The Role of TSLP in Atopic Dermatitis: From Pathogenetic Molecule to Therapeutical Target

Luo, Jialiang; Zhu, Zhengyumeng; Zhai, Yumeng; Zeng, Junxiang; Li, Lei; Wang, Di; Deng, Fan; Chang, Bo; Zhou, Jia; Sun, Ledong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7697699

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Innate Immune Regulation in Atopic Dermatitis

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 7697699 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7697699

The Role of TSLP in Atopic Dermatitis: From Pathogenetic Molecule to Therapeutical Target

Jialiang Luo,^1,2,3Zhengyumeng Zhu,^2,3Yumeng Zhai,¹Junxiang Zeng,⁴Lei Li,^2,3Di Wang,⁵Fan Deng,^2,3Bo Chang,²Jia Zhou,²and Ledong Sun¹

Academic Editor: Fumio Tsuji

Received18 Aug 2022

Revised25 Sept 2022

Accepted10 Oct 2022

Published15 Apr 2023

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a kind of chronic skin disease with inflammatory infiltration, characterized by skin barrier dysfunction, immune response dysregulation, and skin dysbiosis. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) acts as a regulator of immune response, positively associated with AD deterioration. Mainly secreted by keratinocytes, TSLP interacts with multiple immune cells (including dendritic cells, T cells, and mast cells), following induction of Th2-oriented immune response during the pathogenesis of AD. This article primarily focuses on the TSLP biological function, the relationship between TSLP and different cell populations, and the AD treatments targeting TSLP.

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most frequent chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin diseases, which is featured by intense itching along with various clinical symptoms and signs [1]. Over the past three decades, AD affects up to 20% of the population and children in particular among developed countries [2]. Recent study concerning the prevalence of AD in China found that 30.48% of infants and 12.94% of children under 7 years old suffer from AD [3]. Accompanied by persistent or recurrent scratching and inflammation, patients suffering from AD usually develop skin thickening and lichenification during the long-term disease course. Chronic itching of the skin is a characteristic symptom of AD, disturbing patients’ daily routines and life quality [4, 5].

The family history of AD or asthma and seasonal allergies is closely related with increased risk of AD in childhood [6, 7]. Apart from genetic disorders, the development of AD is involved with a series of relevant factors, including immune dysregulation, skin microbiota imbalance, epidermal barrier defect, and environmental stimuli (e.g., ambient allergens and stress) [8, 9]. AD as a type 2 immune response usually results in the inhibition of epidermal differentiation and elevation of skin permeability [10, 11]. Moreover, infiltration of inflammatory cell in AD lesional skin is typically featured by the presence of various T cell subpopulations and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), prompting a T helper (Th) type 2-predominant inflammation [12, 13]. Keratinocytes, as the largest quantity of cell in epidermis, are serving a significant role in promoting AD proinflammatory environment [14]. Thus, these cells together secrete abundant chemokines, antimicrobial peptides, and cytokines, such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin- (IL-) 25, IL-33 that drives the infiltration of both innate immune cells (e.g., ILCs and mast cells), and T cells in AD lesional skin [15].

Emerging evidence has revealed TSLP induces Th2-type immune responses via activation of DCs and mast cells; therefore, TSLP is considered as a key molecular in AD physiopathology [16]. In this review, we focus on the role of TSLP associated with different cells during AD pathogenesis and discuss the potential TSLP-targeting AD treatments.

2. Overview of TSLP

TSLP was first found in the supernatants of a murine thymic stromal cell line in 1994 [17] and was identified as an epithelial cell-derived cytokine that supports proliferation and development of immature B cell [18, 19]. TSLP, a member of the 4-helix bundle cytokine family, is a paralog of IL-7, sharing an overlapping, but distinct biological profile [20]. The human TSLP gene is located on chromosome 5q22.1, while the mouse TSLP gene is located on chromosome 18 [21]. TSLP binds to TSLPR (TSLP receptor) heterodimeric receptor complex that consists of the TSLPR and the IL-7 receptor α-chain (IL-7Rα) so as to get involved with biological activities. According to sequence analysis, TSLPR is closely related to the common receptor-γ chain (γc) [22]. Interestingly, sole TSLPR has low affinity for TSLP, while TSLPR combined with IL-7Rα induces high affinity for TSLP and triggers subsequent signaling transduction. Amino acid sequence revealed that the identity of TSLP between murine and human is 43% and TSLPR is 39%, suggesting TSLP and TLPLR are homologous between human and mouse [22, 23].

