A. Z. Zhang, Y. Y. Shi et al., “Impact of smoking on anal abscess and anal fistula diseases,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 1034–1037, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zanotti, C. Martinez-Puente, I. Pascual, M. Pascual, D. Herreros, and D. García-Olmo, “An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1459–1462, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Read and H. Abcarian, “A prospective survey of 474 patients with anorectal abscess,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 566–568, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shi, L. Zheng, X. Li et al., “Clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of loose combined cutting seton in the treatment of high perianal abscess: a randomized controlled trial protocol,” Annals of Translational Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 108, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. A. Khan, R. Patnaik, J. Y. Huang et al., “Leukopenia is an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications following incision and drainage of anorectal abscess,” Colorectal Disease, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Brook, “The role of anaerobic bacteria in cutaneous and soft tissue abscesses and infected cysts,” Anaerobe, vol. 13, no. 5-6, pp. 171–177, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lundqvist, I. Ahlberg, F. Hjalte, and M. Ekelund, “Direct and indirect costs for anal fistula in Sweden,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 35, pp. 129–133, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. T. Pham, S. Dold, A. Rehman, J. K. Bird, and R. E. Steinert, “Vitamins, the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal health in humans,” Nutrition Research, vol. 95, pp. 35–53, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Iebba, M. Nicoletti, and S. Schippa, “Gut microbiota and the immune system: an intimate partnership in health and disease,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 823–833, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yue, X. Luo, Z. Yu, S. Mani, Z. Wang, and W. Dou, “Inflammatory bowel disease: a potential result from the collusion between gut microbiota and mucosal immune system,” Microorganisms, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 440, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Magrone and E. Jirillo, “The interplay between the gut immune system and microbiota in health and disease: nutraceutical intervention for restoring intestinal homeostasis,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1329–1342, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
C. R. Shaler, A. A. Parco, W. Elhenawy et al., “Psychological stress impairs IL22-driven protective gut mucosal immunity against colonising pathobionts,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6664, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, J. Jing, L. Han et al., “Characterization of gut microbiota, metabolism and cytokines in benzene- induced hematopoietic damage,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 228, article 112956, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, H. Xu, H. Huang et al., “Are there potential applications of fecal microbiota transplantation beyond intestinal disorders?” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 3469754, 11 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ma, H. Lu, Z. Yang, L. Chen, Y. Li, and X. Zhang, “Differences in microbiota between acute and chronic perianal eczema,” Medicine, vol. 100, no. 16, article e25623, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. van Oostendorp, L. Dekker, S. van Dieren, W. A. Bemelman, and I. J. M. Han-Geurts, “Antibiotic Treatment foLlowing surgical drAinage of perianal abScess (ATLAS): protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial,” BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 11, article e067970, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gul, A. Faraz, M. Kalim, and M. F. Khan, “Perianal abscesses: a clinical experience in a tertiary care hospital,” Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Kelm, S. Kusan, G. Surat et al., “Disease- and medication-specific differences of the microbial spectrum in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease-relevant aspects for antibiotic therapy,” Biomedicines, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 2682, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
D. A. Schwartz, L. J. Ghazi, and M. Regueiro, “Guidelines for medical treatment of Crohn’s perianal fistulas,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 737–752, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. B. Gaertner, P. L. Burgess, J. S. Davids et al., “The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 964–985, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gao, L. Liu, C. Du, and Q. Hou, “Comparative analysis of fecal bacterial microbiota of six bird species,” Frontiers in Veterinary Science, vol. 8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yuan, B. Ma, J. Yu et al., “Fecal bacteria as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal adenocarcinoma,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bálint, K. Farkas, O. Méhi et al., “Functional anatomical changes in ulcerative colitis patients determine their gut microbiota composition and consequently the possible treatment outcome,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 346, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. P. Herridge, P. Shibu, J. O'Shea, T. C. Brook, and L. Hoyles, “Bacteriophages of Klebsiella spp., their diversity and potential therapeutic uses,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 176–194, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, T. C. Brook, C. Z. Soe et al., “Preterm infants harbour diverse Klebsiella populations, including atypical species that encode and produce an array of antimicrobial resistance- and virulence-associated factors,” Microbial Genomics, vol. 6, no. 6, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yuan, C. Chen, J. Cui et al., “Fatty liver disease caused by high-alcohol-producing _Klebsiella pneumoniae_,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 675–688.e7, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Walker and P. Schmitt-Kopplin, “The role of fecal sulfur metabolome in inflammatory bowel diseases,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 311, no. 5, article 151513, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Dahmus, D. L. Kotler, D. M. Kastenberg, and C. A. Kistler, “The gut microbiome and colorectal cancer: a review of bacterial pathogenesis,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 769–777, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. Ribaldone, R. Pellicano, and G. C. Actis, “Inflammation: a highly conserved, Janus-like phenomenon-a gastroenterologist' perspective,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 861–871, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bender, L. Eckerth, M. Fritzenwanker et al., “Drug resistant bacteria in perianal abscesses are frequent and relevant,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, article 14866, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Jung, L. R. Chen, M. M. Suyemoto, H. J. Barnes, and L. B. Borst, “A review of enterococcus cecorum infection in poultry,” Avian Diseases, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 261–271, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Takahashi, K. Ubukata, and H. Watanabe, “Invasive infection caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis: characteristics of strains and clinical features,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chen, F. Chen, J. Lei, and B. Zhou, “Gut microbial metabolite urolithin B attenuates intestinal immunity functionin vivoin aging mice andin vitroin HT29 cells by regulating oxidative stress and inflammatory signalling,” Food & Function, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 11938–11955, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wei, X. Liu, Y. Wang et al., “(-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate mitigates cyclophosphamide-induced intestinal injury by modulating the tight junctions, inflammation and dysbiosis in mice,” Food & Function, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 11671–11685, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chassaing, C. Compher, B. Bonhomme et al., “Randomized controlled-feeding study of dietary emulsifier carboxymethylcellulose reveals detrimental impacts on the gut microbiota and metabolome,” Gastroenterology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 743–756, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jia, M. Huang, L. Qian et al., “The depletion of carbohydrate metabolic genes in the gut microbiome contributes to the transition from central obesity to type 2 diabetes,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 12, article 747646, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Gebeyew, C. Yang, Z. He, and Z. Tan, “Low-protein diets supplemented with methionine and lysine alter the gut microbiota composition and improve the immune status of growing lambs,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 105, no. 21-22, pp. 8393–8410, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Hezhai Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

589

Downloads

370

Citations