The biological role of TSLP-TSLPR axis is rather conserved in human and mice. On the one hand, TSLP is similar to IL-7 that not only activates the same transcription factor, signal transducer, and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) but also induces common genes expression. On the other hand, the mechanisms in STAT5 activation are distinctly different between TSLP and IL-7 [24]. Isaksen et al. applied overexpression of kinase-deficient Jak1 in HepG2 which proved that Jak1 is necessary for IL-7-mediated signaling, but not for TSLP-mediated signaling [25].

TSLP is abundantly expressed in the skin, intestine, thymus, lung, and tonsils. TSLP is found in epithelial cells, stromal cells, dendritic cells, and mast cells [26, 27] but is hardly found in hematopoietic cell types and not in endothelial cells [28]. Confrontation with viruses, bacteria, parasites, or TLR (Toll-like receptors) agonists can potently elevate TSLP expression [29–31], but the underlying regulation mechanism remains unknown. Previous study has provided the first evidence of pathogenic stimulation in TSLP induction that human primary small airway epithelial cells remarkedly release TSLP after stimulation of peptidoglycan (a component of Gram-positive bacteria wall) [32]. Additionally, rhinovirus, as one of the most common respiratory viruses, was found to stimulate TLR3 and subsequently elevate TSLP expression in airway epithelial cells [30]. After exposure to proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) and TLR ligands (TLR2, TLR8, and TLR9), gene expression of TLSP is increased in both human and mouse airway epithelial cells [31]. The expression of TSLP is significantly induced by Th2 cytokines (e.g., IL-4 and IL-13) and TLR3 ligand via NF-κB and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) signaling through TLR3 in human airway epithelial cells [30]. Apart from epithelial cells, TSLP expression is upregulated by IL-1β and TNF-α in human airway smooth muscle cells [33]. TNF-α, TLR3, and TLR4 ligands also increased TSLP in synovial fibroblasts isolated from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients [34, 35]. Allakhverdi et al. reported that TSLP expression is boosted in epithelial cells after damage or trauma [32]. What is more, both in vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated that notch-deficient skin keratinocytes lead to persistent defect in skin differentiation/barrier formation which subsequently release high levels of TSLP into circulation system [36]. Of note, poly I:C (a TLR-3 ligand)-activated human keratinocytes decrease the release of TSLP after interferon-γ (IFN-γ), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and IL-17 treatment [37].

3. TSLP Role during AD Pathogenesis

TSLP has become as an important factor positively correlated with AD. Serum TSLP levels in adults and children with AD are significantly higher compared to those in healthy people [38, 39]. In addition, rising studies have demonstrated that polymorphisms of the TSLP gene are closely associated with the enhanced risk of AD development and progression. According to a study concerning variants in TSLP and its receptors, a significant association was observed between five TSLP single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and AD, among which three is found in European American populations (rs1898671, rs11466749, and rs2416259) and two is found in African American populations (rs10043985 and rs2289276). Besides, Gao et al. also found that several IL7R-SNPs and TSLPR-SNPs are closely related with AD [40].

3.1. TSLP and Keratinocytes

Keratinocytes are the most abundant cells located in epidermis, serving a significant role in promoting AD [41]. TSLP is highly expressed by keratinocytes in skin lesions of both acute and chronic AD patients. However, TSLP is not found in nonlesional skin in AD patients and lesions of nickel-induced allergy contact dermatitis or cutaneous lupus erythematosus patients [42]. In vitro experiments demonstrated that the TSLP expression is significantly elevated in TNF-α-inflamed HaCaT [43] and ploy (I:C)-induced NHEK cells [44]. Recent studies hinted that keratinocyte-expressed TSLP is upregulated via TLR [45] and histamine 4 receptor [46] while negatively regulated through glucocorticoid receptor [47] and aryl hydrocarbon receptor [48]. Furthermore, Yoo et al. engineered a kind of transgenic mice (K5-TLSP transgenic mice) that overexpress tetracycline-inducible TSLP in keratinocytes under the control of the keratin 5 promotor [49]. Consistent with the previous in vitro findings, skin-specific overexpression of TSLP spontaneously leads to an AD-like phenotype, accompanied with an increase of inflammatory cell infiltration in eczematous lesions, elevated frequency of CD4⁺ Th2-expressing cutaneous homing receptors, and higher levels of IgE in serum in comparison with WT littermates [50]. Their findings indicated that overexpression of TSLP in epithelial cells likely stands for as an early event in allergic inflammation. Of note, TSLP expression in epidermal keratinocytes is necessary for the development of AD-like dermatitis induced by topical application of active vitamin D3 analogue (MC903, an analogue of vitamin D to induce AD-like lesions) [51, 52]. Li et al. unequivocally demonstrated that after the ablation of TSLP in keratinocytes, mice showed neither skin lesions nor infiltration cells and inflammatory cytokines in comparison to WT littermates challenged with MC903 [52].

3.2. TSLP and Dendritic Cells (DCs)

It is well known that DCs play a pivotal role in the immunologic cascade, prompting the AD initiation and development. Allergens commonly stimulate DCs through the binding of FcεRI via specific IgE, subsequently driving Th2 polarization along with dominant secretion of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 during AD acute phase [53]. It is reported that TSLP participated in Langerhans cell (LC) migration and activation, implying TSLP as an activator of DC-oriented allergic inflammation in the early stage [54]. Even though DCs are thought to be closely related with AD, direct evidence demonstrating the exact role of DCs in TSLP-induced inflammatory skin remained to be confirmed in the future. Previous study has found that TSLP positively contributes to the maturation of CD11c⁺ DCs and the production of CC chemokines (e.g., thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and macrophage-derived chemokine) by CD11c⁺ subpopulation of DCs to attract Th2 cells [55]. Elentner et al. demonstrated that neither AD-like inflammation was developed nor the level of IgE in serum was upregulated in epidermal LC-depleted mice treated with MC903 in comparison to C57BL/6 mice treated with MC903. Accordingly, they found that the expression of maturation markers by LCs is evidently increased in mice treated with MC903 or in K14-TSLP transgenic mice [56]. It is worthwhile to mention that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) apparently serves as an important downregulating factor against TSLP-initiated immune responses through inhibiting DC functions and TSLP production in NC/Tnd mice [57]. Furthermore, TSLP is inclined to upregulate the expression of OX40 ligand on DC cell membrane which interacts with OX40 expressed on activated naive T cells to subsequently induce the elevated expression of IL-4 and IL-13 while decreased expression of IFN-γ from T cells [50, 58, 59]. TSLP-stimulated DCs also orchestrate the homeostatic expansion of allergen-specific Th2 memory cells as well as prompt the Th2 phenotype polarization via interaction with OX40L [60, 61], thus contributing to the maintenance of chronic allergy-related inflammation.

3.3. TSLP and T Cells

In vitro experiments have exhibited that mouse TSLP serves as a potent cytokine to support T cell growth. The association between TSLP and T cell lymphopoiesis was further supported by the evidence that γc/TSLPR double-deficient mice developed significantly severe hindrance concerning T cell development compared with γc single-deficient mice [62]. In line with this finding, transgenic mice with overexpressed TSLP recover T cell normal development in IL-7^-/- mice [63]. However, it should be noted that both the T cell development and T cell populations’ distribution display normal status in TSLPR^-/- mice, implying T cell development not strictly dependent on the TSLP-TSLPR pathway under normal conditions [64].

Previous studies have uncovered the biological function of TSLP to induce Th2 differentiation due to the direct interaction on CD4⁺ T cells in mice. Omori and Ziegler found that TSLP preferentially contributes to Th2 cell differentiation from naïve CD4⁺ T cells due to the induction of IL-4 expression in CD4⁺ T cell without the presence of the addition of IL-4 and antigen presenting cells. Thus, the blocking of IL-4 suppresses TSLP-induced Th2 polarization [50]. Additionally, TSLP directly acts on antigen-stimulated CD4⁺ T cells and promotes the upregulation of Th2 cytokine. It is evidenced by the observation that human TSLP not only contributes to the activation and differentiation of CD8⁺ T cells into cytotoxic T cells but also acts as a survival factor for CD8⁺ T cells [65]. What is more, TSLP can also directly interact with TSLPR expressed on TCR-activated human and murine CD8⁺ T cells, thus boosting CD8⁺ T cell survival and inducing the expression of antiapoptotic protein, Bcl-2, while hardly exerting function on CD8⁺ T cell homeostatic proliferation [66].

3.4. TSLP and Other Immune Cell Populations

Beside from the discussion of TSLP with keratinocytes, DCs, and T cells, TSLP is also closely associated with other immune cell populations. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that skin inflammatory infiltration cells, including mast cells and eosinophils, are remarkedly increased accompanied with skin epidermal thickening in the K5-TSLP transgenic mice with TCRβ^-/- background [49]. In vitro experiments found that the proinflammatory Th2 cytokines, including IL-5, IL-6, and IL-13 produced and secreted by human mast cells, are attributed to the synergistical stimulation of TSLP, IL-1β, and TNF-α [32]. What is more, the addition of TSLP with bone marrow progenitor cells for 4 weeks supports mast cell proliferation and differentiation [67]. Recent study elucidated that TSLP promotes the degranulation of skin mast cells which is significantly dependent on STAT5 and contributed by JNK activity [68]. In turn, mast cells are capable of regulating the epithelial TSLP expression via FcεRI during allergic rhinitis development [69].

The elevation of TSLP expression mediates eosinophils, DCs, and mast cells in MC903-induced RAG^-/- mice. Single TSLP treatment can increase the migration of eosinophil, and the combination of TSLP with other cytokines can further enhance eosinophil migration via the phosphorylation of L-plastin [70].

TSLP has been found to promote basophil hematopoiesis, when cultured with bone marrow progenitor cells for 5 days. TSLP is capable of maturing a functionally distinct basophil subgroup without strictly requiring IgE. In addition, TSLP-induced basophils would release IL-4, thus triggering the Th2 response and accelerating AD progression [71, 72].

ILC2s, as one of the ILC subsets, are distributed in healthy human skin and found abundantly enriched in lesional skin of people suffering with AD [73]. In AD murine model induced by MC903, ILC2s play a significant role in the skin inflammation development [74]. A recent study has discovered that TSLP and IL-33 reciprocally promote each other’s protein expression, thereby further enhancing ILC2 activation and expansion during innate allergic airway inflammation [75].

4. Targeting TSLP Treatment in AD Patients

As described, accumulating evidence indicated that TSLP is a key molecule in the pathogenesis of AD. Released by epidermal keratinocytes due to a series of stimulation, TSLP promotes Th2 responses as well as the pathway for pruritus via interacting with a subpopulation of sensory neurons. Thus, TSLP is a promising therapeutic target for ameliorating or preventing AD progression. Tezepelumab (AMG-157/MEDI9929) is an IgG2λ human monoclonal antibody with the aim at circulating TSLP. In terms of mechanism, tezepelumab binds to the TSLP receptor, which therefore interferes the interaction of TSLP with its receptor and ultimately blocks the downstream inflammatory pathways. Tezepelumab has conducted the phase 1 clinical trial (NCT00757042) and phase 2a (NCT02525094) randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled studies in AD patients.

In the phase 2a trial, 113 patients with moderate to severe AD were randomized 1 : 1 at first, following either subcutaneous tezepelumab (280 mg) combined with class 3 topical corticosteroids (TCS) treatment or a placebo combined with TCS treatment every 2 weeks [76]. At week 12, the percentage of EASI-50 (a 50% decrease in the Eczema Area and Severity Index) was evaluated, and the results showed that patients in tezepelumab combined with TCS group exhibited a greater percentage of EASI-50 compared to the placebo combined with TCS group (64.7% vs. 48.2%; ). Moreover, multiple improvements were observed among patients at clinical endpoint, and biomarker-defined subgroups displayed greater efficacy of tezepelumab, indicating the potential benefits of TSLP blocking in treating AD patients. Nevertheless, no statistically significant improvements were achieved, including EASI50 response, 1EASI75 response, and pruritus numeric rating scale. Apart from efficacy verification, researchers also evaluated the safety of tezepelumab that the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between two treatment groups. This clinical trial explored a potential agent to ameliorate AD, but with limited samples. In the light of the critical role of TSLP in AD pathogenesis in the previous preclinical studies, more clinical studies with tezepelumab application are required to confirm these findings in the phase 2a trial. Besides, a phase 2b trial of tezepelumab enlisted AD patients to further testify the safety and effectiveness of tezepelumab as monotherapy and adjunct therapy in combination with TCS (NCT03809663) [77]. It is worthwhile to mention that another TSLP-targeting drug, MK-8226, was conducted in a phase 1b trial (NCT01732510) but was hauled on the halfway of the trial without statistic recorded [73]. Beside from clinical trial in treating AD, tezepelumab has completed phase 2 clinical trial in patients with asthma (NCT02054130) and has two ongoing phase 3 trials in patients with uncontrolled, severe asthma [78]. What is more, CSJ 117 which is an anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab) has completed a 3-month phase 1 trial (NCT03138811) among patients suffering with mild asthma [73]. In conclusion, although there is no clinical trial supporting the efficacy of TSLP-targeting drugs against AD at present, new agents targeting TSLP or TSLPR in the future are still expected highly.

5. Conclusion and Prospect

The association between TSLP and AD has been confirmed by rising evidence. The SNPs of TSLP gene are positively correlated with the high occurrence of AD among people. The current available evidence proves that the overexpression of TSLP in keratinocytes deteriorates AD-like lesions in mice, while ablation of AD impedes the development of AD. As TSLP is involved with numerous cell populations during AD (Figure 1), TSLP not only promotes Th2 response through mediating DC-Th2 axis during the induction phase but also elicits activated T cells and the secretion of Th2 cytokines during the effector phase. Further investigations on TSLP will have a better understanding of its biological function on AD and related allergic diseases. To date, the common therapy against AD in clinic consists of moisturization, topical and systemic application of corticosteroids, and application of calcineurin inhibitors. Since numerous basic studies have suggested TSLP is a promising therapeutic target against AD and other allergic diseases, further clinical trials are required to validate whether TSLP-targeting therapies could prevent the progression of AD, which is expected to improve AD patients’ quality of daily life and alleviate AD-related allergic disorders.

Data Availability

No original data were used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Jialiang Luo proposed and wrote the manuscript. Jialiang Luo, Zhengyumeng Zhu, Yumeng Zhai, Junxiang Zeng, Lei Li, Di Wang, Fan Deng, and Bo Chang collected and analyzed the literature. Ledong Sun, Jia Zhou, and Jialiang Luo supervised the conception and writing of the article. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971550), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515012437), Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province in China (20131161), and President Foundation of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (YZ2022QN01).

References

H. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Guo, and Z. Yao, “Update on the pathogenesis and therapy of atopic dermatitis,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 324–338, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bieber, “Atopic dermatitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 14, pp. 1483–1494, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, P. Li, J. Tang et al., “Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Chinese children aged 1-7 ys,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 29751, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Silverberg, J. M. Gelfand, D. J. Margolis et al., “Patient burden and quality of life in atopic dermatitis in US adults: a population-based cross-sectional study,” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 340–347, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chrostowska-Plak, A. Reich, and J. C. Szepietowski, “Relationship between itch and psychological status of patients with atopic dermatitis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. e239–e242, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. F. Eichenfield, W. L. Tom, S. L. Chamlin et al., “Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 338–351, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Y. Leung and T. Bieber, “Atopic dermatitis,” Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9352, pp. 151–160, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakatsuji and R. L. Gallo, “The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis,” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Yang, J. K. Seok, H. C. Kang, Y. Y. Cho, H. S. Lee, and J. Y. Lee, “Skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunction in atopic dermatitis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 2867, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Luger, M. Amagai, B. Dreno et al., “Atopic dermatitis: role of the skin barrier, environment, microbiome, and therapeutic agents,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 142–157, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Humeau, K. Boniface, and C. Bodet, “Cytokine-mediated crosstalk between keratinocytes and T cells in atopic dermatitis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 13, article 801579, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Kader, M. Azeem, S. A. Jwayed et al., “Current insights into immunology and novel therapeutics of atopic dermatitis,” Cell, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 1392, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Alkon, W. M. Bauer, T. Krausgruber et al., “Single-cell analysis reveals innate lymphoid cell lineage infidelity in atopic dermatitis,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 624–639, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gallegos-Alcala, M. Jimenez, D. Cervantes-Garcia, and E. Salinas, “The keratinocyte as a crucial cell in the predisposition, onset, progression, therapy and study of the atopic dermatitis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 19, article 10661, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Roan, K. Obata-Ninomiya, and S. F. Ziegler, “Epithelial cell-derived cytokines: more than just signaling the alarm,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1441–1451, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Wang and Y. J. Liu, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin, OX40-ligand, and interleukin-25 in allergic responses,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 798–806, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Friend, S. Hosier, A. Nelson, D. Foxworthe, D. E. Williams, and A. Farr, “A thymic stromal cell line supports in vitro development of surface IgM+ B cells and produces a novel growth factor affecting B and T lineage cells,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 321–328, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
R. J. Ray, C. Furlonger, D. E. Williams, and C. J. Paige, “Characterization of thymic stromal-derived lymphopoietin (TSLP) in murine B cell development in vitro,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Levin, R. M. Koelling, S. L. Friend et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin: a cytokine that promotes the development of IgM+ B cells in vitro and signals via a novel mechanism,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, pp. 677–683, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Sims, D. E. Williams, P. J. Morrissey et al., “Molecular cloning and biological characterization of a novel murine lymphoid growth factor,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 671–680, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Quentmeier, H. G. Drexler, D. Fleckenstein et al., “Cloning of human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and signaling mechanisms leading to proliferation,” Leukemia, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1286–1292, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Park, U. Martin, K. Garka et al., “Cloning of the murine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor: formation of a functional heteromeric complex requires interleukin 7 receptor,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 659–670, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pandey, K. Ozaki, H. Baumann et al., “Cloning of a receptor subunit required for signaling by thymic stromal lymphopoietin,” Nature Immunology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Rochman, M. Kashyap, G. W. Robinson et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation via kinases JAK1 and JAK2 reveals a key difference from IL-7-induced signaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 45, pp. 19455–19460, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Isaksen, H. Baumann, P. A. Trobridge, A. G. Farr, S. D. Levin, and S. F. Ziegler, “Requirement for stat5 in thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated signal transduction,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 163, pp. 5971–5977, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Kashyap, Y. Rochman, R. Spolski, L. Samsel, and W. J. Leonard, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is produced by dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 1207–1211, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. He and R. S. Geha, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1183, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rimoldi, M. Chieppa, V. Salucci et al., “Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 507–514, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Miazgowicz, M. S. Elliott, J. S. Debley, and S. F. Ziegler, “Respiratory syncytial virus induces functional thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor in airway epithelial cells,” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. 6, pp. 53–61, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kato, S. J. Favoreto, P. C. Avila, and R. P. Schleimer, “TLR3- and Th2 cytokine-dependent production of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in human airway epithelial cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 1080–1087, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Lee and S. F. Ziegler, “Inducible expression of the proallergic cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin in airway epithelial cells is controlled by NFkappaB,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 914–919, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Allakhverdi, M. R. Comeau, H. K. Jessup et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is released by human epithelial cells in response to microbes, trauma, or inflammation and potently activates mast cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zhang, L. Shan, M. S. Rahman, H. Unruh, A. J. Halayko, and A. S. Gounni, “Constitutive and inducible thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in human airway smooth muscle cells: role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. L375–L382, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Koyama, T. Ozawa, K. Hatsushika et al., “A possible role for TSLP in inflammatory arthritis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ozawa, K. Koyama, T. Ando et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin secretion of synovial fibroblasts is positively and negatively regulated by toll-like receptors/nuclear factor-kappaB pathway and interferon-gamma/dexamethasone,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 459–463, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Demehri, Z. Liu, J. Lee et al., “Notch-deficient skin induces a lethal systemic B-lymphoproliferative disorder by secreting TSLP, a sentinel for epidermal integrity,” PLoS Biology, vol. 6, no. 5, article e123, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kinoshita, T. Takai, T. A. Le et al., “Cytokine milieu modulates release of thymic stromal lymphopoietin from human keratinocytes stimulated with double-stranded RNA,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 179–186, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Nygaard, M. Hvid, C. Johansen et al., “TSLP, IL-31, IL-33 and sST2 are new biomarkers in endophenotypic profiling of adult and childhood atopic dermatitis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1930–1938, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Lee, K. W. Kim, J. Y. Hong, H. M. Jee, M. H. Sohn, and K. E. Kim, “Increased serum thymic stromal lymphopoietin in children with atopic dermatitis,” Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, vol. 21, no. 2p2, pp. e457–e460, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Gao, N. M. Rafaels, D. Mu et al., “Genetic variants in thymic stromal lymphopoietin are associated with atopic dermatitis and eczema herpeticum,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 1403–1407.e4, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chieosilapatham, C. Kiatsurayanon, Y. Umehara et al., “Keratinocytes: innate immune cells in atopic dermatitis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 296–309, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Soumelis, P. A. Reche, H. Kanzler et al., “Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell-mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 673–680, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yeo, Y. H. Lee, S. S. Ahn, E. Jung, Y. Lim, and S. Y. Shin, “Chrysin inhibits TNFα-induced TSLP expression through downregulation of EGR1 expression in keratinocytes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 4350, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Qiao, T. Jia, H. Gu, R. Guo, K. Kaku, and W. Wu, “A novel effect of lipids extracted from vernix caseosa on regulation of filaggrin expression in human epidermal keratinocytes,” Annals of Dermatology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 611–620, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xie, T. Takai, X. Chen, K. Okumura, and H. Ogawa, “Long _TSLP_ transcript expression and release of TSLP induced by TLR ligands and cytokines in human keratinocytes,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schaper, K. Rossbach, B. Kother et al., “Stimulation of the histamine 4 receptor upregulates thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in human and murine keratinocytes,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 113, no. Part A, pp. 209–215, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jeong, H. J. Chong, J. So, Y. Jo, T. Y. Yune, and B. G. Ju, “Ghrelin represses thymic stromal tymphopoietin gene expression through activation of glucocorticoid receptor and protein kinase C delta in inflamed skin keratinocytes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3977, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jeong, J. Y. Shin, M. J. Kim, J. Na, and B. G. Ju, “Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor negatively regulates thymic stromal lymphopoietin gene expression via protein kinase Cδ-p300-NF-κB pathway in keratinocytes under inflammatory conditions,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1098–1109, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yoo, M. Omori, D. Gyarmati et al., “Spontaneous atopic dermatitis in mice expressing an inducible thymic stromal lymphopoietin transgene specifically in the skin,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 4, pp. 541–549, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Omori and S. Ziegler, “Induction of IL-4 expression in CD4(+) T cells by thymic stromal lymphopoietin,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 3, pp. 1396–1404, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, P. Hener, Z. Zhang, S. Kato, D. Metzger, and P. Chambon, “Topical vitamin D3 and low-calcemic analogs induce thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mouse keratinocytes and trigger an atopic dermatitis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 31, pp. 11736–11741, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, P. Hener, Z. Zhang, K. P. Ganti, D. Metzger, and P. Chambon, “Induction of thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in keratinocytes is necessary for generating an atopic dermatitis upon application of the active vitamin D3 analogue MC903 on mouse skin,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 498–502, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Novak, R. Valenta, B. Bohle et al., “FcεRI engagement of Langerhans cell-like dendritic cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cell-like dendritic cells induces chemotactic signals and different T-cell phenotypes in vitro,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 949–957, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Liu, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin: master switch for allergic inflammation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 269–273, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Reche, V. Soumelis, D. M. Gorman et al., “Human thymic stromal lymphopoietin preferentially stimulates myeloid cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 336–343, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Elentner, D. Finke, M. Schmuth et al., “Langerhans cells are critical in the development of atopic dermatitis-like inflammation and symptoms in mice,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 8b, pp. 2658–2672, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Jung, A. Tanaka, H. Fujita et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-mediated suppression of dendritic cell function prevents the onset of atopic dermatitis in NC/Tnd mice,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, pp. 420–429, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ito, Y. H. Wang, O. Duramad et al., “TSLP-activated dendritic cells induce an inflammatory T helper type 2 cell response through OX40 ligand,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 9, pp. 1213–1223, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Jenkins, G. Perona-Wright, A. G. Worsley, N. Ishii, and A. S. MacDonald, “Dendritic cell expression of OX40 ligand acts as a costimulatory, not polarizing, signal for optimal Th2 priming and memory induction in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 6, pp. 3515–3523, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Wang, T. Ito, Y. H. Wang et al., “Maintenance and polarization of human T_H2 central memory T cells by thymic stromal lymphopoietin-activated dendritic cells,” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 827–838, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Murakami-Satsutani, T. Ito, T. Nakanishi et al., “IL-33 promotes the induction and maintenance of Th2 immune responses by enhancing the function of OX40 ligand,” Allergology International, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 443–455, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Al-Shami, R. Spolski, J. Kelly et al., “A role for thymic stromal lymphopoietin in CD4(+) T cell development,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chappaz, L. Flueck, A. G. Farr, A. G. Rolink, and D. Finke, “Increased TSLP availability restores T- and B-cell compartments in adult IL-7 deficient mice,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 12, pp. 3862–3870, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Ziegler and Y. J. Liu, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin in normal and pathogenic T cell development and function,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 709–714, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gilliet, V. Soumelis, N. Watanabe et al., “Human dendritic cells activated by TSLP and CD40L induce proallergic cytotoxic T cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 8, pp. 1059–1063, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Rochman and W. J. Leonard, “The role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in CD8+ T cell homeostasis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 7699–7705, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. Han, H. A. Oh, S. Y. Nam et al., “TSLP induces mast cell development and aggravates allergic reactions through the activation of MDM2 and STAT6,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 134, no. 10, pp. 2521–2530, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Babina, Z. Wang, K. Franke, and T. Zuberbier, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin promotes MRGPRX2-triggered degranulation of skin mast cells in a STAT5-dependent manner with further support from JNK,” Cell, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 102, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Miyata, K. Hatsushika, T. Ando et al., “Mast cell regulation of epithelial TSLP expression plays an important role in the development of allergic rhinitis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1487–1492, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Noh, J. U. Shin, C. O. Park et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin regulates eosinophil migration via phosphorylation of l-plastin in atopic dermatitis,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 880–886, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Siracusa, S. A. Saenz, D. A. Hill et al., “TSLP promotes interleukin-3-independent basophil haematopoiesis and type 2 inflammation,” Nature, vol. 477, no. 7363, pp. 229–233, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hou, M. S. Tsang, L. L. Kan et al., “IL-37 targets TSLP-primed basophils to alleviate atopic dermatitis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 7393, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nakajima, H. Kabata, K. Kabashima, and K. Asano, “Anti-TSLP antibodies: targeting a master regulator of type 2 immune responses,” Allergology International, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 197–203, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Kim, M. C. Siracusa, S. A. Saenz et al., “TSLP elicits IL-33-independent innate lymphoid cell responses to promote skin inflammation,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 170, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Toki, K. Goleniewska, J. Zhang et al., “TSLP and IL-33 reciprocally promote each other's lung protein expression and ILC2 receptor expression to enhance innate type-2 airway inflammation,” Allergy, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1606–1617, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Simpson, J. R. Parnes, D. She et al., “Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized phase 2a clinical trial,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1013–1021, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ratchataswan, T. M. Banzon, J. P. Thyssen, S. Weidinger, E. Guttman-Yassky, and W. Phipatanakul, “Biologics for treatment of atopic dermatitis: current status and future prospect,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1053–1065, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Corren, J. R. Parnes, L. Wang et al., “Tezepelumab in adults with uncontrolled asthma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, no. 10, pp. 936–946, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Jialiang Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

801

Downloads

692

Citations